BRICS | A Global Power Bloc?
Summary
TLDRThis video discusses the growing significance of the BRICS group as a potential challenger to Western dominance in international relations. Initially formed by Brazil, Russia, India, and China, and later expanding to nine members, BRICS is seen by some as an emerging global power bloc. However, the group faces challenges due to political, economic, and ideological differences among its members. While BRICS holds potential to influence global affairs, its cohesion and relevance remain limited, raising doubts about its ability to rival the West in shaping international policies.
Takeaways
- 🌍 The BRICS group, initially comprising Brazil, Russia, India, and China, was formed as an emerging counterweight to Western global dominance.
- 🛠️ In 2010, South Africa joined the group, turning BRIC into BRICS, solidifying its presence as a global economic and political entity.
- 🏦 The BRICS established the New Development Bank in 2014, as an alternative to Western-dominated financial institutions like the World Bank and IMF.
- 🌐 BRICS members cover 31% of the world’s landmass and include 45% of the world’s population, with a combined GDP of 30% of the world’s total.
- 📈 BRICS has expanded, with Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and others joining or showing interest, which could increase its influence in global affairs.
- 🤔 Despite its growing size, BRICS lacks internal cohesion due to political, economic, and cultural differences, notably between members like China and India.
- 💥 Many BRICS members hold differing positions on major global issues, such as Russia's war in Ukraine or relations with Israel, limiting their ability to present a unified front.
- 🤝 BRICS calls for reforms to multilateral organizations like the UN, World Bank, and IMF, resonating with many developing nations that feel underrepresented.
- ⚖️ While seen as an alternative bloc to the West, BRICS faces challenges due to differing governance systems, lack of institutional structure, and internal conflicts.
- 🔮 BRICS may grow in global importance, but it currently serves more as a platform for opposing Western dominance rather than as a cohesive, unified bloc.
Q & A
What is the BRICS group, and how did it originate?
-BRICS is a group of major emerging countries initially consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, and China. It originated in 2001 when British economist Jim O'Neill identified these countries as having the potential to reshape the global economic order. South Africa joined in 2010, making it BRICS.
What are the key characteristics of the BRICS nations?
-The BRICS nations are characterized by large geographic size, significant populations, and rapidly growing economies. They also aim to strengthen their role in global affairs and reduce their dependence on Western-dominated financial institutions.
How has BRICS expanded in recent years?
-In 2023, BRICS expanded by inviting six new members: Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. Argentina later withdrew, but the other countries joined in 2024, bringing the total membership to nine.
What initiatives have BRICS launched to challenge Western-dominated institutions?
-BRICS has launched several initiatives, including the establishment of the BRICS Development Bank (now the New Development Bank) in 2014. This bank provides an alternative to Western-dominated financial institutions like the IMF and World Bank.
What challenges does BRICS face in becoming a cohesive global power bloc?
-BRICS lacks natural cohesion due to significant political, economic, and cultural differences between its members. For example, China and India have geopolitical rivalries, and tensions exist between Iran and Saudi Arabia. These issues hinder their ability to act as a unified force.
Why do some countries want to join BRICS?
-Countries are attracted to BRICS because it represents a voice for the global South, advocating for reforms in global institutions and offering an alternative to Western dominance in international relations.
How does BRICS compare to Western alliances like NATO or the EU?
-Unlike NATO or the EU, BRICS lacks strong institutional structures and permanent bodies. While it holds summits, it doesn't have the same level of day-to-day cooperation or unified approach to global issues, limiting its influence.
What role does China play within BRICS, and how does it affect the group’s dynamic?
-China is the most influential member of BRICS and is often seen as a key challenger to U.S. supremacy. However, China's geopolitical tensions with other BRICS members, like India, complicate the group's unity and cohesion.
What are the key criticisms of the BRICS group?
-Critics argue that BRICS lacks cohesion due to internal political and ideological differences. Additionally, many of its members are seen as authoritarian, which undermines their criticism of Western policies. This weakens the group's ability to act as a unified force.
Is BRICS truly a significant challenger to Western dominance in international relations?
-While BRICS has the potential to become a significant player in global politics, it currently faces challenges due to its internal differences and lack of cohesive vision. Its influence is growing, but it remains just one of many competing voices in international affairs.
Outlines
🌍 The BRICS Group: Emerging as a Global Power Bloc?
The BRICS group, consisting of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, is seen as a rising alternative to Western dominance in global affairs. Initially formed by four countries and later expanded, the group seeks to challenge Western-led institutions and promote a multipolar world. Despite its growing influence, the question remains whether it will become a significant counterforce in international relations. This section introduces the BRICS group, its origins, and the idea of power blocs in global politics.
📈 BRICS: Geopolitical and Economic Strength
The BRICS group's combined geographic, demographic, and economic power is notable. Together, they represent 31% of the world’s landmass, 45% of its population, and 30% of global GDP. As a powerful voice, they are increasingly influencing both developing and Western countries, particularly as China positions itself as a challenger to U.S. dominance. The group’s calls for reforming global institutions resonate with many developing countries, and their resistance to Western environmental policies is a point of appeal.
⚔️ The Challenges of Cohesion in the BRICS
Despite their collective strength, the BRICS group faces challenges due to internal differences. Unlike the West, which unites around liberal democracy, the BRICS lack a shared ideology or political cohesion. Some members, like India and China, are even geopolitical rivals. Tensions exist between current and prospective members, such as Iran and Azerbaijan, and disagreements over global security issues hinder unified action. These challenges limit the group’s ability to act cohesively, especially compared to Western alliances like NATO or the European Union.
🔗 The BRICS and Global Multilateralism
In an increasingly complex global environment, the BRICS group must navigate a landscape filled with competing regional and international organizations. Unlike the Western alliances, which are closely knit, BRICS members often belong to multiple other groups like the African Union or the G20, which offers a more constructive platform for cooperation with the West. Furthermore, the group's authoritarian tendencies and the perceived mistreatment of their own citizens dilute their appeal as a voice for the global South, making it just one of many competing actors in global politics.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡BRICS
💡New Development Bank
💡Contingent Reserve Agreement
💡multipolar international system
💡global governance
💡geopolitical bloc
💡emerging economies
💡global institutions
💡institutional structures
💡collective influence
Highlights
BRICS is increasingly seen as an alternative global power bloc challenging Western dominance.
BRICS initially consisted of Brazil, Russia, India, and China, and has now expanded to nine members.
BRICS members share large geographic size, significant populations, and rapidly growing economies.
The group’s first summit was held in Russia in 2009, followed by South Africa joining in 2010, officially forming BRICS.
BRICS calls for a multipolar international system, opposing Western-dominated global institutions like the UN, IMF, and World Bank.
In 2014, BRICS launched the New Development Bank to offer an alternative to Western financial institutions.
The 2023 BRICS summit in South Africa marked a significant expansion with the addition of six new members.
The combined population of BRICS countries is 3.6 billion, representing 45% of the world’s population, and their combined GDP is around $30 trillion.
BRICS is perceived as a key voice for the global South, with growing influence in global economic and political matters.
Despite its potential, BRICS faces internal challenges, including political and economic differences between member states like China and India.
The group lacks natural cohesion, with no shared values or unifying ideology compared to Western blocs.
BRICS members like India and China have regional rivalries, complicating their cooperation within the group.
The BRICS group lacks formal institutional structures, unlike organizations like the EU or NATO.
BRICS may serve as a platform for opposition to the West, but it is unlikely to become a fully unified global power bloc.
As BRICS expands, it risks greater internal tensions, which could limit its effectiveness in global affairs.
Transcripts
Are the BRICS really emerging as the primary challenger to
Western dominance in international relations?
In recent years, the group is increasingly seen as an alternative global power bloc,
taking on the United States and its allies.
Originally made up of Russia, India, China, and Brazil,
it’s now expanded to nine members, with many more countries lining up to join.
More recently, even Turkey has suggested that it might want to join.
But what exactly is it? And is it really becoming a significant force in world affairs?
Hello and welcome. If you're new to the channel, my name is James Ker-Lindsay,
and here I take an informed look at international relations, conflict, security, and statehood.
Power blocs are a fundamental feature of modern international relations.
Made up of countries that want to enhance their collective influence or
pursue common strategic interests, they can emerge in various ways.
Sometimes, they arise as a joint response to perceived threats.
Alternatively, they can be driven by joint economic interests or by shared ideological goals.
They also come in many different forms.
While some are formal alliances with strong institutional structures,
others are little more than loose coalitions of like-minded states.
One of the most significant blocs to have emerged since
the turn of the millennium is the BRICS group.
But while it's often presented as a counterweight
to Western power in international affairs, is this truly the case?
Our story starts with the end of the Cold War in 1991.
Following the collapse of communism and the disintegration of the Soviet Union,
the widespread view was that the victorious West would dominate the period ahead.
However, by the turn of the millennium, an alternative view was taking shape.
Attention began turning to a group of major emerging countries outside the Western order.
In 2001, a British economist, Jim O'Neill,
identified four fast-growing large states that he argued had the potential to fundamentally
reshape the global economic order: Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
Termed the BRIC states, they shared several key features: a large geographic size,
significant populations, and rapidly growing economies.
By the middle of the decade, what had started as a catchy acronym began emerging as an actual entity.
Driven by their wish to strengthen their role in
global affairs and reduce their dependence on Western-dominated financial institutions,
the four countries held their first summit in Russia in 2009.
Having established themselves as a group, the next major step came the following year, in 2010.
Attempting to strengthen their legitimacy and influence on the global stage by including
a country from each continent, the group now added South Africa, thus becoming the BRICS.
From there, the group steadily increased its activities.
As well as leading calls for a multipolar international system no
longer dominated by the West, they called for global institutions to
be reformed to give a stronger voice to the developing world.
In addition, the group became increasingly organized.
As well as holding annual summits, they launched several high-profile
initiatives to offer an alternative to what they saw as Western-dominated institutions.
Most notably, in 2014, they established the BRICS Development Bank,
now known as the New Development Bank, based in Shanghai, China.
By the start of the 2020s,
the group was increasingly seen as a powerful voice for the global South.
As a result, other countries increasingly wanted to join.
This came to a head at its 15th summit, held in South Africa in August 2023,
when the group announced that six new members had been invited to join the bloc:
Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
While Argentina later withdrew its application after Javier became president in December 2023,
and Saudi Arabia has yet to decide on membership,
the other four countries joined in January 2024, taking the group’s total membership to nine.
Since then, the list of potential new members has continued to grow.
In August 2024, Azerbaijan announced its intention
to join the group following a visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin.
And it's against this backdrop that reports have
now emerged that even Turkey is looking to join the group, although, of course,
it's unclear whether membership of the group would be incompatible with its NATO membership.
All this has strengthened claims that the BRICS group is emerging
as the most significant counterweight to Western domination in world affairs.
But is this really the case?
To its supporters, the BRICS group is a significant force in international politics.
First, there's the group's combined geographic, demographic, and economic strength.
Together, the nine members cover 46 million square km, or 18 million square miles.
This is around 31% of the world's total landmass, and their combined population
of around 3.6 billion is around 45% of the world's inhabitants.
Moreover, their combined GDP of around $30 trillion US is 30% of the world's total.
Altogether, they represent a vast bloc by almost any measure.
All this gives them enormous potential to shape the international economic and political system.
Secondly, and crucially, the BRICS group is increasingly seen by others
as a powerful voice in international affairs.
Both as a group and individually, they exert considerable economic, political,
and diplomatic influence, not only over developing countries but also over the West.
Just on its own, China is seen as the key challenger to US supremacy in world affairs.
Pulling together various regional and emerging international powers,
the BRICS are now seen as the natural leaders of the non-Western world.
This is also aided by the fact that the group's core messages
resonate strongly with many other countries.
They call to reform multilateral institutions, such as the United Nations and its financial
bodies, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, strike a chord with many
developing states that have long felt they've been shut out of global decision-making.
Likewise, on climate change, they've often spoken out against
what they see as Western policies imposed on the developing world.
Many countries have long resented demands that they reduce consumption and development for
their populations while Western states enjoy the benefits of past pollution that they've inflicted.
Finally, there's the group's growing attraction as a club.
More and more countries want to be part of it.
The group’s summits now attract many other attendees.
Overall, there's a general sense amongst its supporters that the
group represents the best way to build the strength of developing nations and
challenge Western overreach into the affairs of other countries.
Meanwhile, as more countries seek to align with the BRICS,
the group's ability to shape global norms, policies, and alliances seems likely to grow.
But while there are good arguments to suggest that the BRICS group
could well become a significant alternative bloc in global politics,
there are also strong reasons to suggest that it won't become an alternative force.
First, the group lacks a natural cohesion.
Unlike the West, which is grouped around shared values and a belief in liberal democracy,
the BRICS have no unified or unifying outlook.
The members have significant political, economic, and cultural differences.
Indeed, several members are even adversaries.
As well as having a long-standing border dispute that occasionally flares up in
violence, China and India have become geopolitical opponents.
Indeed, while India may cooperate with China in the BRICS group, it's also part of the Quad,
a new security and defense bloc, including Japan, Australia, and the United States,
that is specifically designed to limit China's influence in the Indian and Pacific Oceans.
Looking ahead, there are also tensions between current and future members.
For example, Iran and Azerbaijan have a strained relationship.
Likewise, Iran and Saudi Arabia,
notwithstanding a Chinese-brokered peace deal, also have a long history of tension.
Such problems will inevitably get worse as the group expands.
More generally, while the group may have found common ground in some areas,
they are at odds in others.
For example, unlike the West, there's no overarching sense of cohesion when
tackling critical global security challenges.
While China and Iran may be supporting Russia over the war in Ukraine,
many others are taking a far less vocal position.
And while Iran remains bitterly opposed to Israel, and South Africa has brought a genocide case
against it at the International Court of Justice, others have far better relations with the country.
All this limits the ability of the group to speak
with one voice on the most pressing issues of the day.
Contrast this with the high degree of Western cohesion on these issues.
But it doesn't end there.
The group also has other shortcomings.
For a start, despite having established several institutions, it still lacks the
structures and coherence one would expect to see from a major international organization.
While it may hold international summits, it doesn't have the permanent bodies that match the
European Union or even NATO, which maintain large secretariats overseeing day-to-day cooperation.
Meanwhile, the group faces the challenge of building and maintaining relevance
in an increasingly complex and diverse international environment.
While the West comes together around a few key organizations that cement their mutual ties,
the members of the BRICS group can join many other regional and international bodies,
such as the African Union, ASEAN, and the Non-Aligned Movement.
At the same time, other bodies exist that provide
an arguably better approach to dealing with the West.
Rather than taking a confrontational approach, as many believe the BRICS does,
other forums offer a way for the world's largest countries to engage more constructively.
A good example is the G20, which includes BRICS members India, China,
and Brazil alongside the United States, Japan, and leading European states.
This becomes even more important if you consider that while certain BRICS members
are ostracized by the West and under sanctions, such as Iran and Russia,
for others, economic cooperation with the West remains a cornerstone of their prosperity.
Finally, while many countries do indeed want to join the group, others are much more cautious,
not least of all because the group is also widely seen as an emerging group of authoritarian states.
While it may talk about the mistreatment of many countries
by the West, many would point out that many of the
group's members have little compunction about mistreating their own citizens.
All this seemingly dilutes the impact that the BRICS group can have on global politics.
Rather than becoming the preeminent voice for the global South,
the group is, in many ways, just one amongst many competing voices.
So, is the BRICS group a challenger to Western domination?
The answer is yes and no.
In one way, the group is, by its very nature, defined as opposition to the West,
and this certainly gives it a powerful position for many other countries.
However, one also senses that this is where it really starts and ends.
The countries are united by the fact that they aren't the West
rather than by a unified vision of what they want to be as a group.
While this may give them a degree of cohesion at one level,
it seems superficial, especially as several members maintain workable,
if not good, economic, political, and diplomatic ties to the West.
Of course, none of this is to say that the group
can't or won't become an increasingly prominent actor in global affairs.
In an increasingly divided world, the BRICS may indeed become a substantial player.
But for now, it seems unlikely to develop a genuinely significant role in international
relations beyond being a forum for channeling opposition to the West.
I hope you found that useful.
If so, please consider giving the video a like, it really helps.
And do consider subscribing if you haven't already.
And here's another video that you might find interesting.
Thanks so much for watching, and see you in the next video.
関連動画をさらに表示
BRICS: Emerging counterweight in a multipolar world? | DW Analysis
BRICS: A Trap or Opportunity for Malaysia?
BRICS will be Inherited by the Ummah
How China is Using BRICS to Change the World Order
What is BRICS explained | How CHINA is using BRICS to kill US Dollar | Abhi and Niyu
Iran, Putin and China's BOMBSHELL has Israel & U.S. Panicking w/ Prof. Mohammad Marandi
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)