Operational Definitions and Construct Validity (Intro Psych Tutorial #9)
Summary
TLDRIn this video, Michael Corayer discusses the importance of operational definitions and construct validity in psychological research. He explains that a property, like happiness, cannot be directly measured and thus requires an operational definition—a method to measure and represent it. Examples include survey responses, smiling behavior, or brain activity. Construct validity ensures there's a clear relationship between the property and its operational definition. Corayer emphasizes the significance of choosing appropriate operational definitions to maintain the validity of research findings.
Takeaways
- 🔍 A property in psychology is a concept that cannot be directly measured, such as happiness or intelligence.
- 📏 An operational definition is a method used to measure a property indirectly, like using a survey to measure happiness.
- 🌟 Operational definitions are not the properties themselves but serve as useful representations for research purposes.
- 📏 The choice of operational definition should be appropriate for the context, like using centimeters for desk length or miles for distances between cities.
- 🧠 In psychological research, operational definitions can vary widely, such as using surveys, smiling behavior, or brain activity to measure happiness.
- 🔗 Construct validity is the degree to which an operational definition accurately represents the property it aims to measure.
- 😄 A clear relationship between the property and its operational definition indicates high construct validity, as seen with happiness and smiling behavior.
- 🚗 An example of low construct validity might be defining happiness by the number of cars a person owns, which doesn't clearly relate to the emotional state of happiness.
- ❌ A study with a faulty operational definition and low construct validity can lead to disregarded results, as the operational definition doesn't accurately represent the property.
- ✅ When evaluating a study, it's crucial to first examine the property and its operational definition to assess the validity of the findings.
Q & A
What is a property in the context of psychological research?
-A property is a general concept that researchers want to investigate, such as happiness, depression, or intelligence. It is something that cannot be directly detected and thus requires an operational definition for measurement.
What is an operational definition and why is it necessary?
-An operational definition is a specific way to measure a property. It is necessary because properties like happiness or intelligence cannot be directly observed, so researchers need a measurable way to represent these abstract concepts.
How does the length of a desk serve as an example of an operational definition?
-The length of a desk can be operationally defined in various units like centimeters or miles. These units are not the desk itself but are useful representations that help determine if the desk fits in a space.
Why are different operational definitions more appropriate in certain situations?
-Different operational definitions are more appropriate in certain situations because they provide a more useful or relevant measure depending on the context. For example, measuring the distance between cities in miles is more practical for travel planning than in centimeters.
What is construct validity and why is it important in psychological research?
-Construct validity refers to the clear relationship between a property and its operational definition. It is important because it ensures that the measurements taken actually represent the property being studied, which in turn affects the validity of the research findings.
How does smiling behavior relate to the operational definition of happiness?
-Smiling behavior is suggested as an operational definition for happiness because people tend to smile when they are happy. This implies a potential construct validity, as there is a logical connection between the behavior and the emotional state.
What is an example of a poor operational definition given in the script?
-An example of a poor operational definition is defining happiness by the number of cars a person owns. This lacks construct validity because there is no clear, logical relationship between car ownership and happiness.
Why might measuring brain activity be considered as an operational definition for happiness?
-Measuring brain activity could be an operational definition for happiness because certain patterns of brain activity might be associated with the emotional state of happiness, providing a more direct physiological measure.
How can a faulty operational definition impact the results of a study?
-A faulty operational definition with low construct validity can lead to disregarding the results of a study because the measurements may not accurately represent the property being investigated, thus calling the conclusions into question.
What should be the first thing to consider when evaluating the results of a study?
-When evaluating the results of a study, the first thing to consider is the operational definition used for the property under investigation and whether it has a clear relationship with the property, as this affects the validity of the findings.
Outlines
🔍 Understanding Properties and Operational Definitions
In the first paragraph, Michael Corayer introduces the concept of 'properties' in psychological research, which are abstract concepts like happiness or intelligence that cannot be directly measured. He explains the necessity of operational definitions, which are specific methods used to measure these properties. Operational definitions are not the properties themselves but serve as representations that allow researchers to investigate them. Corayer uses the analogy of measuring the length of a desk in different units to illustrate how operational definitions can vary in usefulness depending on the context. He emphasizes the importance of choosing operational definitions that are appropriate for the situation and have construct validity, which is the degree to which the operational definition accurately represents the property it is intended to measure.
😄 The Importance of Construct Validity in Psychological Research
The second paragraph delves into the concept of construct validity, which is the extent to which an operational definition is a good representation of the property it aims to measure. Corayer uses the example of happiness and its potential operational definitions, such as self-reported happiness on a survey or observable behaviors like smiling and laughing, to demonstrate how construct validity is assessed. He contrasts these with less valid operational definitions, like the number of cars a person owns, which may not clearly relate to happiness. Corayer stresses that a lack of construct validity can render a study's conclusions meaningless, as the operational definition used may not accurately reflect the property under investigation. He concludes by advising viewers to critically evaluate the operational definitions and construct validity of any psychological study they encounter.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Property
💡Operational Definition
💡Construct Validity
💡Smiling Behavior
💡Laughing
💡Brain Activity
💡Survey
💡Abstract Property
💡Measurement
💡Validity
💡Research Findings
Highlights
Definition of a property in psychological research as a concept that cannot be directly detected.
Explanation of operational definition as a way to measure a property indirectly.
Importance of operational definitions in representing properties for research purposes.
Example of measuring the length of a desk using different units as operational definitions.
Discussion on the appropriateness of operational definitions depending on the situation.
The concept of construct validity and its relation to the property and its operational definition.
The challenge of defining psychological variables like happiness with operational definitions.
Proposal of using survey responses as an operational definition for happiness.
Suggestion to measure smiling behavior as an indicator of happiness.
Consideration of brain activity as a potential operational definition for happiness.
The expectation of a clear relationship between the property and its operational definition for construct validity.
Critique of using the number of cars as an operational definition for happiness due to lack of construct validity.
Emphasis on the importance of operational definitions and construct validity in psychological research.
Warning against disregarding study results with low construct validity due to faulty operational definitions.
Advice to scrutinize the operational definition and its relationship to the property in any study.
Encouragement for viewers to like and subscribe for more educational content.
Transcripts
Hi, I'm Michael Corayer and this is Psych Exam Review.
In this video I'd like to talk about operation definitions and construct validity.
I'm going to start with a property.
So what is a property? A property is a general sort of concept that we want to investigate.
So researchers might want to know about the property of
happiness
or they might want to know about
depression
or intelligence.
And an important thing about properties is that we can't directly detect them
so I don't have a happiness detector that's going to tell me exactly how happy you are
Instead I need to have a way of defining it and this is my operational definition.
So an operation definition is the particular way that I'm going to measure the property.
It's important to remember that
it's not actually the property, it's just a representation of the property
It gives us a way to talk about
so for instance if I wanted to know about the length of a desk
you could tell me that the desk is 80 centimeters
and now this is not saying that 80 centimeters on a tape measure is the desk
but it's a useful representation
to help you determine whether the desk is going to fit in a particular space
and there's other operational definitions that you could use to talk about the length of the desk
you could tell me that it's 0.000497097 miles
and that might be just as accurate as telling me it's 80 cm but
in this particular situation it's not that useful. So different operational definitions are going to be more appropriate in certain situations.
In contrast, if I wanted to know the distance between
Austin and Houston
I'd probably prefer that you tell me in miles, because I'm not used to thinking about how many centimeters per hour my car can travel.
so if I want to figure out how long this trip is gonna take, centimeters isn't very useful.
Now we have experience using certain operational definitions like for length were used to using cm or inches or miles
so we have a pretty good idea what that means but when it comes to psychological variables
it can be little bit more complicated. So let's say we want to know about happiness.
How am I going to define happiness? I can't detect it directly so I need to come up with an operational definition, something that I can
actually measure and that's going to represent it's. So you might say "well, ok I could ask people on a survey I could say
how happy are you from -5 to +5", that would give me a measurement.
But it might be kinda hard to determine
what that means. What is +3?
That's not as comfortable to me as using cm or miles. I don't really know what +3 happiness means.
Ok, well I might measure smiling behavior. People smile when they're happy, people are happy they tend to smile, so I'm going to say
that, I'm going to count how much people smile and use that to determine how happy they are.
That might be a way of defining happiness. Or I might say smiling is too easy to fake, I want to use laughing
so I'm going to show people a video, count how many times they laugh, use that to determine how happy the video made them.
You might say, well there might be some brain activity associated with happiness. I'm going to measure people's brain activity in a scanner
and show this certain pattern of activity and use that to represent happiness
What we're hoping for with any of these operational definitions, we want to have construct validity
and what construct validity refers to
is the idea that we have the property
and we want to see a clear relationship between the property
and the operational definition we chose.
So I'm going to look at happiness and smiling, is there a clear relationship between these two? And we hope that there is.
We hope that the property is actually related to the thing that we're measuring.
So let's use that example, let's say OK I want to know about happiness
and I'm going to measure smiling behavior
and we're going to ask, is there a clear relationship between these two things?
Ok, people smile when they're happy, if people are unhappy they tend not to smile so much, so OK this seems like it has construct validity.
There seems to be a clear relationship between this property and this definition.
It's not perfect. Certainly people can be happy and not smile and people can be smiling even
though they're not actually happy. So it's not perfect but we can say
it has construct validity, it seems to have a clear relationship between these two things.
In contrast, I might say I wanna know about happiness
and let's see, I was really happy when I got a car
so I think cars make people happy so I'm going to count how many cars people have
and I'm going to use that to determine how happy they are.
If you have more cars then you're happier, if you have fewer cars, not so happy.
In this case you might look at this relationship and say "I'm not so convinced here. I don't think there's
a clear relationship between happiness and the number of cars that somebody owns".
There might be some relationship but it's not a very clear one. And I can certainly imageine lots of people who don't have any cars
who bike everywhere and they seem perfectly happy and I can imagine somebody who has dozens of cars but isn't actually happy.
So in this case, I'm going to say I'm not convinced, I don't think we have construct validity here. Our operational definition is not a
good representation of our property. Now this is where we see that operational definitions and construct validity are extremely important
because if this relationship isn't clear then my conclusions don't really matter.
if I told you my study was on happiness and I found some conclusion about happiness and then you looked at my paper
and said "wait a minute, you defined happiness as the number of cars that people had?" you would immediately disregard
my results, they wouldn't matter because you'd say "they're not really about happiness".
So this is why it's so important, a faulty operational definition
with low construct validity causes us to basically disregard any of the results from that study.
This is why this should be the first thing that you look at whenever you see a study or you see some results.
You say, "wait a minute, what's the property and how are they measuring it?". If that relationship isn't clear then I don't really care what the
results were. I hope you found this helpful, if so please like the video and subscribe to the channel for more. Thanks for watching!
関連動画をさらに表示
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)