WATCH: Alice Guo denies she is Guo Hua Ping, refuses to reveal death threats

Summary

In a Senate hearing, Miss Alice Guo faces intense questioning regarding her identity and past statements. The committee confronts her with evidence from the NBI linking her fingerprints to those of Guo Ping, suggesting they are the same person. Despite invoking her right against self-incrimination, she is urged to answer truthfully to avoid contempt charges. The hearing reveals inconsistencies in her previous testimonies and documents, casting doubt on her claims of being Filipino. The committee seeks clarity and the truth, emphasizing the importance of honest testimony for their investigation.

Takeaways

• 🗣️ The Senate committee is seeking the truth and expects complete and honest answers from Miss Alice.
• 🚫 Miss Alice initially refuses to answer questions, invoking her right against self-incrimination.
• 👁️‍🗨️ The committee emphasizes the importance of truthfulness and respect for the Senate's authority.
• 🆔 There is a discrepancy in Miss Alice's identity, with evidence suggesting she is actually Gu Ping.
• 👁️‍🗨️ Miss Alice admits to having cases in court but refuses to answer questions related to her identity.
• 🔍 The NBI has matched fingerprints of Gu Ping and Alice Gu, suggesting they are the same person.
• 🚫 Miss Alice continues to deny being Gu Ping and insists on her right to self-incrimination.
• 📜 The committee points out inconsistencies in Miss Alice's previous statements and documents.
• 🏢 There are allegations of government agency involvement in the irregular acquisition of Miss Alice's Philippine documents.
• ⚖️ The committee warns Miss Alice that evasiveness and dishonesty may lead to contempt charges.

Q & A

Why did the Senate committee call upon Miss Alice to testify?

Miss Alice was called upon to testify to answer questions truthfully and respectfully to the Senate committee, as they were seeking the truth and expected her to cooperate fully with their inquiries.

What was the issue with Miss Alice's birth registration?

Miss Alice was accused of late registration of her birth, which was a point of contention as it was suspected to be part of a fraudulent process to establish her identity.

Why did Miss Alice invoke her right against self-incrimination?

Miss Alice invoked her right against self-incrimination when faced with questions that could potentially incriminate her, especially regarding her identity and the legitimacy of her documents.

What was the significance of the fingerprint comparison mentioned in the script?

The fingerprint comparison was significant because it showed that the fingerprints of 'Gua Ping' and 'Alice Guo' were identical, suggesting that they might be the same person, which was a crucial point in the investigation of Miss Alice's identity.

Why did the committee express concern about Miss Alice's safety?

The committee expressed concern about Miss Alice's safety because she mentioned receiving death threats, which, if true, could indicate that she was in danger and might need protection.

What was the committee's reaction to Miss Alice's claims of death threats?

The committee was skeptical of Miss Alice's claims of death threats, as she was unwilling to discuss them publicly, and they felt it was a tactic to avoid answering their questions.

Why was the issue of Miss Alice's Philippine passport important to the committee?

Miss Alice's Philippine passport was important because it was tied to the legitimacy of her identity and citizenship. The committee wanted to verify how she obtained it and whether it was part of a fraudulent scheme.

What did the committee want to achieve by questioning Miss Alice about her past statements and documents?

The committee aimed to verify the consistency and truthfulness of Miss Alice's past statements and documents to determine her credibility and uncover any discrepancies that might indicate deception.

What was the implication of the NBI's dactyloscopy report in the hearing?

The NBI's dactyloscopy report, which confirmed that the fingerprints of two different names belonged to the same person, was a critical piece of evidence suggesting identity fraud, which the committee used to challenge Miss Alice's claims.

Why did the committee insist on Miss Alice's truthfulness in her testimony?

The committee insisted on Miss Alice's truthfulness to establish the facts of the case, maintain the integrity of the Senate's inquiry, and to determine if she should be held in contempt for lying under oath.