Parte5ok
Summary
TLDRThe speaker discusses the differences in agricultural practices between Brazil, Denmark, and the United States, emphasizing the importance of learning from one another. They highlight efficiency, sustainability, and holistic approaches in farming, while also stressing the need for internal transformation and mindfulness in agribusiness. The speaker criticizes reliance on external technology to solve internal issues and suggests that true change comes from within. They use examples from Denmark's pork and dairy industries, reflecting on ethical concerns and the need to rethink how agriculture is approached, focusing on balance with nature.
Takeaways
- đ Brazilian agriculture can learn from the efficiency of Danish and American systems.
- đ§đ· Brazilians should focus on the holistic production process, integrating nature and involvement in agriculture.
- đșđž American farmers, with their advancements in technology, offer solutions, but often focus on problem-solving with more technology, which isn't always ideal.
- đ©đ° Denmark, with high animal density, does not prioritize agriculture in its GDP, unlike Brazil where agribusiness is a key economic sector.
- đĄ Brazilian agribusiness needs to shift its reactive approach and become more proactive in embracing sustainability.
- đ Danish farmers focus on efficiency but face challenges like balancing high productivity (e.g., in dairy) with animal welfare.
- đ§ââïž Meditation and internal mindfulness practices are essential to managing the challenges faced in modern agriculture.
- đšâđŸ Farmers need to address internal problems, such as stress and mindset, before seeking external technological solutions.
- đ» Technology alone isnât enough; there needs to be a holistic approach that considers both the internal and external elements of farming.
- đ The speaker emphasizes a shift towards self-awareness and meditation to enhance productivity and sustainability in farming.
Q & A
What agricultural differences does the speaker highlight between Denmark and Brazil?
-The speaker mentions that Denmark has a high density of animals compared to humans, which contrasts with Brazil, where agribusiness plays a much more significant role in the GDP. In Denmark, agriculture is not as critical to the economy as it is in Brazil.
What challenges do Danish farmers face due to government policies?
-Danish farmers face challenges because the government does not place high importance on agriculture's contribution to the GDP. For instance, farming activities, such as livestock production, are being taxed, which could potentially reduce the industry's significance.
What lesson does the speaker suggest Brazilian farmers could learn from Danish farmers?
-The speaker suggests that Brazilian farmers could learn the importance of producing with involvement in nature. Thereâs a focus on holistic farming and solving internal issues rather than just relying on technology or external fixes.
How does the speaker view the role of technology in agriculture?
-The speaker believes that while technology is important, it is not the sole solution to agricultural problems. Instead, a more holistic approach, focusing on internal factors like the well-being of the farmers, is needed for sustainable agricultural practices.
What is the significance of 'breathing patterns' mentioned in the speech?
-The speaker refers to breathing patterns as an indicator of internal well-being. Farmers with 'short breath' patterns are stressed and unable to manage their farms efficiently. By improving their internal state, including their breathing, farmers can better handle external challenges.
What does the speaker mean by 'resolving problems with problems' in agriculture?
-The speaker critiques the common approach of solving one issue by creating another, such as using hormones to improve milk production in cows but causing reproductive issues. Instead, he advocates for addressing the root cause rather than applying band-aid solutions.
What role does meditation play in the speaker's vision for agricultural reform?
-The speaker views meditation as a tool to help farmers reconnect with themselves and their work. By calming the mind and focusing on internal well-being, farmers can approach their tasks with more clarity and efficiency, ultimately improving agricultural practices.
How does the speaker illustrate the ethical dilemmas in intensive farming practices in Denmark?
-The speaker shares an example where a student questions whether it is ethical to prioritize higher production, such as producing more piglets, at the cost of higher mortality rates due to the mother's inability to feed them all. This highlights the ethical concerns in maximizing production at the expense of animal welfare.
What does the speaker suggest is the future challenge for Brazilian agribusiness?
-The speaker believes that the challenge for Brazilian agribusiness will be adapting to global shifts in attitudes towards agriculture, particularly as governments start to prioritize sustainability over economic growth. Brazilian farmers need to focus on being more involved with nature rather than just resisting these changes.
What is the speakerâs overall message regarding the future of agriculture?
-The speaker's message emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to agriculture, focusing on internal well-being, sustainability, and long-term thinking rather than quick technological fixes or purely profit-driven decisions. The future of agriculture depends on addressing internal issues to create sustainable external results.
Outlines
đ Cross-Cultural Agricultural Learning
The speaker discusses the importance of learning from different agricultural practices across countries. They mention their experiences in Denmark and the United States, emphasizing the need for Brazilians to learn from both Danish and American farmers. The speaker also suggests that there is a lot for Danish and American farmers to learn from Brazilians. They highlight the concept of efficient management within the agribusiness sector and the importance of production with involvement and care for nature. The speaker shares personal encounters with farmers and the idea that the greatest beneficiaries of sustainable and involved production are the producers themselves. They also touch upon the need for a holistic approach to agriculture, moving away from a linear, problem-solving mindset towards a more integrated, internal focus.
đ· The High Cost of Production
In this paragraph, the speaker reflects on the ethical implications of high-production agriculture, particularly in livestock farming. They mention the example of dairy farming, where the focus on increasing milk production has led to issues with reproduction, necessitating the use of hormones. The speaker criticizes this approach, suggesting that it creates a cycle of solving one problem by creating another. They advocate for a more thoughtful and meditative approach to agriculture, emphasizing the need to address internal issues before seeking technological solutions. The speaker also shares an anecdote about a student's emotional response to the realities of high-production farming, highlighting the need for a deeper reflection on the true costs of our food production systems.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄAgriculture Efficiency
đĄInvolvement
đĄTaxation on Agriculture
đĄSustainable Practices
đĄHolistic Approach
đĄTechnology in Agriculture
đĄBreathing Patterns
đĄYouth in Agriculture
đĄAnimal Production in Denmark
đĄInternal vs. External Solutions
Highlights
The importance of efficiency in agriculture is universal, regardless of country or conditions.
Successful agricultural production requires deep involvement, as seen in both Denmark and the U.S.
Brazil's agribusiness plays a critical role in the country's GDP, unlike Denmark, where agriculture has less economic impact.
Denmark has the highest density of livestock compared to its human population, second only to regions of Belgium.
The Brazilian agricultural sector could benefit from holistic thinking and solutions, moving away from a purely problem-solving approach.
Technology alone cannot solve all issues in agriculture; there is a need for a holistic and systemic perspective.
Dinamarca's government may impose taxes on agriculture, highlighting the sector's lesser economic importance compared to Brazil.
Addressing internal issues is crucial before looking to external technologies or solutions in agriculture.
Farmers should focus on internal transformation, including changing breathing patterns, to improve productivity and well-being.
Shortened average breathing rates among farmers (from 3.75 to 2) negatively impact their ability to innovate and change.
The rising generation in agriculture is moving towards sustainable, mindful practices.
Denmark excels in pig production, with five pigs for every one Danish citizen.
Denmark leads in litter size for pigs, but higher birth rates lead to higher infant mortality due to maternal limitations.
A student at a Danish agricultural lecture highlighted the ethical dilemma of increasing production at the cost of more animal deaths.
Agriculture needs to shift from resolving problems with more problems to a more integrated, mindful approach.
Transcripts
Lu Gustavo Tu mora na Dinamarca compen
tu conhece diversos agricultores na
Dinamarca tu morou nos Estados Unidos tu
conheceu diversos agricultores Estados
Unidos eu queria te perguntar o que que
o brasileiro deveria aprender com os
dinamarqueses na agricultura que que o
brasileiro deveria aprender com os
americanos na agricultura mas também vou
fazer o vice-versa o que os
dinamarqueses deveria aprender com com
os brasileiros o que os AM
deveria aprender com os brasileiros e
para vocĂȘ acompanhando essas
diferenciaçÔes o que que seria uma
gestĂŁo eficiente dentro do agronegĂłcio
Ă© uma pergunta bem complexa assim eu
tive oportunidade nĂ© outros paĂses
também de conhecer mas é interessante
que independente do lugar independente
do paĂs independente das condiçÔes
o grande poder Ă© de eficiĂȘncia quando
existe a produção com envolvimento eu
tive oportunidade de conhecer o Gilson
aĂ com a com o cel a turma da Nestle eu
tive oportunidade de conhecer um casal
de 65 anos aqui na na Dinamarca famĂlia
White P eu vejo que o grande recado né
E que o gand falava né seja a
transformação que vocĂȘ quer pro mundo nĂ©
faz o teu eu acho que esses produtores
para mim sĂŁo os exemplos de como Ă©
possĂvel e a gente trabalhar com isso
mas a gente tem uma macr diferença muito
grande né Por exemplo aqui na Dinamarca
vocĂȘs devem ter acompanhado aĂ nos
Ășltimos tempos vai ser uma atividade que
ela vai ser taxada né mas só que e a
pecuĂĄria a agricultura dinamarquesa
Dinamarca hoje Ă© o paĂs com a maior
densidade de população animal em relação
a humano tem mais animal por ser humano
perde para algumas regiĂ”es especĂficas
da BĂ©lgica lĂĄ do norte da da BĂ©lgica e
outras né é que apesar de ter muita
pecuĂĄria para esses paĂses representa
muito pouco no PIB e que pro Brasil a
gente
tem O agronegĂłcio como um peso muito
forte então eu vejo né e a mensagem que
eu queria deixar Ă© muito nesse sentido
de nĂŁo
aproveitar eh de nĂŁo entrar pro embate
porque Ă© Ă© muito difĂcil Ă© muito fĂĄcil
aqui o governo chegar e tirar eh a
pecada porque ele nĂŁo dĂĄ importĂąncia pro
PIB e essa essa visĂŁo vai chegar no
Brasil mas a gente perdeu um pouco essa
reatividade e de que entender e isso Ă©
uma visĂŁo interna de que o maior
beneficiĂĄrio de tĂĄ produzindo com
envolvimento com a natureza Ă© o produtor
quando eu vi o Bruno eu tava assistindo
sua Live falar um agrÎnomo novo né é
disso que a gente precisa a gente
precisa mudar um pouco esse foco a gente
tem uma visão jå citei aqui né linear
newtoniana que é de resolver problema né
a gente fez a vaca produzir mais de 50
kg de leite ela parou de reproduzir aĂ
nĂłs fomos inventamos hormĂŽnio aĂ ela jĂĄ
voltou a reproduzir e continua
produzindo muito leite entĂŁo a gente vai
resolvendo o problema com problema e eu
acho que a gente tem que pensar essa
reinvenção eu acho que vocĂȘs usaram o
nĂŁo adianta tecnologia tem que ser
holĂstico E aĂ Pedro tem uma coisa muito
legal que vocĂȘ colocou que Ă© o meu foco
de pesquisa hoje aqui na Dinamarca Ă© que
vocĂȘ falou que vocĂȘ
medita antes de fazer para tentar tocar
o coração né E hoje Toda atividade do
mundo o que acontece numa fazenda que tĂĄ
com dificuldade de lucro de conseguir
FuncionĂĄrio Ă© exatamente mudar o padrĂŁo
de respiração Pedro o nosso produtor com
a respiração curta a média de
3.75 passou para dois como que vocĂȘ vai
querer que um produtor nessa situação Vå
fazer diferente entĂŁo Ă© arrumar o
interno para fazer o o externo acontecer
acho que esse Ă© um grande ponto nĂłs
estamos esquecendo disso e muitas vezes
sendo levado em acreditar tentando
resolver problemas internos com
tecnologias externas o problema Ă©
interno é rever isso né E quando a gente
vĂȘ uma juvent
sendo formada e trabalhando direito a
gente passa a acreditar aqui na
Dinamarca um dia desse a gente estava
dando aula e aĂ um especialista a
Dinamarca Ă© uma referĂȘncia na produção
de porco né tem para cada um dinamarques
existe cinco porcos e a Dinamarca tem os
melhores Ăndices de produção de
leitegada entĂŁo Ă© onde se nasce mais
leitÔes mas como nasce muito a mãe não
consegue alimentar tanto e morre mais
porque os animais ficam vulnerĂĄveis mas
gera mais vida e aĂ um estudante com um
olho cheio d'ĂĄgua para e fala aĂ pera aĂ
nĂłs estamos matando mais para produzir
mais Ă© isso mesmo entĂŁo essas coisas
ficam tão normais pra gente hoje né de a
gente vĂȘ o abate de marcho leiteiro a
gente vĂȘ esse exemplo que eu tĂŽ dando da
da pecuĂĄria tem muitos no meio vegetal
que a gente precisa olhar para dentro
vai ser preciso meditar para transformar
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)