BECED 1-2 | RPH | GROUP 1 | SITE OF THE FIRST MASS

Bernardino, Mary Jones C.
1 Nov 202210:06

Summary

TLDRThe video discusses the controversy surrounding the location of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines, focusing on two claims: Limasawa and Butuan. Based on the journals of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo, both of whom were part of Magellan's expedition, the National Historical Commission of the Philippines supports Limasawa as the site. The video highlights key evidence supporting Limasawa, such as navigational routes and historical accounts, while contrasting it with the less substantiated claims of Butuan. Ultimately, the Limasawa claim is deemed more credible based on verified evidence.

Takeaways

  • 📜 The discussion focuses on the site of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines, a controversial topic in Philippine history.
  • 🇵🇭 There are two places that claim to be the site of the first mass: Limasawa and Butuan.
  • 👑 According to Antonio Pigafetta's account, the first mass occurred on March 31, 1521, in Limasawa (formerly called Mazawa) during Magellan's expedition.
  • ✝️ The mass was conducted by Father Pedro de Valderrama, with two native chieftains, Raja Colombo of Limasawa and Raja Siago of Butuan, in attendance.
  • 🌍 The mass took place on Easter Sunday, and after the ceremony, a wooden cross was planted on a hilltop.
  • 🗺 Pigafetta's map and detailed accounts of Magellan's route from the Pacific to Cebu strongly support Limasawa as the location of the first mass.
  • 👁 Francisco Albo, Magellan's pilot and eyewitness, also confirmed that the first mass occurred on an island called Masawa (Limasawa).
  • 🛳 The Butuan claim is based on local traditions and monuments but lacks concrete primary evidence like Pigafetta's and Albo's accounts.
  • 🚩 A monument to the first mass was erected in Butuan in 1872, but this is seen as symbolic rather than historical proof.
  • 📊 The National Historical Commission of the Philippines, using modern navigational instruments, supports the Limasawa claim based on historical records and evidence.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the presentation?

    -The presentation discusses the debate over the location of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines, focusing on two main claims: Limasawa and Butuan.

  • Who is Antonio Pigafetta and what is his relevance to the topic?

    -Antonio Pigafetta was a member of Magellan's expedition and one of the 18 survivors who returned to Spain. His journal provides the most detailed account of the first mass, which he claims took place on Limasawa Island.

  • According to the presentation, when and where was the first mass in the Philippines held?

    -The first Catholic mass in the Philippines was held on March 31, 1521, Easter Sunday, on Limasawa Island according to Antonio Pigafetta's account.

  • What role did Francisco Albo play in the expedition, and what did he document?

    -Francisco Albo was Magellan’s pilot and one of the survivors of the expedition. He documented that the first mass took place on an island called ‘Masawa’ (now identified as Limasawa) and gave details about the geography and route taken.

  • What key evidence supports the Limasawa claim for the location of the first mass?

    -Key evidence includes Pigafetta’s journal, the geographical details provided by Francisco Albo, and modern navigation tools that confirm Limasawa as the location. The National Historical Commission also declared Limasawa as the site of the first mass.

  • What are the two native chieftains mentioned in Pigafetta’s account?

    -The two native chieftains present at the first mass were Raja Colambu, the ruler of Limasawa, and Raja Siaiu, the ruler of Butuan.

  • What evidence is there to support Butuan’s claim to the first mass?

    -Butuan’s claim is mostly based on tradition and interpreted evidence, such as the discovery of a boat believed to be used for worship services, and a monument placed in 1872 by Catholics in Magallanes, near Butuan City.

  • Why does the presentation favor Limasawa over Butuan as the site of the first mass?

    -The presentation favors Limasawa because it has more solid, documented evidence, including testimonies from eyewitnesses like Pigafetta and Albo, while Butuan relies on beliefs and interpreted evidence without as much concrete proof.

  • What was the significance of the wooden cross planted after the mass?

    -The wooden cross was planted by Magellan’s party on a small hill in Limasawa as a symbol of Christianity and to mark the occasion of the first Catholic mass in the Philippines.

  • What role did modern navigational instruments play in this historical debate?

    -Modern navigational instruments helped validate the accounts of Pigafetta and Albo by confirming the geographical descriptions they provided, aligning their accounts with the location of Limasawa.

Outlines

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Mindmap

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Keywords

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Highlights

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード

Transcripts

plate

このセクションは有料ユーザー限定です。 アクセスするには、アップグレードをお願いします。

今すぐアップグレード
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
Philippine historyFirst MassMagellan expeditionLimasawaButuanHistorical debateCatholic influenceAntonio PigafettaFrancisco AlboNational Historical Commission
英語で要約が必要ですか?