Philosophy of Research (Social Sciences v Natural Sciences)
Summary
TLDRDr. Gary Kerr, a social scientist at the University of Salford, reflects on his transition from a positivist scientific background in genetics and cell biology to his current qualitative research in sociology, focusing on science festivals. He discusses how his research paradigm shifted from viewing truth as an objective reality waiting to be discovered, to seeing knowledge as co-constructed through human interactions. By using ethnographic methods and semi-structured interviews, he seeks to understand the social dynamics of science festivals. Dr. Kerr concludes by noting the distinct challenges between science and social science PhDs.
Takeaways
- 🎓 Dr. Gary Kerr is a social scientist at the University of Salford.
- 🔍 Social science studies society, its functions, relationships, behaviors, and organization.
- 🧬 Dr. Kerr's first PhD was in genetics and cell biology, reflecting a shift in his academic focus.
- 🎭 His second PhD is in sociology, festival studies, and science communication, with a focus on science festivals.
- 🌐 As a 'recovering scientist,' Dr. Kerr's worldview has evolved from a positivist to a more constructivist perspective.
- 📊 Previously, he believed in an objective truth discovered through quantitative research.
- 📝 Now, as a social scientist, he sees truth as socially constructed through people's actions and thoughts.
- 🗣️ Dr. Kerr uses qualitative research methods, such as in-depth semi-structured interviews, to co-construct knowledge.
- 🌐 His research approach does not seek a generalizable truth but rather the meanings people construct.
- 🌍 Inspired by ethnography, Dr. Kerr spends time with science festivals worldwide to understand them from an insider's perspective.
- 🤔 Dr. Kerr finds it difficult to compare the challenges of doing a PhD in sciences versus social sciences, as both present unique difficulties.
Q & A
What is social science according to Dr. Gary Kerr?
-Social science is the study of society, focusing on how society functions, relationships in their broadest sense, human behavior, interactions, and how society organizes itself.
What is the main focus of social research as described by Dr. Kerr?
-Social research is about understanding the social world, making sense of social hierarchies, interactions, and behaviors.
What is Dr. Kerr’s academic background?
-Dr. Kerr has a PhD in genetics and cell biology, and a second PhD in sociology, with a focus on festival studies and science communication.
How does Dr. Kerr describe his transition from a natural scientist to a social scientist?
-Dr. Kerr refers to himself as a 'recovering scientist,' meaning his research paradigm shifted from a positivist view (objective truth) in laboratory science to a social constructivist approach in social research.
What does Dr. Kerr mean by 'positivist' in his previous scientific work?
-In his laboratory science work, 'positivist' refers to the belief that objective truth exists independently and can be discovered through quantitative methods, where the researcher stands apart from the research.
How does Dr. Kerr’s ontology and epistemology differ as a social scientist?
-As a social scientist, Dr. Kerr's ontology suggests that reality is made through people’s actions and thoughts, and his epistemology holds that truth emerges through social interaction, rather than being an external, discoverable reality.
What research methods does Dr. Kerr use as a qualitative researcher?
-Dr. Kerr uses in-depth, semi-structured interviews to generate data. He believes that knowledge is co-constructed with research participants, and the data can include feelings and interpretations.
What role does ethnography play in Dr. Kerr’s research?
-Dr. Kerr’s research is inspired by ethnography, where he works closely with science festivals in various capacities. This insider perspective helps him better understand how science festivals function and operate.
Why does Dr. Kerr believe it’s important to study as an insider in his field?
-Dr. Kerr believes that studying as an insider allows him to interpret his data more effectively, as he gains insights and understanding that an outsider may not have.
Does Dr. Kerr think it is easier to do a PhD in the sciences or social sciences?
-Dr. Kerr does not believe one is easier than the other, noting that both fields offer their own set of challenges and are not easily comparable.
Outlines
🧑🔬 From Genetics to Social Science
Dr. Gary Kerr introduces himself as a social scientist at the University of Salford. He explains that social science involves studying society, human behavior, and interactions. Dr. Kerr shares his academic journey, starting with a PhD in genetics and cell biology, and then transitioning to sociology and science communication with a focus on science festivals. He reflects on his shift from a positivist worldview as a laboratory scientist to a more interpretive approach as a social scientist, where he believes that truth is socially constructed through people's actions and thoughts. Dr. Kerr emphasizes the qualitative nature of his current research, which involves interviewing people and co-constructing knowledge with his research participants.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Social Science
💡Research Paradigm
💡Positivism
💡Ontology
💡Epistemology
💡Qualitative Research
💡Science Communication
💡Ethnography
💡Social Constructionism
💡Science Festivals
Highlights
Dr. Gary Kerr is a social scientist at the University of Salford.
Social science studies society, its functions, relationships, human behavior, and organization.
Dr. Kerr's first PhD was in genetics and cell biology.
His second PhD is in sociology, festival studies, and science communication.
Dr. Kerr's research focuses on science festivals.
He describes himself as a 'recovering scientist', indicating a shift in his research paradigm.
As a laboratory scientist, Dr. Kerr had a positivist worldview.
In his current role, Dr. Kerr's ontology and epistemology are distinctly different from his positivist past.
The world is made real through people's actions and thoughts, according to Dr. Kerr's current view.
Truth emerges rather than existing in a discoverable form, as per Dr. Kerr's qualitative research approach.
Dr. Kerr generates data through in-depth, semi-structured interviews.
His role as a researcher is to co-construct knowledge with research participants.
Knowledge is socially constructed in Dr. Kerr's research.
Dr. Kerr's research is inspired by ethnographic principles.
He spends time working with science festivals worldwide to understand their inner workings.
Being an insider allows Dr. Kerr to understand and interpret data differently.
Dr. Kerr finds it difficult to compare the challenges of doing a PhD in sciences versus social sciences.
Both sciences present unique challenges, according to Dr. Kerr.
Transcripts
hello my name is dr. Gary Kerr and I'm a
social scientist here at the University
of Salford social science is the study
of society how society functions
relationships in their broadest sense
human behavior interactions and how
society organizes itself social research
is about understanding the social world
in which we live and making sense of our
social hierarchies interactions and
behaviors but my background hasn't
always been as a social scientist my
first PhD was in genetics and cell
biology and now my second PhD is in the
sociology festival studies and science
communication specifically I research
science festivals so when people ask me
if I'm a scientist I usually respond by
saying that I'm a recovering scientist
and what I mean by that is that my view
of the world or my research paradigm the
set of beliefs that my research has
shifted from a positivist view of the
world when I was a laboratory scientist
my worldview was positivist or
Objectivist were my worldview was a the
ultimate truth is just out there sitting
waiting to be discovered
in the labs truth is discovered by
quantitative research using a calculator
where the role of the researcher is to
observe record and analyze data the
researcher stands apart from the
research and uses a systematic set of
methods to try and disprove a hypothesis
however as a social scientist my
ontology that is the nature of social
reality and my epidemiology how we know
the reality could not be more different
from my previous positivist outlook for
me now my worldview as a social
researcher is that the world is made
real through people's actions through
people's thoughts and that the truth
emerges and does not exist in some
external and readily discoverable form
I'm a qualitative researcher so I
generate my data by interviewing people
using in-depth semi-structured
interviews my role as a researcher is to
co construct knowledge using the data I
collect from my research participants in
this sense knowledge is something that's
socially constructed by the research
participants and by myself of course my
approach does not presume that there's a
generalizable truth about reality but
the aim is to identify the meaning
people construct as they interact and
data may also include feelings and
interpretations of what subjects reveal
my research is also inspired by the
principles of ethnography so I spent
quite a lot of time working with various
science festivals across the world in
various capacities this helps me
understand how science festivals
function and operate from the inside so
it's a really interesting place to be as
a researcher studying as an insider and
I wouldn't be able to understand and
interpret my data in the same way I
would if I were an outsider looking in
and asking these questions and finally
people always ask me is it easier to do
a PhD in the sciences or the social
sciences and to that I don't have an
answer
they're both different and provide their
own set of challenges
so they're not so comparable thank you
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)