Administrative Evil dalam Administrasi Publik / Video Pembelajaran Interaktif

Summary

The concept of 'administrative evil' in public administration explores how bureaucratic actions, while legally legitimate, can cause significant harm to society. Developed by Goy Adams and Denny L. Balfor, this concept emphasizes the abuse of power, hidden unethical practices, and systemic impacts. It highlights the role of complex structures, lack of transparency, and weak accountability in fostering these issues. To address administrative evil, the script advocates for ethical training, transparency, public awareness, and organizational reforms, emphasizing that public administration should prioritize human welfare and social justice over rigid rule-following.

Takeaways

• 😀 Administrative Evil refers to the harmful social impacts that can arise from bureaucratic systems, which appear legal, formal, and procedural.
• 😀 It was introduced by Goy Adams and Denny L. Balfor in their 1998 book *Unmasking Administrative Evil*.
• 😀 Despite being legally sound, bureaucratic actions can create severe societal harm due to a lack of ethical awareness and accountability.
• 😀 The three key characteristics of Administrative Evil are abuse of authority, hidden actions behind bureaucracy, and systemic damage that affects society as a whole.
• 😀 Bureaucrats often face ethical dilemmas between following rigid rules and considering the human consequences of their decisions.
• 😀 Lack of transparency, weak accountability, and hierarchical bureaucracy can facilitate the emergence of administrative evil.
• 😀 Technological advancements, such as digital data manipulation, can further exacerbate administrative evil when not properly controlled.
• 😀 Administrative Evil can result from dehumanization, where decisions are made based on statistics rather than human impact.
• 😀 Addressing Administrative Evil requires increased ethical awareness through training, improved transparency, and public engagement in decision-making.
• 😀 Reforming bureaucratic structures through decentralization, simplifying procedures, and strengthening independent oversight can help reduce the occurrence of administrative evil.
• 😀 Public administration should prioritize human welfare over mere rule-following, ensuring that administrators combine technical competence with ethical integrity and empathy.

Q & A

What is 'administrative evil' in public administration?

Administrative evil refers to harmful social outcomes that arise from bureaucratic practices that appear legal, procedural, and formal but lead to negative consequences. It highlights the hidden dangers within systems that seem legitimate but can cause significant harm to society.

Who developed the concept of administrative evil, and when?

The concept of administrative evil was developed by Goy Adams and Denny L. Balfor in their 1998 book titled *Unmasking Administrative Evil*.

What is the fundamental question posed by Adams and Balfor in their work?

Adams and Balfor's fundamental question is: 'How can actions that are formally legal and performed by state officials, who appear to be following the rules, result in serious social harm?'

What are the key characteristics of administrative evil?

The key characteristics of administrative evil are: 1) abuse of power, 2) invisibility behind administrative procedures, and 3) systemic impact that causes dysfunction not just for individuals but for entire institutions or society.

How does administrative evil differ from overt criminal behavior?

Administrative evil is not immediately visible as a crime because it is masked by legal procedures, regulations, and bureaucratic structures, whereas overt criminal behavior is direct and explicit.

What ethical dilemmas do public administrators face that could lead to administrative evil?

Public administrators face dilemmas such as weak accountability mechanisms, difficult choices between strict rule-following and flexible decision-making for the public good, and conflicts of interest that may lead to administrative evil if not handled with integrity.

What conditions facilitate the emergence of administrative evil in bureaucratic systems?

Conditions that facilitate administrative evil include complex bureaucratic structures, lack of transparency, weak internal controls, and overemphasis on technical compliance at the expense of human-centered values.

How can technology contribute to administrative evil in the digital age?

In the digital age, technology can enable administrative evil through manipulated data, such as falsified attendance reports or altered electronic documents, especially when proper supervision and security measures are lacking.

What steps can be taken to combat administrative evil?

To combat administrative evil, we need to raise ethical awareness through training, increase transparency in administrative processes, launch public campaigns to raise awareness, and adopt a human-centered approach in public administration.

What structural reforms can help prevent administrative evil in public administration?

Structural reforms include developing independent oversight mechanisms, decentralizing power to prevent its concentration, simplifying administrative procedures to reduce opportunities for corruption, and promoting organizational culture change to emphasize accountability and ethical behavior.