Jaksa : Ferdy Sambo Dituntut Penjara Seumur Hidup Kasus Pembunuhan Brigadir J!

Summary

The prosecution presents its case against the defendant, Ferdi Sambo, emphasizing factors that aggravate his crime, including the loss of the victim’s life, public disturbance, and the defendant's lack of remorse. The prosecution argues that Sambo's actions, as a high-ranking law enforcement officer, have severely tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian police force both domestically and internationally. No mitigating factors are cited. The prosecution demands a life sentence for the defendant, also addressing related legal charges, and concludes by requesting the return of evidence for use in other connected cases.

Takeaways

• ⚖️ The prosecutor begins by presenting the factors considered in submitting the criminal charges against the defendant.
• 💔 The defendant's actions resulted in the death of the victim, Noviansyah, causing deep pain for the victim's family.
• 🤥 The defendant was uncooperative, did not confess to his actions, and gave contradictory statements in court.
• 😨 The defendant's actions led to public unrest and widespread concern in society.
• 🚓 As a law enforcement officer and a high-ranking Polri official, the defendant's actions were deemed highly inappropriate.
• 🌍 The defendant's conduct tarnished the image of the Indonesian Police both domestically and internationally.
• 👮‍♂️ The defendant's actions led to the involvement of other Polri members in the crime.
• ⛓️ The prosecutor found no mitigating factors in favor of the defendant.
• 📜 The prosecutor requests the court to declare the defendant guilty of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) in conjunction with Article 55, paragraph 1.
• 🏛️ The prosecutor demands a life sentence for the defendant and asks the court to return evidence to be used in related cases.

Q & A

What is the main accusation against the defendant in this case?

The defendant, Ferdi Sambo, is accused of premeditated murder and causing widespread disturbances in the community, as well as disrupting electronic systems unlawfully.

What are the aggravating factors mentioned by the prosecutor?

The aggravating factors include the death of the victim Noviansyah, the emotional pain caused to the victim's family, the defendant's lack of remorse and denial during the trial, the disruption caused to society, and the damage to the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and internationally.

What impact did the defendant’s actions have on the public and the police force?

The defendant’s actions caused widespread concern and unrest in society. Additionally, they tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri), both domestically and internationally, and involved other police officers in the case.

Did the prosecutor identify any mitigating factors for the defendant?

No, the prosecutor did not identify any mitigating factors for the defendant.

What charges are the defendant facing according to the prosecutor’s statement?

The defendant is facing charges of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), and unlawful electronic system disruption under Law No. 19 of 2016 in relation to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions.

What punishment is the prosecutor seeking for the defendant?

The prosecutor is seeking a life sentence for the defendant.

What evidence is mentioned in the prosecutor's statement?

The prosecutor mentions evidence from exhibits A to 41, which are to be returned to the public prosecutor for use in related cases involving Hendra Kurniawan and others.

Who else is involved in related cases, as per the prosecutor’s statement?

Hendra Kurniawan and other unnamed individuals are involved in related cases.

When and where was the prosecutor’s demand read out?

The prosecutor’s demand was read out in the South Jakarta District Court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.

What instructions were given to the defendant after the prosecutor presented the demands?

The defendant was instructed to consult with his legal counsel following the reading of the prosecutor’s demands.