Is the Big Bang Theory Wrong? | Neil deGrasse Tyson Explains...
Summary
TLDRAstrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson addresses misconceptions about the Big Bang theory, sparked by misleading headlines. He explains that new scientific ideas do not replace established theories but rather expand upon them, as seen with Einstein's relativity building on Newton's laws. Tyson emphasizes that evidence-backed findings, like those supporting the Big Bang, remain valid despite new discoveries. He humorously describes the scientific process as a 'fight club' where ideas are tested and debated, but ultimately, only evidence prevails in shaping our understanding of the universe.
Takeaways
- 🧠 Scientific ideas are always contested and tested, often resulting in some ideas being proven wrong.
- 🔬 The success of a scientific idea depends on evidence, not how well it is argued.
- 🧪 Experiments are designed to test ideas, and consistent results from different tests lead to new objective truths.
- 🌌 The Big Bang theory is strongly supported by observations, even though certain details like dark matter and expansion are still being studied.
- 🚀 New scientific ideas must enclose and build upon experimentally verified knowledge, rather than replace it entirely.
- 🌍 If a new theory about the universe emerges, it will still include the Big Bang as part of the broader understanding.
- 🔄 The process of scientific discovery involves refining or expanding existing ideas rather than completely overturning them.
- 👨🔬 Journalists often misrepresent scientific developments for clickbait, causing misconceptions about established theories like the Big Bang.
- ⚙️ Einstein’s theories of relativity expanded upon Newtonian physics without invalidating it, showing how new theories build on old ones.
- 🧐 Experimental verification is key to scientific progress, and verified knowledge cannot simply be discarded with new theories.
Q & A
What common misconception about the Big Bang is mentioned in the script?
-The misconception is that the Big Bang is 'debunked' or 'in trouble,' often fueled by misleading clickbait headlines. In reality, the foundational ideas of the Big Bang are supported by extensive scientific evidence.
What role does the James Webb Space Telescope play in relation to the Big Bang theory?
-The James Webb Space Telescope provides new data that refines our understanding of the universe, but it does not debunk the Big Bang theory. Any new discoveries from the telescope will likely expand on current knowledge rather than contradict established findings.
How are scientific ideas tested and verified, according to the script?
-Scientists propose hypotheses, and others attempt to disprove them through experiments. If repeated experiments by different groups yield the same results, the hypothesis is strengthened and may be accepted as an objective truth.
What is the significance of experimental verification in science?
-Experimental verification ensures that new scientific ideas are not merely opinions or beliefs but are supported by observable and repeatable evidence. Verified ideas remain valid even if future theories encompass them within a broader context.
What is meant by the term 'Science Dome' or 'Fight Club for Scientists' in the script?
-This metaphor illustrates the competitive nature of scientific research, where ideas are constantly challenged and tested. Only those supported by evidence survive this intellectual 'battle.'
How does the script describe the relationship between Einstein’s theory of relativity and Newtonian physics?
-Einstein’s theory of relativity doesn’t invalidate Newtonian physics. Instead, it expands upon it, showing that Newton’s laws are a special case applicable at low speeds and low gravity. Einstein’s theory encompasses a broader understanding of the universe.
Why is Newtonian physics still useful, despite being 'usurped' by Einstein’s relativity?
-Newtonian physics is still effective for many practical applications, such as space travel and everyday physics, where high speeds and intense gravitational fields are not factors.
What example does the script give of Newton’s laws failing?
-The orbit of Mercury was one example where Newton's laws did not align with observed reality, leading scientists to initially propose a hidden planet, 'Vulcan,' before Einstein’s theory of relativity provided a more accurate explanation.
How does the script explain the concept of 'new physics' in relation to old theories?
-New physics builds upon old theories by encompassing them within a larger, more comprehensive framework. It doesn’t discard experimentally verified truths but rather expands the understanding of them within new contexts.
What is the key message of the explainer about the Big Bang theory?
-The key message is that the Big Bang theory remains a well-supported scientific explanation for the origin of the universe, despite clickbait headlines suggesting otherwise. Any new theories must still account for the experimental and observational evidence supporting the Big Bang.
Outlines
🌌 The Big Bang Theory: Constantly Evolving
The paragraph discusses the ongoing nature of scientific research, particularly in astrophysics, where theories are frequently revised as new evidence emerges. It addresses the sensationalist headlines suggesting that the James Webb Space Telescope has debunked or forced a rethink of the Big Bang theory, clarifying that such headlines are often clickbait. The speaker emphasizes that scientific frontiers are dynamic, where ideas are tested and contested, and only those supported by evidence survive. The paragraph concludes by affirming that the core tenets of the Big Bang theory, such as the universe starting out small, hot, and dense, are well-supported by observations and are not in danger of being debunked by new findings.
🔬 The Frontiers of Science and the Big Bang
This paragraph delves into the process of scientific discovery and the nature of theories. It explains that new ideas in science must encompass all previously verified knowledge; they cannot simply replace old theories. The speaker uses the example of dark matter and the expansion of the universe to illustrate points that are still being explored. The paragraph also discusses how journalists sometimes create misleading headlines suggesting that the Big Bang theory is in trouble due to new findings, when in reality, these findings are part of the ongoing scientific process. The speaker asserts that the Big Bang theory is solidly based on experimental and observational evidence and is not likely to be overturned by new ideas that do not account for this evidence.
🚀 The Enduring Legacy of Established Physics
The final paragraph contrasts the enduring nature of verified scientific theories with the sensationalism of media headlines. It uses the history of physics, transitioning from Newtonian to Einsteinian theories, to illustrate how new scientific understandings do not negate previous ones but rather expand upon them. The speaker points out that Einstein's theories of relativity, while fundamentally changing our understanding of gravity and motion, still reduce to Newton's laws under conditions of low gravity and speed. The paragraph concludes by reinforcing the idea that the Big Bang theory is not threatened by new scientific discoveries but is instead enriched by them, and that any new theories must be consistent with the experimental evidence that supports the Big Bang.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Big Bang
💡Astrophysicists
💡James Webb Space Telescope
💡Clickbait
💡Scientific Frontier
💡Evidence-based
💡Dark Matter
💡Expansion of the Universe
💡Einsteinian Physics
💡Scientific Method
💡Observational Verification
Highlights
Introduction of clickbait headlines surrounding astrophysics, especially with claims about the Big Bang theory being debunked.
Discussion of how science is contested at the frontier, where ideas are constantly being tested and many end up being wrong.
Explanation that scientific success is determined by evidence, not by how well an idea is argued or how articulate a scientist is.
Emphasis on experimental verification as the key to establishing objective truths in science.
The Big Bang theory is widely supported by observations, including the small, hot, dense state of the early universe.
New ideas in science must build upon and enclose previously verified knowledge; they don’t erase established experimental findings.
Discussion of potential for new theories, like the multiverse, to expand upon the Big Bang, but not replace the evidence supporting it.
Clarification that ongoing debates in astrophysics, like the nature of dark matter and cosmic expansion, do not undermine the Big Bang.
Introduction of humor through pop culture references, including TV shows and K-pop when searching for 'Big Bang' online.
Rejection of the idea that significant scientific facts like the Big Bang being hot, dense, and expanding will be overturned.
Comparison between Einstein’s general relativity and Newton’s laws, explaining how Einstein’s theory encloses Newton's laws in low-gravity and low-speed conditions.
Einstein’s equations revolutionized physics but did not negate Newton’s work, which was still useful for tasks like the Apollo missions.
Statement that future scientific breakthroughs will not undo experimentally verified facts, just expand upon them.
Conclusion that the Big Bang theory is not under threat and will remain a fundamental part of our understanding of the universe.
Humorous conclusion with references to 'science fight club' and an overall playful tone while delivering a serious message about scientific rigor.
Transcripts
[Music]
hi chuck i got another explainer for you
oh well i'm here to get it
yeah yeah there's no end of these i
don't think that's well no
i will run out at one point my brain
will be empty and i'll just be this this
vessel right that i used to have stuff
in it a hollow cell
a hollow shell it's all online at that
point
i'll need to do some one of these one of
these uh consciousness uploads
to get my brain back from everything i
put on online
but i i have to address
something that i think we've seen in the
news
you know every six months goes by and
then you see a headline oh uh
astrophysicists have to rethink the big
bang or big bang
debunked or or did you did you see any
of these at any time oh my god but well
recently the james webb space telescope
supposedly
the headline is
um did the james wells webb's telescope
um make scientists think the rig the big
bang or has the james webb telescope
debunked the big bang yeah it makes
excellent clickbait yeah there it is
it's it's click bait headlines so let me
just explain a few things that's going
on here okay
uh on the frontier of scientific
research
it is a bloody place
all right ideas are slayed two
scientists enter
one scientist leaves
it's the octagon
welcome to science dome
[Laughter]
on the frontier ideas are contested
daily right
and
most ideas turn out to be wrong
all right so
so what you are as a scientist working
on the frontier
you're in this idea factory that's what
you are
and the successful idea is not the one
that's argued most strenuously or argued
by the most articulate that's called
politics it's called politics exactly
exactly
uh it's not it has nothing to do with
either of those it has to do with
evidence
all right which idea is supported by
evidence so typically what happens is
you can test your ideas and here's where
you have to be convincing you have to
say i i think my idea is better than
your idea and here's a way to test it
right
so i have an idea so if you don't like
me
the way you show it is you design an
experiment to show them wrong
okay well that's some cutthroat nasty
stuff that's some cut
this is some nasty all right that's some
real housewives stuff
real housewives
let me tell you something phaedra your
hypothesis
is trash
[Laughter]
so scientists can test their ideas so
you
uh you don't like me and you're gonna
show me that i'm wrong and so you go
home and you invent an experiment
you invent an experiment to test my idea
with the objective of showing that i'm
wrong and it turns out hey wait a minute
i'm getting what the dude says right you
got to publish that and then someone
else performs
performs another kind of experiment
aimed at testing the same hypothesis
and they get kind of the same result and
then someone from a different country
with a different wall current
240 volts maybe and they plug their
stuff in and they're getting the same
result
when you have repeated experiments
verifying an idea
we have a new objective truth
that has emerged in those sciences
and what i'm telling you
is that
the big bang
theory
by the way if you type that into google
you get the tv show just i'm my personal
jury is still out on whether that's a
good or bad thing um you know it doesn't
mean like science is so popular it's a
tv show that's the first thing you hit
because you got to get through that then
there's the big bang is a k-pop group
you got to get through that
then you get to the origin of the
universe okay in the google search just
thought i'd point that out it's good to
know that we google in order of
importance
[Laughter]
there it is
just saying wow all right so
so here's the point
the tenets of the big bang that the
universe started out small
hot
dense
uh where matter and energy were a
primordial soup
where the forces of nature had merged
all of that is thoroughly supported by
observations of this universe
thoroughly supported
okay now there are some things that well
did this really cause that or might it
be something that we don't know about
yet
and who ordered up the dark matter we
don't know where that came from and
where's this expansion
we don't know where that came from but
we can describe it and we can measure it
here's the point
if tomorrow you have a new idea about
how the universe works
it's going to enclose everything we've
been talking about up to that moment
that has been experimentally and
observationally verified
you can close it in something deeper
okay you can say oh and i have an idea
our universe is just one in a multiverse
fine okay but our universe would have
started with a big bang okay
and our universe would have expanded
from a dense hot cool state and it's
been cooling ever since
that's observed and that's real and
that's not going away
that's my point so so what you have are
journalists trying to make click bait
and if there's some little thing in the
early universe that is still on the
frontier still being contested in the
octagon in this in the in the fight dome
and and some new idea is emerging over
another idea
oh big bang is in trouble so i just go
back to the drawing but big man is not
in trouble right
i'm just saying it's not in trouble it
is a whole
thing that could conceivably fit in a
deeper bigger idea
right but it's not going to be swapped
out tomorrow we're not going to find out
tomorrow gee
uh
the early universe was cold instead of
hot that's not going to happen
that's not how science works
so if you're going to come up with
something new
you're not coming up with
something that will change the old
all you have to the all that has been
experimentally verified right if you're
going to come up with something new
about the earth and the sun it's not
going to be well
it's really earth is stationary and the
sun moves around the earth and the sun
is cold and earth is hot and earth is
what's illuminating the moon that is not
going to happen right right okay you
can't just pull an idea out of your
orifice and ignore experimental
verification of what's going on right so
you might you might come up with the big
fang but you're not changing the big
bang
what what's the best c plus on that one
it's what came before the big bang we
call it the big thing the big thing
okay that's a b plus if that's
what's your thing yeah that's before the
big bang
[Laughter]
so
and and by the way the when we think of
einsteinian physics
so it's relativity
which
completely
uh usurped newtonian gravity and
newtonian motion all right what we call
clot the error of classical physics
which led right up to the late 1800s
newton's ideas reigns supreme
all right and
he told you what gravity did what motion
did and acceleration in a pre-existing
space and it was working okay
it was working and then people said well
wait a minute
uh the orbit of mercury is not really
following newton's laws
and we said oh we got this we know we
got this there's a there's another
planet you can't see that's tugging on
it we even had a name for that planet it
was called vulcan okay
we a hypothetical planet tugging on
mercury so that we didn't have to throw
out newton's laws all right so that was
invoked just out of do we just pull that
out of our ass right said there it is
we'll find it one day
einstein comes along with a special
theory of relativity and then his
general theory of relativity and what we
find is that at high gravity like near
the sun
and at high speeds
at high gravity and high speeds
newton's laws completely fail you cannot
use them at all
so do we say did we throw away newton no
we didn't you know why
because if you take einstein's equations
and plug in
low speeds and low gravity
they become newton's equations
yes so einstein basically
enclosed newton's
ideas as a special low-speed low-gravity
case of a much larger deeper
understanding of the universe fantastic
it's it is it is beautiful it is and so
so and by the way newton's uh newton's
uh gravity and newton's motion went just
fine for the apollo project right we got
to the moon and back without any
einstein relativity at all okay so it's
only if you really uh
um up the stakes in
your gravity there's no wonder way to
understand black holes really with or
even the big bang itself with just
newtonian physics point is
new physics
does not undo experimentally verified
physics that's the whole point of
experimental verification that's all
look at that and so the big bang is just
fine you want to do something else with
it take it body and soul and stick it in
some other theory you have but you can't
undo what the experiments and
observations have shown
and that
is an explainer for you there you go wow
that is good take that big
big bang deniers take that
um so that's that's an explainer from
the octagon
[Laughter]
from the scientist fight club there it
is
science fight club i love it all right
so we got to end it there chuck always
good to have you always a pleasure all
right
neil degrasse tyson here for star trek
[Music]
you
関連動画をさらに表示
Do you really understand Einstein’s theory of relativity? - BBC News
The Big Bang Theory Exploring the Origins of the Universe (4 Minutes)
Why science is NOT 'Just a Theory'
My Response to Terrence Howard
The New Ultra-Deep Image from the JWST Suggests That We May Have Made a Serious Error!
Learning Physics_Evidence for the Big Bang Theory
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)