Penjelasan Fadli Zon Tentang Ideologi PKI & Komunis.

Berakal Sehat Channel
29 Sept 202017:32

Summary

TLDRThe speaker discusses the historical events surrounding the Indonesian Communist Party's (PKI) alleged coup attempts in 1948 and 1965. They reference MPRS No. 25 and Law No. 27/99, which led to the PKI's dissolution for attempting to overthrow the Indonesian government. The speaker also addresses the party's collaboration with the Dutch during the second Indonesian war of independence and the subsequent impact on the nation. They emphasize the importance of understanding history to prevent such tragedies from recurring.

Takeaways

  • 😀 The speaker addresses the audience in Indonesian, marking the end of an event and wishing them a good evening.
  • 📜 The speaker mentions two attempts by the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) to stage a coup, one in 1948 and another in 1965, and claims to have clear evidence of these attempts.
  • 🇮🇩 Reference is made to the MPRS No. 25 of 1966 and Law No. 27 of 1999, which clearly state the dissolution of the PKI for attempting to overthrow the Republic of Indonesia.
  • 📚 The speaker discusses the historical context of the PKI's involvement in the Indonesian Revolution and their collaboration with the Dutch during the second military aggression.
  • 🗣️ A quote from the first Bolshevik, Piotr Catch, is cited to emphasize the need for revolutionaries to seize power before implementing revolutionary programs.
  • 📖 The speaker highlights the importance of understanding history to avoid repetition of past mistakes, referencing a conversation with Ustadz Tengku Zulkarnain.
  • 📰 The speaker mentions the 'Harian Rakyat' newspaper, which was led by the PKI and published editorials supporting the actions of the 30 September Movement to 'save the revolution and the people'.
  • 🔍 The speaker refutes claims that figures like Soekarno and Hatta were involved in the 1965 coup, asserting that the PKI was the sole instigator.
  • 🚫 The speaker argues that the PKI's actions were treasonous, as they collaborated with foreign powers to undermine the nation, and thus their ban was justified.
  • 🏛️ The speaker discusses the legal and historical basis for the PKI's ban, citing the MPRS and Law No. 27 as conclusive evidence of the party's guilt in the coup attempt.

Q & A

  • What is the main theme of the discussion in the transcript?

    -The main theme of the discussion is the historical events surrounding the alleged coup attempts by the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) in 1948 and 1965, and the subsequent actions taken against the party.

  • What does the speaker claim about the PKI's intentions in 1948 and 1965?

    -The speaker claims that the PKI intended to stage coups in both 1948 and 1965, citing evidence and historical documents to support this assertion.

  • What legal actions are mentioned in the transcript regarding the PKI?

    -The transcript mentions MPRS No. 25, year 66, and Law No. 27, year 99, which clearly state that the PKI was disbanded for attempting to overthrow the Republic of Indonesia.

  • What is the significance of the reference to 'Revolution from above' mentioned in the transcript?

    -The reference to 'Revolution from above' is significant as it is a concept from a Bolshevik, Piotr Catch, which suggests that revolution must occur before societal transformation, and that a small group must seize power to implement the revolution's program.

  • What does the speaker say about the historical involvement of the PKI in the Proclamation of Independence of Indonesia?

    -The speaker states that the PKI did not participate in the Proclamation of Independence of Indonesia, and that it was the nationalists and Islamic figures who were involved.

  • What is the connection between the PKI and the events of Madiun in 1948 mentioned in the transcript?

    -The connection mentioned is that the PKI collaborated with the Dutch, who were attempting to reassert control over Indonesia after the Proclamation of Independence. The PKI's actions in Madiun were part of a broader attempt to undermine the newly independent nation.

  • What is the significance of the reference to 'Musso' in the transcript?

    -The reference to 'Musso' is significant as he is a figure from Moscow who came to correct the course of the PKI, indicating the influence of international communism on the PKI's actions and ideology.

  • What is the speaker's view on the role of history in understanding the PKI's actions?

    -The speaker emphasizes the importance of understanding history to avoid misinterpretations and to correctly identify the PKI's actions as coup attempts, rather than legitimate political activities.

  • What does the speaker say about the actions of the PKI in the 1950s and 1960s?

    -The speaker alleges that the PKI was involved in various acts of terror and subversion during the 1950s and 1960s, leading up to the events of 1965.

  • What is the speaker's stance on the banning of the PKI?

    -The speaker supports the banning of the PKI, viewing it as a necessary measure due to the party's history of backstabbing and attempts to seize power through coups.

  • What is the speaker's view on the comparison of the PKI to other political movements or parties?

    -The speaker differentiates the PKI from other political movements, arguing that the PKI's actions were unique in their attempt to overthrow the government and that they should not be equated with other parties or movements.

Outlines

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Mindmap

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Keywords

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Highlights

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Transcripts

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Indonesia HistoryCommunist StrugglePolitical AnalysisHistorical ContextRevolutionary MovementPKI ControversyCultural RevolutionNationalismGovernment ResponseHistorical Debate
英語で要約が必要ですか?