OUTDATED: Four Workout Ideas Science Just Debunked

Wolf Coaching
30 Sept 202410:54

Summary

TLDRThis video debunks outdated workout ideas still prevalent in fitness culture, such as focusing on time under tension, relying on surface electromyography (EMG) for exercise selection, and sticking to body part splits. The presenter emphasizes that scientific research shows a wide variety of rep ranges and tempos can effectively build muscle, and frequent training is better than traditional splits. They advocate for full-body or split routines that train muscles multiple times per week, and they explain that rest times between workouts are context-dependent rather than rigid. The video promotes evidence-based training and the Myoda app for personalized programs.

Takeaways

  • 💪 Time under tension is an outdated concept for muscle growth; instead, focus on taking sets close to failure.
  • 📊 Sets of 5 to 50 reps are equally effective for building muscle, provided they are taken close to failure.
  • 🕒 Repetition tempo has minimal impact on hypertrophy; a controlled eccentric phase and an explosive concentric phase are sufficient.
  • 🚫 Surface electromyography (EMG) is not a reliable indicator of muscle growth potential; it's outdated science.
  • 📅 Training a muscle at least twice a week yields better muscle growth than training it once a week with traditional body part splits.
  • 🏋️ Full body, upper-lower, or push-pull-leg routines are more effective than body part splits for building muscle.
  • 🔁 Rest between workouts depends on the intensity of the previous workout and recovery, not on rigid rules like 48- or 72-hour rest periods.
  • ⚖️ Training on consecutive days is not harmful if balanced with overall weekly training volume and recovery.
  • 🎯 Focus more on total weekly training volume than how it’s distributed across the week for muscle growth.
  • 🚀 New research shows you can still achieve muscle growth and strength gains by training on consecutive days, debunking the myth that full recovery is always required.

Q & A

  • What is the concept of 'time under tension' and why has it been popular in bodybuilding?

    -'Time under tension' refers to focusing on how long muscles are under strain during a set, rather than the number of reps. It has been popular in bodybuilding because it's believed to enhance muscle growth by maximizing the duration of muscle contraction.

  • Why does the video argue that 'time under tension' may not be the best approach for muscle growth?

    -The video argues that focusing on 'time under tension' isn't as effective as previously thought. Studies show that taking sets close to failure and using a wide rep range (5-50 reps) is more important for hypertrophy than slowing down reps to increase tension time.

  • What did research by Brad Schoenfeld and colleagues conclude about the best rep range for muscle growth?

    -The research concluded that any rep range from 5 to 50 reps can be effective for muscle growth as long as the set is taken close to failure. The key is pushing muscles to the point of fatigue, rather than focusing solely on the number of reps.

  • How does the video suggest handling repetition tempo during workouts?

    -The video recommends using a controlled eccentric (lowering phase) and an explosive concentric (lifting phase), but emphasizes that a wide variety of repetition tempos are effective. It's not necessary to slow down reps significantly.

  • What is the main critique of using surface electromyography (EMG) to determine effective exercises for muscle growth?

    -The video criticizes the use of surface EMG as outdated science, explaining that EMG readings, which measure neuromuscular excitation, don’t necessarily predict muscle growth. Studies show that muscle activation levels measured by EMG don’t always correlate with actual hypertrophy.

  • Why are body part splits considered outdated for optimal muscle growth?

    -Body part splits, where each muscle group is trained once a week, are outdated because research shows training muscles at least twice a week is more effective for growth. Full body or upper-lower splits allow for more frequent training of each muscle, leading to better results.

  • What are the alternative training splits recommended for better muscle growth?

    -The video recommends full body routines, upper-lower splits, or push-pull-legs routines depending on how many days you can train. These approaches ensure muscles are trained at least twice a week, which is more effective for hypertrophy than traditional body part splits.

  • Is it necessary to rest for a specific period between workouts, such as 48 or 72 hours?

    -No, the video debunks the idea that a specific rest period is always needed between workouts. The amount of rest required depends on the intensity and volume of the workout, and it’s possible to train muscles on consecutive days without overtraining, as long as recovery is considered.

  • Can training on consecutive days still result in muscle growth?

    -Yes, the video cites studies showing that training on consecutive days can lead to similar improvements in muscle growth and strength as training on non-consecutive days, challenging the idea that muscles always need a certain amount of rest between sessions.

  • How does the video describe the balance between training volume and distribution across the week?

    -The video explains that total training volume over the week is more important than how it's distributed. Whether you spread your training evenly or frontload it across several days, maintaining consistent volume and balancing recovery is key to muscle growth.

Outlines

00:00

💪 Outdated Workout Ideas and Time Under Tension

The first paragraph discusses the outdated nature of some workout concepts, with a focus on the 'time under tension' (TUT) idea. While bodybuilders and influencers have long advocated for TUT to increase muscle growth, recent research suggests it's less important than previously thought. The key takeaway is that taking sets close to failure is more important than focusing on time per set. Studies show a broad range of reps (5-50) is effective, as long as you are near failure, without the need to slow down excessively.

05:00

📊 The Fallacy of Surface Electromyography (EMG) for Muscle Growth

This paragraph debunks the use of surface EMG readings to determine the best exercises for muscle growth. Although influencers like Ryan Humiston use EMG data to suggest exercise choices, studies show EMG is not a reliable predictor of muscle hypertrophy. For example, the muscle growth observed in a comparison between hip thrusts and squats did not correlate with EMG readings. Instead, it's recommended to select exercises based on research directly measuring muscle growth rather than relying on EMG data.

10:02

🦵 Why Body Part Splits Are Outdated for Muscle Growth

The third paragraph critiques the traditional body part split workout, which focuses on training one muscle group per day. Research shows that training a muscle at least twice a week results in better muscle growth. The classic 5-day split only trains each muscle once a week, which is less effective. Depending on how many days you can train, the speaker suggests alternatives like full-body routines, upper-lower splits, or push-pull-leg routines to increase training frequency for better results.

⏳ The Myth of Required Rest Days Between Workouts

The fourth paragraph challenges the notion that you need a specific amount of rest between workouts, like 48 or 72 hours. The idea of always needing a set recovery time is debunked as being too simplistic. The key factor is balancing training intensity and recovery. Full-body routines, even on consecutive days, are possible as long as the overall volume is balanced. The speaker also reassures 'Weekend Warriors' that research supports muscle growth and strength gains, even when training on consecutive days.

🎉 Bro Science and the Reality of Effective Training

The final paragraph takes a lighthearted jab at 'bro science,' emphasizing that despite some longstanding misconceptions in the fitness community, science continues to evolve. It mentions that while some practices endorsed by bodybuilders were flawed, others were grounded in solid principles. The paragraph ends with a plug for Rascal Apparel, encouraging viewers to purchase clothing and support the speaker.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Time Under Tension

Time Under Tension refers to the amount of time a muscle is under tension during a set of exercise, calculated as the number of repetitions multiplied by the time each repetition takes. In the video, it is discussed as a concept that has been traditionally emphasized in bodybuilding for muscle growth. However, recent research suggests that focusing solely on time under tension may not be as crucial as previously thought, and that other factors like approaching muscle failure might be more important.

💡Repetitions

Repetitions, or 'reps', are the number of times an exercise movement is performed consecutively without stopping. The script mentions a review paper that found a rep range of 5 to 50 to be effective for muscle growth, challenging the traditional belief that higher numbers of repetitions are necessary.

💡Muscle Failure

Muscle failure is the point at which a muscle can no longer perform another repetition with proper form. The video emphasizes that approaching muscle failure is more critical for muscle growth than maximizing time under tension.

💡Repetition Tempo

Repetition Tempo describes the speed at which an exercise is performed, including both the lowering (eccentric) and lifting (concentric) phases. The script suggests that a variety of tempos can be effective for muscle growth, contradicting the idea that a specific tempo is best.

💡Hypertrophy

Hypertrophy is the increase in muscle cell size due to an increase in protein content within the cells, which is a primary goal of bodybuilding and strength training. The video discusses how different training variables affect hypertrophy.

💡Surface Electromyography (sEMG)

Surface Electromyography is a technique that measures the electrical activity of muscles during contraction. The video critiques the use of sEMG to determine the best exercises for muscle growth, stating that it may not be as predictive as some influencers claim.

💡Body Part Split

A Body Part Split is a training routine where different muscle groups are trained on separate days. The script argues that this approach may not be optimal for muscle growth compared to training each muscle group more than once a week.

💡Full Body Routine

A Full Body Routine involves training all major muscle groups in each workout session. The video suggests that this approach can be more effective for muscle growth than a body part split, as it allows for more frequent training of each muscle group.

💡Upper/Lower Split

An Upper/Lower Split is a training program where upper body and lower body muscles are trained on separate days. The script mentions this as an effective alternative to the body part split for those who can train more frequently.

💡Push/Pull/Legs Routine

A Push/Pull/Legs Routine is a workout program that divides training into days focused on pushing movements (e.g., chest, shoulders, triceps), pulling movements (e.g., back, biceps), and leg exercises. The video suggests this as a viable option for those who can train six days a week.

💡Rest Periods

Rest Periods are the intervals of rest taken between sets during a workout. The video challenges the notion that there is a specific required amount of rest, such as 48 hours, between workouts for the same muscle group, suggesting that context and individual recovery capabilities are more important.

Highlights

The concept of 'time under tension' is outdated and doesn't significantly impact muscle growth.

Focusing solely on the number of repetitions or sets isn't as important as training close to muscle failure.

Research indicates that rep ranges between 5 to 50 reps can be equally effective for muscle growth, as long as the sets are performed near failure.

Repetition tempo doesn't need to be extremely slow; a slightly more controlled eccentric phase and explosive concentric phase are optimal.

The ideal set duration for hypertrophy ranges from 20 to 70 seconds, making time under tension less crucial if you're using proper rep ranges.

Surface electromyography (EMG) readings aren't reliable indicators of which exercises are best for muscle growth.

Studies have shown that muscle growth observed in participants didn't correlate with EMG readings, challenging its effectiveness as a predictor.

Body part splits, where each muscle group is trained once per week, are less effective than training each muscle at least twice a week.

Training frequency is crucial for muscle growth, and hitting each muscle group 2–3 times per week provides better results.

Training muscle groups on consecutive days isn’t necessarily detrimental to muscle growth, as long as fatigue and recovery are properly managed.

A full-body workout routine can be effective, even if training on consecutive days, due to the balance between fatigue and overall weekly volume.

Training methods such as push-pull legs or upper/lower splits can offer optimal frequency and results for those training 4–6 days a week.

Science has debunked the idea that you need 48 or 72 hours of rest between workouts, emphasizing the importance of context and fatigue management.

Weekend Warriors can make gains similar to those training on non-consecutive days, as long as overall weekly volume and intensity are consistent.

Despite popular misconceptions, training on consecutive days doesn’t hinder progress, and optimal gains can be achieved with various training frequencies.

Transcripts

play00:00

these workout ideas are outdated

play00:03

focusing on them is at best making your

play00:06

program more complicated than it needs

play00:08

to be at worst it's actually reducing

play00:11

how much muscle you're growing stick

play00:13

around until the end of the video where

play00:15

I'll give you the consensus of the

play00:17

research on these topics first the

play00:20

concept of time under tension this is a

play00:22

bodybuilder classic instead of focusing

play00:25

on the number of reps focusing on time

play00:27

and retention is supposed to boost your

play00:29

muscle growth

play00:30

bodybuilders and influencers alike have

play00:32

advocated for it for decades hell Jeff

play00:35

Cavalier continues to preach this to

play00:37

this stage the language that muscles

play00:39

speak is tension we know that if you

play00:42

want your muscles to grow if you want to

play00:44

stimulate muscle protein synthesis you

play00:45

need to elicit tension in those working

play00:48

muscles and there is some truth to it if

play00:50

you disregard time under tension or how

play00:52

long your set takes entirely you could

play00:55

arrive at the conclusion that a set of

play00:56

one rep is a great way to build muscle

play00:59

however ever that's about where the good

play01:01

sides of the focus on time un retention

play01:03

end let's break down the concept of time

play01:06

un retention it can easily be defined as

play01:08

number of repetitions times repetition

play01:10

duration it's essentially the equivalent

play01:13

of set duration fortunately for us over

play01:16

the last decade or so science has

play01:18

examined both the effectiveness of

play01:20

number of reps and repetition Tempo

play01:23

first the number of repetitions a review

play01:25

paper by Brad shenfeld and colleagues

play01:27

specifically sought to determine what is

play01:30

the best rep range for building muscle

play01:32

when reviewing studies that compared a

play01:33

wide variety of rep ranges from sets of

play01:36

100 or more reps to just one rep per set

play01:39

the conclusion they arrived at is that

play01:41

sets of anywhere around 5 to 50 reps are

play01:44

equally effective for building muscle

play01:47

provided you take that set close to

play01:48

failure hitting failure appears to be

play01:50

the more important part versus purely

play01:53

maximizing time under tension likewise

play01:55

the most recent review paper on

play01:57

repetition Tempo found that although a

play01:59

slightly more controlled Ecentric or

play02:01

lowering phase and a slightly more

play02:03

explosive concentric or lifting phase

play02:06

May optimize hypertrophy based on some

play02:08

preliminary evidence most evidence

play02:10

suggests that a wide variety of

play02:11

repetition tempos appear equally

play02:14

effective for building muscle in fact

play02:16

they recommend a set duration or toner

play02:18

tension per set of 20 to 70 seconds for

play02:22

hypertrophy I guarantee that if you're

play02:24

doing anywhere between 5 to 50 reps

play02:26

unless you're going incredibly fast

play02:28

you'll fall within this range there is

play02:30

no need to focus on time under tension

play02:33

and slow things down a ton just use a

play02:35

reasonable rep range usually 5 to2 with

play02:38

some higher rep work in your program for

play02:41

completeness as far as repetition Tempo

play02:43

goes take at least a couple seconds on

play02:45

the way down and be explosive during the

play02:47

concentric congratulations you should

play02:49

never need to worry about pamon or

play02:51

tension ever again this next one is

play02:53

still happening to this day and honestly

play02:56

needs to stop fortunately myap doesn't

play02:59

make make these mistakes it's constantly

play03:01

being updated based on the latest

play03:03

research meaning it doesn't apply

play03:05

outdated principles myoda is a coach in

play03:08

your pocket the training app we've been

play03:10

working on for years behind the scenes

play03:13

designed by exercise scientists you can

play03:15

finally Outsource programming things for

play03:18

yourself and get an effective truly

play03:20

individualized program the best part

play03:22

it'll be a fraction of the price of a

play03:24

good coach go to myod app.com and sign

play03:27

up with your email to be notified when

play03:29

it is released and as an exclusive offer

play03:32

if you sign up during Early Access

play03:34

you'll receive a lifetime discount the

play03:36

next outdated whack out idea I still see

play03:39

pedal on YouTube is using muscle

play03:41

activation or Surface electromyography

play03:43

readings to determine what exercises are

play03:46

best for building muscle Ryan humiston

play03:49

continues doing this to this day in case

play03:52

you haven't seen this floating around

play03:53

surface electromyography is a research

play03:56

technique that involves placing

play03:57

electrodes on the surface of your

play03:59

muscles the idea behind it is to detect

play04:02

the electrical currents your nervous

play04:04

system senss to your muscles to contract

play04:07

also referred to as neuromuscular

play04:09

excitation therefore the amount of

play04:11

surface electromyography is thought to

play04:13

reflect neuromuscular excitation and

play04:16

muscle activation in contraction

play04:18

consequently since surface

play04:20

electromyography is supposed to be a

play04:22

measurement of muscle contraction more

play04:24

of it could mean greater hypertrophy

play04:27

right well probably not

play04:30

as tempting as it is to think that you

play04:31

can just buy a

play04:33

$10,000 surface electrography unit and

play04:36

finally know which exercises are best

play04:38

for building muscle surface

play04:40

electrography likely doesn't do this

play04:43

hell even many Studies have compared

play04:45

using exercises using surface

play04:48

electrography which has led influencers

play04:50

to make strong conclusions regarding

play04:52

muscle growth the predictive power of

play04:54

surface EMG for muscle growth was called

play04:57

into question by the gotsky and colleag

play05:00

in short the assumptions that need to be

play05:02

true for surface EMG to be a good

play05:05

predictor of the muscle building effects

play05:07

of an exercise are all questionable if

play05:10

you want an example of this playing out

play05:11

plot getting colleagues compared to the

play05:13

hip thrust and squats effects on lower

play05:15

body muscle growth however before having

play05:18

participants trained the researchers

play05:20

measured surface electrography during

play05:22

both exercises the muscle growth

play05:24

observed didn't correlate to the

play05:27

Baseline surface electrography readings

play05:30

no matter how the researchers try to

play05:32

Tinker with a data if an influencer

play05:34

makes videos on which exercises are best

play05:37

for muscle growth based on Surface EMG

play05:40

they are using outdated science at best

play05:42

or it might just be a cool toy that

play05:44

makes for easy videos don't base your

play05:46

exercise selection on Surface

play05:49

electrography instead use this checklist

play05:52

based on dozens of studies directly

play05:54

measuring muscle growth just like ton or

play05:56

tension body part splits used to be

play05:58

widely recommended Ed by bodybuilders a

play06:01

body part split involves dividing the

play06:03

training week into one day for each

play06:05

major muscle group in the body the

play06:07

classic 5day example is Monday chest

play06:10

Tuesday back Wednesday legs Thursday

play06:12

shoulders and Friday arms do a quick

play06:15

search and many popular fitness pages

play06:17

and magazines still recommend this

play06:20

however this approach doesn't stand up

play06:22

against modern scientific scrutiny the

play06:25

primary issue with the body part split

play06:27

is that you're only training each muscle

play06:29

once a week

play06:30

the two latest met analyses looking at

play06:32

all the research comparing training and

play06:34

muscle more frequently or less

play06:36

frequently suggest that training a

play06:37

muscle at least twice a week is better

play06:40

than training it just once a week as you

play06:42

would in a traditional body part split

play06:44

I'm aware of even more research that may

play06:46

or may not be out at the time of this

play06:47

video that cement this finding at any

play06:50

rate science debunked the notion of body

play06:52

part splits if you want your best muscle

play06:55

growth body part splits do still build

play06:58

some muscle but you could be growing

play07:00

more here's how if you can train at

play07:02

least 2 to 3 days a week use a full body

play07:04

routine if you can train Four to 6 days

play07:06

a week or even more use an upper lower

play07:09

split finally if you can consistently

play07:11

train 6 days a week you can try a push

play07:13

pull legs routine these will all allow

play07:16

you to train a muscle at least twice a

play07:18

week which is going to build more muscle

play07:20

than just once a week if you're really

play07:21

trying to bring up a specific muscle

play07:24

like your arms some soon to be out

play07:26

research also suggests you can

play07:28

experiment with training those muscles

play07:30

even more often finally if you're still

play07:32

intent on sticking with the body part

play07:34

split at least modify it like this it'll

play07:37

let you hit each muscle twice a week on

play07:40

average did you catch what I said that's

play07:42

right the astute listener will have

play07:44

noticed that I mention you can train

play07:46

using a full body split even if you're

play07:48

training say four or more days a week

play07:50

but wait a minute wouldn't that mean

play07:52

you're training the same muscles on two

play07:54

consecutive days wouldn't that mean

play07:56

you'll overtrade this is our next

play07:58

outdated workout rule

play07:59

the idea that you need a specific amount

play08:01

of rest between two workouts such as 48

play08:04

Hours 72 or any other gratuitously

play08:07

rounded to the nearest 24-hour increment

play08:09

number that you can imagine don't get me

play08:12

wrong resting is important but let's

play08:14

rationally analyze the idea that for

play08:16

example you always need 48 hours between

play08:19

workouts okay what about if you did one

play08:22

set of bicep curls today and try to do

play08:24

another set tomorrow would you be fine

play08:26

hell yes it turns out you very very much

play08:29

need to consider context when

play08:31

determining how long you need between

play08:34

two workouts for the same muscle how

play08:36

fatiguing was the walkout and how good

play08:38

is your recovery the balance between

play08:40

those two will determine the answer

play08:43

that's why a full body approach can work

play08:46

you're not smashing yourself every

play08:48

single day and your weekly training

play08:50

volume how many sets you do in a week

play08:52

remains similar when it comes to the

play08:54

balance between training and Recovery

play08:56

the amount of work you do matters a a

play08:59

whole lot more than exactly how it's

play09:01

distributed across the week one of the

play09:03

most common questions I receive by

play09:05

someone who just downloaded my 12 free

play09:07

programs Link in the description is how

play09:10

should I distribute my three training

play09:12

days across the week I can only train

play09:14

Monday Tuesday Wednesday hell you might

play09:17

even think that you won't make gains

play09:19

since you can only train on backtack

play09:21

days and certainly you can make

play09:23

compelling theoretical case training

play09:25

muscle when it isn't fully recovered

play09:27

might not be ideal on the other and even

play09:30

if you frontload your training to Monday

play09:32

Tuesday and Wednesday and are fatigued

play09:34

by the time you get to Wednesday's

play09:35

workout wouldn't your body just use the

play09:37

rest of the week to recover from the

play09:39

accumulated fatigue and be just fine

play09:42

fortunately for you science has examined

play09:44

that idea too Weekend Warriors Rejoice

play09:47

three different studies now have

play09:49

compared the effect of training on

play09:50

non-consecutive days versus training on

play09:52

consecutive days using the exact same

play09:55

training program all three studies found

play09:57

similar improvements in muscle strength

play09:59

and muscle growth from both approaches

play10:02

so contrary to popular bro wisdom

play10:04

training on consecutive days though

play10:07

potentially not ideal definitely isn't

play10:09

going to make or break your gains and

play10:12

know you don't need a preset amount of

play10:14

rest between two walkout days look I

play10:16

know it's all the rage these days to you

play10:18

out the Bros have known about this all

play10:21

along whenever a new study comes out

play10:23

it's easy to forget how many practices

play10:25

the Bros got wrong maybe if the Bros had

play10:29

some some fly clothing they would be a

play10:31

bit more relaxed about new studies

play10:33

suggesting that some of their practices

play10:35

might not be ideal for the most

play10:37

comfortable durable and nicest designs

play10:40

in the game Go to Rascal apparel.com and

play10:42

use code wolf a checkout for a discount

play10:45

and to support your favorite Tik Tok

play10:48

influencer Dr Milo wolf we out

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Workout TipsMuscle GrowthBodybuildingTraining FrequencyFitness ScienceRep RangeHypertrophyExercise MythsModern TrainingStrength Training
英語で要約が必要ですか?