Berque 1
Summary
TLDRThis script explores ecology from a philosophical and ethical perspective, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all things in nature. It delves into the origins of words like 'ecology' and 'economy,' highlighting their ties. The Anthropocene epoch, where human impact dominates Earth's geology, is discussed, questioning humanity's responsibility towards the environment. The script critiques the Promethean approach to environmental issues, which views nature as a resource for human use, and discusses the limitations of quantifying ecological values using economic terms, suggesting the need for a more holistic understanding.
Takeaways
- đż **Ecology and Relationality**: The script discusses ecology as the study of relationships among living organisms and their environment, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all things in nature.
- đĄ **Origin of 'Ecology'**: The term 'ecology' comes from the Greek word 'Oikos', meaning 'home' or 'dwelling place', which is also the root of 'economy', suggesting a deep connection between how we live and how we manage our resources.
- đ± **Anthropocene Era**: The script introduces the Anthropocene, a proposed geological epoch where human activity has been the dominant influence on climate and the environment, highlighting our significant impact on the planet.
- đ„ **Promethean View**: It critiques the Promethean perspective, which views humans as transcending nature through technological prowess, suggesting this view can lead to seeing nature merely as a resource for human use.
- đ **Human-Nature Relationship**: The discussion points to the ethical implications of how we perceive our relationship with nature, which influences our environmental ethics and actions.
- đł **Ecological Restoration Failures**: The script uses the example of a failed ecological restoration project in China to illustrate the limitations of applying economic models to environmental conservation.
- đ° **Economic Terms in Ecology**: It critiques the use of economic terms like 'capital stock' and 'services' to describe natural resources, arguing that this translation is limiting and may not capture the true value of ecosystems.
- đ **Quantification Limitations**: The script suggests that there are inherent limits to quantifying natural systems and that economic models might not be suitable for understanding or preserving ecological health.
- đ **Translation and Simulation Issues**: It points out that translating natural phenomena into economic terms requires simulation, which can distort our understanding and appreciation of nature's true value.
- đ **Market System and Environmental Destruction**: The script connects the market system, with its focus on economic growth, to environmental degradation, suggesting that our economic approach may be part of the problem.
Q & A
What is the primary focus of the discussion in the script?
-The primary focus of the discussion is ecology, specifically addressing ecological questions from philosophical and ethical perspectives.
What does the term 'ecology' etymologically suggest?
-Etymology of 'ecology' suggests it means something like the structure, language, and logic of the place where we live or where things live.
How are the concepts of 'ecology' and 'economy' related?
-Both 'ecology' and 'economy' share the root 'oikos' from ancient Greek, which means 'home' or 'dwelling place'. 'Ecology' relates to the study of the environment, while 'economy' originally referred to the law of behavior, and today it's more about the discourse of how the means of living are procured and distributed.
What is the Anthropocene and why is it debated?
-The Anthropocene is a term used to describe the geological age in which humans have become the dominant force on Earth. It's debated because it's contentious whether humans are influential enough to name a geological epoch after themselves and there's uncertainty about when it started.
When and by whom was the term 'Anthropocene' coined?
-The term 'Anthropocene' was coined by Dutch meteorologist Paul Crutzen in 2002 in an article titled 'Geology of Man' published in the Journal of Nature.
What is the significance of the Industrial Revolution in relation to the Anthropocene?
-The Industrial Revolution, marked by James Watt's design of the steam engine in 1784, is significant as it coincides with the beginning of the Anthropocene, a period characterized by growing global concentrations of carbon dioxide and methane.
What is a Promethean position in the context of environmental ethics?
-A Promethean position in environmental ethics refers to the view that humans have transcended nature through their technical prowess and can use technology to manipulate and control the environment for human benefit.
What is the myth of Prometheus and how does it relate to environmental issues?
-The myth of Prometheus involves him stealing fire from Zeus to give to humans, symbolizing the gift of technology. In environmental issues, it relates to the human ability to see nature as a resource for culture, overcoming the limitations of nature.
What is the main critique of the Costanza valuation method as discussed in the script?
-The main critique of the Costanza valuation method is that it reduces environmental issues to economic terms, which may not be relevant or appropriate for natural systems, and it uses a framework that some argue is responsible for environmental degradation.
Why does Burke argue that translating nature into economic terms is problematic?
-Burke argues that translating nature into economic terms is problematic because it requires simulation and translation, which limit the understanding of nature to the field of economy, and it may not capture the true value of ecosystems and the environment.
What is the proposed issue with using quantifiable measures for ecosystems?
-The proposed issue with using quantifiable measures for ecosystems is that such measures are inherently limited and may not account for the complexity and intangible aspects of nature, leading to an incomplete understanding and potentially harmful management practices.
Outlines
đż Ecology and Interrelation
The script introduces the topic of ecology from a philosophical and ethical perspective, emphasizing the concept of interrelation among elements in the environment. It explains the etymology of 'ecology' from the Greek word 'Oikos,' meaning home or dwelling, and its connection to the word 'economy.' The script mentions the Anthropocene, a term describing the current geological age where human activity has become the dominant influence on the Earth's environment. It discusses the debate surrounding the term and its implications for our responsibility towards the Earth.
đ„ The Human-Nature Relationship and the Promethean View
This section delves into the relationship between humans and nature, questioning the traditional views that position humans as separate or superior to nature. It introduces the Promethean perspective, which sees humans as capable of transcending natural limitations through technological prowess. The script references the myth of Prometheus, who stole fire from the gods to empower humans, symbolizing the human ability to manipulate nature for cultural advancement. The discussion critiques the Promethean approach, suggesting it leads to viewing nature merely as a resource for human use.
đł Ecological Restoration and Economic Perspectives
The script discusses an ecological restoration project in western China, highlighting its failure and using it as a case study to critique the economic approach to environmental conservation. It mentions the Chinese government's perspective on nature preservation as a resource for economic development. The narrative then explores the Costanza valuation method, a financial approach to assessing environmental assets, which reduces natural elements to capital stocks and services. The script argues that this method is limited because it requires translating non-human concepts into human economic terms, potentially obscuring the true value and complexity of natural ecosystems.
đĄ Limitations of Quantification and Economic Language in Ecology
The final paragraph critiques the use of quantification and economic language in addressing ecological issues. It points out that translating natural phenomena into economic terms can be problematic, as it simplifies and commodifies complex ecosystems. The script suggests that this approach may not capture the full essence and value of nature, and it hints at the need for a different, more holistic perspective that better respects the intrinsic qualities of the environment. The summary ends by suggesting that future discussions will explore alternative approaches to understanding and valuing ecological systems.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄEcology
đĄRelationality
đĄAnthropocene
đĄEconomy
đĄPromethean position
đĄGeological Epoch
đĄEthics
đĄResource
đĄQuantification
đĄTranslation and Simulation
đĄEnvironmental Ethics
Highlights
Ecology is fundamentally about relationality amongst things in the environment.
The foundational idea of ecology is that everything is interrelated.
The word 'ecology' comes from 'Oikos' in Greek, meaning home or dwelling place.
Economy is derived from 'Oikos' and 'nomos', meaning law of behavior in the context of where we live.
Ethics and ecological/environmental ethics involve understanding humankind's relationship with nature.
The term 'Anthropocene' describes the geological age where humans have become the dominant force.
The Anthropocene is debated due to questions about human influence and the starting point of this era.
The Anthropocene is marked by the Industrial Revolution and the rise in global carbon dioxide and methane levels.
Ethical discussions on ecology often start from the idea that humans hold a special place in the environment.
Promethean position in environmental ethics suggests that humans have transcended nature through technology.
The myth of Prometheus is used to illustrate the human ability to use technology to overcome nature's limitations.
Prometheus gave humans 'techne', a form of vision that allows them to see nature as a resource for culture.
The Chinese government's ecological restoration project is an example of a quasi-Promethean view.
The Costanza valuation method is criticized for reducing natural things to economic terms like capital stock and services.
Translation and simulation of natural things into economic terms are seen as problematic in ecological discussions.
The market system, which the Costanza method is based on, is historically linked to environmental destruction.
Burke suggests that there are limits to quantification when discussing ecosystems and the environment.
Transcripts
thank you
hello so now we're going to be talking
about ecology or we're trying to address
uh ecological questions from a
philosophical and ethical perspective
um the first thing to say about ecology
broadly speaking is that when we think
about ecology we're thinking about
relation uh relationality amongst things
[Music]
um
in the environment in nature and so on
and so forth
they say people say and you'll find this
in the nairat article if we end up
reading it
um the the the the sort of Golden Rule
the first idea the foundational idea of
colleges that everything is interrelated
and quick background on the word because
I like to do this sometimes Oikos in
Greek and ancient Greek means home or
Hearth or dwelling place and Oikos is
the Eco in a lot of words that we still
have today so ecology
but also
economy and these two are going to be
tied especially in the Burke piece so
ecology if you break it down
etymologically and of course it's not
literally how we use the word today
anymore but ecology sort of means um
something like the structure language
and logic of the place that we live or
the places in which things live an
economy uh also Eco Oikos nomos means
law oftentimes
uh referring to behavior
um and so you might say that economy
originally means or refers to something
like
um
the law of behavior
law yeah law sort of law of
behavior in parentheses for where we
live
um or where things live right we know it
now to be more about the discourse about
how the means of living are procured and
distributed
so this is a little background Oikos
ecology economy um these are
interrelated Concepts and it's difficult
to think one without the other
um I guess a little bit of background or
something that's worth mentioning when
we talk about something like ethics and
ecological or environmental ethics I
noticed this semester semester in which
I'm recording this a lot of students
have never heard the term anthropocene
before so anthropocene is a term that we
it's a debated term that we use today to
describe
um the geological age
in which man has become humans have
become the dominant Force uh and what's
what this means uh geological age we're
talking about the history Evolution and
development of the Earth as a thing
and so this is quite a contested term
because you know can we really say that
humans are so influential that um
we can name a geological Epoch after
ourselves
um when did it start and so on and so
forth this was coined by a Dutch
meteorologist in 2002 in an article
written in the Journal of nature named
geology of man you could Google well his
name's Paul krutson you can Google Paul
crudson
c-r-u-t-z-e-n uh geology of man it's
very short I think you could read it in
five or ten minutes I have a little uh
excerpt here that I'll read really
quickly he says it seems appropriate to
assign the term anthropocene to the
present in many ways human-dominated
geological Epoch supplementing the
Holocene the warm period of the last 10
to 12 Millennia so we're talking about
massive almost unfathomable from the
human perspective of periods of time
right 10 to 12 Millennia the holocene's
been going on for it the anthropocene
can be said to have started in the
latter half of the 18th century
when analyzes of air trapped in Polar
Ice showed the beginning of growing
Global concentrations of carbon dioxide
and methane
this date also happens to coincide with
James Watts design of the steam engine
in 1784. so uh crucson is is dating this
around the sort of dawn of the
Industrial Revolution when we really
start putting uh certain types of things
in the air right uh carbon and methane
uh methane also if you don't know um
a byproduct of
large-scale cattle farming right
um
so in any case
um we live in an age where
um our responsibility whether or not the
question of whether or not we have a
responsibility and what that
responsibility is and how we ought to
act on it towards the Earth towards the
environment as the thing that sustains
us
so when we talk about ecology we're sort
of back in this question of what is the
human what is humankind but we're also
simultaneously asking what is nature and
we're asking about the relationship
between these two things right so
subject object Mind Body now we're human
nature
um and the way that we think about this
relationship often has quite a good deal
of influence on the way we address it
ethically right
um adjust the environment or the or
ecological issues ethically
um
we're sort of starting out here from the
idea that humankind has uh holds a
special place in the environment a
special place in relation to Earth it's
sort of transcended it we've sort of
gotten Beyond
um the limitations
of nature or we're getting Beyond them
and usually we're getting Beyond them in
this context through our technical
prowess our ability to use technology so
this idea that for example those
approaches to environmental issues that
suggest things like geoengineering
actually anything at all any solution
which requires engineering to some
degree is what would be called a
Promethean position
and if you don't know why we would call
it a Promethean position it's it's an
important term and I think to know in
the context of environmental ethics the
myth of Prometheus in ancient Greece it
sort of goes something like this
um
Epimetheus who was prometheus's brother
was tasked with the job of giving all of
the creatures on Earth that special
thing that makes them what they are that
special trait unique trait so what makes
a goat a goat and so on and so forth
right he forgot to give humans their
special trait and so his brother
Prometheus stole fire
um from Mount Olympus stole fire from
Zeus and gave it to humans Zeus got very
mad and sort of chained him or or
um held him on the side of the mountain
in some other way
um and so because Prometheus is a God he
can't die so he lives in in suffering
and torture I'm gonna read a good I
think synopsis of the myth of Prometheus
that pertains to what we're talking
about
um when we talk about environmental
issues
so this says uh historically the most
significant version of Prometheus comes
from the Greek tragedy Prometheus bound
it famously begins with Prometheus
spiked through the chest to a mountain
Crag by Zeus's henchmen force and
violence
because he is a god Prometheus can't die
in his suffering he becomes a symbol of
democratic resistance and a kind of poet
of witness as he uses his lengthy
speeches and tortured body as evidence
against Zeus's authoritarianism
at one point Zeus even considers wiping
out the human race
Prometheus responds by giving humans
technology
doing so out of Goodwill towards humans
his fellow sufferers under Zeus
but what Prometheus gives is not so much
technological things as technological
site right and we've talked about this
in various ways where you've read about
this in various ways right the uh unique
technical technological capacity that
humans have right
um technical site technological sites so
before his gift of Technology Prometheus
Compares human Visions to shapes in a
dream saying that humans didn't have any
reliable sign of winter and did
everything without planning Prometheus
then showed them the risings of the
stars and showed them all these things
blah blah blah Prometheus gives humans a
kind of vision and this is what's
important here that allows them to see
nature as a resource for culture
overcoming the limits of uh the
limitations of nature for early human
life so
uh to
extrapolate a little bit from the
analogy or or just clarify
um Zeus here you know the god of thunder
and lightning and the weather and so on
the the top God as it were and the son
of time I think which is not not um
irrelevant here
um
in some sense overcome by Prometheus in
a way by giving humankind the means to
fend for themselves not a bad story
um except well and I'm not going to say
this is bad but the way that we use
prometheism today is precisely in this
last line a lot what allows us to see
nature as a resource for culture so when
we view a hard split between say
humankind nature a relation exists when
we when we view a hard split between
these two as if humankind has
transcended nature
then nature becomes an object for us
important preposition four right it's
something that's for us not for anything
else right it's it's a resource for the
development of human things which is
where uh the Burke article sort of
starts
one second I'll be back
okay so the first part of this Augustine
Burke essay which really goes up to page
six
um he starts by describing these
magnificent trees and then he's talking
about this ecological restoration
project or conservation project in
western China
um he tells us about how all the things
all the details why I failed and so on
why is he telling us this why do we get
this whole story and everything that
happened
pause for a second and think about it
okay so the answer is
um
he wants to emphasize the discursive
approach which is to say like how we
approach
um
nature or questions of what we should do
with nature what sort of language what
sort of um
Fields do we use to approach it and uh
here we have the two
two examples of a
quasi-promethean View at the very least
we have the position of the Chinese
government which refers directly to the
preservation of nature because nature as
as a resource for
the development of the economy which is
therefore a resource for humans
um you should stop and think about
whether or not saying that a resource
for humans and a resource for the
economy is the same thing
um and how it might differ in different
economic scenarios
so this whole thing fails
and
uh a method called the Costanza
valuation method is done applied so the
first we get this uh resource resource
resource language then we get this
Costanza evaluation method
um and what is that well that's a that's
a a method that comes from Finance
Capital it has two major factors that
Burke discusses
um one of them is uh
Capital assets or Capital asset stock I
should go twice out to see what the word
exactly is and the other is resource
right so Capital stocks is exactly what
you you imagine it to be it's capital in
reserve that can be used
um and services I don't know if I said
resources or Services excuse me the
other one is Services service is an
intangible commodity and so when using
the gistan's evaluation method to figure
out what went wrong with this
environmental strategy we have to
translate natural things into these two
categories right so we get an iceberg
viewed as a natural Capital stock and we
get service and intangible Commodities
so generally intangible Commodities I
deliver you a pizza or I wait on you or
I drive an Uber whatever the service
industry right these are things
Commodities that you can buy but you
can't really actually Reach Out And
Touch
um
and so
um Services here
become
or a service
the amount of water given by the glacier
to this term River Basin this ecosystem
and Burke wants to use all this he's
telling us all this for one reason which
is to point out that we're probably
approaching this using the wrong type of
language and the wrong field We're
translating nature
which is not inherently human
into inherently human terms right the
economy is something that we invented to
do specific things so it's an inherently
human thing We're translating nature
into this right so Capital stock
Services these are very specific human
Concepts and now we're taking glaciers
and you know Glacier glacial runoff
basically the various ways in which it
can feed the water table
um we have to simulate and translate and
so the key passages here
um come at the page six towards the end
he says
however it Remains the case that
translating into commercial terms is by
definition limited to a field of the
economy
whose relevance is immediately canceled
out by the simulation that makes the
translation possible
so it's not relevant because we have to
do this simulating and translating in
order to fit natural things into
economic terms in this way right we're
talking about conservation here in a way
and then the last bit here at the at the
end of this section the Costanza method
in fact brings problems of the
environment down to a dimension which is
itself inherent in the system the market
that as history shows leads to the
destruction of the planet's environment
so not only have we we picked one
um which causes for problems because
it's not we have these translation and
simulation problems but we picked these
specific one that many people think is
responsible for environmental problems
in the first place
it seems more logical to question the
relevance of that reference and look for
a more fundamental one so the whole
first half or so
um of this article by Burke is to
suggest and to demonstrate how um
there are
quantifiable right because these things
are the Capitals uh stock and services
uh when they're simulated they're
simulated in quantifiable terms
um and he's suggesting that we can't
really do that when we're talking about
ecosystems and the environment
um he's saying that there are limits to
quantification I think that that's the
subtitle of one of the sections here so
that's that's where we are
um and in the next video I'll talk about
um a little bit what he proposes
as a potential solution so cool
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)