Chris Watts Blames ‘Jezebel’ Mistress for Him Killing Pregnant Wife, Kids

Summary

This video explores the psychological profile of Chris Watts, the man convicted of murdering his wife and children. It discusses his manipulative behavior in prison, using letters to elicit sympathy and possibly create romantic connections. Experts reflect on his lack of remorse, his narcissism, and his ability to deceive others for his own gain. The conversation also touches on the ethics of profiting from criminal stories, highlighting how some individuals might fail to take responsibility for their actions. Ultimately, the speakers stress the importance of recognizing the true nature of such killers to prevent further romanticization.

Takeaways

• 😀 Chris Watts uses written letters to manipulate women and garner sympathy, portraying his crimes as someone else's fault to maintain control and advance his agenda.
• 😀 Watts' actions in prison reflect his narcissism and lack of remorse, focusing on his own desires rather than taking responsibility for the lives he destroyed.
• 😀 People are often drawn to notorious criminals like Chris Watts due to their fame, with some even offering emotional support, unaware of the true nature of these individuals.
• 😀 The practice of profiting from notorious criminals' stories, whether through books or documentaries, is controversial but can provide valuable insights into criminal behavior and prison dynamics.
• 😀 There's a clear distinction between supporting prisoners out of genuine interest in the psychology of crime versus blindly admiring or enabling harmful individuals like Watts.
• 😀 Despite his confinement, Watts continues to avoid introspection, preferring to blame others for his actions, which prevents him from achieving any real emotional growth or remorse.
• 😀 The psychological profile of Chris Watts aligns with that of a narcissistic, psychopathic killer, showing little to no empathy for the victims or their families.
• 😀 Nicole Kessinger is not responsible for the murders, and Watts has never directly blamed her, despite the rumors circulating about her involvement.
• 😀 Prison could provide an opportunity for self-reflection, but Watts chooses the easier path of denial and blame-shifting, making it unlikely he will ever show true remorse.
• 😀 The conversation expresses a desire to stop focusing on Chris Watts and shift attention away from the constant media coverage of such cases, hoping to move beyond the obsession with notorious criminals.

Q & A

What is Chris Watts' behavior in prison, and how does he continue to manipulate others?

Chris Watts continues to manipulate his image and actions in prison by engaging with women who are sympathetic to his situation. He uses written letters to elicit sympathy, create potential romantic relationships, and maintain control over the narrative of his life. This behavior is seen as part of his broader agenda to maintain an image that avoids full responsibility for the murders he committed.

How does the speaker describe the role of women who send letters to Chris Watts?

The speaker suggests that women who send letters to Chris Watts may be either gullible or seeking meaning in their lives, which Watts exploits for personal gain. These individuals may not fully understand his true nature, and Watts continues to manipulate them to advance his own agenda, either for sympathy or to form relationships.

What does the speaker believe about Chris Watts' level of remorse for his crime?

The speaker believes that Chris Watts shows no genuine remorse for the murder of his wife and children. Instead, Watts continues to deflect responsibility and avoid introspection, opting instead to blame others and maintain a self-centered narrative.

Is it unusual for criminals to profit from sharing their stories? How is this perceived in the context of Chris Watts?

While some may view profiting from a criminal's story as unethical, the speaker argues that there can be value in sharing insights into the mind of a killer, especially if it provides lessons for criminal justice students or helps others understand patterns of behavior. The speaker likens it to producers making films about notorious criminals like Goodfellas, asserting that such stories can be valuable if done ethically.

What concerns does the speaker raise about the influence of prison relationships on Chris Watts?

The speaker raises the concern that in prison, individuals like Chris Watts may form relationships with people who are sympathetic to them or enamored by their notoriety. These relationships may enable Watts' behavior and prevent him from taking responsibility for his crimes. The speaker highlights the danger of these dynamics influencing both the prisoners and the public outside.

Why is the case of Chris Watts considered a particularly dangerous example of narcissism and psychopathy?

Chris Watts is described as a 'once-in-a-century psychopathic narcissist' who shows no concern for the lives he destroyed. The speaker argues that Watts' behavior continues to revolve around his own self-interest, including manipulating others and hiding behind a false narrative of being a victim. This refusal to take responsibility makes him a particularly dangerous example of narcissism and psychopathy.

What does the speaker say about the influence of family members on Chris Watts' actions?

The speaker mentions that Chris Watts' mother visits him in prison, offering support despite knowing that her son is a murderer. This relationship, while likely well-intentioned, underscores the ongoing enabling dynamic in Watts' life. The speaker suggests that his parents may continue to support him out of a sense of family loyalty, despite the severity of his crimes.

How does the speaker describe the role of Nicole Kessinger in the Watts case?

The speaker emphasizes that there is no evidence to suggest that Nicole Kessinger was involved in the murders of Watts' family. Despite online criticisms of her, the speaker points out that Watts never implicated her in the crime, and it is clear that the responsibility for the murders lies entirely with him.

What is the importance of understanding Chris Watts' behavior in prison, according to the speaker?

The speaker believes that understanding Chris Watts' behavior in prison is crucial because it offers insight into the mind of a killer. By studying his actions and words, it may be possible to identify patterns of behavior and recognize similar traits in other individuals. This knowledge can be valuable for both criminal justice professionals and the public to understand the psychology of people who commit such heinous acts.

What does the speaker hope for Chris Watts' future in terms of self-reflection?

The speaker expresses hope that, over time, Chris Watts will come to fully understand the gravity of his actions and take responsibility for his crimes. However, given Watts' behavior over the past few years, the speaker is doubtful that he will ever achieve true introspection and remorse, as he continues to avoid responsibility and blame others.