State of Tech 2025: Coding is Dead, H1B's, Bitcoin.

Summary

In 2025, the speaker argues that learning to code is becoming increasingly irrelevant due to AI, outsourcing, and the global labor market. Traditional STEM careers, particularly in programming, face significant challenges, with the speaker criticizing the U.S. education system for focusing on diversity rather than technical skills. Rather than pursuing outdated tech careers, the speaker advocates for focusing on media, digital assets, and Bitcoin as the future of wealth and influence. With a global financial shift towards stablecoins and cryptocurrency, the speaker suggests Americans can still succeed by embracing these emerging opportunities.

Takeaways

• 😀 Technology and coding careers are facing an uncertain future due to competition from AI and cheaper foreign labor.
• 🌍 Globalization and outsourcing are creating an increasingly difficult job market for American programmers.
• 💡 STEM education in the U.S. has deteriorated, and there’s a significant gap between American and foreign students' capabilities.
• 💼 The job market is evolving, and traditional tech roles may no longer offer the same security or opportunities.
• 📉 H1B visa issues and outsourcing continue to fuel debate over protecting American jobs versus accelerating technological progress.
• 🔧 America's education system needs a major overhaul to prepare future generations for the high-tech job market.
• 🛠 Many countries, especially in Asia, have a stronger STEM foundation, making it harder for American workers to compete.
• 💥 The tech industry is stagnating, with no major new breakthroughs to justify the high valuations of tech companies.
• 📲 The U.S. should shift focus from traditional STEM careers to global media influence and digital assets like Bitcoin for future success.
• 🌐 Media companies, especially in advertising and global content, hold more power than tech companies in the current global landscape.
• 💰 Bitcoin and stablecoins are positioned to become the backbone of the global financial system, offering a new path to prosperity for those who invest early.

Q & A

Why does the speaker claim that learning to code in 2025 is not viable?

The speaker argues that due to factors like cheap foreign labor, AI bots, and outsourcing, learning to code in 2025 is unlikely to secure a sustainable job. They suggest that competition from global labor markets and technological automation makes coding a less viable career path.

What is the speaker's view on the H1B visa issue and its impact on the American job market?

The speaker criticizes the H1B visa program, describing it as a contributor to outsourcing jobs and lowering wages in the U.S. They highlight that even if immigration policies are adjusted, global labor markets and companies will continue to find ways to hire cheaper labor overseas.

How does the speaker perceive the current state of the American education system?

The speaker believes that the U.S. education system has deteriorated, particularly due to the Department of Education's policies. They argue that students are no longer being taught necessary STEM skills, and as a result, the upcoming generation is ill-prepared for tech or engineering jobs.

What is the speaker's opinion on the importance of STEM education in America?

While STEM education was previously instrumental in America's success, the speaker argues that it is no longer crucial for future success. They suggest that other skills, such as media influence and entrepreneurship, are more relevant in the current global economy.

What does the speaker say about the future of technological industries like AI, Quantum Computing, and semiconductors?

The speaker is pessimistic about the future of these industries in the U.S., arguing that technological advancements in fields like AI and Quantum Computing will be heavily restricted due to geopolitical factors. They also suggest that other countries, especially in Asia, are ahead in tech development.

How does the speaker compare the contributions of individuals like Kim Kardashian and Taylor Swift to the U.S. economy versus STEM professionals?

The speaker humorously contrasts media figures like Kim Kardashian and Taylor Swift, who contribute significantly to the U.S. GDP through their global influence, with STEM professionals whose work is seen as having less immediate economic impact, despite their technical skills.

What is the speaker's perspective on the U.S. culture's approach to tech and science?

The speaker criticizes U.S. culture for not valuing technical professions or intellectual pursuits, pointing out that celebrities and social media influencers are celebrated more than scientists, engineers, or tech innovators.

Why does the speaker believe the U.S. can still win in the global economy without focusing on tech?

The speaker suggests that while the U.S. may no longer be a tech powerhouse, it still holds an advantage in media influence and digital assets. They argue that global media control and the rise of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin present significant opportunities for America to thrive.

How does the speaker view the role of Bitcoin and stablecoins in the global economy?

The speaker believes that Bitcoin and stablecoins are crucial to the future of the global financial system. They argue that dominating these digital assets will allow the U.S. to strengthen its position in international trade and secure its financial future.

What advice does the speaker offer to those looking to succeed in 2025?

The speaker advises focusing on global opportunities in media and digital assets, particularly Bitcoin and stablecoins, rather than pursuing traditional tech careers or STEM degrees. They believe these sectors offer a more realistic path to success in the evolving global economy.