LIMASAWA vs BUTUAN " A Debate About The First Mass in the Philippines"

Summary

The Hiraya Podcast presents a debate about where the first mass in the Philippines took place: Limasawa or Butuan. Both teams provide arguments supported by historical accounts from figures like Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo, with the proposition backing Limasawa as the location and the opposition claiming it occurred in Butuan. Throughout the debate, the teams examine geographical descriptions, eyewitness testimony, and archaeological evidence, leaving the audience to ponder which side is correct. The podcast concludes by inviting listeners to share their opinions on the historical controversy.

Takeaways

• 🎤 The podcast episode focuses on a debate about the location of the first mass in the Philippines—whether it occurred in Limasawa or Butuan.
• 📜 The debate is between two groups: the proposition team supporting Limasawa and the opposition team supporting Butuan.
• 🗺️ The proposition side references Republic Act 2733 and the accounts of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo to assert that the first mass took place in Limasawa.
• 📖 The opposition side argues that Butuan is the correct location, citing historical accounts and evidence like the discovery of ancient balangay boats and the writings of historian Father Fernando Collins.
• 🔍 The opposition also highlights that the name 'Masawa' is closer to Butuan’s location, and Limasawa lacks the natural resources described in Pigafetta’s journals.
• ⛪ The proposition defends their claim with Pigafetta and Albo's eyewitness accounts, asserting that the geographical and topographical details align more with Limasawa.
• 🏞️ The opposition emphasizes the rich history of Butuan, including its significant role in trade and its strong connection to Cebu.
• 🗣️ Both teams debate the reliability of sources, with the proposition focusing on first-hand accounts and the opposition relying on second-hand interpretations and local findings.
• ⛴️ The proposition team questions the feasibility of Magellan's fleet traveling back to Butuan from Cebu within a day, strengthening their claim that Limasawa was the correct location.
• 🗳️ The debate ends with both teams strongly defending their positions, and the audience is invited to share their opinions on whether the first mass occurred in Limasawa or Butuan.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the Hiraya Podcast debate?

The main topic of the Hiraya Podcast debate is about where the first mass in the Philippines took place, specifically whether it was in Limasawa or in Butuan.

What historical evidence does the proposition team use to support their claim that the first mass took place in Limasawa?

The proposition team references the accounts of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo, who were eyewitnesses of Magellan's voyage. They mentioned that the first mass took place on an island called 'Mazaua,' which is geographically identified with Limasawa in Southern Leyte.

What argument does the opposition team present to support their claim that the first mass happened in Butuan?

The opposition team argues that the word 'Limasawa' was never mentioned in Pigafetta's accounts. They claim that the place referred to as 'Masao' is closer to Butuan, and they cite the discovery of 600-year-old balangai boats near the Masao River in Butuan as evidence of historical activity in the area.

Why does the proposition team believe that the law declaring Limasawa as the site of the first mass is significant?

The proposition team cites Republic Act 2733, which declares the site on Limasawa Island as the place where the first mass in the Philippines was held. This law recognizes Limasawa as a National Shrine, providing official status to their claim.

What role do eyewitness accounts play in the debate between the two teams?

Eyewitness accounts, particularly those of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo, are crucial in the debate. The proposition team relies on their detailed descriptions of the journey to identify Limasawa as the location, while the opposition team questions the interpretation and suggests that the accounts point to Butuan.

How does the opposition team challenge the geographical evidence presented by the proposition?

The opposition team argues that the geographical features mentioned by Pigafetta, such as the presence of gold mines, fertile rice fields, and abundant resources, do not match Limasawa but align more closely with Butuan. They also claim that Butuan had a known route to Cebu, unlike Limasawa.

What historical figure's work does the opposition team use to support their argument for Butuan?

The opposition team references Father Francisco Colin’s work, 'Labor Evangelica,' where he asserts that Magellan went to Butuan and celebrated the first mass there, later erecting a cross.

How does the proposition team counter the opposition's argument about the historical accounts?

The proposition team argues that the accounts used by the opposition are second-hand and less reliable compared to Pigafetta's firsthand account, which they claim to be the most comprehensive and trustworthy source regarding Magellan's voyage.

What is the significance of the balangai boats mentioned in the debate?

The balangai boats are significant because they serve as physical evidence of historical activity in Butuan. The opposition uses their discovery to support their argument that Butuan was an important center during the time of Magellan's voyage, potentially the site of the first mass.

How does the debate conclude, and what does the podcast encourage listeners to do?

The debate concludes with both sides presenting their final arguments, reaffirming their stances. The podcast encourages listeners to decide for themselves where the first mass took place by texting their answers or commenting on the Facebook live session.

Outlines

00:00

🎙️ Introduction to Hiraya Podcast and History Debate 2023

The Hiraya Podcast opens with a brief introduction to a historical debate regarding the location of the first mass in the Philippines. The host announces the debate topic: whether the first mass occurred in Limasawa or Butuan. The episode, titled 'Fee Between Us,' invites listeners to tune in as debate teams present arguments. Two groups are introduced, one supporting Limasawa and the other Butuan, and the debate begins with the first proposition speaker defending Limasawa based on historical records.

05:02

📜 Opposition Defends Butuan as the Site of the First Mass

The first speaker of the opposition argues against the claim that the first mass occurred in Limasawa, citing a lack of scientific evidence and supporting Butuan. She references the discovery of ancient boats in Butuan and claims historical accounts like Father Fernando Colin's and Antonio Pigafetta's manuscripts favor Butuan. The argument also challenges the interpretation of Pigafetta’s accounts, emphasizing the importance of correcting history based on solid evidence, including local archaeological finds.

10:03

💬 Proposition Refutes Opposition with Pigafetta’s Eyewitness Account

The second speaker for the proposition counters the opposition's claims by emphasizing Pigafetta's eyewitness account. She argues that Pigafetta clearly identified Limasawa as the site of the first mass, and that the two chiefs who met Magellan were from Butuan but visiting Limasawa at the time. This suggests that Magellan did not hold the mass in Butuan, reinforcing the geographical accuracy of Pigafetta's account and pointing to Limasawa as the location of the mass.

15:05

🗺️ Opposition Critiques Geographical Evidence for Limasawa

The second opposition speaker disputes the geographical evidence presented by the proposition. She argues that Pigafetta's description of the island he called Masao matches Butuan more closely than Limasawa, particularly in terms of natural resources and gold mines. The speaker also points to the historical trade route between Butuan and Cebu, emphasizing the stronger case for Butuan as the site of the first mass, supported by the presence of balangay boats and Butuan's relationship with Cebu.

🔍 Proposition Highlights Flaws in Opposition’s Historical Sources

The third speaker for the proposition refutes the opposition’s use of secondary historical sources, emphasizing that their case relies heavily on second-hand accounts, while the proposition is backed by primary accounts from Pigafetta and Francisco Albo. She argues that the opposition's claim that Magellan returned to Butuan after visiting Cebu is geographically implausible. Furthermore, she points to specific topographical details mentioned by Albo that align with Limasawa, reinforcing its identification as the location of the first mass.

⚔️ Opposition Defends Butuan Using Additional Historical Accounts

The third opposition speaker defends Butuan as the site of the first mass by referencing additional historical accounts, such as Francisco Combés' Historia de Mindanao, which claims Magellan went to Butuan to meet its powerful king. She argues that a cross was planted in Butuan as a sign of future alliances and insists that the first mass took place there. She further supports her case by reiterating the historical and archaeological significance of Butuan, including the presence of balangay boats.

🧭 Proposition Clarifies Chieftains’ Presence in Limasawa, Not Butuan

The proposition responds to the opposition by clarifying that the chieftains from Butuan were visiting Limasawa at the time of the first mass, based on Pigafetta’s and Albo’s accounts. This assertion further strengthens the claim that the first mass was held in Limasawa and not Butuan, as the opposition had argued. The proposition stresses the reliability of Pigafetta’s firsthand documentation over the opposition’s secondary sources.

📚 Opposition Reaffirms Butuan with Artifacts and Historical Evidence

The final opposition speaker reiterates that the first mass occurred in Butuan, supported by the presence of balangay boats and other archaeological artifacts. She argues that Butuan has long been recognized as the site of the first mass and dismisses the proposition’s reliance on geographical details, which she believes are less convincing than the historical and archaeological evidence presented for Butuan.

📢 Proposition Concludes with a Focus on Reliable Historical Sources

The final speaker for the proposition concludes by stressing the reliability of Pigafetta and Albo’s first-hand accounts, which provide clear geographical and topographical evidence favoring Limasawa as the site of the first mass. She critiques the opposition’s use of secondary sources and emphasizes that Pigafetta’s journal is the most credible source available for this historical debate.

🏆 Opposition’s Final Claim for Butuan Based on Historical Records

The opposition team closes by summarizing their argument that Butuan is the true site of the first mass, based on historical records that reference the island of Masao. They assert that Butuan fits the descriptions in Pigafetta’s accounts better than Limasawa and highlight the discrepancy in the number of syllables in the names Masao and Limasawa. Additionally, the opposition points to the wealth and trade connections of Butuan, which further support their claim.

🤔 Closing Remarks and Audience Participation

The hosts wrap up the debate, reflecting on the strong arguments made by both sides. They invite listeners to share their opinions and vote on whether they believe the first mass took place in Limasawa or Butuan. The episode closes with an announcement for a future discussion on the Battle of Mactan, encouraging continued listener engagement with Philippine history.

Keywords

💡First Mass in the Philippines

The First Mass in the Philippines is a historical event that is considered the introduction of Christianity to the country. The script centers around a debate on whether this mass was held in Limasawa or Butuan, making it a pivotal theme of the podcast. The discussion revolves around the significance of identifying the true location, as it relates to the country's religious and cultural heritage.

💡Limasawa

Limasawa is an island in the province of Southern Leyte, which is claimed by some historians as the site of the first Mass in the Philippines in 1521. The proposition team in the podcast argues that this is the accurate location based on historical accounts, such as the Republic Act 2733 and the writings of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo, making it central to their argument.

💡Butuan

Butuan is a city in the Caraga region of the Philippines that is also believed by some to be the site of the first Mass. The opposition team presents evidence such as the discovery of ancient Balangai boats and the historical accounts of Father Francisco Colin, which they claim support Butuan's role as the true location of the first Mass, creating a central point of contention in the debate.

💡Antonio Pigafetta

Antonio Pigafetta was a Venetian scholar and explorer who chronicled Ferdinand Magellan's voyage, providing one of the primary accounts of the journey. Both the proposition and opposition teams in the podcast reference Pigafetta's records as evidence for their arguments. His detailed descriptions of the voyage and the events surrounding the first Mass make his account a crucial piece of evidence in the debate.

💡Balangai Boats

Balangai Boats are ancient wooden boats found in Butuan that date back to around 1,600 years ago. The opposition team uses these boats as archaeological evidence to argue that Butuan was a significant and advanced settlement at the time, capable of hosting the first Mass. This historical artifact is presented as proof of Butuan's connection to early Filipino history and Christianity.

💡Republic Act 2733

Republic Act 2733 is a law enacted in the Philippines that declared Limasawa Island in the province of Leyte as the official site of the first Mass in the country. The proposition team uses this act to strengthen their argument, suggesting that the government officially recognizes Limasawa as the birthplace of Christianity in the Philippines, giving it a significant legal and historical standing in the debate.

💡Francisco Albo

Francisco Albo was a Spanish pilot who accompanied Magellan on his voyage and kept a logbook detailing the journey. His accounts are cited by the proposition team as supporting evidence for the claim that the first Mass took place in Limasawa. Albo's descriptions of the island's geography and location provide critical data used to affirm Limasawa’s authenticity as the site of the first Mass.

💡Father Francisco Colin

Father Francisco Colin was a Spanish missionary and historian whose work 'Labor Evangelica' is used by the opposition to support the claim that the first Mass was held in Butuan. Colin's historical writings provide an alternative narrative that contradicts other accounts, making him a significant figure in the debate over the actual location of the first Mass in the Philippines.

💡Magellan's Expedition

Magellan's Expedition refers to the historic voyage led by Portuguese explorer Ferdinand Magellan, who was the first European to reach the Philippines. This journey is central to the debate as it marks the introduction of Christianity to the archipelago. Both the proposition and opposition use accounts from Magellan's crew, such as Pigafetta and Albo, to support their arguments about the location of the first Mass.

💡Historical Accuracy

Historical Accuracy refers to the importance of correctly identifying and interpreting past events, which is the crux of the debate. The podcast highlights the challenges of using various historical sources, interpretations, and evidence to determine where the first Mass occurred. It emphasizes the role of historical documentation, archaeology, and legal declarations in establishing an accurate account of history.

Highlights

Introduction of Hiraya Podcast, introducing fresh and meaningful deliberations about historical events in the Philippines.

Debate topic: Where was the first mass in the Philippines held? Limasawa or Butuan?

The proposition team claims that the first mass took place in Limasawa, supported by the accounts of Antonio Pigafetta and Francisco Albo.

Proposition cites Republic Act 2733, declaring Limasawa Island as the site of the first mass and a national historical shrine.

Opposition argues that Butuan is the true site of the first mass, citing the absence of the word 'Limasawa' in historical accounts and emphasizing the significance of Butuan.

Opposition introduces scientific evidence from the discovery of Balangay boats near Masao River in Butuan, suggesting a historical connection.

Proposition responds that Pigafetta’s and Albo’s eyewitness accounts point geographically to Limasawa, not Butuan.

Opposition claims that Butuan’s wealth and resources, including gold mines, make it a more plausible location for the first mass than the smaller and poorer Limasawa.

Opposition mentions historian Father Fernando Colin's account, which supports Butuan as the site of the first mass.

The proposition rebuts that Magellan’s fleet couldn’t have returned to Butuan from Cebu within a day due to the distance, making Limasawa a more practical location for the first mass.

Opposition continues to emphasize geographical inaccuracies in the proposition’s claim, reinforcing the argument that Masao in Butuan is the correct location.

Proposition asserts that Pigafetta’s original accounts are more reliable than later translations and claims made by the opposition.

Opposition states that Magellan was drawn to Butuan due to its more powerful king, reinforcing the idea that Butuan was an important historical center.

Conclusion from the proposition side: Limasawa is the more likely site of the first mass based on geographical evidence and primary accounts.

Conclusion from the opposition side: Butuan has stronger historical, geographical, and cultural evidence, including the presence of Balangay boats, to support it as the site of the first mass.

Transcripts

[Music]

this is hiraya podcast introducing fresh

informative and meaningful deliberation

worthy of your time stay tuned their

listeners throughout this moment who

will be talking about our very own

Philippines in this session we call Fee

between us with a question worth it that

first mass happened the masawa or in

Boudoir

a pleasant greeting ladies and gentlemen

I and my comedy reader are delighted to

present to you our history debate 2023

the topic to debate is about the first

mass in the Philippines is it Lima Sawa

or in Boudoir and the motion of this

house the first Nas in the Philippines

happened in limasawa what do you think

the mass first happened partner where

are you placing your bed well I'm not

quite sure as well partner but I'm

putting my beds on Lima Sawa I just fill

it in my boat anyway we have this debate

in our special episode to know where

exactly it happened so without further

Ado let us welcome the debate groups

with us in this podcast the first cure

for presenting the proposition with Miss

G and keto Miss April May abandon and

Miss Angela cashio and the second group

representing the opposition with Miss

Maria Carmella assassin Miss Zara Claire

burundo and Miss Giselle canvas each of

the debates have one minute and 30

seconds to present their own arguments

and rebots

this time I will call the house to order

I will call upon Misty and cattle to

present their proposition

the motion of the government is the same

as declared in the Republic act

2733 which is an app to declare the site

in magalyanasawa island in the province

of Leyte where the first mass in the

Philippines was held in a National

Shrine to provide for the preservation

of historical monuments and landmarks

there and for other purposes our team

would like to specify first the

definition of mass so a mass it is known

as a practice among Christian people to

honor and worship God for her argument

which is in accordance with the accounts

of Antonio pigafetta and Francisco albo

who are eyewitnesses of Magellan's

Voyage so they both stated that the

first mass took place on the island they

called mazava in almost

[Music]

so they both asserted that from the

island of homonym they went westwards

towards the island paper and turned to a

Southwest direction to reach this island

So based on the geographical locations

provided by algo and pegafeta the island

of limasawa in southern Leyte is the

counterpart thus the proposition team

strongly supports the motion of this

house to the first mass of the

Philippines took place in the limassawa

wow what an informative claim we have

there we thank the first affirmative

speaker from the proposition and now I

call upon Miss Maria Carnival asses to

open a case from the proposition

in response to the first Speaker passing

a law is not substantial evidence

knowing that it was not even approved by

the executives and had no scientific

evidence as well thus we firmly believe

that Misawa but one is the venue of the

first mass here in the Philippines and

we are going to take a look at the

accounts of pigafetta and Alba the word

the Misawa was not mentioned at all so

how come you concluded that it is where

the first mass was held also we have the

island named mazao a two to three

syllable word which is much closer to

the word masawa it is essential to

correct history which is backed up by

scientific evidence wherein according to

the one City Cultural and historical

foundation and the butuan government 10

10 of 1 600 year old balangai boats were

found in 1976 near masau river which is

located in butuan City right now on the

statement of Father Fernando Collins a

historian in his work labor evangelica

or evangelica he asserted that Magellan

went to boot one and there he celebrated

the first mass and erected across and to

support this Antonio pigafetta testified

that he gave a gift of a certain things

of certain things rather to the Queen

Mother of France Louise of Savoy and the

mother of Francis the first now Gian

Batista ramusuyo

mentioned that a copy of bigger feta's

account was given to Luis

of Savoy whereas this manuscript was

translated to French by Jacquees fabre

and imported by Simon the cocklands then

it was later translated back into

Italian version Byram and it was the

basis of Collins account thus on the

other way around Colin's account was

considered reliable and there was a

monument erected during 1872

commemorate the first mass in book 1 on

April 8 1521 and for this reason we

claim that the first mass happened in

Bhutan

now that both teams have shared their

stand we are starting to feel the heat

yes exactly partner I cannot feel the

heat the cleanse of these two teams are

really convincing you know we think the

first Speaker from the opposition and

call upon Miss April May abandon to

continue the case from the proposition

let's keep this rolling let's keep

rolling

now I objected a statement of the

opposed speaker so pigafetta provide a

transformatory evidence in the presence

of the two native Kings of rajas at

mazawa during the Magellan visit so one

was the king of mazawa who later

Gadget and expedition to Cebu the other

was the relative namely the Raha was one

so he added the finest man that he had

ever seen in those parts according to

the king of what one from that the fact

that he was a visitor to mazawa and his

territory was in the Quan which was in

another Island and album while an island

of mazawa the metucheki one is the

chieftain of azawa and one is the chief

minus one who was said to be visiting

the island therefore the chief Xenoverse

1 was not into one during the time but

in mazawa so in conclusion Magellan

didn't go to butuan

we thank the second affirmative speaker

from the proposition and now I call upon

Miss jizakanas to open the case from the

opposition

in accuracy of the map and the

calculation of the exact location of the

island of masau is questionable evidence

to claim that the first mass happened in

limasawa if geographical feature says

it's masawa butuan now if you truly

understand the cafeta's journal it says

there that the island of matau has a

great quantity of fouls goats pigs and

many more especially gold mines masawa

has its all richly and limasawa on the

other hand a small and poor island lacks

it especially the presence of fertile

rice fields and abundance of gold also

there is an existing route from butuan

to Cebu and these two cities have a

great relationship with each other since

then that limasawatu Cebu has none and

again the presence of balang high in the

butuan is the most sufficient evidence

to prove that the birthplace of

Christianity in the Philippines is none

other than in masawa butuan

[Music]

we think the second speaker from the

opposition wow I'm speechless the two

teams are so good with their claims

partner exactly Porter even me I am now

doubting which side is right

yes me too their claims quite change my

bed anyways there's still a lot of here

from this passionate teams stay tuned as

a Raya will get back for a few minutes

are you proud of our language I am not

proud ma'am

yes ma'am until now we still belong to a

third world country

everyone

ikaw Miss Alonso can you explain to me

results uh

um what was that again ma'am

knowing our history shows love for our

country I remind her from National

Historical Commission of the Philippines

and hiraya podcast

[Music]

all right here Raya is back to continue

with our discussion about where did the

first mass happened

at this juncture may I call upon Miss

Angel akasho to continue the case from

the proposition

[Applause]

[Music]

so thank you Miss Tracy so I disagree

with the claims of deposition from a

sales version of pigafata's manuscripts

are not reliable the transmission

effects from pigapeta to Lewis and Savoy

to simondikons is without documentary

support pick up Peta himself didn't

mention that he gave the copy of his

manuscript to Collins but simply a gift

officer can play so our claims from the

first argumentative speaker was based on

the original Ambrose attacks of

pigafetta and I would like to point out

that based on Father Collins account

Magellan and his men went to Cebu on

April 7 1521 but in the monument

subscription the first mass was held on

April 8 15 21 on Route 1 so how is it

possible to go back to butuan from Cebu

for just one day wearing wood award is

236 kilometers away from Cebu and the

ships of Magellan that time is not that

fast enough and to add to our argument

on the same day of the mass a cross was

erected on the summit of a mountain and

according to Francisco Alba on the

summit of the mountain you can see three

Islands from the west and Southwestern

but one can be seen in the northern

Direction based on the topographical

details given by Alba and pikapeta it

describes the present in masawa we think

the turret speaker for the preposition

and now I will call upamis Zara Claire

burundo to continue the case of the

opposition

I disabled will be the argument

presented by the third proposition

speaker I claim that this mazawa is in

between one and is approved in Historia

De Medina why hello written by Francisco

Compass SG who worked at the missionary

missionary in the Philippines states

that Magellan went to Route 1 because

they heard that the king there was more

powerful and they wanted to meet him so

it was said that their expectations were

satisfied by the king and there they

planted a cost in a Southern submeremony

as a sign of future Alliance in

Francisco Collins work the first match

occurred the same day they started the

cross and for that reason we believe

that the first must occurred in boot one

we thank the third speaker of that

position and now I will call upon Miss

Jay and Kato again to continue the case

from the proposition

I object to the statement of the third

opposed speaker Magellan did not go to

butuan to meet the king there according

to pigafetta and Albus account while in

the island of mazawa they met the two

Chieftains one is the chieftain of

butuan who said to be visiting the

island so therefore our claims is that

the chieftain of butuan is not in butuan

but in mazawa during that time we thank

Miss Jay and from the proposition side

and now I call up on Mr Maria Carmelo

ask us to continue the case of the

opposition our team opposed the motion

of this house we claimed that the first

match took place in both one and not in

limasawa we believe that our sources are

reliable and that Magellan landed first

on but one were the first mass took

place the monument erected was proof of

it okay in fact there are artifacts that

prove that the first max occurred in the

island on on the island rather now those

are the presence of balangai in butuan

which they believe was used for

transportation during Magellan's visit

and again the presence of balangai in

the but what is the most sufficient

evidence to prove that the birthplace of

Christianity in the Philippines is none

other than in masawa but one

it's Maria Carmela asked us from the

opposition side now before hearing the

concluding remarks of our two teams

let's take a break for a while stay

tuned here I will get back to you for a

few minutes

Mommy Mommy why are there so many people

Gathering every single log it is to give

honor to our Santo Nino a resemblance of

baby Jesus the holy Child mommy can you

explain to me the 500 years of

Christianity is that the year of

Christian faith my child 500 years of

Christianity pertains to the number of

years since the Spanish brought

Christian faith here in the country in

the year 1521 till now in short it's the

birth of Christianity in the Philippines

Mommy that's so nice wow thank you so

much for teaching me about this I'm

learning a lot teach children when

meaningful things while they are still

young so when they get old they will not

depart from it a reminder from the

National Historical Commission of the

Philippines and the Uriah podcast

now we're finally back at this moment

let us hear the concluding statements of

the two passionate teams may I come up

and Miss abandon first to conclude the

proposition's case

that's why these

Victor plays in limasawa because of the

statement of Alba and pikafeta regarding

the geographical directions and

topographical descriptions of azawa

which best describes the island of

limasawa than would want and to

strengthen our claims of pikafetas and

Albus accounts are considered as first

hand account the Cafe's work is the most

fulfilled and reliable source of

information regarding my Channel's

Voyage where the claims of the

opposition are based on the second hand

accounts only thank you

thank you Miss April from the

proposition team now I call upon Miss

Giselle can last to conclude a case from

the opposition the evidence of Masa or

rather than limasawa are as follows the

name of the place in all primary sources

including the Diary of Antonio pigafetta

the funicular of Magellan's Voyage the

name of the place was three syllables

masau or something close to it Lima Sawa

has four syllables and begins with

another letter second is the root from

Human now according to the primary

records again the Expedition traveled 20

to 25 leagues from Homan hon their first

landing point to the site of the first

mass thinking of west southwest course

so if they had been at limasawa Island

the distance is only about 14.8 leagues

or one half of that length moreover

the opposition team used a wide range of

historical sources regarding this

historical event while the claims of the

preposition team are only based on two

accounts but one at the site of the

first mass in the Philippines has been I

believe for centuries that's all thank

you wow wow wow wow there was an

incredible discussion thank you team

proposition and team a position and to

every speaker here this has been a very

knowledgeable and insightful day to

discuss with you

yes exactly for there and to our viewers

and listeners thank you for watching

both opposing teams had shared their

claims very well how about to our dear

listeners what could be your decision

it's the first mass held in Le Misawa or

in butuan you can text your answers and

to those who are watching via FB live do

not hesitate to comment your choice

all right this time we will end our

debate session and see you next time for

our another special episode with a

question were they the Battle of mactan

takes place Island

still here in our Horizon

Filipinas once again thank you for

listening see you on our next episode

this is yours Julie carry the Tracy Ai

and this is

now signing off till next day

[Music]

[Applause]