Sherlock Unlock
Summary
TLDRIn the podcast 'Bilateral View,' host Arup K. Chaty and Dr. Rora Magan delve into the cultural resonance of Sherlock Holmes in the 21st century. They discuss the character's evolution, the impact of adaptations on his image, and the potential dangers of misrepresenting Holmes's use of substances. The conversation also touches on the influence of Indian culture on Arthur Conan Doyle's work, the importance of maintaining the original character's integrity, and the future of the detective genre in a digital age.
Takeaways
- 🎙️ The podcast 'Bilateral View' aims to explore cross-cultural conversations, with a focus on Southeast Asia and the impact of Sherlock Holmes on modern culture.
- 🕵️♂️ Sherlock Holmes remains a popular icon in the 21st century, with adaptations like Robert Downey Jr.'s and Benedict Cumberbatch's versions resonating with contemporary audiences.
- 📚 Dr. Rora Magan discusses the need for good role models in a nuclearized society, where traditional family structures are disintegrating, and how Holmes can serve as one.
- 🧪 The portrayal of Holmes as a substance abuser in modern adaptations is questioned, as the original canon by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle depicted him using drugs for intellectual stimulation, not addiction.
- 👨⚕️ Dr. Watson's role as a witness and narrator in the Holmes stories is highlighted, emphasizing the legal and narrative importance of his character.
- 📖 The discussion points out the inaccuracies in Dr. Watson's narratives and the meta-fictional nature of the original stories, which are often lost in modern adaptations.
- 🌏 The influence of Indian culture and toxicology on the creation of the Holmes universe is explored, showing how Conan Doyle drew from a wealth of historical and spiritual traditions.
- 🚫 The podcast critiques the modern trend of portraying Holmes with toxic masculinity and aggressive behavior, which is contrary to the original character's well-mannered and egalitarian nature.
- 🔮 Predictions are made about the future of the detective genre, suggesting a shift towards virtual crimes and the potential for audience complicity in digital spaces.
- 🌟 The conversation concludes with a call to appreciate Holmes for his intellectual and egalitarian qualities, rather than emulating the negative traits sometimes highlighted in adaptations.
Q & A
What is the main theme of the podcast 'Bilateral View'?
-The main theme of the podcast 'Bilateral View' is a conversation across cultures, focusing on topics that resonate with what's happening in Southeast Asia, using Sherlock Holmes as a central figure for discussion.
Why is Sherlock Holmes still relevant in the 21st century according to the podcast?
-Sherlock Holmes is still relevant in the 21st century because people need good models in increasingly nuclear times, and Holmes represents an intellectual icon that can inspire and be used to channel causes and campaigns for great things.
How does the podcast discuss the portrayal of substance abuse in modern Sherlock Holmes adaptations?
-The podcast discusses the portrayal of substance abuse in modern adaptations as problematic, as it focuses on aspects that were not central to the original character. It points out that Holmes used substances for intellectual experiments and to keep his mind active, not for recreational purposes or due to addiction.
What is the significance of Dr. Watson's character in the Sherlock Holmes stories according to the podcast?
-Dr. Watson is significant as he serves not only as a narrator but also as a legal witness to Holmes's deductions, which was a requirement in British common law during the Victorian era. His presence humanizes Holmes and provides a more relatable perspective to the audience.
How does the podcast view the changes in the character of Sherlock Holmes in modern adaptations?
-The podcast views the changes in Holmes's character in modern adaptations with concern, as they often emphasize negative traits like substance abuse and toxic masculinity, which were not present in the original stories by Arthur Conan Doyle.
What is the podcast's perspective on the influence of Indian culture on Sherlock Holmes?
-The podcast suggests that Sherlock Holmes, as a character, was influenced by Indian culture, particularly in the use of poisons and spiritual traditions, which were prevalent in the Victorian era's toxicology and medicine.
Why does the podcast argue that Sherlock Holmes should not be emulated for certain traits in modern adaptations?
-The podcast argues that Holmes should not be emulated for traits like substance abuse, hostility, or aggressiveness towards women as these are not true to the original character and do not align with the values of a democratic and egalitarian society.
What does the podcast predict about the future of the detective genre, especially in relation to technology?
-The podcast predicts that the detective genre will evolve to include more virtual crimes and that detectives may operate in cyberspace, with the line between real life and virtual life diminishing, possibly making consumers complicit in crimes they are unaware of.
How does the podcast describe the nature of the conversation between the hosts?
-The conversation between the hosts is described as impromptu, not scripted, and a work of love, indicating a spontaneous and genuine exchange of ideas.
What is the podcast's stance on the importance of historical and cultural context in understanding literary characters like Sherlock Holmes?
-The podcast emphasizes the importance of historical and cultural context, arguing that characters should be evaluated within their original setting and that modern adaptations should not be taken as the definitive representation of the character.
Outlines
🎙️ Introduction to Bilateral View Podcast
The podcast 'Bilateral View' is introduced by host Arup K. Chhaty, who warmly welcomes the audience and his co-host, Dr. Rora Magan from the Philippines. The podcast aims to facilitate a cross-cultural conversation, discussing topics relevant to Southeast Asia. The inaugural episode focuses on the cultural impact and adaptations of Sherlock Holmes, a character that has been widely embraced in the 21st century. Dr. Magan discusses the significance of discussing Holmes in contemporary times, emphasizing the need for positive role models in a society that is becoming increasingly fragmented. The conversation touches on the evolution of Holmes' character through various adaptations, including big-screen and BBC series, and how these modern portrayals may differ from the original Victorian conception.
🕵️♂️ The Evolution and Misrepresentation of Sherlock Holmes
Dr. Rora Magan and Professor Chhaty delve into the character of Sherlock Holmes, discussing how the 21st-century adaptations have altered the original portrayal. They address concerns about the focus on Holmes' substance use, which is not a central theme in the original stories by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Instead, Holmes is depicted as a workaholic who uses substances to stimulate his mind. The conversation critiques modern adaptations for emphasizing Holmes' sociopathic tendencies and aggressive behavior towards women, which are not present in the original canon. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding Holmes within his historical context and the potential negative impact of modern portrayals on popular culture.
📚 The Role of Dr. Watson and the Impact of Adaptations
The conversation shifts to the role of Dr. Watson in the Sherlock Holmes stories, with Dr. Magan explaining that Watson serves as a legal witness and narrator, contributing to the construction of Holmes' character. They discuss the differences between the original stories and modern adaptations, noting that adaptations lack the narrative diversity and metafictional elements found in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's work. The adaptations present a more singular and believable version of Holmes, leaving less room for the audience's imagination and questioning. The discussion also touches on the serialization of the original stories and how modern consumption of media might affect the perception of these nuances.
🌏 The Influence of Indian Culture on Sherlock Holmes
Dr. Magan and Professor Chhaty explore the influence of Indian culture on the creation of the Sherlock Holmes universe. They discuss how the use of poisons in the stories is deeply connected to the Indian subcontinent and how Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's medical studies in Edinburgh during the peak of Victorian toxicology influenced his work. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding Holmes not just in relation to Western culture but also in the context of India's contributions to the stories, including the use of poisons and spiritual traditions. The discussion emphasizes the need to apply the same methods of deduction used by Holmes to the analysis of the Holmes canon itself.
🔮 The Future of the Detective Genre and Holmes' Legacy
The final part of the conversation speculates on the future of the detective genre, suggesting that it may become more focused on virtual crimes and the cyberspace. They discuss the potential for artificial intelligence to influence crime and detection, and the possibility that audiences may unknowingly participate in these virtual crimes. The conversation concludes with reflections on the importance of understanding Holmes as a complex character with both intellectual and egalitarian qualities. The hosts express their enjoyment of the conversation and their hope that the audience will continue to engage with such discussions on the 'Bilateral View' podcast.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Sherlock Holmes
💡Adaptation
💡Substance Abuse
💡Cultural Icon
💡Victorian Era
💡Narrative
💡Empiricism
💡Theosophy
💡Toxic Masculinity
💡Cyberspace
Highlights
Introduction of the podcast 'Bilateral View' and its focus on cross-cultural conversations.
Discussion on the enduring relevance of Sherlock Holmes in the 21st century, including modern adaptations.
The importance of good role models in contemporary society and the role of iconic characters like Sherlock Holmes.
Analysis of Sherlock Holmes as a character, distinguishing between the original conception and modern adaptations.
Critique of modern adaptations for focusing on Holmes' substance abuse, contrasting it with the original stories.
Explanation of Holmes' use of substances as an intellectual experiment rather than substance abuse.
Concerns about the portrayal of Holmes in modern adaptations as embodying toxic masculinity.
The role of Dr. Watson in humanizing Holmes and the dynamic between the two characters.
The influence of Indian culture and toxicology on the creation of the Holmes universe.
The potential future of the detective genre, with a shift towards virtual crimes and cyberspace.
The importance of not emulating Holmes' negative traits, such as alienation and aggression, from the adaptations.
The value of Sherlock Holmes as a fictional character and the joy of engaging with the character.
The unplanned and impromptu nature of the podcast conversation, reflecting a genuine exchange of ideas.
The hope for future conversations on 'Bilateral View' that delve into multifarious topics.
Final thoughts on the significance of the discussion and the invitation for the audience to engage with the ideas presented.
Transcripts
[Music]
hello and welcome everybody thank you
for joining in you have joined our new
podcast bilateral view this is me Arup K
chaty uh saying a warm warm welcome to
all of you and with me here is Dr rora
Magan from the Philippines uh batal view
happens to be a conversation across
cultures between two Nations and uh well
hopefully their representatives in a
minor capacity and uh I am very keen to
hear from Dr Magan about how it is in
the Philippines uh uh and uh how's the
weather and how's how's everything back
home Dr right thank you Professor chat G
for having me in this podcast it's an
honor to be your
co-host um yes you're right uh the few
topics we're going to be having in this
podcast is going to be resonating with
what's happening in southeast Asia for
example so Sherlock Holmes is uh very
much adapted in many cultures out there
I'd like to ask because I read your
study and um this question is very
important why is there a need for us to
talk about Sherlock Holmes in the 21st
century well apart from the fact that uh
shomes has been adopted vigorously off
late for 21st century audiences uh
beginning with a big screen adaptation
featuring Robert Downey Jr and that was
followed by uh another you know highly
commercially successful and very popular
series uh launched by the BBC featuring
Benedict hbat yeah uh in general you
know I think the trend is uh uh catching
up all the more because uh people need
good models we are living in
increasingly nuclear Iz times and we
need good icons all the more because uh
somehow it seems like uh the old system
of of family uh I think cohesions has uh
disintegrated somewhat and that requires
all the more uh for us to see better
models on the screen and on the pages of
literary fiction as it were so sh saying
necessary Heroes
right um yes and and shakun I dare say
is uh you know one of those models one
of those icons that keeps growing in
stature albe it there are uh some
problems that also come with that
repackaging of what is originally in
19th century a Victorian character who
was born sometime in the 1850s who lived
throughout the Victorian years well into
the adward years one uh speculates that
Sherlock Holmes the fictional character
uh lived um
you know well into the uh 1920s so I
suppose uh uh there are going to be uh
differences in the way we approach the
new sh course and uh Visa be you know
the canonical sh that was constructed
by you know that's the reason why I like
this podcast because we can freely talk
about these people especially iconic
ones like Sherlock Holmes whose
character or whose many characteristics
are actually being used by people now to
you know Channel their causes and say
campaign for for for great things and
with that I'm going to ask you whether
or not substance abuse is something that
is needing some correction because these
adaptations kind of focus on
that yeah it is a bit uh uh you know
worrying for me why the makers would uh
latch onto that aspect of sh because um
if you read the Canon uh carefully uh
the original which is I know a a very
loaded notion there is practically no
original so to
speak but still if you read the the
Canon written by S do you will find that
there's only two instances of what you
are terming as substance abuse H so once
it is morphine and the other time it is
cocaine to give you an example of his
cocaine consumption on the sign of the
and Dr Watson asks him uh what is it
this time morphine or cocaine and he
famously describes it as a 7%
solution but here in comes the point
that
shocks in Aron and Do's perspective is
not a substance abuser he consumes
substance he cons consumes drugs not for
recreational purposes not because he's
addicted to them he's addicted to work
he's a worker
holic but he wants to keep his mind at
play he wants to keep operating and that
is why he consumes these things and he
also does that as an intellectual
experiment in a sign of the for Dr
Watson comes to supposedly admonish him
as a medical
practitioner holes uh you know turns the
tables and suddenly the shoe is on the
other foot because under the quote
unquote influence of this 7% solution
Holmes is able to deduce the entire
ancestry of uh Dr Watson's watch which
was an heirloom by the way from his
father which passed on to his elder
brother and from the watch its details
its scratches holes is able to deduce uh
you know multiple morally questionable
pasts of his uh Dr Watson's father and
his elder brother mhm so what we find
here is you know a kind of a fabulous uh
uh almost like a you know moral precept
uh implicitly being discussed by AR that
on the one hand substance abuse is is
not cool even though back in the 19th
century moral
resar yeah back back in the 19 century
it was perfectly legal and not
necessarily immoral either uh so homes
would not have been doing anything uh
particularly licentious if he was
consuming cocaine or orine vac okay this
is not an endorsement of any of these
substances in the present year at all
but as historians of literary fiction we
have the right to you know uh to
evaluate a character within his or her
context and Holmes in his context is
perfectly uh you know above the board
but but even within that context he's
not abusing these substances so I was
I was perturbed quite a bit when the
makers of the 21st century homes
adaptations decided to latch on to these
aspects and and uh arguably these are
also the aspects that make uh the new
homes uh even more successful
because like it or not we are living in
the era of Tik Tok reals and Instagram
reals so whatever is cringe or slightly
beneath the board does tend to sell a
lot more than you know the normal things
so the normalization of these substances
you definitely do you find it dangerous
because I thought that you know within
the popular culture framework this
practice is going to be sustained you
see you talked about commodification you
talk about hollywoodized
[Music]
that you are commodifying and you making
at the same time uh an intellectual man
the icon the figure of a a very very
highly you know high functioning
intellectual from the Victorian G more
accessible to the audience through the
hinge or through the hook of these uh
you know idiosyncrasies which are not
very moral or not very legal to begin
with
well I don't think it's dangerous that
would be a strong word but certainly
pernicious because then it would seem
that Holmes is becoming popular for the
wrong
reasons unpop the wrong reasons because
uh attached to substance abuse is also
this trait of uh of toxic masculinity
which is completely alien uh to the
original Holmes Holmes was exceedingly
well-mannered uh not merely in his
satorial per he was impecably best but
he had remarkable etiquette and it was a
you know cause of shagin for Watson very
often because he wouldn't be able to
match up now Holmes was a man of nerves
of Steel m but that does not mean he was
uh hostile towards members of society he
was not a
sociopath like the BBC adaptation tends
to project and rooms was exceedingly
well-mannered towards women whereas uh
both the Robert Downey Jr version and
the Benedict cbat version especially the
latter tends to project homes as
somebody who takes pleasure in being
somewhat sociopathic and uh kind of you
know aggressive towards the female sex I
don't think these are matters that we
can find in the original Canon at all
yeah you see these very important
information
um will surely help our audience out
there to you know process this character
development of Sherlock Holmes in these
adaptations so I think um there's a lot
to take in why not take a break and
we'll have more after this
break hello good evening once again
we're back from the break so earlier
professor chaty you shared how this
character of
Sherlock is hijacked you know by these
adaptations and you know there's this me
substance that is wrongly painted in
these
adaptations also you mentioned how
Watson Dr
Watson is very
influential um I think his character is
important to neutralize
things do you believe that this is the
humanizing element in the
story uh well yes and no actually uh Dr
Watson as uh you know one of my uh
critics while I was writing you know all
those research articles on on shock
holes uh by the way I've written five or
six peer-reviewed articles and multiple
other in the mainstream press so one of
my critics once reminded me helpfully I
should add that Dr Watson's presence is
uh vital to the construction of this
figure of Sherlock because aspect of
British common law from
Victorian England that you need a
witness in order to solve your cases or
uh you know whatever details you have uh
uned about a a certain case needs to be
presented to one honorable uh witness
who well supposedly is a a Victorian
white man uh not not all not partly so
so I think Watson is uh not mely a
narrator but also legal responsibility
in the ubra that represents shlock hes
but apart from that I think there is
this huge disjuncture between the way
Aron and perceived or you know conceived
uh the homesan world Visa how the makers
have represented homes in their
adaptations in the 21st century because
see what happens in the adaptations is
that we what we see is what we
believe and uh there is no scope for any
kind of uh uh you know willing
suspension of belief if I may put it
that way by by which I mean when we view
the adaptations they are so even though
they are surreal even though the times
have been changed even though the
characters have been uh you know shifted
here and there a bit the plot lines have
been modified what we see becomes
believable or in invites us to believe
it whereas Aron and do stories were
doing something different constantly in
the stories you will have this uh you
know dialogue or dialectic between
Holmes and Watson that Watson gives
Holmes a very you know Airy fairy kind
of a representation because Watson is a
romantic and there are there are
actually historical inaccuracies in the
stories themselves so if I may put it
this way that there is metah historicity
and meta uh fictitiousness fictional uh
it's it's a meta fictional world uh that
the articol stories are are talking
about that Watson is giving holes an
inaccurate representation and Aron and
Doyle is giving them both some sort of
an inaccurate representation so this
Healy you know exchange of belief and
disbelief and uh the room for uh
questioning I think disappears in the
adaptations
if you know what I mean and and that
makes it seem like well Dr Watson is a
narrator all right but he is probably
not as inaccurate as the original Watson
was to give you an example of Dr
Watson's
inaccuracy in the in the Canon uh Dr
Watson who's come back from
Afghanistan uh is supposed to be
wounded uh you know somewhere I think in
his limbs but Watson himself the
character forgets where he was wounded
so in one short story it is somewhere in
the subclavian artery in another short
story it is in his shoulder uh in
another novel or Nolla it is in his in
his legs so so he is somewhat confused
or maybe doy is a little bit confused
now this is also a problem of
serialization because Doyle was writing
these as serials in the Strand magazine
but when we watch the films or the
adaptations we perhaps binge watch them
and definitely if it's a work of Cinema
of two hours then then we watch it at
once so those nuances of Storytelling of
of narrative uh uh problems or or you
know narrative diversity as it were that
I think gets eved and and viewers are
then left to see see Sher coms fictional
or otherwise as he is on the screen and
that is what you see is what you get
there is no room for further imagination
about what might have been the other
aspects of homes that were hidden from
the public at
[Music]
large hello everyone hello Professor
chaty so earlier you talked a lot about
how India needs to be understood with
reference to Sherlock
holms can you share some more references
or
linkages um so that our viewers could
better understand the relevance of indic
culture in the creation of the Homen
Universe um thank you Dr Magan for that
question I think it's quite the other
way around it's not India that needs to
be understood with reference to shlock
Holmes but rather Sherlock Holmes who
needs to be understood understood
vigorously with reference to India
because uh consider it this way the uh
the Indian universe is informing the
homesan canon in the 19th and the early
20th
century um uh now to give you one
example apart from the you know the the
the details that we can get from the
short stories uh the world of a
detective is almost nothing at least in
the 19th century and the 20th century
without poisons without crimes so if
there's no murder mystery then the
readers don't have uh something to you
know really latch on to because that is
what really drives the plot everybody
know wants to know who committed the
murder uh now the the one of the most
important weapons that uh the criminals
in the homes in World find to commit
their murders are poisons and these
poisons owe a great deal to uh the
Indian
subcontinent so AR gandol was a student
of medicine at the University of
Edinburgh between 1878 and 188 2 and
this was also the time that Victorian
toxicology was at its peak and Victorian
African toxicology and Victorian Indian
toxicology were making great headways uh
so Victorian anthropology and Victorian
uh tropical medicine and Victorian
toxicology were this Trinity that was uh
shaping uh people like Aron and who was
intern shaping the the homesan you know
world so if we
reduce uh the you know the the Indian
subcontinent presence to merely certain
proper nouns or merely the plotline in
one given novel and refuse to go into
the the tiniest things that inspired
Arthur and doy such as the poisons there
is one instance which I have uh pointed
out in one of my papers where a very
famous African poison of what Arthur
kundal calls an African poison was
actually an Indian poison and
toxicologists throughout the 20th
century and the early 21st century have
have worked on this problem area but
they could not exactly you know pin it
down to one poison but I I believe I
have landed on it where I
identify this the quote unquote African
poison from arand doll's short story The
Adventure of the devil's F to an Indian
poison because I studied the anal of
toxic ology and I also made uh very uh
you see uh educated speculations on what
was the material that Aral was
studying in his in his uh days of uh
days as a student of medicine and
afterwards so Aragon and doll himself
was deeply inspired by India and if he
do not apply the same methods that
Sherlock Holmes appli that is the
science of deduction or the art of
detection as Watson later called it in
the Canon to the homesan Canon itself
that I don't think we are doing justice
as literary critics to too's work and
labor you know it's beautiful that you
mentioned how Sir Arthur conand Doyle
draws upon an India method of
deduction it sort of tells us all that
this inspiration come from India and
that's the reason why earlier you spoke
of intellectual Supremacy
can you talk more about this I don't
think Aron do draws from India uh the
method of scientific deduction but what
he draws from India what he draws from
India definitely is a lot of inspiration
and a wealth of historical material and
he also draws on uh Indian spiritual
Traditions like Buddhism like the
punishers vanta uh and he's drawing also
from Theos theosophists like Helena
so who by the way becomes controversial
towards the end of her life but rather
than uh you know I think uh looking at
the science of deduction as purely an
empirical science what we need to do is
look at it with the kind of
skepticism say with which we look at uh
you know matters of religion for example
or matters of cultural Supremacy so the
same uh models of skepticism should be
applied to any kind of scientific ific
deduction as well because I don't think
Aron and do wanted to separate
scientific deduction from the other
walks of life I think in his perception
in the homesan world uh science is very
much linked to several other aspects of
culture and and spir and the spirit so
the life of the mind is also the life of
the spirit fors as I have uh you know as
I have argued in one of my papers uh
which is which is a rather a call to
action I would say uh not to make
empiricism you know
absolute uh certainly not the absolute
you know scale of determining how good
or how wonderful a particular society is
I think it should be seen with a healthy
dose of skepticism and
Equanimity okay well but um there is no
doubt that Arthur C
oil got so much from the indic
culture and that moving forward
especially in the 21st century this can
be conveyed to the youngsters out there
who are only concerned with an action
pack
narratives and more than the actionpack
narratives the visuals the okay the
icons Cumberbatch for
example um so if there's one thing that
we can never ever emulate from Sherlock
Holmes what could that
be I think we have uh sort of touched on
this aspect in the initial part of this
conversation but uh I have no Authority
on what we should not uh uh be emulating
from homes but uh at the same time I
think I think if you read the original
it would become clearer that uh homes uh
in the adapted versions is not the man
that arand do actually had in mind and
if you have to be a genius
I don't think that requires any kind of
hostility uh towards members of society
I don't think uh a genius needs to
commit substance abuse I don't think a
genius needs to be impolite or
indelicate towards women uh I think it's
perfectly all right for a genius to be
monastic celibate even even a
solitudinarian to live in solitude but
um I I re you know really I think this
concept of the Mad genius need not be uh
alienated from society it can very well
live in society and enjoy social life uh
so if if uh we take the adaptations as
any index of who homes was then those
are the aspects that I sadly would not
uh endorse that is being alienated from
society being aggressive towards your uh
you know people of let's say who are not
as good as you in the intellectual game
or who don't seem as good as you
uh because maybe there are other
wonderful aspects to them and a life of
intellect is not the only life to lead
there are many more aspects to to life
so exactly but at the end of the day we
think that the detective genre has been
heavily impacted by Sherlock Holmes and
the universe Conan DOL
created for example in Southeast Asia we
have a lot of writers emulating Conan
Doyle the idea of a necessary hero um
giving
Justice uh to whoever deserves Justice I
mean that simple motive is promoted um
every now and then even with those
adaptations so what can you say is
though or can you
predict the the status of detective
genre I think it's uh beyond my perview
uh to be honest but what certainly is uh
uh you know very clear to me it is
evident that uh the the world where the
detective operates uh is is going to
change dramatically and it could become
more like a you know world of virtual
crimes or rather the crimes themselves
no matter their magnitude maybe the
magnitude would be severer but the the
world itself would become virtualized
increasingly so I I sense that
um the the distance between the real
life and the virtual life will will
diminish a lot more and uh that is to
say it would be a meta referential world
the
detective would be uh you know working
in the cyber space and we would be
getting to hear and know about the
detective in the in that very cyber
space and interesting it's also not
unlikely to me that while we consume
stories and myths and legends about the
cyberspace detective at that very
instant we might be participating ever
so unknowingly in uh you know we might
be complicit I mean to say in certain
crimes that uh go beyond our notice so
so that is a very creepy uh a very eerie
scenario and I hope this this prediction
does not come true but there are certain
indic there are certain indications that
artificial intelligence is is really
taking over the the game of ction so
well unfortunate but true I
suppose Professor chaty you wrote a lot
about Sherlock hes your papers would
tell volumes of your love for this um
creation by Conan Doyle personally do
you adore the
character very much do and I I believe I
believe we have the we have the
obligation to endorse shs as he was
represented by AR but not uh you know
each and every aspect I think we have
the also equally the obligation to enjoy
uh Sherlock Holmes as a fictional
character as somebody who is not really
out there and we do not need to model
ourselves on on homes unless we
ourselves really want to and if we
really want to think seriously about
adopting or adapting certain homes and
trades in ourselves then maybe we should
look more at his Democratic and
egalitarian side which are also equally
true of homes just like as intellectuals
I love that the egalitarian try
to much has been said it's covered much
tonight and you see how we wish there
could be much time to talk about this
but we have to say goodbye to our
audience because they have to digest
everything you have said and these are
so so heavy matters to begin
with so Professor chaty I hope you
enjoyed our conversation tonight well it
was a wonderful conversation Dr Nan I am
uh very very pleasantly surprised at uh
the way this conversation went it was uh
totally unexpected I think the the
audience has the right to know that we
did not script any of this it was
entirely impromtu and uh purely a work
of uh love uh that we wanted to put out
there for all of you uh well I certainly
found it an honor and and a huge
pleasure to converse with you Dr Magan
and I'm sure our audience must have
liked it as as much much as I did and
and we did and uh I look forward to
having uh many more such conversations
with you on bilateral view right like
you said at the beginning bilateral view
is going to be
conversations about two sides or even
beyond the two sides the multifarious
levels out there and hopefully our
audiences will be engaged along the way
as they discover interesting ideas very
exquisite Pi on these beautiful
beautiful matters like Sherlock Holmes
and many
more so I think we have to say goodbye
Prof CH to our audience and because I'm
aana I would
say namaste to everybody bye-bye have a
great day
関連動画をさらに表示
English File 3rdE - Intermediate - Revise and Check 9&10 -Short Films: The Hound of the Baskervilles
Philippine Modernity and Popular Culture: An Onto Historical Inquiry
Is It Too Late To Start Making Content Now?
The Hans Zimmer Composer Round Table
Sherlock Holmes isn't Who You Think He is
Konain Shah on Scaling an Agency & Staying Humble
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)