شاهد .. لحظة إعلان قرار محكمة العدل الدولية بشأن اتهام إسرائيل بارتكاب إبادة جماعية في غزة
Summary
TLDRThe transcript reveals a court decision regarding Israel's obligations towards Palestinians in Gaza. The court, with a vote of 15 to 2, mandates Israel to adhere to several measures under an agreement. These measures include preventing acts that could harm the Palestinian community, including physical or psychological harm, and avoiding living conditions that could lead to the community's partial or complete destruction. Additionally, Israel is required to prevent actions that could hinder births within the community. Dissenting opinions are noted from judges including Ehud Barak. The decision emphasizes Israel's duty to prevent incitement to genocide and ensure the preservation of evidence related to the Genocide Convention. Israel is also tasked with providing essential services and humanitarian aid to Palestinians in Gaza, and must report back to the court on the measures taken.
Takeaways
- 💭 The court ruled by a majority, 15 to 2, that Israel must take all necessary measures to prevent any acts associated with genocide against Palestinians in Gaza, including killing, causing serious physical or mental harm, imposing conditions of life aimed at partial or total destruction of the group, and measures intended to prevent births within the group.
- 🔥 Judges Donoghue, Tomka, Yusuf, Abraham, Benouna, Yusuf, Salam, and others voted for the decision, indicating a strong consensus among a diverse panel of judges.
- 🛠 The court emphasized Israel's obligations under the convention to prevent acts of genocide, highlighting the importance of adhering to international legal standards.
- 👮 The decision mandates Israel to ensure its military forces do not commit prohibited acts, reinforcing the need for strict compliance with international law.
- 🚨 Israel is required to take effective and immediate steps to ensure the provision of essential services and humanitarian aid to address the needs of Palestinians in Gaza, showcasing the court's concern for immediate humanitarian needs.
- 📝 The ruling demands Israel to take efficient measures to prevent the destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence related to acts of genocide, underlining the importance of accountability and the rule of law.
- 📈 With a vote of 16 against 1, the court further stipulated that Israel must prevent and punish incitement to genocide, expanding its directives to encompass actions that could lead to genocide.
- 📚 Israel is required to report back to the court on the measures taken within a month, indicating the court's intention to monitor compliance and implementation of its orders.
- 🔗 The decision is binding and reflects the international community's stance on preventing genocide and protecting human rights, illustrating the role of international courts in enforcing legal norms.
- 💡 The dissenting opinions, notably from judges like Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh and others, highlight the complexity and contentious nature of international legal decisions, emphasizing the diversity of judicial perspectives.
Q & A
What was the decision made by the court regarding Israel's obligations?
-The court decided that Israel must take all measures to prevent any acts connected to the scope of Article 2, including killing members of the group, causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group, imposing living conditions on the group aimed at its partial or total destruction, and imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.
What was the vote count for the temporary measures mentioned in the decision?
-The vote count for the temporary measures was 15 in favor and 2 against.
What actions must Israel ensure its military forces do not commit?
-Israel must ensure that its military forces do not commit any prohibited acts according to the mentioned obligations.
What measures must Israel take concerning the Palestinians in Gaza according to the decision?
-Israel must take effective and immediate steps to ensure the provision of basic services and humanitarian aid to address the problems faced by Palestinians in Gaza.
What was the decision regarding Israel's efforts to prevent and punish genocide incitement?
-Israel must take all measures to prevent incitement to genocide and punish it against the Palestinians in Gaza.
What does the decision say about Israel's obligations to preserve evidence?
-Israel must take effective measures to prevent destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence according to Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide.
How often must Israel report to the court on the measures it will take?
-Israel must submit a report to the court on all measures it will take within one month from the date of the order.
Who were the judges that voted against the decision?
-Judges Akay, Brak, and Ms. Senik were mentioned as being against certain decisions.
What is the significance of the vote tally in the decisions made by the court?
-The vote tallies, such as 15 to 2 and 16 to 1, demonstrate the majority support for the court's decisions regarding Israel's obligations and measures to be taken concerning the Palestinians in Gaza.
What are the implications of the court's decision for Israel and the Palestinians in Gaza?
-The court's decision obligates Israel to undertake specific actions to prevent violations of international law, ensure humanitarian aid, and report on its compliance, impacting the living conditions and rights of the Palestinians in Gaza.
Outlines
⚖️ Decision Pronouncement on Temporary Measures
The court pronounces a decision requiring Israel to adhere to its obligations under an agreement related to the Palestinians in Gaza, with a vote of 15 in favor and 2 against. The measures include preventing acts that could lead to the physical or psychological harm of group members, imposing living conditions aimed at the group's partial or total destruction, and preventing births within the group. Dissenters like Donnie Yen, Woof Tomka, and others against the decision emphasize Israel's responsibility to ensure its military does not commit prohibited actions. The decision mandates Israel to take immediate and effective steps to prevent incitement to genocide and to ensure the provision of basic services and humanitarian aid to address the challenges faced by Palestinians in Gaza. Additionally, Israel is required to take effective measures to prevent destruction and preserve evidence according to the Genocide Convention, and to report back to the court on the measures taken within a month of the order.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Temporary Measures
💡Article 2
💡Genocide Prevention
💡Humanitarian Aid
💡Military Forces
💡Justice and Accountability
💡Living Conditions
💡Judges' Votes
💡Legal Obligations
💡Prohibition of Acts
Highlights
The court refers to temporary measures with a vote of 15 to 2.
Israel must, according to its obligations under the agreement, take all measures to prevent any act related to Article 2.
Measures include preventing killing members of the group, causing serious physical or psychological harm, and imposing living conditions intended to partially or completely destroy the group.
The court also emphasizes preventing measures aimed at reducing births within the group.
Judges Donoghue, Tomka, Yusuf, Bhandari, Salam, and others support the decision.
Judges Abraham, Benoît, Yusuf, and others express dissent against certain decisions.
Israel must ensure its military forces do not commit prohibited acts as per the court's decision.
A significant majority, 16 against 1, mandates Israel to take measures to prevent and punish incitement to genocide against Palestinians in Gaza.
The court orders Israel to take immediate and effective steps to ensure basic services and humanitarian aid to address the challenges faced by Palestinians in Gaza.
The court demands Israel to take effective measures to prevent destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence according to Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
Israel is required to report back to the court on all measures taken within a month from the order.
The decision underscores the importance of protecting Palestinian rights and ensuring their safety and well-being.
The court's ruling highlights the international community's commitment to preventing acts of genocide and ensuring accountability.
The dissenting opinions emphasize the complexity of the situation and the challenges in implementing the court's orders.
The resolution reflects the court's proactive stance on human rights and the protection of vulnerable populations in conflict zones.
Transcripts
سوف اقرا
الان منطوق القرار ولهذه الاسباب فان
المحكمه تشير الى
هذه التدابير
المؤقته 15 مقابل اثنين من الاصوات
اسرائيل يجب وفقا لالتزاماتها بالاتفاقيه
وعلاقه ذلك بالفلسطينيين في غزه ان تتخذ
جميع الاجراءات لكي تمنع اقتراف اي فعل
مرتبط بنطاق الماده
الثانيه بما في ذلك قتل اعضاء من الجماعه
ثانيا الحاق الاذى الجسدي او النفسي
الخطير باعضاء الجماعه ثالثا فرض اوضاع
معيشيه على الجماعه بشكل متعامد تهدف الى
التدمير الفعلي المدي للجماعه كليا او
جزئيا رابعا فرض اجراءات تهدف الى منع
المواليد او انجاب الاطفال داخل
الجماعه الرئيس دونيه ووفور تومكا
يوسف ش
بنداري سلام ي مولت شار
برانش ج اك
مسيني مع سبينت ادهك براك ضد هذا القرار
اذا من خلال 15 لصالح واثنان ضد
اسرائيل يجب ان تتاكد بان قواتها العسكريه
يجب ان لا تقترف اي افعال محظوره وفقا لما
ذكرت كفور وتمك ابراهام بنونا يوسف شوي
بنداري روبنسون سلام ايساو نوتي تارز وورث
براند ج ادهك
مسكي مع
وضد اك براك
و 16 مقابل
واحد اسرائيل يجب تخ جميع الاجراءات
ل منع التحريض على الاباده الجماعيه
والمعاقب عليها ازاء الفلسطينيين في قطاع
غزه مع
القرار الرئيس ونائبه دونكا ابراهام بنونا
يوسف شوي بنداري روبنسن سلام ايساو نتي
شارز
بران اكك مسك ضد هذا القر
القاضي
سفينكي 16 مع وواحد ضد دوله اسرائيل يجب
ان تتخذ خطوات فعاله وفوريه لكي تضمن
توفير الخدمات الاساسيه والمساعدات
الانسانيه للتصدي للمشاكل التي يواجهها
الفلسطينيون في غزه مع هذا التدبير
الوقائي الرئيس ونائبه القاضي تمكا قاضي
ابرهم بينون يوسف شوي بنداري روسون سلام
يساو نوتي تشارلز وورث براند
وبراك وم سينيكي اما ضد ف ضد هذا التدبير
سينيكي 15 مع اثنان ضد دوله اسرائيل يجب
ان تتخذ تدابير ناجعه لمنع
تدمير التاكد من الحفاظ على الادله وفقا
للماده الثانيه والماده الثالثه من
الاتفاقيه بشان منع الاباد الجمعيه
والمعاقب عليها ضد اعضاء من المجموعه يعني
الفلسطينيين مع الرئيس
نائبه القاضي تمكا ابراهام بونا يوسف شوي
بنداري روبنسون سلام ايسا نت تزور براند
ومسكي
ضد
بارك 15 مقابل الاثنان دوله اسرائيل يجب
ان ترفع تقريرا للمحكمه بشان جميع
التدابير التي سوف تتخذها خلال الشهر من
يوم هذا الامر الرئيس مع نائبه القاضي
دومك ابراهام بينونه يوسف شوي بنداري
روبنسون سلام
يوسا تور بر ومسكي ضد
تبير المؤقت سبتني
وبرك الان
[موسيقى]
اطالب
関連動画をさらに表示
How unprecedented was the ICJ ruling on Gaza genocide case?
UN court rules Israel must prevent genocidal acts in Gaza | BBC News
La Base 4x78 | Corte Internacional de Justicia: Israel debe detener el genocidio
Debunking Israel's Defense Speedrun
'It was a judgment full of twists and turns': Barrister discusses ICJ hearing on Israeli genocide
Israel ruling: Reaction and analysis from Sky News correspondents
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)