i just got banned from indonesia

Summary

The speaker recounts his legal land purchase in Bali and the subsequent media and government backlash that followed a lawsuit he filed against a land seller accused of fraud. Despite acquiring the land through legal leasehold rights, the speaker's reputation was targeted through manipulated media stories. He highlights his contributions to the local economy and expresses frustration over being publicly humiliated and banned from Indonesia. The speaker calls for an investigation into corruption and urges the Indonesian people to seek the truth and restore his reputation, emphasizing his commitment to integrity and inspiring others through his entrepreneurial journey.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker was banned from Indonesia after attempting to resolve legal issues regarding a land purchase.
• 😀 The land purchase was made through a legal leasehold agreement, which is common in many countries for foreign investors.
• 😀 The speaker emphasized that using the term 'purchase' led to misunderstandings, with the media portraying it as an illegal transaction.
• 😀 The speaker's reputation was targeted by a coordinated media campaign, with false and out-of-context stories being spread to discredit him.
• 😀 The speaker spent millions of dollars legally investing in Bali and creating jobs for the local community, which the media ignored or misrepresented.
• 😀 The Indonesian government publicly humiliated the speaker, accusing him of owning nothing, despite him providing evidence of his legal investments.
• 😀 The media focused on the negative aspects of the speaker's story while ignoring his positive contributions to Bali, including his restaurant Penny Lane.
• 😀 The speaker pointed out the hypocrisy of the media's and government's focus on him, while the person who allegedly defrauded the government remains unpunished.
• 😀 The speaker clarified that he made his wealth outside of Bali and that his investments in Indonesia make up a small part of his net worth.
• 😀 Despite the challenges and media attacks, the speaker expressed his continued love and respect for Indonesia and its people, urging them to stand against corruption.

Q & A

What led to the individual's ban from Indonesia?

The individual was banned after filing a lawsuit against a man who allegedly defrauded them in a land deal. Media outlets then published numerous negative articles and videos, which led to public humiliation and a government statement declaring they owned nothing.

Why was the land acquisition in Bali controversial?

The controversy stemmed from the individual using the word 'purchase' to describe acquiring land, while in reality, they legally acquired leasehold rights, which is common for foreign investors in Indonesia. This misunderstanding was amplified by media attacks.

What was the nature of the legal issues surrounding the land deal?

The individual discovered that the man they bought the land from was involved in tax fraud by allegedly underreporting the sale price to reduce taxes owed to the Indonesian government, which prompted the lawsuit.

How did the media handle the individual's story?

The media orchestrated a targeted campaign against the individual by taking their statements out of context. They used an old video where the individual mentioned a 'land purchase,' ignoring that the land was legally acquired through a leasehold agreement.

What impact did the media's actions have on the individual's reputation?

The media's actions severely damaged the individual's reputation by spreading false information. They were accused of lying about owning land and businesses, which led to public shaming and even a government ban, despite evidence proving otherwise.

How does the individual compare their situation to property laws in other countries?

The individual compares their leasehold acquisition in Bali to similar systems in countries like China, Australia, and the UK, where leasehold properties are common. They argue that there was no difference in principle, but the media unfairly targeted them for this legal transaction.

What is the significance of the individual’s business ventures in Bali?

The individual owns Penny Lane, a successful restaurant in Bali that generates substantial revenue and provides jobs to local families. However, media claims about their ownership of the business were misleading, despite the individual’s documented financial involvement.

What motivated the individual to make the video and address the issue publicly?

The individual felt compelled to defend their reputation, clear up misconceptions, and expose the corruption and targeted media attacks. They also wanted to use their platform to inspire others by showing that success is possible, even coming from humble beginnings.

How does the individual view the government’s actions in this situation?

The individual expresses frustration with the Indonesian government's involvement, particularly their public statements declaring the individual owned nothing and banning them from the country. They believe the government failed to verify the facts before taking such drastic actions.

What does the individual hope for in the future regarding this situation?

The individual hopes that the Indonesian system will properly investigate the facts and address the corruption they believe is at play. They trust the Indonesian people to recognize the truth and stand against media manipulation and corruption.