Judge the Validity of Evidence Listened to|| GRADE 9|| MELC-based VIDEO LESSON | QUARTER 3| MODULE 3
Summary
TLDRThis English lesson focuses on teaching grade 9 learners how to judge the validity of evidence. The video emphasizes the importance of listening skills to gather and analyze information. It defines evidence and its types, which include testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and illogical evidence. The teacher provides tips for validating evidence, such as checking the credentials of the source, considering the publication date, looking for biases, and examining the evidence cited by the author. The lesson aims to equip students with the ability to discern credible information and make informed decisions based on valid evidence.
Takeaways
- 📚 **Understanding Validity**: Validity is defined as being factually sound, legally binding, or acceptable. It's crucial to judge the validity of evidence to make informed decisions.
- 🧐 **Skills for Judgment**: To judge the validity of evidence, one must employ various skills, including understanding the text and leveraging prior knowledge or experiences.
- 👂 **Listening Skills**: Listening is vital for gathering information. Effective listening involves concentration, analysis, and memory of the message.
- 🔍 **Extracting Information**: To assess validity, one must extract both supporting and opposing opinions and evidence presented about an issue.
- 🗣️ **Types of Evidence**: Evidence can be testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, or based on similarity (illogical), each with its own strengths and weaknesses.
- ⚖️ **Importance of Validity**: The quality of information varies, and determining the validity of evidence is as important as the quality of research in academic papers.
- 🏷️ **Credentials of the Source**: The credibility of the source is key. Check if the person is an expert in the field and consider their educational background.
- 📅 **Publication Date**: The recency of the source matters, especially for current topics. Older sources may still be relevant for historical context.
- 🤔 **Checking for Bias**: Be aware of potential biases in the source. An objective source should present balanced views and not favor one side excessively.
- 📚 **Citing Evidence**: Authors who list their sources, particularly recent studies or well-known authorities, are generally more credible.
- 🔎 **Author's Evidence**: Scrutinize the author's evidence to ensure it is specific and not taken out of context to support a biased thesis.
- 🌟 **Continual Learning**: The video encourages ongoing learning and subscribing for more tutorials to improve English proficiency quickly.
Q & A
What is the main topic of the video?
-The main topic of the video is teaching viewers how to judge the validity of evidence.
What is the definition of validity according to the Oxford Language Dictionary?
-Validity is defined as the quality of being factually sound, the state of being legally or officially binding, or acceptable.
What are the four types of evidence mentioned in the video?
-The four types of evidence mentioned are testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and illogical.
Why is listening considered an important skill in gathering information?
-Listening is important because it allows one to concentrate on hearing and understanding the message, analyze it, and remember it, which is crucial for determining the validity of the presented information.
How can one determine if the evidence presented is valid?
-One can determine the validity of evidence by examining the credentials of the source, considering the publication date, checking for biases, and looking at the author's evidence.
What should one consider when checking the credentials of a source?
-One should consider whether the person is qualified to speak on the issue, their expertise in the field, educational background, and if it's a written text, the writer or reporter's credentials.
Why is the publication date important when validating evidence?
-The publication date is important because it can indicate the currency and relevance of the information, with more recent publications generally being more reliable for current topics.
What is the role of biases in validating evidence?
-Biases can affect the objectivity of a source. It's important to check if the source presents a balanced view or if it favors one side, as this can influence the validity of the evidence.
How can one tell if an author is credible based on their evidence?
-An author is generally more credible if they cite specific studies or well-known authorities, particularly if they reference recent studies, and if they list their sources.
What is the importance of determining the validity and reliability of evidence?
-Determining the validity and reliability of evidence is important because it ensures the information used is accurate and trustworthy, which is crucial for making informed decisions or forming beliefs.
What does the video suggest for further learning?
-The video suggests subscribing and turning on notifications for more video tutorials to learn English more effectively.
Outlines
📚 Understanding Evidence Validity
This paragraph introduces the topic of the video, which is about judging the validity of evidence for grade 9 learners. The English teacher, Nihuan, emphasizes the importance of this skill and encourages students to like, comment, and subscribe for more educational content. The paragraph defines validity as being factually sound, legally binding, or acceptable, and outlines the need for various skills and understanding to make a correct judgment. It also mentions the role of prior knowledge and experiences in evaluating evidence. The teacher highlights listening as a crucial skill for gathering information and understanding the writer's message, and discusses the importance of extracting supporting and opposing opinions to determine the validity of the presented evidence. The paragraph concludes by defining evidence and its types, which include testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and illogical evidence.
🕵️♂️ Validating Evidence: Criteria and Tips
The second paragraph delves into the specifics of validating evidence. It begins by discussing the credentials of the source, questioning whether the person is an expert in the field and considering their educational background. The paragraph also advises checking the publication date, suggesting that for current subjects, books published within the last 10 years are preferable, while for historical topics, older books may still be relevant. The importance of checking for biases in the source is emphasized, as a biased source may only present one side of an argument. The paragraph also advises checking the evidence cited by the author, as authors who list their sources and reference recent studies or well-known authorities are generally more credible. However, it cautions that a biased author may use biased sources or take information out of context. The paragraph concludes with a prompt for the viewers to reflect on what they have learned and an invitation to subscribe for more English learning content, ending the lesson on a friendly note.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Validity
💡English Teacher
💡Learning Competency
💡Listening
💡Supporting and Opposing Cons
💡Evidence
💡Testimonial Evidence
💡Statistical Evidence
💡Anecdotal Evidence
💡Credentials of the Source
💡Publication Date
Highlights
Today's video is about how to judge the validity of evidence
Validating evidence requires various skills and understanding of the text
Prior knowledge or experiences can help in making a correct judgment
Listening is the most important skill to gather information
To be an effective listener, you must concentrate, analyze and remember the message
Extract supporting and opposing opinions about the issue to determine validity
Evidence is the available body of facts or information indicating truth or validity
Types of evidence: testimonial, statistical, anecdotal, and illogical
Testimonial evidence is statements of truth made under oath in a court
Statistical evidence is results from research or surveys based on probability
Anecdotal evidence relies on personal testimony and informal collection
Illogical evidence is based on the idea of similarity between things
Determining evidence validity is important due to varying quality of information
Consider the credentials of the source when validating evidence
Check the publication date, preferably books published in the last 10 years
Look for biases in the source to ensure objectivity
Check if the author cites specific studies or evidence to back up assertions
Consider the author's evidence and whether it is biased or taken out of context
The video provides practical tips on evaluating evidence in an engaging way
Transcripts
time check
it's english o'clock
[Music]
english teacher nihuan
[Music]
i made learning english easy for you
please like comment and subscribe
hello there grade 9 learners your
english teacher is back
today we will be talking about how to
judge the validity of an evidence
let's begin
our target most essential learning
competency for this video is
judge the validity of the evidence
listened to
[Music]
oxford language dictionary defines
validity as the quality or being
factually sound the state of being
legally or officially binding or
acceptable
to judge the validity of the evidence
listened to you need to employ various
skills and understanding of the text
your values prior knowledge or schema or
experiences may help you arrive with a
correct judgment
in some cases you will be forced to make
decisions or make a stand about an issue
or to judge the validity of the evidence
you heard from an issue
[Music]
listening is probably the most important
skill you should possess in order to
gather information
to be an effective listener you must
concentrate on hearing and understanding
the message
analyzing the message and then
remembering the message
to know if the information presented by
the writer is valid or not you need to
extract the supporting prose and
opposing cons opinions about the issue
isa
[Music]
both sides have their own opinions and
evidence to present their stand
now the information they present may
influence you to believe certain ideas
and push you to take some form of action
the question is
how to determine if valid and evidence
that were presented
before that let us define first evidence
and its types
what is evidence
evidence is the available body of facts
or information indicating whether a
belief or proposition is true or valid
sa tagalog ito
ebidensia
[Music]
these are the types of evidence
testimonial
statistical
anecdotal
and illogical
isa is
[Music]
testimonial evidence
this are statements of truth from a
certain person made under oath in a
court or testimonies offered to prove
the truth of the matter
statistical evidence
these are the result of researches or
surveys that can never be proven because
of probability or likelihood which is
from random sampling
anecdotal evidence
this are collected in a casual or
informal manner and relying heavily or
entirely on personal testimony
and a logical or a specific way of
thinking
it is based on the idea that two or more
things are similar in some aspects in
that there is a tendency that they are
also similar in other aspects
now
why is it important to determine whether
the evidence you listen to is valid or
reliable
just as the quality of research in
student papers varies so does the
quality of information in many sources
here are some tips you may consider when
validating evidence
credentials of the source
is the person qualified to say something
about a certain issue
is he an expert in that particular field
you may also want to consider his or her
educational background
or if it is a written text or a news
report you may check on the writer or
the reporter's credentials
publication date it's a good idea to
look for books published in the last 10
years
on some topics for example
shakespeare the middle ages world war ii
it's okay to use books 25 or 50 years
old
for a subject that's current let's say
climate change or the internet a 25 year
old book would be usable only in certain
circumstances like exploring early
theories and solutions or studying the
ideas leading up to the most recent
thoughts on your topic
[Music]
check four biases
is the book an objective source on the
subject
does it look at both sides of an
argument or is it biased in favor of one
side only
information in a biased source may still
be useful
but the author may be overstating
benefits overlooking negatives or
otherwise reflecting only one side of an
argument
for example
if the author thanks people for the
ethical treatment of animals or peta in
the acknowledgements of a book on
veganism the author may be biased toward
convincing people to avoid animal
products for ethical reasons rather than
reasons based on health or environmental
damage
check the evidence
an author may cite specific studies or
other evidence to back up his or her
assertions
authors who list their sources are
generally more credible particularly if
they reference recent studies or
well-known authorities
however use your judgment
a biased author may have found biased
sources
and or may have taken information out of
context to support a thesis
look at the author's evidence
does the author cite specific evidence
to back up his or her assertions
so did you learn something today
if you want more of this video tutorial
and learn english in a light speed
walk kalimu tang muk subscribe and turn
on a notification button
updated
lessons
an english teacher in iwan
class dismissed
see ya
[Music]
関連動画をさらに表示
AP Seminar: Incorporating Evidence
SBCS Inference: Singapore as a Port City (Sec 1 History)
Understanding 'Levels of Evidence' - What are Levels of Evidence?
BAB 3. PART 1 BERPIKIR KRITIS DAN DAMPAK SOSIAL INFORMATIKA. PENGANTAR BERPIKIR KRITIS. FASE F SMA.
English 10 Quarter 1 Module 7: Making Judgments about a Range of Texts
EVIDENCE BASE MEDICINE( EBM)
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)