10 Psychological Experiments You Would Never Believe Happened

MindChop
15 Sept 201614:12

Summary

TLDRThis video explores ten groundbreaking psychological experiments that reveal profound insights into human behavior. From the Asch conformity test highlighting the power of social influence to the Stanford Prison Experiment uncovering the dark side of authority, each experiment provides a unique perspective on how we conform, obey, and react under various social pressures and conditions. These studies, ranging from the marshmallow test on self-control to Dr. Cameron's controversial 'beneficial brainwashing,' challenge our understanding of human nature and the impact of external factors on our actions.

Takeaways

  • 🧠 The Asch conformity test revealed that people tend to conform to group opinions even when they are clearly wrong, with 37 out of 50 subjects choosing the incorrect answer.
  • 🍭 The marshmallow experiment by Walter Mischel demonstrated that children who could delay gratification by waiting for a second marshmallow had higher success rates in adulthood.
  • 🍻 Carlsberg's social experiment showed that people are creatures of habit and fearful of the unknown, as observed when couples faced a room full of bikers at a cinema.
  • 🏕 The Robbers Cave experiment illustrated how competition and conflict between groups can be resolved through cooperation when faced with a common challenge.
  • 🦍 The ape and child experiment by Winthrop Kellogg suggested that human children can learn animal behaviors, highlighting the importance of environmental influences on development.
  • 🧠 Dr. Cameron's 'beneficial brainwashing' or 'psychic driving' aimed to reprogram the brain for health by forcing new patterns of thinking, but was deemed unethical.
  • 👁️‍🗨️ Jane Elliott's class divided experiment taught students about the harmful effects of racism and discrimination by assigning superiority based on eye color.
  • 🗣️ The Monster Study by Wendell Johnson showed the detrimental effects of negative reinforcement and the benefits of positive therapy on speech impediments.
  • ⚡️ The Milgram experiment revealed the extent to which people will obey authority figures, even to the point of causing harm to others.
  • 🏫 The Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Dr. Philip Zimbardo demonstrated how quickly people can adopt abusive roles when given power in a simulated prison environment.

Q & A

  • What was the main finding of the Asch conformity test?

    -The Asch conformity test showed that a significant number of people are willing to conform to a group's opinion even when it is clearly wrong, demonstrating a human tendency to go along with the majority.

  • What did the marshmallow experiment by Walter Mischel indicate about patience and future success?

    -The marshmallow experiment indicated that children who were able to wait longer before eating a marshmallow tended to have higher success rates in adulthood, suggesting that patience and delayed gratification are correlated with future achievements.

  • How did the Carlsberg social experiment demonstrate human behavior in unfamiliar situations?

    -The Carlsberg social experiment showed that people are creatures of habit and fearful when approaching the unknown, as many couples were daunted by a crowd of bikers in a cinema and only a few dared to claim their seats, which was met with applause and rewards.

  • What was the purpose of the Robbers Cave experiment, and what did it reveal about group dynamics?

    -The Robbers Cave experiment aimed to see how different groups work together to solve conflicts. It revealed that adversity and combined suffering can bring even the most hostile groups together, demonstrating the human psyche's ability to cooperate under common challenges.

  • What was the 'Ape and the Child' experiment, and what did it attempt to prove?

    -The 'Ape and the Child' experiment was an attempt to see if an ape could be taught human behaviors and communication. It aimed to prove that animals could learn civilized ways of mankind, but it also showed that human children could easily emulate animal behaviors.

  • What was Dr. Cameron's approach to treating schizophrenia, and what was it called?

    -Dr. Cameron's approach to treating schizophrenia involved forcing patients to listen to recorded audio messages on a loop, which he called 'psychic driving.' He believed this could reprogram the brain to be healthier.

  • What was the main takeaway from Jane Elliott's class divided experiment regarding racism and self-perception?

    -The main takeaway from Jane Elliott's class divided experiment was that the perception of others plays a significant role in self-development. When children were labeled as inferior, their academic performance suffered, and when they were labeled as superior, they performed better.

  • What was the 'Monster Study' and why was it considered unethical?

    -The 'Monster Study' was an experiment where orphans with speech impediments were either constantly belittled or given positive therapy. It was considered unethical because the negative reinforcement group was subjected to harmful psychological abuse, leading to lifelong damages.

  • What was the Milgram experiment, and what did it reveal about obedience to authority?

    -The Milgram experiment was a series of studies that tested the obedience to authority by asking participants to administer shocks to a volunteer when they answered questions incorrectly. It revealed that people are willing to obey authority figures even when their actions are morally questionable.

  • What were the key findings of the Stanford Prison Experiment, and why was it terminated early?

    -The Stanford Prison Experiment showed that normal people can engage in abusive behavior when given power and authority. The guards became sadistic, and the prisoners lost their sense of self. The experiment was terminated early due to the disturbing and unethical nature of the abuse that occurred.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 Asch Conformity Test & Marshmallow Experiment

The Asch conformity test from the 1950s demonstrated humans' tendency to conform to group decisions even when they are obviously incorrect. In this experiment, actors intentionally gave wrong answers to a simple question, and 37 out of 50 subjects followed suit. The Marshmallow Experiment by Walter Mischel in 1972 showed that children who could resist eating a marshmallow for 15 minutes received a second one, and those who waited longer tended to have higher success rates in adulthood, suggesting patience and self-control are linked to future success.

05:00

🍻 Carlsberg Social Experiment & Robbers Cave Experiment

Carlsberg's social experiment involved a marketing stunt where couples were intimidated by a room full of biker-clad actors, and those who bravely sat in the middle received applause and beer, highlighting human reactions to unfamiliar situations. The Robbers Cave Experiment from 1954 studied how preteen boys in two groups, initially kept apart and made competitive, could work together when faced with shared challenges, showing that adversity can unite even hostile groups.

10:02

🐒 The Ape and the Child & Dr. Cameron's Brainwashing

In 1931, psychologist Winthrop Kellogg adopted a chimpanzee to study if animals could learn human behaviors. The ape, Guha, and his son Donald were raised together, with Guha outperforming Donald in some tests, but the experiment was halted due to concerns over Donald's speech development. Dr. Ewen Cameron's 'beneficial brainwashing' in the 1950s-60s aimed to 'reprogram' the brain for health by forcing new patterns of thinking through repeated audio messages, but his methods were later criticized.

👁️‍🗨️ Jane Elliott's Class Divided & The Monster Study

Jane Elliott's experiment post-Martin Luther King's assassination divided a class into blue-eyed and brown-eyed groups to study the effects of perceived superiority and inferiority, leading to immediate behavioral changes and highlighting the impact of expectations on performance. The 'Monster Study' by Wendell Johnson in 1939 involved orphans, where one group received negative reinforcement for speech errors, worsening their condition, while the other received positive therapy, showing the lasting effects of reinforcement on self-development.

🔋 Milgram Experiment & Stanford Prison Experiment

The Milgram experiment explored obedience to authority by having participants administer shocks to 'volunteers' who answered questions incorrectly. Despite the volunteer's distress, most participants continued due to the authoritative figure's commands, revealing the potential for evil under obedience. The Stanford Prison Experiment simulated a prison environment with random assignment of roles, leading to abusive behavior by guards and submissiveness by prisoners, demonstrating how normal people can commit atrocities given the right circumstances.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Conformity

Conformity refers to the act of matching attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors to group norms. In the video, the Asch conformity test is highlighted, where subjects often chose the incorrect answer to match the group, demonstrating the powerful influence of social pressure. This concept is central to understanding how individuals can be swayed by the majority, even when it contradicts their own judgment.

💡Patience

Patience is the ability to tolerate waiting, delay, or frustration without becoming agitated or upset. The Marshmallow Experiment mentioned in the video illustrates the correlation between a child's ability to delay gratification and their later success in life. This concept is pivotal in the video's discussion on self-discipline and its long-term benefits.

💡Social Conditioning

Social conditioning is the process by which social influences from society, family, and institutions shape an individual's behavior and attitudes. The video references Jane Elliott's experiment, where students were conditioned to believe one eye color was superior to another, leading to immediate behavioral changes. This keyword is crucial for understanding how societal structures can influence individual beliefs and actions.

💡Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is the tendency to comply with the orders or commands given by an authority figure. The Milgram experiment, as discussed in the video, demonstrates the extent to which individuals will obey authority figures even when it involves causing harm to others. This concept is central to the video's exploration of the darker aspects of human nature and the potential for cruelty under certain social dynamics.

💡Stress and Coping

Stress and coping refer to the psychological and physiological responses to pressures or demands placed upon a person. The Stanford Prison Experiment, featured in the video, shows how participants under the stress of their roles as guards or prisoners exhibited extreme behaviors, highlighting the impact of stress on human behavior and the coping mechanisms individuals employ in response to challenging situations.

💡Imitation

Imitation is the act of copying the behavior of others. In the 'Ape and the Child' experiment, the video discusses how a child's interaction with a chimpanzee led to the child imitating the ape's behaviors, indicating the strong influence of imitation in early development and learning.

💡Group Dynamics

Group dynamics are the behaviors and psychological processes occurring within a social group. The Robbers Cave experiment, as mentioned in the video, explores how group dynamics can lead to both conflict and cooperation, showing how groups can be manipulated and how shared challenges can foster unity.

💡Positive Reinforcement

Positive reinforcement is a psychological principle where a positive outcome increases the likelihood of a behavior occurring again. The 'Monster Study' discussed in the video demonstrates the detrimental effects of negative reinforcement and the benefits of positive reinforcement on speech development in children, underscoring the importance of encouragement in shaping behavior.

💡Brainwashing

Brainwashing refers to the manipulation of an individual's beliefs or attitudes through persistent persuasion, often involving isolation from dissenting viewpoints. Dr. Cameron's 'beneficial brainwashing' experiment, as described in the video, aimed to reprogram patients' thinking patterns but was criticized for its ethical implications and the potential for manipulation.

💡Self-Esteem

Self-esteem is an individual's overall sense of self-worth or personal value. The Asch conformity test, highlighted in the video, suggests that individuals with lower self-esteem may be more likely to conform to group opinions, even when they are incorrect, to gain acceptance and validation from others.

💡Behavioral Modification

Behavioral modification is the process of changing an individual's behavior through the use of various techniques, such as reinforcement and punishment. The video's discussion of the Stanford Prison Experiment touches on how the environment and role expectations can rapidly modify behavior, with participants adopting extreme roles as guards or prisoners.

Highlights

Asch conformity test demonstrated the human tendency to conform to group opinions even when they are clearly wrong.

37 out of 50 subjects in the Asch test chose the incorrect answer due to group pressure.

The marshmallow experiment showed that children who could delay gratification had higher success rates in adulthood.

Children who waited for the second marshmallow in the experiment were more likely to do better on SATs and be intellectually competent.

Carlsberg social experiment revealed human fear of the unknown and the courage to face unfamiliar situations.

Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that adversity can bring even the worst enemies closer together.

The ape and the child experiment explored the possibility of teaching civilized behavior to animals.

Dr. Cameron's beneficial brainwashing aimed to reprogram the brain for healthier thinking patterns.

Jane Elliott's class divided experiment highlighted the rapid effects of negative conditioning on self-esteem.

The monster study showed the detrimental effects of negative reinforcement on speech development.

Milgram experiment revealed the extent to which people would obey authority figures, even to the point of causing harm.

Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrated how quickly people can adopt abusive behaviors when given power.

The Stanford Prison Experiment was terminated early due to the severe psychological effects on participants.

These psychological experiments provide insights into human behavior, conformity, obedience, and the impact of social dynamics.

Transcripts

play00:01

[Music]

play00:07

number ten Asch conformity test

play00:10

- conformity test was conducted in the

play00:12

early 1950s and showed the human

play00:14

tendency to stick with a mob even though

play00:16

it is clearly wrong in this experiment

play00:18

one person the unknowing subject is

play00:20

placed in a room full of actors the

play00:22

conductor the experiment held up a piece

play00:24

of paper with three lines on it and

play00:26

asked for the crowd to identify the

play00:27

longest line the actors all showed the

play00:29

wrong answer on purpose to see whether

play00:31

the subjects would disagree using their

play00:33

own logic or go with everyone else's

play00:35

answers simply because there is strength

play00:36

in numbers 37 out of a sample size of 50

play00:39

chose the incorrect answer even though

play00:41

it was very easy to identify the correct

play00:43

option this test proved how much people

play00:45

are willing to conform to others ideas

play00:47

this day psychologists still

play00:48

passionately debate whether this comes

play00:50

from a need to be accepted or from

play00:52

serious issues with self-esteem number 9

play00:57

the marshmallow experiment I've heard

play00:59

the expression patience is better but

play01:01

its fruit is sweet yeah us neither till

play01:03

we had to google it for this video

play01:05

perspective this experiment proves how

play01:07

this really is the case apparently

play01:09

jean-jacques rousseau a French thinker

play01:11

the 18th century was really on to

play01:13

something when he said this Stanford

play01:15

University remembers Walter Mischel

play01:17

conducted an experiment in 1972 to test

play01:20

just how true this was children aged

play01:22

four to six were taken into a room and a

play01:24

marshmallow was placed before each one

play01:26

the administrators then left them alone

play01:28

in a room and they were told that if

play01:30

they could go for 15 minutes without

play01:32

eating it then they would get a second

play01:34

one as a reward dominoes record how long

play01:36

each child go before succumbing to

play01:37

temptation and they further record how

play01:39

each child fared later on in life and

play01:41

the results were surprising all those

play01:43

who had waited longer before giving in

play01:45

eating the marshmallow we reported to

play01:47

have a higher success rate in adulthood

play01:48

a small minority of the 600 children

play01:50

sampled stuff to their faces immediately

play01:53

but a third of them were able to wait

play01:54

long enough to earn the second

play01:55

marshmallow in the extensive research

play01:57

conducted over the span of those child's

play01:59

lives it was found that the children who

play02:01

waited patiently in

play02:02

gratification longer we're more likely

play02:04

to do better on the SATs and we're more

play02:06

intellectually competent in comparison

play02:08

to their peers so even though being

play02:10

patient and waiting really is better try

play02:12

to be more mindful of it and the results

play02:14

in the end are worth it

play02:16

number eight Carlsberg social experiment

play02:20

Carlsberg a Danish beer brewing company

play02:22

conducted the social experiment and then

play02:23

turned into a successful marketing

play02:25

gimmick they tricked innocent couples of

play02:27

cinema and Brussels to test how gutsy

play02:29

humans can be when faced with an

play02:30

unfamiliar situation at the cinema a

play02:33

hundred and forty a man dressed as

play02:34

bikers filled the entire stadium and

play02:36

only two seats available were right in

play02:38

the middle

play02:39

Carlsberg representatives were present

play02:41

to record the exchange that took place

play02:42

many of the couples have walked in and

play02:44

were shocked to see the crowd and some

play02:46

of them even responded by saying that

play02:47

this wasn't what they had paid for many

play02:50

couples were daunted by the bikers and

play02:51

turned away whether this happened the

play02:53

bikers showed no reaction however every

play02:56

time a couple awkwardly shuffled between

play02:57

the bikers and claiming the two seats in

play02:59

the middle

play02:59

everyone broke out an applause and

play03:01

offered the pair a bottle of Carlsberg

play03:02

beer the reactions of the couples were

play03:05

of genuine shock and pleasure this is

play03:07

just another experiment to show that

play03:08

humans are creatures of habit and are

play03:11

fearful when approaching the unknown

play03:14

number 7 robbers cave experiment this

play03:17

experiment took place in the summer of

play03:19

1954 a group of preteen boys were used

play03:22

to see how different groups work

play03:23

together to solve conflicts Mazar and

play03:25

carolyn sheriff as well as their

play03:27

research team at the University of

play03:28

Oklahoma were responsible for finding 24

play03:30

boys who were well-adjusted socially and

play03:32

physically in their communities and

play03:34

invited them to a seemingly ordinary

play03:36

summer camp what these kids didn't know

play03:38

was that the counselors were actually

play03:40

psychologists and they were the

play03:41

unknowing subjects of a psychological

play03:43

experiment the two groups were split

play03:45

randomly and the boys within each group

play03:46

were encouraged to bond with each other

play03:48

however the two groups were kept apart

play03:50

at all times and the counselors did

play03:52

little things to reinforce

play03:53

competitiveness between the two groups

play03:54

after instilling competition and some

play03:56

hostility between them the counselors

play03:58

held tournaments in which the winners

play04:00

were awarded and the losers were made to

play04:01

feel bad this led to a whole new level

play04:03

of anger and resentment between the

play04:05

groups finally as the last step to this

play04:07

experiment the psychologist introduced a

play04:09

stimulus that was

play04:10

bad for both groups the first one was a

play04:12

shortage of water and surprisingly they

play04:14

found that the two groups were willing

play04:15

to work together to solve the issue this

play04:17

sparked the curiosity of the

play04:18

psychologists who had set up a few more

play04:20

of these tasks more stimuli such as lack

play04:23

of food were introduced into the study

play04:24

which led to even greater cooperation

play04:26

between the groups by the end of the

play04:28

experiment they were working comfortably

play04:30

with each other and all the initial

play04:32

hostility was long forgotten this study

play04:34

is famous for showing a lot about the

play04:36

human psychic many gang movies in even

play04:38

high school sports movies will tell you

play04:39

the same thing

play04:40

adversity and combined suffering tends

play04:42

to bring even the worst of enemies

play04:43

closer together number six the ape and

play04:48

the child believe it or not a fair

play04:49

number of human beings have being raised

play04:51

in the wild by animals therefore

play04:53

scientists craved the chance to see if

play04:55

animals could be taught the civilized

play04:56

ways of mankind

play04:57

in 1931 psychologist Winthrop Kellogg

play05:00

decided to see what would happen if he

play05:01

adopted a 7 month old female chimpanzee

play05:04

named Guha

play05:04

zone son Donald was only in ten months

play05:07

old at the time

play05:08

Donald Guha became fast friends and did

play05:10

everything together

play05:11

Kellogg took it a step further and even

play05:13

tested their development shockingly

play05:15

enough

play05:15

Guha did better on many of these tests

play05:17

however the Kellogg's were disappointed

play05:20

that Guha had not acquired the ability

play05:21

to communicate through words and they

play05:23

were horrified to discover the Donald's

play05:25

speech cognition was also suffering when

play05:27

he imitated Goa's hunger bark the

play05:29

Kellogg's decided that Donald need to

play05:31

spend more time around other humans

play05:33

goooooo was shipped off to a primate

play05:35

center where she died a year layer due

play05:37

to a fever

play05:37

this experiment is not well known

play05:39

because this is odd to think the humans

play05:41

find easier to emulate animals than

play05:43

vice-versa there's a real theory out

play05:45

there that cats and dogs tend to act and

play05:47

even behave like their owners over time

play05:49

there's so much about the human animal

play05:51

relationship that is wildly fascinating

play05:53

for researchers and with lack of

play05:55

concrete information there is a much

play05:57

much room for growth

play05:59

number five beneficial brainwashing dr.

play06:03

cameron believes the brain can be

play06:04

reprogrammed to be healthier by simply

play06:06

forcing a new pattern of thinking at the

play06:08

time he thought he found a cure for

play06:10

schizophrenia and used to force patients

play06:12

to listen to record audio messages on a

play06:13

loop for long periods of time he named

play06:16

this psychic driving as according to him

play06:18

the messages were being directly

play06:19

received by the psychic causing the

play06:21

media to dub is approach beneficial

play06:23

brainwashing from the 1950s to the 1960s

play06:26

many of Cameron's patients at the

play06:27

Montreal Allen memorial clinic became

play06:29

his test subjects and whether they

play06:31

suffered from schizophrenia or not was

play06:33

not taken into account each was injected

play06:36

with barbiturates and forced to listen

play06:37

to different reaffirming mantras such as

play06:39

people like you and need you to check

play06:41

the effectiveness of the program he once

play06:43

played the instructions to his subjects

play06:45

so that they must pick up a piece of

play06:46

paper afterwards he drove him to a

play06:48

nearby gym were oddly enough there was a

play06:50

piece of paper in the middle of the room

play06:51

he was convinced those methods were

play06:53

working as all the subjects

play06:55

instantaneously went to grab that one

play06:56

piece of paper

play06:57

the CIA heard of the good doctors work

play06:59

and funded his research as they were

play07:01

interested in the findings unfortunately

play07:03

for them their investment did not pay

play07:05

off as he had shut down the experiment

play07:07

when the subjects later learned that the

play07:08

CIA's involvement they pressed charges

play07:10

but the matter was quickly solved out of

play07:12

court for an undisclosed amount gulp -

play07:15

even Cameron himself a mid-layer that

play07:16

his research had been a step in the

play07:18

wrong direction and that had been

play07:20

focused on the wrong elements

play07:22

number four a class divided blue-eyed

play07:25

brown-eyed Jane Elliott started this

play07:27

experiment at a local elementary school

play07:29

after Martin Luther King was

play07:30

assassinated in 1968 she divided her

play07:32

students into two groups those with blue

play07:35

eyes and those with brown eyes the first

play07:37

day she deemed those with blue eyes a

play07:38

superior group and started giving them

play07:40

preferential treatment during playtime

play07:42

in class time the changes she knows

play07:44

within a day were significant almost

play07:46

instantaneously the blue-eyed group

play07:48

armed with their superiority started

play07:50

doing better academically some of them

play07:52

even started bullying the brown-eyed

play07:53

kids and there was a fight between two

play07:55

boys by the end of the day likewise the

play07:57

brown-eyed kids did not do as well as

play07:59

they normally did academically and fell

play08:01

into the role of being inferiors the

play08:03

second day she reversed the roles

play08:04

between the two groups and said that the

play08:06

brown eye kids were better the results

play08:08

again showed the fast effects of

play08:09

negative conditioning the brown eye kids

play08:11

did so much better than they had before

play08:13

and they returned to being more

play08:14

confident and outgoing well they were

play08:16

only children both groups learned the

play08:18

horrible effects of racism and

play08:19

interestingly enough when the class came

play08:21

together again at a reunion each of them

play08:23

are under the incident remark that made

play08:25

them more conscious of the different

play08:26

challenges that people have diversity

play08:27

faced Jane Elliott became an advocate

play08:30

for this experience and she was often

play08:31

asked to give talks to different groups

play08:33

and conduct the experiment with them as

play08:35

well her results have always shown that

play08:37

when people are expected to fail they

play08:39

are more likely to undeniably the

play08:41

perception of others does play an

play08:43

important role in self development

play08:46

number three the monster test this test

play08:49

was called the monster study because of

play08:51

how unethical was in its nature

play08:52

however ironically this study shows the

play08:55

importance of positive reinforcement for

play08:57

the development of a healthy self in

play08:58

1939 Wendell Johnson from the University

play09:01

of Iowa selected 22 orphans and split

play09:03

them randomly into two groups each group

play09:05

had a number of children either

play09:06

stuttered or had some sort of speech

play09:08

impediment one group was constantly

play09:10

belittled for every single mistake they

play09:12

made and under the constant chastisement

play09:14

of the psychologists the children in

play09:15

this group actually worsened even more

play09:17

shockingly the children who had

play09:18

previously not had any speech impediment

play09:20

developed verbal issues after being part

play09:22

of this morally outrageous study on the

play09:24

other hand those who were placed in the

play09:26

other group were given positive therapy

play09:28

their progress was highlighted

play09:30

planted every step of the way this

play09:31

greatly inspired the massive changes of

play09:33

the took place and many of the orphans

play09:35

developed greater fluency even those

play09:36

with stutters are reportedly doing much

play09:38

better and holding conversations in 2007

play09:41

several the orphans who would have been

play09:42

well in their early seventies press

play09:44

charges against to study for the

play09:46

lifelong damages that had suffered as

play09:47

many of them had retained such issues

play09:49

well into their adult life the courts

play09:51

awarded 60s orphan children with nine

play09:53

hundred and twenty five thousand dollars

play09:55

as compensation for their abuse which

play09:57

isn't all too much considering many of

play10:00

them were permanently harmed

play10:01

olá was a harsh and gruesome experiment

play10:03

many of the reforms in our modern-day

play10:05

educational system are based on the

play10:07

findings that support positive

play10:08

reinforcement over criticism number two

play10:12

Milgram experiment the Milgram

play10:15

experiment refers to a series of

play10:16

experiments that were conducted by Yale

play10:18

University professor Stanley Milgram

play10:20

during the early 60s this test was

play10:22

conducted soon after one of the nazis

play10:24

who was put on trial in israel pled the

play10:25

defense of simply following orders since

play10:28

everyone was questioning how much of an

play10:30

effect obedience has on people

play10:32

professor Milgram and his team decided

play10:33

to explore the theory of obedience to

play10:35

Authority the experiment asked ordinary

play10:37

people to ask a volunteer who was part

play10:39

of Milgram scheme interrogated questions

play10:41

and then administer shocks through a

play10:42

machine if the volunteer answered

play10:44

incorrectly the conductor the experiment

play10:46

took the authoritative role and asked

play10:48

unknowing subjects to increase the

play10:49

voltage of the shock after each question

play10:51

was incorrectly answered luckily

play10:53

unbeknownst the shock administer the

play10:55

shocks were completely fake and the

play10:57

volunteer was a hired actor in order for

play10:58

the test to be truly accurate the shock

play11:00

administrator was led to believe it was

play11:02

real

play11:02

and each shock came at the series of

play11:04

horrifying screams from the volunteer in

play11:06

one case the UN told the subjects that

play11:08

the volunteer had a heart condition

play11:09

which they expected to awaken the

play11:12

conscience of the subjects unfortunately

play11:14

the results showed something horrifying

play11:16

about human nature Milgram's team

play11:18

expected the subjects to stop giving the

play11:20

shocks after a certain number but almost

play11:22

everyone kept going and obeyed the

play11:24

commands of the authority figure without

play11:25

taking into account the morality of

play11:27

their actions the study makes it to the

play11:29

top of a wacky psychological experiments

play11:32

because it shows that there is a little

play11:33

bit of evil within everyone and that all

play11:35

it takes to emerge is the authoritative

play11:37

command

play11:39

number one Stanford Prison Experiment

play11:42

this insane experiment was conducted in

play11:44

the early 1970s and there have been

play11:46

numerous reports and further studies

play11:48

about it dr. Philip Zimbardo ethically

play11:51

questionable experiments even inspired

play11:53

an award-winning movie in 2015 the study

play11:55

was conducted to explore the effects of

play11:57

the prison system on inmates and guards

play11:59

both the Navy in the general military

play12:01

were interested in the findings as at

play12:03

the time they wish to understand the

play12:04

troubled relationship between inmates

play12:06

and guards

play12:06

Zimbardo his team enticed 24 males to be

play12:09

part of the study by offering them a pay

play12:11

of fifteen dollars per day

play12:12

these males were further divided into

play12:14

two groups either the guards or the

play12:16

prisoners perhaps the freakiest element

play12:18

of the study was that they were chosen

play12:19

for these roles randomly no certain

play12:22

characteristics could have predicted

play12:23

these decisions the participants were

play12:25

told to make the simulation as realistic

play12:27

as possible the prisoners were told to

play12:29

forget they had real names and answer

play12:31

only to their assigned numbers their

play12:32

clothes were stripped off them and they

play12:34

were forced to wear uncomfortable prison

play12:35

garb at the time the guards were given

play12:37

power symbols such as batons and

play12:39

sunglasses

play12:40

soon after the experiment began the

play12:42

guards became abusive due to the immense

play12:44

power that they had and the prisoners

play12:45

lost all sense of self and complied with

play12:47

anything that they were told to do as a

play12:49

study progressed his Umberto's team

play12:51

discovered that the guards became more

play12:53

sadistic over time and seemed to enjoy

play12:55

inflicting pain on their underlings

play12:56

within the first few days to the inmates

play12:58

asked to leave the experiment one person

play13:00

experienced a mental breakdown and the

play13:02

other suffered an extreme body rash dr.

play13:04

Zimbardo omits that he himself became

play13:06

obsessed with the power that he had as a

play13:08

prison warden and allowed the abuse to

play13:10

go on until his girlfriend point out the

play13:12

ethical issues of the program the study

play13:14

was meant to go on for two weeks but

play13:16

after just six days the disturbing

play13:18

results forced Zimbardo to terminate the

play13:20

experiment the results are so morbidly

play13:22

fascinating because they show that

play13:24

normal people are capable of doing

play13:26

terrible things if they are provided

play13:28

with the right environment as one of the

play13:29

participants perfectly summed it up by

play13:31

saying you don't know what you would do

play13:33

unless you were in that situation if you

play13:35

ever take up psychology in school you

play13:36

will

play13:37

definitely hear about this experiment

play13:38

trust me I did

play13:44

[Music]

play13:55

[Music]

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

関連タグ
PsychologyExperimentsHuman BehaviorConformitySocial InfluenceStanford PrisonMarshmallow TestAsch ConformityMilgram ObedienceCarlsberg Social
英語で要約が必要ですか?