Ada apa dengan Core Ultra 200S 'Arrow Lake' ? (Test Singkat Core Ultra 9 285K & Core Ultra 5 245K)

Summary

In this video, the reviewer explores Intel's Core Ultra 200 series, also known as Aerolake, focusing on its performance, efficiency, and unique features. Key highlights include its impressive single-threaded performance, significant power efficiency improvements over previous Intel models, and potential benefits for content creators. Despite lacking SMT, Aerolake competes well in multi-threaded tasks. However, its gaming performance appears lacking due to memory latency issues, although overclocking may help. The video concludes that Aerolake is best suited for users seeking efficient, small-form-factor desktops or those upgrading from older Intel/AMD platforms, with less appeal for current high-end users.

Takeaways

• 😀 The Intel Core Ultra 200 series (codenamed Aerolic) is Intel’s latest desktop processor with impressive power efficiency and multi-threaded performance.
• 😀 Aerolic processors lack Intel's typical Hyper-Threading (SMT), meaning each core only handles one thread, but they still perform competitively in multi-core tasks.
• 😀 Despite having fewer threads than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (32 threads) and Intel i9-14900K (32 threads), the Aerolic flagship (Core Ultra 9 285K) delivers remarkable performance per thread.
• 😀 Intel’s Aerolic processors feature an integrated Meteor Lake graphics processor (IGP), which is a step up from AMD's IGP, but still not suitable for gaming. It's mainly for media playback and light tasks.
• 😀 For the first time in a desktop processor, Intel introduces an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) to accelerate AI tasks. However, the NPU is not yet widely utilized in desktop applications and is more beneficial in mobile devices for battery efficiency.
• 😀 The Core Ultra 9 285K shows a significant improvement in power efficiency, consuming less power than the i9-14900K (500W) and rivaling AMD’s Ryzen 9 9950X in overall system efficiency.
• 😀 In gaming benchmarks, the Aerolic 285K performed under expectations due to its higher memory latency. Tuning memory speeds (e.g., DDR5 6400 or higher) can improve gaming performance.
• 😀 Aerolic processors exhibit strong performance in content creation tasks like video encoding and Blender, but their gaming performance lags behind due to memory-related inefficiencies.
• 😀 The Aerolic series supports high memory overclocking, with DDR5 speeds reaching up to 9733 MHz. However, it suffers from higher memory latency compared to Raptor Lake, affecting its gaming results.
• 😀 The Core Ultra 200 series is recommended for content creators who prioritize power efficiency and multi-core performance but may not offer enough gaming performance improvements to justify an upgrade for gaming enthusiasts.

Q & A

What is the main focus of the video?

The video focuses on reviewing and testing Intel's new Core Ultra (Aerolake) processors, particularly analyzing their performance, power efficiency, temperature management, and unique features like the integrated graphics (IGP) and Neural Processing Unit (NPU).

What are the key features of the Intel Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor?

The Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor introduces several key features, including a 24-core architecture (with each core handling a single thread), a new integrated graphics unit (IGP) based on Intel's Arc architecture, and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI tasks.

How does the Core Ultra 285K compare to other high-end processors like the i9-14900K and Ryzen 9 9950X?

Despite having fewer threads (24 cores, 24 threads), the Core Ultra 285K can still compete with the i9-14900K and Ryzen 9 9950X in multi-threaded workloads, thanks to its high performance per core. The Aerolake processor performs well in content creation tasks, but gaming performance may be weaker due to higher memory latency.

What is the performance of the Intel Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor in content creation tasks?

In content creation tasks, such as video encoding and rendering (e.g., using Handbrake and Blender), the Aerolake processor shows strong performance, making it a good choice for content creators who need power-efficient, multi-threaded performance.

What issues were observed with the gaming performance of the Core Ultra 285K?

The Core Ultra 285K demonstrated weaker gaming performance compared to other processors, likely due to higher memory latency. However, performance could be improved with faster memory configurations and careful overclocking.

How does the Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor handle power consumption compared to other high-performance CPUs?

The Core Ultra 285K is significantly more power-efficient than other high-end CPUs like the i9-14900K. Under heavy workloads, Aerolake's power consumption is much lower, making it ideal for users who prioritize energy savings or plan to build small form-factor systems.

How does the temperature management of the Core Ultra 285K compare to other Intel processors like Raptor Lake?

The Core Ultra 285K has a more manageable temperature range, with temperatures under heavy load (Cinebench R23) reaching 85-95°C. This is an improvement over the i9-14900K, which can reach 100°C. Using liquid cooling helps maintain even lower temperatures.

What impact does memory latency have on the performance of the Core Ultra 285K?

Memory latency is a significant factor affecting the Core Ultra 285K’s performance, particularly in gaming. Higher memory latency can slow down data access, which impacts the CPU's ability to perform well in gaming scenarios. Overclocking memory can help mitigate this issue.

What are the overclocking capabilities of the Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor?

The Core Ultra (Aerolake) processor shows strong overclocking potential, especially in memory performance. It supports DDR5 memory speeds up to 8800 MHz, and users can achieve higher bandwidth through overclocking. However, this comes with some complexity and requires careful tuning.

Who would benefit the most from upgrading to the Intel Core Ultra (Aerolake)?

Users who prioritize power efficiency, such as those building small form-factor PCs or systems that require lower power consumption, would benefit from upgrading to the Core Ultra (Aerolake). It's also a solid option for content creators who need strong multi-threaded performance. However, gamers may want to wait for more memory optimizations before upgrading.