Jaksa : Ferdy Sambo Dituntut Penjara Seumur Hidup Kasus Pembunuhan Brigadir J!

Kompas TV Sukabumi

16 Jan 202303:34

Summary

TLDRThe prosecution presents its case against the defendant, Ferdi Sambo, emphasizing factors that aggravate his crime, including the loss of the victim’s life, public disturbance, and the defendant's lack of remorse. The prosecution argues that Sambo's actions, as a high-ranking law enforcement officer, have severely tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian police force both domestically and internationally. No mitigating factors are cited. The prosecution demands a life sentence for the defendant, also addressing related legal charges, and concludes by requesting the return of evidence for use in other connected cases.

Takeaways

⚖️ The prosecutor begins by presenting the factors considered in submitting the criminal charges against the defendant.
💔 The defendant's actions resulted in the death of the victim, Noviansyah, causing deep pain for the victim's family.
🤥 The defendant was uncooperative, did not confess to his actions, and gave contradictory statements in court.
😨 The defendant's actions led to public unrest and widespread concern in society.
🚓 As a law enforcement officer and a high-ranking Polri official, the defendant's actions were deemed highly inappropriate.
🌍 The defendant's conduct tarnished the image of the Indonesian Police both domestically and internationally.
👮‍♂️ The defendant's actions led to the involvement of other Polri members in the crime.
⛓️ The prosecutor found no mitigating factors in favor of the defendant.
📜 The prosecutor requests the court to declare the defendant guilty of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) in conjunction with Article 55, paragraph 1.
🏛️ The prosecutor demands a life sentence for the defendant and asks the court to return evidence to be used in related cases.

Q & A

What is the main accusation against the defendant in this case?
-The defendant, Ferdi Sambo, is accused of premeditated murder and causing widespread disturbances in the community, as well as disrupting electronic systems unlawfully.
What are the aggravating factors mentioned by the prosecutor?
-The aggravating factors include the death of the victim Noviansyah, the emotional pain caused to the victim's family, the defendant's lack of remorse and denial during the trial, the disruption caused to society, and the damage to the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) and internationally.
What impact did the defendant’s actions have on the public and the police force?
-The defendant’s actions caused widespread concern and unrest in society. Additionally, they tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri), both domestically and internationally, and involved other police officers in the case.
Did the prosecutor identify any mitigating factors for the defendant?
-No, the prosecutor did not identify any mitigating factors for the defendant.
What charges are the defendant facing according to the prosecutor’s statement?
-The defendant is facing charges of premeditated murder under Article 340 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP), and unlawful electronic system disruption under Law No. 19 of 2016 in relation to Law No. 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions.
What punishment is the prosecutor seeking for the defendant?
-The prosecutor is seeking a life sentence for the defendant.
What evidence is mentioned in the prosecutor's statement?
-The prosecutor mentions evidence from exhibits A to 41, which are to be returned to the public prosecutor for use in related cases involving Hendra Kurniawan and others.
Who else is involved in related cases, as per the prosecutor’s statement?
-Hendra Kurniawan and other unnamed individuals are involved in related cases.
When and where was the prosecutor’s demand read out?
-The prosecutor’s demand was read out in the South Jakarta District Court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.
What instructions were given to the defendant after the prosecutor presented the demands?
-The defendant was instructed to consult with his legal counsel following the reading of the prosecutor’s demands.

Outlines

00:00

⚖️ Prosecution's Arguments Against the Defendant

The prosecutor begins by outlining the grounds for their demands, emphasizing the severity of the crime committed by the defendant. The defendant's actions resulted in the death of Noviansyah, causing deep pain to the victim's family. The prosecutor highlights the defendant's lack of remorse, refusal to admit guilt, and uncooperative behavior during the trial. These actions have caused widespread public unrest and tarnished the reputation of the police institution both in Indonesia and internationally. Furthermore, the defendant's actions also implicated other members of the police force, and no mitigating circumstances were found.

📜 Legal Charges and Penalties Requested

The prosecutor officially requests the court to declare the defendant, Ferdi Sambo, guilty of premeditated murder as per Article 340 of the Criminal Code, in conjunction with Article 55, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Criminal Code. The defendant is also charged with violating electronic information systems, per Article 49 or Article 33 of Law No. 19 of 2016 (amending Law No. 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions), combined with Article 55, Paragraph 1, Clause 1 of the Criminal Code. As a result, the prosecutor demands a life sentence for the defendant.

🔍 Evidentiary Matters and Other Defendants

The prosecutor requests that the evidence, labeled items A through 41, be returned to the prosecutor's office to be used in a separate case against other defendants, including Hendra Kurniawan and his associates. The prosecutor also requests that the court assign all legal costs to the state.

📅 Closing of the Prosecutor's Statement

The closing section indicates that the prosecution's statement and demands were presented in court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023. The defendant is then given the opportunity to consult with their legal counsel regarding the prosecutor's demands.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Terdakwa

Terdakwa refers to the 'defendant' or 'accused' in a legal proceeding. In this context, the term is used to describe Ferdi Sambo, who is being prosecuted for serious crimes. The concept is central to the theme of the video, which revolves around legal arguments made during a criminal trial.

💡Pembunuhan Berencana

Pembunuhan Berencana translates to 'premeditated murder.' This refers to the charge that Ferdi Sambo is accused of in the video. It highlights the gravity of the crime, as it implies that the murder was carefully planned and not an impulsive act. The prosecutor's argument focuses on this charge, emphasizing its seriousness under Indonesian law.

💡Pasal 340 KUHP

Pasal 340 KUHP is a specific article in the Indonesian Penal Code that deals with premeditated murder. The prosecutor cites this law to establish the legal grounds for the charges against the defendant. This law is crucial to the case, as it defines the crime of planned murder and sets out the penalties for such an offense.

💡JPU (Jaksa Penuntut Umum)

JPU stands for 'Jaksa Penuntut Umum,' which means 'public prosecutor' in Indonesia. The JPU plays a critical role in presenting the case against the defendant, arguing for a conviction and specific punishment. In the video, the JPU lays out both the aggravating factors and the legal articles violated by the defendant.

💡Sistem Elektronik

Sistem Elektronik refers to 'electronic systems' that have been disrupted or compromised as part of the criminal activity. This relates to the charge that the defendant unlawfully disrupted electronic systems, which is a violation of the law. This concept ties into broader concerns about cybersecurity and the misuse of digital technology in criminal actions.

💡Undang-Undang ITE

Undang-Undang ITE refers to the Indonesian law governing information and electronic transactions. In this case, the defendant is accused of violating this law by unlawfully interfering with electronic systems. This law is significant in modern Indonesian legal frameworks, especially in cases involving technology and cybercrime.

💡Keresahan dan Kegaduhan

Keresahan dan Kegaduhan means 'anxiety and commotion' in society. The prosecutor highlights how the defendant's actions caused widespread public unrest and chaos. This concept is critical to understanding the societal impact of the crime, as it reflects how the incident affected not only the victims but also the larger community.

💡Institusi Polri

Institusi Polri refers to the Indonesian National Police institution. In this context, the prosecutor argues that the defendant's actions have tarnished the reputation of the Polri both nationally and internationally. This concept underscores the responsibility of law enforcement officers to uphold the law and the impact when they are involved in criminal activities.

💡Hukuman Seumur Hidup

Hukuman Seumur Hidup translates to 'life imprisonment.' The prosecutor requests this sentence for the defendant, emphasizing the severity of the crimes committed. This is a significant legal penalty, illustrating the irreversible nature of the defendant's actions and the strong desire for justice for the victims and society.

💡Barang Bukti

Barang Bukti means 'evidence' in a legal trial. In this case, it refers to the physical and digital items presented during the trial to support the prosecution's case. These pieces of evidence are essential in proving the defendant's guilt and play a key role in the trial's outcome.

Highlights

The defendant's actions resulted in the loss of Noviansyah's life and caused deep suffering for his family.

The defendant refused to admit his actions and gave contradictory statements during the trial.

The defendant's actions caused widespread unrest and anxiety in society.

The defendant, a senior law enforcement official, should not have committed such acts, given his position in the police force.

The actions of the defendant tarnished the reputation of the Indonesian National Police (Polri) in both national and international perspectives.

The defendant's actions led to the involvement of numerous other police officers.

No mitigating factors were found in favor of the defendant.

The prosecution sought a life imprisonment sentence for the defendant.

The defendant was found guilty of premeditated murder in collaboration with others, violating Article 340 of the Indonesian Penal Code.

The defendant was also found guilty of disrupting electronic systems, violating Article 49 of Law No. 19 of 2016 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.

The prosecution referred to multiple sections of the law, including Article 55 paragraph 1 of the Penal Code, in charging the defendant.

Evidence from the case is to be returned to the Prosecutor's Office for use in the case against Hendra Kurniawan and others.

The court was asked to charge all court fees to the state.

The prosecution's statement was read in court on Tuesday, January 17, 2023.

The defendant was given the opportunity to consult with his legal counsel after the charges were presented.