MAHASISWA DEMO BERUJUNG DROP OUT !!!

Summary

In this video, Rizal, a student from the Faculty of Engineering at Andi Djemma University, shares insights into the recent student-led occupation of the rectorate building. The protest stemmed from demands for reduced tuition fees due to the pandemic, support for flood victims, financial transparency, and the removal of the Vice Chancellor. Despite facing obstacles, including heavy rain and lack of response from the university leadership, the students persisted in their efforts for over a month. Rizal emphasizes the importance of student activism and the pursuit of a more transparent and accountable academic environment.

Takeaways

• 😀 The video features an interview with Rizal, a student from Andi Djemma University, who discusses a month-long protest involving the occupation of the university's rectorate building.
• 😀 The primary reason for the protest was a set of demands including a reduction in tuition fees, financial transparency, and relief for students affected by flash floods in North Luwu Regency.
• 😀 The protest stemmed from frustrations over tuition fees during the pandemic, which remained high despite the reduced use of university facilities.
• 😀 One of the key demands was a 50% reduction in tuition fees, though the university leadership only approved a 30% reduction for seven study programs.
• 😀 Students also demanded free education for those impacted by the flash floods in North Luwu, as a humanitarian gesture.
• 😀 Another major demand was financial transparency from the university, as students expressed concerns over poor financial management by the administration.
• 😀 The protest was marked by intense actions, including a one-month occupation of the rectorate building, during which students faced harsh weather conditions but continued to press for dialogue with the university leadership.
• 😀 The university leadership failed to meet the protestors' demands and did not engage in meaningful dialogue, leading to further disillusionment among the students.
• 😀 The video also highlighted the disappointment of students when they were accused of misconduct and faced disciplinary actions, without a clear explanation or opportunity to defend themselves.
• 😀 Rizal emphasized the importance of students having a voice in campus politics and the necessity of critical thinking, urging fellow students to continue fighting for their rights if policies remain oppressive.

Q & A

What prompted the students to protest and occupy the rectorate building?

The students protested due to various demands, including a reduction in tuition fees, financial transparency, and support for students affected by flooding in North Luwu Regency. They also sought the removal of the Vice Chancellor.

What were the main demands of the students during the protest?

The main demands included a reduction in tuition fees, free education for students impacted by floods, financial transparency from the university, and the removal of the Vice Chancellor.

Why did the students call for a reduction in tuition fees?

The students called for a reduction in tuition fees due to the financial crisis caused by the pandemic, which led to economic hardships for many families, including the students. They argued that university expenses had decreased as classes shifted online and facilities were underused.

What was the outcome of the discussions regarding the reduction of tuition fees?

After discussions, the university leadership recommended a 30% reduction in tuition fees, but the foundation only approved a 7% reduction for certain study programs, which was a disappointment to the students.

What role did the flooding in North Luwu Regency play in the students' demands?

The students sought free tuition for students affected by the flash floods in North Luwu Regency as part of their humanitarian efforts. They emphasized the importance of supporting students in disaster-affected areas.

How did the university respond to the students' demands for financial transparency?

The university did not meet the students' demands for financial transparency, as the Vice Chancellor in charge of finance was unresponsive, leading to further frustration among the students.

What happened during the occupation of the rectorate building?

The students occupied the rectorate building for about a month in an attempt to meet with the Rector and push for their demands. Despite their efforts, the Rector did not engage in discussions with them, which led to further dissatisfaction.

How did the university administration respond to the students occupying the rectorate building?

The university administration failed to meet the students' demands during the occupation. Promises to discuss the issues were not fulfilled, and the students were met with indifference and lack of communication from the administration.

What is the significance of the Vice Chancellor’s role in the protests?

The Vice Chancellor, particularly in charge of financial management, was seen as failing to address the students' concerns regarding financial transparency. His lack of response to their requests was a key issue that fueled the protests.

What was the students' reaction to the lack of disciplinary procedures during the protest?

The students were disappointed by the lack of a formal process to address their actions. Despite the protest being a peaceful occupation with no violence, the university did not provide a space for students to defend themselves or explain their actions before disciplinary measures were taken.