Video 1.1 Materi Rendah Hati

Summary

The transcript captures a conversation among students working on an academic assignment, discussing their progress, feedback from a professor, and the challenges they face in perfecting their articles. The students navigate their revisions and concerns about their writing, particularly focusing on how to make their arguments more coherent and accessible. Throughout the dialogue, there is a mix of uncertainty, learning from feedback, and determination to improve the work before submission. The interactions reflect common student experiences with academic pressure and the process of refining a project.

Takeaways

• 😀 The conversation revolves around preparing for an article task, discussing the writing process, and seeking feedback from the professor.
• 😀 One individual expresses concern about making mistakes in their article, fearing the professor's critique.
• 😀 There's a discussion about the importance of presenting ideas clearly, even if they are initially unconventional or daring.
• 😀 The idea of sending a well-written article early is discussed, with one person believing their article could be perfect without revisions.
• 😀 Despite initial concerns, the person eventually completes the article, feeling confident about its quality.
• 😀 The feedback session reveals that while the article is good, certain paragraphs lack coherence and need improvement.
• 😀 The professor suggests improving the article’s flow by adding supporting facts or theories between certain paragraphs.
• 😀 Some fear of reaching out to the professor arises due to the differing responses and concern about finding the right time to communicate.
• 😀 A second feedback session focuses on the language used in the article, with the professor suggesting simplifications to avoid ambiguity and make it more accessible to a wider audience.
• 😀 There is tension between sticking to technical language for expert readers and making the article more digestible for the general public.
• 😀 The process of revising and adapting the article continues, with a sense of frustration over the need for more adjustments despite thorough research.

Q & A

What task is the person working on throughout the transcript?

The person is working on an article that needs to be submitted as part of an assignment, which involves discussion and revision with their professor.

What is the main concern the person has regarding their article?

The main concern is that their article might contain mistakes, and they worry about how their professor will respond to it during discussions or feedback sessions.

What role does the professor play in the person's task?

The professor reviews the article, provides feedback for improvements, and guides the student on how to refine their work for better clarity and coherence.

What suggestion does the professor give regarding the article's structure?

The professor suggests adding a theory or fact between two paragraphs to make the argument more coherent, as the current transition feels disjointed.

Why does the person feel nervous about submitting the article?

The person feels nervous because they fear their professor will find mistakes or issues in the article, leading to further revisions and critiques.

How does the person handle the revision process after receiving feedback?

The person revises the article based on the feedback received, although they feel frustrated when their revisions are not perfect or are further questioned by the professor.

What was the reaction of the professor to the initial submission of the article?

The professor acknowledged the submission but noted that the language used was too hyperbolic, and that some analogies should be simplified to avoid confusion.

What does the professor recommend regarding the tone and style of the article?

The professor recommends simplifying the language and analogies to make the article more accessible to a wider audience, especially considering it might be published in the media.

How does the person feel about simplifying the language in the article?

The person is reluctant to simplify the language, as they believe it would make the article feel too basic and less impactful, despite the professor's advice.

How does the interaction between the student and professor highlight the process of academic writing?

The interaction shows that academic writing involves multiple revisions, feedback, and careful consideration of audience and clarity. The professor's input helps refine the article, but the student must balance their own ideas with constructive criticism.