🚨BREAKING: Shedeur Sanders ENTIRE OFFENSIVE LINE WAIVED & CONFIRMS Browns SABOTAGED Him In Rams Game

Summary

In this video, Mad Dog TV critiques the Cleveland Browns' handling of Shadur Sanders' preseason performance, questioning the legitimacy of his quarterback battle. He argues that Sanders was set up for failure with subpar offensive linemen and a lack of support from key players, some of whom were waived immediately after the game. Mad Dog TV emphasizes that while Sanders had some mistakes, the conditions were stacked against him. He highlights the discrepancies in roster decisions and contrasts Sanders' situation with other quarterbacks, challenging viewers to rethink the fairness of the competition.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker criticizes Coach Kevin Stefanski's claim that Shadour Sanders wasn't sabotaged, calling it BS.
• 😀 Four of the five offensive linemen who were blocking for Shadour Sanders were waived within 24 hours, raising concerns about the team's commitment to him.
• 😀 Sanders’ tight end, S. Canela, was also waived shortly after, further indicating a lack of support for Sanders.
• 😀 The speaker argues that Sanders was placed in a tough situation, akin to being in a gunfight with a slingshot, implying the team set him up to fail.
• 😀 Despite Sanders' struggles, the speaker defends him, stating that Sanders had limited support and was trying to compete for a spot.
• 😀 The speaker points out the lack of reps with the first and second teams for Sanders, questioning the legitimacy of the quarterback competition.
• 😀 A comparison is made with other quarterbacks like Dylan Gabriel, Joe Flacco, and Kenny Pickett, questioning why they remain on the roster despite not playing.
• 😀 The speaker emphasizes that providing receipts (factual evidence) is a key part of their commentary, as opposed to simply offering opinions.
• 😀 The speaker defends Sanders’ potential, stating that he's not a quarterback who should be judged by a bad game but is legendary and will get his opportunity.
• 😀 The speaker encourages viewers to voice their opinions in the comments, like the video, subscribe, and turn on notifications for future content.

Q & A

Why does Mad Dog TV call Kevin Stefanski's statement about not sabotaging Shadour Sanders BS?

Mad Dog TV calls it BS because he believes that the Cleveland Browns did not provide Shadour Sanders with the proper support. Specifically, four out of five of the offensive linemen blocking for Sanders were waived, which Mad Dog argues made it difficult for Sanders to perform well.

What reason does Mad Dog TV give for Shadour Sanders' poor performance in the game?

Mad Dog acknowledges that Sanders missed some plays, but he points out that the lack of support—particularly from the offensive line—was a major factor in his poor performance. He also mentions that Sanders was trying to compete for a job, which may have led to him holding the ball too long at times.

Why were four of the five offensive linemen waived after the game?

Mad Dog TV suggests that the waiving of four of the five offensive linemen was part of a deliberate effort to set up Shadour Sanders to fail. He implies that the Browns didn't want Sanders to succeed in the quarterback competition.

How does Mad Dog TV describe the support Shadour Sanders had from his teammates?

Mad Dog TV believes that Shadour Sanders had little to no support, citing the waiving of his offensive line and tight end. He argues that this lack of support made it impossible for Sanders to succeed in the quarterback battle.

What does Mad Dog TV mean by 'they literally wanted Shadour Sanders to fail'?

Mad Dog TV implies that the Cleveland Browns intentionally set up a situation where Shadour Sanders had no chance of succeeding. He points to the lack of quality teammates, particularly the offensive line, and suggests that this was a deliberate move to undermine Sanders.

Why does Mad Dog TV question the legitimacy of the quarterback battle?

Mad Dog TV questions the legitimacy of the quarterback battle because he believes that Shadour Sanders was not given a fair chance. Specifically, he mentions that Sanders didn't receive reps with the first or second team, and points out that other quarterbacks like Dylan Gabriel did not face the same obstacles.

What other quarterbacks does Mad Dog TV compare Shadour Sanders to?

Mad Dog TV compares Shadour Sanders to Dylan Gabriel and Joe Flacco. He highlights that Gabriel did not run with the fourth or fifth team, and Flacco, despite not playing in any preseason games, remains on the roster ahead of Sanders.

What is Mad Dog TV's stance on providing receipts for his claims?

Mad Dog TV stresses the importance of backing up opinions with concrete evidence. He prefers to provide receipts—i.e., clear, verifiable facts—to support his claims, rather than just offering his personal opinion without any evidence.

How does Mad Dog TV feel about Shadour Sanders' potential despite the lack of support?

Mad Dog TV believes that Shadour Sanders is a talented quarterback who is destined for success. He praises Sanders for maintaining a positive attitude in press conferences and for his legendary potential, which Mad Dog believes will eventually lead to an opportunity.

What does Mad Dog TV imply about the media's portrayal of the quarterback battle?

Mad Dog TV suggests that mainstream media outlets like NFL Network and ESPN cover up the true details of the situation. He believes they fail to report on the lack of support for Sanders, instead simply stating that Dylan Gabriel outshone him, without providing context about the circumstances surrounding Sanders' performance.