Why Independent Quants Don't Exist
Summary
TLDRThe video addresses the misconception that one can easily become a successful independent Quant. It debunks the idea that Quants can make millions without working for firms, explaining the financial and operational challenges. The speaker uses hypothetical scenarios to illustrate that working for a firm is often more lucrative and less stressful, with a guaranteed salary and benefits. The video also touches on the reality of scaling in finance, suggesting that successful Quants typically transition from working for firms to running their own, leveraging experience and networks to attract investors and manage teams.
Takeaways
- đ€ The common myth is that one can become a successful independent Quant, but the reality is often more complex.
- đŒ Most Quants work for firms due to the financial and operational support they provide, which is crucial for success in quantitative finance.
- đ° The idea of making millions as an independent Quant is romanticized, but it overlooks the significant challenges and resources required.
- đ Historically, Quants have made significant money, but this was often during a different market era and with different economic conditions.
- đŒ Working for a firm provides a stable salary, benefits, and lower stress levels compared to the uncertainties of independent trading.
- đč The market average return is around 6-8%, and achieving a 10% return consistently is challenging and not guaranteed for independent Quants.
- đ The script emphasizes the importance of scalability in finance, suggesting that without the ability to scale, it's not profitable to be an independent Quant.
- đŠ To be successful, Quants often need to transition from independent trading to running a firm, which involves managing a team and dealing with investors.
- đŒ The transition from an independent Quant to a firm owner involves significant legal, regulatory, and operational overhead that is often underestimated.
- đĄ The script debunks the fairy tale of easy wealth through independent trading, highlighting the hard work and team effort required in the finance industry.
Q & A
Can an individual be a successful independent Quant?
-It is challenging for an individual to be a successful independent Quant. Historically, Quants who made millions did so in a different financial climate, and today's markets are more competitive and require more resources.
What are the typical earnings for a Quant starting at a firm?
-A Quant starting at a firm can expect to earn around $100,000 to $120,000 per year, with additional benefits and a guaranteed salary regardless of performance.
What are the advantages of working for a firm as a Quant?
-Working for a firm provides a guaranteed salary, lower stress due to a regular work schedule, and benefits. It is also easier and less risky compared to being an independent Quant.
What are the potential earnings for an independent Quant with a $1 million investment?
-An independent Quant with a $1 million investment could potentially earn $100,000 in the first year with a 10% return, assuming no costs or salary for themselves.
How does the script suggest scaling a Quant's operations to increase earnings?
-To scale operations, a Quant would need to find investors to raise significant capital, which allows for larger profits. This involves managing a team, dealing with legal and regulatory issues, and potentially setting up a firm.
What are the risks associated with being an independent Quant?
-The risks include market volatility, the need for significant initial capital, the challenge of consistently achieving high returns, and the overhead costs of running a trading operation.
Why is it difficult for an independent Quant to attract investors without experience?
-Without experience, it is hard for an independent Quant to prove their ability to generate profits, which makes it difficult to attract investors who are looking for a track record of success.
What is the significance of having a team when running a Quantitative trading operation?
-A team is significant because it allows for the division of labor, including strategy development, trade execution, data management, legal compliance, and investor relations, which are all crucial for a successful trading operation.
What is the role of a Quant in a firm setting?
-In a firm setting, a Quant's role may include developing trading algorithms, conducting quantitative research, risk management, and contributing to the overall strategy of the firm.
What are the potential career paths for a Quant according to the script?
-A Quant can either work for a firm, gaining experience and eventually starting their own fund with investors, or they can remain working for a firm, leveraging the firm's resources and expertise to manage risks and operations.
How does the script describe the transition from an independent Quant to running a firm?
-The script describes the transition as a natural progression where Quants who start independently often end up creating a firm to manage growing operations, investors, and a team, thus moving away from true independence.
Outlines
đŒ The Challenges of Being an Independent Quant
The speaker addresses the common question of whether one can be a successful independent quantitative analyst (Quant) or if all Quants must work for firms. Historically, Quants have made significant money, leading to the allure of independent wealth through financial engineering or quantitative finance. However, the speaker argues that independent success is unlikely due to various practical challenges. A hypothetical scenario is presented where a Quant starts with a million dollars, aiming for a 10% return. Despite initial success, the lack of a guaranteed income, transaction costs, and the need for infrastructure make it less appealing than a salaried position with benefits and lower stress. The speaker emphasizes that while anecdotal success stories exist, the majority find it more advantageous to work within established firms.
đ Scaling in Finance: From Independent Trading to Firm Building
The second paragraph delves into the financial realities of scaling a Quant's operations. It discusses the potential of a Quant to consistently achieve high returns and the subsequent decision to seek investors to scale up to millions, aiming for larger profits. The speaker outlines the complexities of managing a growing firm, including legal, regulatory, and operational challenges. The narrative suggests that while independence is an initial goal, most Quants eventually become part of a larger entity, either by working for an established firm or creating their own, which requires managing teams, investors, and various business aspects. The conclusion is that in finance, scalability is key to profitability, and the romanticized idea of independent wealth through trading is often replaced by the practicalities of working within or building a firm.
Mindmap
Keywords
đĄIndependent Quant
đĄQuantitative Finance
đĄProp Trading Firms
đĄFinancial Engineering
đĄMarket Average
đĄTransaction Costs
đĄBase Salary
đĄRegulations
đĄScaling
đĄInvestors
đĄRisk Management
Highlights
The common misconception that independent quants can be very successful is debunked.
Historically, quants made millions in the 80s, 90s, and early 2000s, creating a false narrative of easy success.
The speaker argues that being an independent quant is not as lucrative as working for a firm.
A scenario is presented where a quant with $1 million makes 10% return in the first year, but faces various costs and no salary.
The importance of transaction costs, technology, and learning resources in the quant's success is highlighted.
A comparison is made between the potential earnings of an independent quant and a quant working for a firm with a base salary.
The benefits of a stable salary and reduced stress in a firm job are emphasized over the uncertainties of independent trading.
The speaker explains the challenges of setting up a hedge fund or prop trading firm, including regulatory and operational hurdles.
The concept of compounding returns is discussed, with an example of $1 million growing to $2,593,742.46 over ten years.
The average annual return from compounding is calculated, showing a lower income compared to a firm job.
The reality of starting a trading venture is contrasted with the romanticized idea of independent success.
Scaling a trading operation by finding investors is presented as a way to increase profits.
The necessity of a team, including data engineers, traders, and legal professionals, for scaling a trading operation is discussed.
The transition from an independent trader to a firm owner is described, with the associated responsibilities and challenges.
The importance of experience and networking in gaining investors for a quant's own fund is emphasized.
The conclusion that quants typically end up working for someone else or creating their own firm is drawn from the discussion.
The necessity of scaling in finance for profitability is reiterated, explaining why quants often work for firms.
Transcripts
foreign
today we're going to answer subscribers
question and probably one I get a lot
and somewhat I would like to debunk a
little bit uh the question is can you be
an independent Quant or do all quants
work for firms so yes and no and it's a
challenging question but my typical
answer is no you cannot be an
independent Quant and be fairly
successful which shocks people because
we start to look back at historical
quants or you know prop trading firms
and we go wow they made millions and
millions of dollars back in the 80s and
90s and maybe early 2000s before the
2007-2008 financial crisis so therefore
all of us want to go out and get a
financial engineering Masters or
quantitative Finance Masters and we're
going to be millionaires and the beauty
of all this is you don't have to work
for anybody so let's run through a
scenario here why this doesn't work out
in practice and I will note and put a
little caveat I am sure there are some
anecdotal evidence here there are a one
or two people that have done it but
let's go through the math a little bit
from a Quant perspective so you know
let's type it medically say
you have a million dollars I just gift
you a million dollars you have a million
dollars and it's just sitting in your
bank account okay it's a million bucks
um and you're gonna make ten percent on
that return in the first year so let's
just do simple math here a million
dollars times ten percent you made a
hundred thousand bucks so people are
like oh man Dimitri that is awesome that
is amazing I made a hundred thousand
dollars and I don't work for anybody
well that's assuming you pay yourself
nothing that also assumes there are no
costs associated with the trading we're
just going to pretend transaction costs
disappear uh we're gonna pretend the
computer the internet
um the time the textbooks the learning
all that stuff just disappears and we're
gonna say you made a hundred thousand
dollars and you paid yourself nothing
now you could rewind this back and say
okay Dimitri let's say I'm really smart
I can get 10 return which as a note
that's more than the market average here
so Market average is between like six
and eight percent with well
diversification if you're really smart
you might be able to knock in a 10
return here so let's just say you can do
10 and you take a hundred thousand
dollars every year so you have a million
dollars somehow which we're not going to
ask questions how you got it but you
have a million dollars uh you can
generate a hundred thousand dollars a
year and you pay yourself a hundred
thousand dollars a year if you can
consistently do that you would make yes
a hundred thousand dollars a year now
when you looked at the two videos which
I'll link above or below
um in the description
quants can work for firms making a
hundred-ish thousand dollars to start
now the beauty of not working for
yourself is you get paid your salary
regardless of performance that's what a
base salary is so you can start at a job
you could do sell side like me and risk
management have low stress uh regular
hours work 40 hours a week have great
benefits on top of all this which they
don't include inside that hundred grand
and you can get paid you know 80 to 100
000 to start within a few years you're
probably making one 120 140 depending
where you're at New York City you should
be making a bit more uh other places
where it's cheaper to live you'll be
making a bit less but in general you're
making 100 Grand with essentially no
stress or minimal stress because you're
working for someone else who has to deal
with all that now this also assumes the
fact that you somehow know how to set up
a hedge fund or a prop trading firm uh
you also know how to go through the
proper regulations you also have free
data to you there's essentially no costs
associated with this so you know you can
see here if you made that ten percent
per year at a hundred thousand dollars
it's more lucrative less stress and
easier to actually work for someone else
than it is to say okay
um the 10 is not guaranteed I have to
perform and I have to do extremely well
and if I don't do extremely well I might
not get paid so you might make I don't
know say six percent for the year which
is about prime Market average six to
eight but you're a little bit on the
Lower Side you make six percent a year
you're only making sixty thousand
dollars and again there's that risk
associated with your performance here so
you can see it's more advantageous just
in this scenario to work for someone now
let's pretend somehow
I don't know your family's super wealthy
you got the million dollars for free and
you're gonna compound that money 10 per
year right that's what everybody likes
to assume here so if we take a million
dollars and we compound that out at 10
years at 10 if my math is correct uh
you'll end up with two million 593
742.46 now you got to subtract out your
million dollar initial investment which
your family gave you or you borrowed or
something altered that's not really a
return that's just assets you had uh you
take that out you end up with one
million 593
742.46 and now you divide out all that
effort that you had over a 10-year
period and you end up with 159
374 and basically 25 cents we rounded up
160 000 a year is a terrible salary for
a firm like you could work somewhere
five ten years into a career and be
blowing past two three hundred thousand
dollars which we saw in the Carnegie
email and Report here again you'll be
making this towards towards some
experience this isn't like you just
Waltz out and make tons of money off the
bat but you can see when you started you
know making around 100 Grand 90 100 with
benefits and all that kind of tight and
everything for your base salary it's
much more advantageous and much easier
to work for someone else in that
scenario now in the case that you don't
need any money and you compounded
everything else again you're not making
a whole lot of money now the secret in
finance though and why people end up
starting firms and actually making
millions of dollars which we want to
talk a little bit about is they're able
to scale this so to scale this
in this scenario let's say you could
make 10 Returns year over year and you
could prove that you could do it uh now
it's much more advantageous to run out
and find investors to raise 50 million
or 100 million or 200 million dollars
that you can scale the operations to now
make the profits much much larger and
now you can pay your employees those you
know a few hundred thousand dollars to
250 whatever in these ranges and get
some new employees and train them you
know from about a hundred thousand up
and you can bring all this in and build
a firm but again you have to go out and
find investors
so again doing it independently with no
investors no team nothing sure it might
be possible there's a lot of risk in it
and a lot of people lose money and get
nothing for the year
um the expectation of returns though it
is usually much more advantageous to
work for someone else now that being
said though going through the scenario
here where you go out you find a bunch
of investors well now you're tied to
those investors and now you have to
report and deal with the investors and
now as you start building a firm you're
going to have more and more legal
paperwork like thin right you have to
deal with because you have to follow
rules and regulations and perhaps you're
another country as an example and you
have to do the same thing well as these
things start to scale
you'll start finding out too that your
one strategy only worked for a short
period of time you have to come for the
new strategy and so now you start
finding out you need to implement these
things into automated systems you need
to have things set up so you need data
Engineers uh you need a Quant to come up
with the strategies and build out you
know the research portions of it you
need someone to execute this which is
typically like some sort of Trader and
again you needed someone to deal with
all the investors and you'll need a
lawyer and you'll need accountants and
as you see here you'll probably need HR
because now you have all these employees
and as these things start to grow you
might be we'll put an air quotes
independent but you're not independent
anymore now you're just creating a firm
and a lot of quants end up doing this
where they go and they work for someone
else they make some good money they have
some nice Financial cushion they take
their ideas their information their
Network contacts to hire really good
employees and they start their own firms
and they become profitable and
successful in that notion here so I hope
you guys get from this takeaway here
it's not like like this I don't know why
this fairy tale exists where it's like
I'm gonna go out and become really
really smart and be because I'm really
really smart in quantitative Finance I'm
going to make millions of dollars
there's just a lot of ignorance in that
ideology here and kind of that
storytelling and yes it is very romantic
it would be amazing if you could just
quit your day job work for yourself sit
here like in an office like I am doing
my YouTube stuff but instead just be
trading and making millions of dollars
and it'd be great and wonderful the
reality is though is one trading is very
very challenging markets are very brutal
to be competitive you have to have a lot
of resources and a team behind you to do
it effectively and efficiently and
there's lots of other costs and
overheads that come into this on the
firm side as well so building a firm is
typically where you end up with you know
there might be this romantic fairy tale
of you starting your own trading
Ventures and then if it grows and you
are successful it will turn into a firm
if you are not successful it'll turn
into you working for someone else it's
not realistically that fairy tale dream
is kind of a Tipping Point where it's
like you might start in that ideology
but you're going to end up either
working for someone else or creating
your own firm and having a bunch of
people work for you but but in finance
if you cannot scale it is not profitable
so that's why quants end up working for
someone else it's much safer or they
work for someone else for a while and
then start their own fund because they
have experience so they can gain
investors here so if you don't have
experience and you're nobody it's really
hard to get investors if you've worked
in the industry for a while and you know
a bunch of people and you can prove that
you can make a profit it is much much
easier to get investors here so you're
gonna end up one of these two camps
either you know working for someone else
which isn't all bad because there's a
lot of the risks associated with running
a fund That You Don't See as a newbie
and the firm takes care of all that they
have people hired to do all that they're
experts in actually running firms and
investment firms and then on the other
side you might gain all that experience
gain a good Network build out your own
firm and do it yourself but again you're
not really working for yourself you have
a lot of investors you report to you
have employees and teams to manage and a
bunch of other things that perhaps
aren't as fun and exciting as building
models and doing quantitative research
so anyways thanks for listening thanks
for watching and as always until next
time
[Music]
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)