Why You Should Never Say "It's Just A Theory"

Professor Dave Explains
31 Oct 201607:40

Summary

TLDRThis script explains the scientific method, emphasizing its importance in understanding the natural world. It covers the core concepts of observation, hypothesis, theory, and law, while addressing common misconceptions. The speaker uses examples like gravity to illustrate how theories are formulated through experiments and data collection, debunking the idea that a theory is merely a guess. It also highlights the difference between a law, which summarizes observations, and a theory, which explains why phenomena occur. Overall, the scientific method is portrayed as the most reliable way to gain knowledge about the universe.

Takeaways

  • 🔬 The scientific method is a crucial framework for gaining knowledge about the universe, originating from Aristotle and maturing around the time of Galileo and Newton.
  • 🌍 Science encompasses the study of everything, aiming to explain the natural world through empirical evidence.
  • 🧪 A hypothesis is a tentative explanation for observations, and it can be tested through experiments to gather empirical data.
  • 📉 An experiment must focus on one independent variable (which we control) and one dependent variable (which changes in response).
  • 🏗️ If a hypothesis consistently explains a wide range of phenomena, it can evolve into a theory, like Newton's theory of gravity.
  • 🌌 Theories, such as general relativity or atomic theory, are well-substantiated explanations that predict and correlate vast amounts of data.
  • 📜 A law summarizes observations (e.g., the law of gravity), but it doesn't explain why something happens—that's the role of a theory.
  • 💡 A common misconception is that a theory is a guess or becomes a law when proven, but theories and laws serve different purposes.
  • 🎯 Theories must make predictions that can be tested and falsified. If a theory’s predictions fail, the theory is discarded or revised.
  • 🧠 The scientific method is impartial and rigorous, avoiding the biases and limitations of human intuition and common sense.

Q & A

  • What is the scientific method and why is it important?

    -The scientific method is a structured process used to gain knowledge about the universe. It involves observation, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, gathering data, and forming theories. It’s important because it is the only way to truly know anything about the world beyond subjective personal experience.

  • How does the script differentiate between a hypothesis and a theory?

    -A hypothesis is a tentative explanation or guess about an observation, while a theory is a comprehensive explanation of phenomena, backed by a large body of data and capable of making predictions. A theory has much more certainty than a hypothesis.

  • What misconception about theories and laws does the script address?

    -The misconception is that a theory is less certain than a law, and that if a theory is proven true, it becomes a law. In reality, laws are summaries of observations, while theories explain why those observations happen.

  • What example does the script use to explain the difference between a law and a theory?

    -The example used is gravity. The law of gravity states that objects fall to the Earth when dropped, but it doesn’t explain why. Einstein's theory of general relativity explains why objects fall by stating that space-time is warped around massive objects.

  • Why are predictions important in scientific theories?

    -Predictions are crucial because they allow theories to be tested. If a theory makes predictions that turn out to be false, the theory must be discarded. This is what makes science powerful—it constantly refines its understanding based on new data.

  • What is the role of experimentation in the scientific method?

    -Experimentation gathers empirical data to support or refute a hypothesis. It involves controlling variables to isolate the factor being tested, ensuring that the data is specific to the inquiry at hand.

  • What example of an experiment does the script discuss?

    -The script discusses an experiment involving dropping objects of different masses, similar to Galileo’s rumored experiment from the Leaning Tower of Pisa. The experiment showed that objects fall at the same rate regardless of their mass, refuting the hypothesis that heavier objects fall faster.

  • How does the script explain the development of Newton's gravitational theory?

    -Newton’s gravitational theory combined Galileo’s data on objects falling on Earth and Kepler’s data on planetary orbits. Newton realized that these phenomena could be explained by a single concept, gravity, and formulated an equation that explained both terrestrial and celestial motion.

  • What is a common misunderstanding about the term 'theory' in everyday language?

    -In everyday language, 'theory' is often used to mean a guess. However, in science, a theory is a well-supported explanation of phenomena, backed by extensive evidence, and capable of making accurate predictions.

  • Why is the scientific method considered impartial and superior to intuition?

    -The scientific method is rigorous and impartial, relying on empirical evidence and controlled experiments, unlike intuition, which is biased by personal desires and limited mental capacity. It allows us to gain objective knowledge about the world.

Outlines

00:00

🔬 Introduction to the Scientific Method

Professor Dave introduces the scientific method, a key framework for understanding the natural world. He discusses how science, derived from the Latin word meaning 'to know,' helps us comprehend phenomena like rocks, the ocean, and the human body. The method, rooted in Aristotle’s time and refined by Galileo and Newton, enables us to gain knowledge of the universe. He highlights that while science may not explain everything yet, it progresses daily, offering an objective way to understand the world beyond personal experience. He also addresses the common cultural skepticism of science, often misunderstanding terms like 'theory.'

05:01

💡 Observation, Hypothesis, Theory, and Law

The concepts of observation, hypothesis, theory, and law are introduced. Professor Dave explains that a hypothesis is a tentative explanation based on observation. He uses the example of an object falling to illustrate how an experiment can test a hypothesis. By controlling variables—such as dropping objects of varying masses—one can gather empirical evidence to support or refute a hypothesis. Dave references Galileo’s experiment from the Leaning Tower of Pisa, noting how refining experiments eliminates extraneous variables and leads to accurate conclusions. If a hypothesis explains a large body of data, it can evolve into a theory, as in Newton's gravitational theory.

🚀 The Power of Theories and Predictions

Professor Dave explores how scientific theories, like Newton’s gravitational theory, explain a wide range of data with simple and elegant equations. He gives the example of sending probes into space using precise mathematical predictions based on gravitational theory. Contrary to common belief, theories are not guesses; they are supported by strong evidence. Theories like atomic theory and the Big Bang theory are fundamental to our understanding of the universe, and their consistency beyond reasonable doubt demonstrates their validity. He clarifies that a theory doesn't 'become' a law; laws summarize observations, while theories explain the 'why' behind those observations.

📜 The Difference Between Laws and Theories

Dave clarifies the common misconception between scientific laws and theories. A law summarizes repeated observations (e.g., gravity making objects fall to Earth) but does not explain why it happens. A theory, such as Einstein’s theory of general relativity, provides that explanation. While laws describe phenomena, theories are more valuable because they explain the mechanisms behind the phenomena and make testable predictions. Theories are judged by their ability to predict future events with accuracy, and those that consistently do so are considered robust explanations of the universe’s workings. Science evolves by continually testing and refining theories based on new evidence.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Scientific Method

The scientific method is a systematic approach to understanding the natural world, involving observation, hypothesis formulation, experimentation, and the development of theories or laws. The video emphasizes its importance as the only reliable way to gain objective knowledge about the universe, contrasting it with subjective beliefs.

💡Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a tentative explanation of an observed phenomenon, which can be tested through experimentation. In the video, the example of a hypothesis is given when observing objects falling to the ground, where one might guess that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones.

💡Theory

A theory is a comprehensive explanation that unifies a wide range of observations and experimental data. In the video, it is emphasized that theories, like Newton’s theory of gravity, explain why phenomena occur and are more valuable than laws. A theory is built on evidence and can predict future events.

💡Law

A law is a statement based on repeated observations that describes a phenomenon, but it does not explain why the phenomenon occurs. In the video, the law of gravity is discussed as a simple description of what happens when objects fall, without providing the explanatory power of a theory like general relativity.

💡Experiment

An experiment is a controlled method of testing a hypothesis by manipulating variables to gather empirical evidence. The video uses the example of dropping objects of different masses to test how mass affects the speed of falling objects, mirroring Galileo's reputed experiment from the Leaning Tower of Pisa.

💡Observation

Observation is the process of gathering data or noticing a phenomenon in the natural world, often the first step in the scientific method. The video begins by mentioning that scientists make observations, like objects falling, which leads to formulating hypotheses and eventually developing theories.

💡Independent Variable

The independent variable is the factor in an experiment that is deliberately changed or manipulated. In the video, mass is presented as the independent variable in an experiment where objects of varying masses are dropped to observe how it influences the rate of descent.

💡Dependent Variable

The dependent variable is the outcome that is measured in an experiment, which changes in response to the independent variable. The video illustrates this concept by describing how the speed at which an object falls depends on its mass in the experiment testing the relationship between mass and descent speed.

💡Falsifiability

Falsifiability refers to the ability of a theory to be proven wrong through empirical evidence. The video stresses that for a theory to be scientific, it must make falsifiable predictions—meaning that if the theory's predictions fail, the theory must be revised or discarded, ensuring the rigor of the scientific process.

💡Prediction

Prediction in science refers to the use of theories or hypotheses to forecast future events or experimental outcomes. The video highlights how Newton’s theory of gravity allows scientists to predict the motion of objects in space, such as calculating the trajectory of a space probe to a distant planet.

Highlights

The scientific method is rooted in the time of Aristotle but came to maturity during the era of Galileo and Newton.

Science is the study of everything, derived from the Latin word meaning 'to know.'

Science doesn't know everything, but each day we know a little more than before.

Understanding the scientific method is crucial because it is the only reliable way to gain knowledge about the world beyond personal experiences.

A hypothesis is a tentative explanation based on observations and is often confused with the colloquial use of the term 'theory.'

An experiment is designed to gather empirical evidence that supports or refutes a hypothesis by comparing data to predictions.

In an experiment, controlling variables is essential, limiting it to one independent variable and one dependent variable to ensure accuracy.

Galileo's experiment from the Leaning Tower of Pisa helped demonstrate that objects of different masses fall at the same rate, challenging intuitive but incorrect hypotheses.

When a hypothesis grows comprehensive enough to explain a broader range of data, it can evolve into a scientific theory.

Newton’s gravitational theory unified Galileo’s data on falling objects with Kepler’s observations on planetary motion, forming one equation explaining gravity.

A scientific theory is not a guess but a robust framework supported by data, capable of making precise predictions about future events.

Laws summarize observations, such as the law of gravity, but do not explain the underlying causes—this is the domain of theories.

Theories must be falsifiable and make predictions. If predictions fail, the theory must be discarded or refined.

The strength of science lies in its ability to discard theories that don't hold up under rigorous testing, leading to more accurate understandings of the universe.

The scientific method involves observation, hypothesis, experimentation, and theory formulation, bypassing personal biases and relying on empirical evidence.

Transcripts

play00:00

Hey it's Professor Dave, I want to tell

play00:02

you about the scientific method.

play00:10

What is within the domain of science?

play00:13

Rocks, the ocean, the human

play00:15

body, stars and planets, the list goes on.

play00:18

If we want to learn about these things

play00:20

we must learn about the way we learn, so

play00:23

we must certainly understand the

play00:25

scientific method, which is rooted in the

play00:27

time of Aristotle, but truly came to

play00:29

maturity around the time of Galileo and

play00:32

Newton. This is the framework from which

play00:34

we attain all of our knowledge about the

play00:37

universe.

play00:37

Some people believe that there are

play00:40

things we can know that science could

play00:41

never explain. But science is the study

play00:44

of everything. It comes from the Latin

play00:47

word that means to know.

play00:49

Science doesn't currently know

play00:51

everything, there are things we are

play00:52

trying to figure out in every scientific

play00:54

field right at this very moment. But we

play00:57

know so much that we didn't know before

play00:59

and every day we know a little more.

play01:02

It's important to understand how the

play01:05

scientific method works, and why it's the

play01:08

only way to actually truly know anything

play01:11

about the world that is outside your own

play01:14

subjective personal experience. A certain

play01:17

fraction of our culture tends to reject

play01:19

science, making statements like "well, we

play01:22

don't know if that's true, it's just a

play01:24

theory". But these kinds of statements

play01:27

reflect a deep misunderstanding of

play01:29

certain concepts. Let's first define the

play01:33

terms observation, hypothesis, theory, and

play01:37

law, as they pertain to science. When most

play01:40

people use the word "theory" in common

play01:43

language, they mean a guess. But that is

play01:45

actually what hypothesis is. A hypothesis

play01:49

is a tentative explanation of

play01:50

observations. Let's say we make an

play01:52

observation about a natural phenomenon

play01:54

like an object falling to the ground.

play01:57

We could observe the object and how fast it

play02:00

falls, and we might try to guess

play02:02

something fundamental about the

play02:03

phenomenon of falling. Maybe we would

play02:06

hypothesize that objects fall at a speed

play02:09

that is proportional to their mass, so

play02:12

heavier things fall more

play02:13

quickly and lighter things fall more

play02:15

slowly, as that seems pretty intuitive.

play02:19

We may then get an idea for some way to

play02:21

test our hypothesis. An experiment is a

play02:24

way that we can gather empirical

play02:25

evidence that will either support or

play02:28

refute the hypothesis by comparing data

play02:30

to predictions we have made. In this case

play02:33

the experiment is pretty obvious.

play02:36

We could drop objects of varying masses

play02:38

from the same point and see how fast

play02:40

they fall, like Galileo is rumored to

play02:43

have done from the top of the Leaning

play02:44

Tower of Pisa in 1589. We might choose to

play02:48

drop an apple and a feather, and the

play02:50

result would seem to support our

play02:52

hypothesis, but if we are clever we will

play02:55

realize that we need to eliminate all

play02:57

the extraneous variables. When we do

play03:00

science, the ideal situation is to limit

play03:02

an experiment to one independent

play03:04

variable and one dependent variable.

play03:08

The independent variable is the one that we

play03:09

can alter at will, in this case the mass

play03:12

of the object, since we could drop an

play03:14

object of any mass. The dependent

play03:17

variable, in this case the speed at which

play03:19

the object falls, is the one that should

play03:21

change its value based on the value of

play03:24

the independent variable, if there is any

play03:26

correlation between them. So if we are

play03:29

testing how the rate of descent

play03:31

correlates with the mass of the object

play03:33

we must drop two objects that are

play03:36

identical in every way

play03:38

apart from their mass. No other variables

play03:41

like shape or wind resistance should be

play03:43

involved. That way all the data we

play03:46

collect will be specific to our inquiry.

play03:48

If we were to drop two spheres with

play03:51

differing masses we would see, just as

play03:53

Galileo did, that they fall at precisely

play03:56

the same rate. This would refute our

play03:58

prior hypothesis and force us to refine

play04:01

the existing one or develop a completely

play04:03

new one. If we can add to a hypothesis so

play04:06

that it becomes comprehensive enough to

play04:08

correlate a larger body of data with

play04:11

just a couple of equations or postulates

play04:13

it can become a theory.

play04:15

This is how Newton arrived at his

play04:18

gravitational theory. He took the data

play04:20

from Galileo about objects falling on

play04:22

earth as well as data from Kepler about

play04:24

the orbits of the planets around the Sun

play04:27

and he realized that it could all be

play04:29

explained by a single concept, and

play04:31

furthermore a single equation.

play04:34

This equation explains the motion of any

play04:36

object in a gravitational field, wether

play04:39

on Earth or in space, so it correlates a

play04:41

tremendous amount of data and explains

play04:44

observable phenomena simply and

play04:47

elegantly. We can even use this equation

play04:49

to do predictive calculations, which is

play04:52

how we send objects through space.

play04:56

We could send a probe towards the outer

play04:58

solar system using math to predict that

play05:00

at a certain time the probe and a

play05:03

particular planet will be near each

play05:05

other so that it can take pictures of

play05:07

the planet. And when that time comes

play05:10

there it is, just as the math said it

play05:12

would be. So a theory is not a guess.

play05:16

In fact, many theories have been shown to

play05:18

be consistent beyond reasonable doubt.

play05:19

There is no doubt that gravity is real.

play05:22

We use atomic theory every day, and if

play05:25

atoms weren't real, chemistry could not

play05:27

exist. So that we can do chemistry at all

play05:31

makes atomic theory consistent beyond

play05:34

reasonable doubt. The same can be said

play05:36

for the big bang theory, evolutionary

play05:38

theory, and so forth. A big misconception

play05:41

is that a theory has less certainty than

play05:44

a law, and that a theory would become a

play05:46

law if proven to be true. This is not at

play05:49

all the case. A law is a summary of

play05:52

observations, which is very different

play05:54

from a theory. Take gravity for example.

play05:57

The law of gravity says that if you drop

play05:59

something it will fall to the earth.

play06:00

Every time we drop something, it falls to

play06:03

the earth, so it's a law. It's just what

play06:05

happens. But this law does not explain

play06:08

why this happens. For that we need a

play06:11

theory, like general relativity, which is

play06:13

Einstein's theory of gravity that

play06:15

improved on Newton's. This says that

play06:18

space-time is warped around massive

play06:20

objects. So the theory explains why an

play06:23

object would fall to the earth as well

play06:25

as why the planets revolve around the

play06:27

Sun. So in reality, a theory is worth more

play06:31

than a law.

play06:32

Furthermore, theories must make

play06:34

predictions. If it doesn't make concrete

play06:37

quantitative, falsifiable predictions

play06:40

about reality, it's not science. And if

play06:43

the theory makes predictions that turn

play06:45

out to be false, then we have to discard

play06:47

the theory. That's what makes science so

play06:49

powerful. If we find a theory that

play06:52

correlates data and every prediction it

play06:54

makes about future events is true, and to

play06:56

high degrees of precision, then that

play06:59

theory must have some explanatory power

play07:01

about the nature of the universe. So that

play07:05

is how we do science. We start with

play07:08

observation, from which we formulate a

play07:11

hypothesis, and then gather empirical

play07:14

data through experiments. If the data

play07:17

yields consistent results we might

play07:18

formulate a law, or if we can organize

play07:21

all the data into an equation or set of

play07:23

postulates, we have a theory. And in this

play07:26

way, common sense and intuition, which are

play07:29

biased due to our innate desires and

play07:31

limited mental capacity, don't hold a

play07:33

candle to the rigorous and impartial

play07:35

approach that is the scientific method.

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Scientific MethodHypothesisTheoryEmpirical DataExperimentationNewtonGalileoGravityScience EducationObservations
英語で要約が必要ですか?