Entitled Sovereign Citizen "BLACK ISRAELITE" Fake J3W SHUTDOWN (Judge Oakley) SovCit #moor #moorish

Summary

In a courtroom session with Judge Oakley, Naji Goodman, a self-proclaimed sovereign citizen, challenges the court's authority, claiming exemption from the law due to his alleged status as an Israelite. Despite his insistence on representing himself and his misunderstandings of legal principles, the judge maintains that the court's authority comes from constitutional law, not personal consent. The hearing highlights Goodman's confusion as he struggles to articulate his points, leading to interruptions and misunderstandings. Ultimately, Judge Oakley sets a date for Goodman to file a motion, emphasizing the necessity of following legal procedures.

Takeaways

• 👨‍⚖️ A man named Naji Goodman claims he is exempt from the law due to his self-proclaimed sovereign status as a Black Israelite.
• ⚖️ The court operates under constitutional authority, not the personal consent or fictional contracts asserted by sovereign citizens.
• 📜 Power of attorney is a legal document that grants one person authority over another's affairs, which Goodman incorrectly believes is necessary for the court's jurisdiction over him.
• 🚫 The judge, Judge Oakley, firmly rejects Goodman's arguments and maintains court procedures despite his claims.
• 🗣️ Goodman insists he represents himself, emphasizing his identity as an Israelite and his lack of connection to capitalized names.
• 🔄 The court proceedings highlight a misunderstanding of legal terminology and concepts by Goodman, reflecting common beliefs held by sovereign citizens.
• 💼 Goodman has several pending legal issues, including a domestic violence case, for which he claims he has no legal representation.
• 🏛️ The judge sets a date for Goodman to file a motion, illustrating the procedural steps the court must follow despite his objections.
• 💸 There are discussions regarding Goodman's bond and financial means, indicating his precarious situation and challenges in navigating the legal system.
• 👥 The interaction serves as a cautionary example of how individuals misinterpret legal frameworks, which can complicate their cases and understanding of the law.

Q & A

What is Naji Goodman claiming in court?

Naji Goodman claims that he is exempt from the laws that govern other citizens because he identifies as a sovereign citizen and an Israelite, asserting that he does not need to prove his legal status to the court.

What does Goodman say about power of attorney?

Goodman insists that the court must prove it has power of attorney over him in order to have any authority in his case, which is a misunderstanding of how court authority works.

How does Judge Oakley respond to Goodman's claims?

Judge Oakley remains patient but firm, clarifying that the court derives its authority from the Constitution and legal statutes, not from personal consent or power of attorney.

What does Goodman express about his rights?

Goodman expresses a desire to have all his rights intact at all times, indicating his belief that his sovereignty protects him from legal processes.

What is the judge's stance on Goodman representing himself?

The judge acknowledges Goodman's desire to represent himself but emphasizes the importance of understanding the legal proceedings and the implications of doing so.

What does Goodman say about his legal documents?

Goodman references having an authenticated birth certificate and a letter of intent, which he believes support his claims of sovereignty and legal status.

What are the consequences Goodman faces in court?

Goodman faces potential legal repercussions for his claims, including the need to file motions and adhere to bond conditions set by the court.

What is the significance of the bond amount mentioned?

The bond amount is significant as it reflects the court's assessment of Goodman’s past behavior and the seriousness of his legal issues, which include felony charges and a history of not appearing in court.

How does Goodman perceive the legal process?

Goodman views the legal process as a form of contract where he believes he has the right to refuse the court's authority unless proper documentation is presented.

What is the overarching theme of Goodman's argument in court?

The overarching theme is the clash between Goodman's beliefs about sovereignty and the legal realities of court authority, highlighting misunderstandings surrounding legal rights and responsibilities.