What Really Happened to Phineas Gage?

Summary

Phineas Gage's remarkable survival after a tamping iron pierced his brain in 1848 intrigued psychologists and contributed to brain specialization theories. Contrary to myths, Gage's personality changed post-accident, but he was not entirely unemployable or a social outcast. He worked as a carriage driver in Chile, suggesting his cognitive abilities were somewhat intact. Modern research using a 3D model of his skull indicates damage to his left frontal lobe, affecting decision-making and emotional processing, and a significant loss of white matter. This case underscores the brain's resilience and the importance of accurate storytelling in neuroscience.

Takeaways

• 🛠️ Phineas Gage survived a severe brain injury in 1848 when an iron rod passed through his skull.
• 🧠 The injury changed Gage's personality, leading to initial claims that he was 'no longer Gage'.
• 📚 Gage's case is a staple in introductory psychology classes, illustrating the brain's functions.
• 📉 The story of Gage has been distorted over time, with myths exaggerating the effects of his injury.
• 🔍 Primary sources about Gage come mainly from Dr. John Harlow, who first treated him.
• 🔁 Within weeks, Gage's memory was reported as intact, and he appeared outwardly normal.
• 🤔 Harlow later noted Gage was slower intellectually, suggesting some cognitive impairment post-injury.
• 🚫 Contrary to myths, Gage did not become a monster or unemployable; he worked steadily in Chile.
• 🧐 The myths about Gage may have arisen from confusion with other cases or as a tool to critique phrenology.
• 🧬 Modern research using 3D modeling of Gage's skull suggests damage was主要集中在他的左前额叶，影响决策和情感处理。
• 🔄 Gage's recovery aligns with current understanding of brain plasticity, particularly white matter regeneration.

Q & A

What is the significance of Phineas Gage's case in the field of psychology?

Phineas Gage's case is significant because it helped settle debates about how the brain works, particularly regarding the idea of brain specialization. His survival and recovery from a severe brain injury provided early evidence that parts of the brain have specialized functions.

What happened to Phineas Gage in 1848?

In 1848, Phineas Gage, a 25-year-old foreman helping lay railroad tracks in Vermont, survived a freak accident where an iron rod entered his skull below his left eye, exited through the top of his head, and landed about 30 yards behind him.

How did Phineas Gage's personality change after the accident according to initial reports?

Initial reports from the doctor who first treated him, John Harlow, indicated that Gage's personality changed post-accident. His friends noted he was 'no longer Gage,' suggesting a significant alteration in his character.

What inaccuracies are commonly found in the retelling of Phineas Gage's story?

Common inaccuracies include descriptions of Gage becoming a monster, a mean psychopath, never working again, becoming a vagrant, a circus attraction, or surviving with the rod still in his skull for 20 years.

How quickly did Phineas Gage's memory recover after the accident?

Phineas Gage's memory was reported to be 'as perfect as ever' within four weeks of the accident, according to Dr. John Harlow.

Did Phineas Gage hold a steady job after his accident?

Yes, Phineas Gage held down a steady job after his accident. He moved to Chile and worked as a carriage driver for years, which required him to exercise social skills as well as cognitive and motor skills.

What was the role of Phineas Gage's case in the debate over brain specialization during his time?

Phineas Gage's case was used in debates over brain specialization. His recovery was emphasized by some psychologists to argue against the phrenologists' holistic view and in favor of the idea that the brain has specialized functions.

What did the 2012 study on Phineas Gage's skull reveal about his brain damage?

The 2012 study, published in PLOS ONE, suggested that the damage was largely to his left frontal lobe, which is associated with decision-making and emotional processing. It also indicated that most of the damage occurred to white matter rather than gray matter.

Why is it important to debunk myths about Phineas Gage?

Debunking myths about Phineas Gage is important to avoid dehumanizing him and to remind us of the resilience of the human brain. It also helps in accurately understanding the implications of brain injuries and the potential for recovery.

What can Phineas Gage's case teach us about modern degenerative diseases like frontotemporal dementia?

Phineas Gage's case can teach us that similar brain regions are affected in frontotemporal dementia, and some of the symptoms associated with personality change can also occur. This comparison highlights the importance of understanding brain injuries and their long-term effects.

Outlines

00:00

🧠 The Phineas Gage Story: Debunking Myths

Phineas Gage is a pivotal figure in the history of psychology, known for surviving a severe brain injury caused by an iron rod passing through his skull in 1848. Contrary to popular myths, Gage did not become a monster or a circus attraction. While his injury did alter his personality, leading to social impairments, he was not rendered unemployable or incapable of functioning in society. Gage eventually worked as a carriage driver in Chile, indicating a significant recovery. The myths surrounding his story likely arose from a mix of honest mistakes and the use of his case in debates over brain specialization. The actual records, primarily from Dr. John Harlow who treated Gage, suggest a more nuanced recovery process and a life that continued with purpose and employment.

05:01

🧬 Understanding Gage's Brain Injury and Its Impact

Modern research, including a 2012 study that created a 3D model of Gage's skull, has shed light on the specifics of his brain injury. The damage was主要集中在他的左前额叶，这是与决策制定和情绪处理相关的大脑区域。The study suggested that Gage lost a significant portion of his white matter, which connects different parts of the brain, but only a small percentage of his gray matter. This distinction is crucial because white matter can regenerate, which could explain Gage's ability to recover and continue working. His case is now seen as analogous to modern degenerative diseases like frontotemporal dementia, which affect similar brain regions and can cause personality changes. The accurate recounting of Gage's story is important not only for historical accuracy but also to avoid dehumanizing those who experience brain injuries today, emphasizing the resilience of the human brain.

Keywords

💡Phineas Gage

Phineas Gage was a railroad construction foreman who survived a severe brain injury in 1848 when an iron rod passed through his skull. His case is central to the video's theme as it illustrates the resilience of the human brain and the impact of brain damage on personality and behavior. The script mentions how Gage's survival and subsequent changes in personality were pivotal in early psychological studies, challenging and shaping theories about brain function.

💡Lethal Injury

A lethal injury refers to a wound that is typically fatal. In the context of the video, it is used to contrast the expected outcome of an iron rod passing through the skull with Phineas Gage's unexpected survival, highlighting the extraordinary nature of his case and its significance in medical history.

💡Frontal Lobe

The frontal lobe is a region of the brain associated with decision-making and emotional processing. The video explains that Gage's injury primarily affected his left frontal lobe, which may have contributed to the changes in his personality and behavior post-accident. This keyword is crucial for understanding the video's exploration of brain function and the implications of localized brain damage.

💡Brain Specialization

Brain specialization is the concept that different areas of the brain have distinct functions. The video discusses how Gage's case was initially used to argue against this idea, but modern understanding supports specialization, with his injury affecting specific cognitive and social abilities. This concept is key to the video's narrative about the evolution of neuroscientific thought.

💡Phrenology

Phrenology was a pseudoscientific belief that personality and intelligence were related to the shape of the skull. The video notes that phrenologists incorrectly used Gage's case to support their theories, emphasizing changes in his social abilities. This keyword is important for understanding historical misconceptions about brain function and the video's broader discussion on the science of psychology.

💡Cognitive Impairment

Cognitive impairment refers to a decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, problem-solving, and language skills. The script describes Gage as experiencing some cognitive changes after his accident, though not to the extent of becoming unemployable. This keyword is significant for understanding the video's discussion on the impact of brain injury on cognitive function.

💡Social Impairment

Social impairment involves difficulties in social interactions and behaviors. According to the video, Gage exhibited changes in his social conduct post-accident, such as a lack of respect and increased profanity, which is an example of social impairment. This keyword is integral to the video's examination of how brain injuries can affect interpersonal skills.

💡Myelin

Myelin is a fatty substance that insulates nerve fibers and aids in the transmission of nerve impulses. The video explains that Gage's recovery might be attributed to the regeneration of white matter, which contains myelinated axons, contrasting with the less regenerative gray matter. This keyword is essential for understanding the video's discussion on brain recovery and plasticity.

💡Frontotemporal Dementia

Frontotemporal dementia is a neurodegenerative disease that affects similar brain regions as those impacted by Gage's injury. The video draws a parallel between Gage's case and this disease to highlight the brain's resilience and the importance of accurate storytelling in medical history. This keyword helps to contextualize Gage's experience within a broader medical framework.

💡Resilience

Resilience, in the context of the video, refers to the brain's ability to recover and adapt after injury. The script emphasizes Gage's recovery as an example of the brain's resilience, challenging myths and highlighting the brain's capacity to heal and reorganize itself. This keyword is central to the video's message about the human brain's remarkable capabilities.

Highlights

Phineas Gage survived a severe brain injury in 1848, challenging common beliefs about brain damage and recovery.

The iron rod entered Gage's skull below his left eye and exited through the top of his head.

Despite the injury, Gage's memory was reportedly unaffected, and he showed no outward signs of impairment to strangers.

Gage's case was initially used to argue against the specialization of brain functions.

Later accounts exaggerated Gage's impairments, suggesting he became unemployable or a circus attraction, which are mostly untrue.

Gage did experience a change in personality, becoming less kind and more prone to conflicts.

He eventually held a steady job as a carriage driver in Chile, demonstrating continued social and cognitive abilities.

Modern studies using 3D models of Gage's skull suggest damage was primarily to his left frontal lobe.

The damage was more extensive to white matter than gray matter, which may explain Gage's partial recovery.

Gage's case is important for understanding brain specialization and the resilience of the human brain.

The myths surrounding Gage's life can dehumanize him and those with brain injuries, emphasizing the importance of accurate storytelling.

Phrenologists, who believed in the importance of skull bumps, may have overemphasized Gage's social changes post-injury.

Gage's recovery was used to argue against phrenology and the holistic view of brain function.

Modern comparisons to frontotemporal dementia show similar brain regions affected and personality changes.

Gage's story is a reminder of the brain's resilience and the importance of accurate representation in psychology.

Transcripts

[Music]

most of the time when a large object

passes through your skull you will

receive what is called a lethal injury

but for one person named phineas gage

that famously did not happen and you

don't survive an iron rod through your

brain without psychologists paying

attention so his name can be found in

basically every intro to psych class but

if your story travels far and wide

chances are it doesn't get told right

every time so it's no surprise that the

tale of phineas gage has become quite

colorful and

inaccurate in most cases but what's true

is that he survived a seemingly

unsurvivable injury and his stunning

recovery helped settle some debates

about how the brain works the first part

of the story is usually told correctly

in 1848 gage was 25 and a foreman

helping lay railroad tracks in vermont

he was using an iron rod three and a

half feet long and over an inch wide to

pack sand onto an explosive when it went

off firing the rod at his head the rod

entered his skull below his left eye and

then came out through the top of his

head landing about 30 yards behind him

he miraculously survived but the doctor

who first treated him reported that his

friends said he was quote no longer gage

the injury had changed his personality

and that's about where the story starts

to spiral out of control in some stories

gage is described as becoming a monster

of a man a mean psychopath that could

never function again in society some

textbooks say that he never worked again

that he became a vagrant or a circus

attraction or in one example that he

survived for 20 years with the rod still

in his skull but pretty much none of

that's true we only have a few primary

sources for gage's life and most are

from the doctor who first treated him an

american physician named john harlow but

those records suggest that in some ways

gage recovered pretty quickly within

four weeks of the accident harlow

recorded that gage's memory was as

perfect as ever for example a visiting

doctor wrote that a stranger would

notice nothing peculiar about him and

six months later harlow wrote that gage

was fully recovered though that might

have been a little optimistic he later

described gage as being intellectually

impaired nothing extreme just a little

slower at things like gage had

previously been thought of as one of the

best at his job and a shrewd smart

businessman but some of his post-injury

records suggest he became

kind of average and it is true that he

didn't get his old job back though that

probably wasn't due to a cognitive

impairment but rather because he became

harder to work with reports suggest that

after the accident he lacked respect and

kindness was more profane and gotten

more conflicts in other words he

suffered a social impairment at least at

first but he didn't become like a wholly

horrible person like some accounts

suggest and he did in fact hold down a

steady job later on gage moved to chile

and worked as a carriage driver for

years though not considered as high

status as his old job as a foreman it

still required him to exercise social

skills as well as cognitive and motor

skills and a doctor who knew him there

described him as having quote no

impairment whatever so clearly he wasn't

permanently unemployable or unable to

function in society it's likely that

such larger than life stories of gage

arose in part through honest mistakes

like the idea that he was a circus

attraction may have arose because he

likely made some paid appearances at

barnum's museum in new york which though

named for that same pt barnum of barnum

bailey was not part of any circus and it

seems like some psychologists writing

about him later on got his case mixed up

with later cases of brain damage also

before pdfs and the internet it was

likely pretty hard for textbook writers

to get their hands on the actual case

notes to fact check what they'd heard

but another big reason that myths grew

about gage is the same reason he's a

pretty important figure in the history

of psychology almost immediately he

became like a pawn in fights over how

the brain works today we take for

granted the idea that parts of the brain

are specialized for certain purposes but

at the time no one was certain of that

and others had a more holistic view

basically that all of it was equally

important for pretty much everything in

fact at the time the biggest proponents

of specialization were phrenologists

adherents of the racist pseudoscience

which proposed that personality and

intelligence were related to bumps in

the skull so some psychologists may have

emphasized gage's recovery specifically

to attack phrenology and being able to

recover did seem to argue against

specialization after all if the brain

was specialized you couldn't lose a lot

of brain tissue and still be mostly fine

meanwhile according to the phrenologists

who again were wrong the rod hit him in

the parts of the brain responsible for

benevolence and veneration so they

likely overemphasized the changes in his

social abilities leading to the bizarre

stories that then snowballed today

gage's true story fits with our

understanding of brain specialization

just not the way that phrenologists

thought what exactly happened to his

brain wouldn't be studied in depth until

over a century and a half after his

accident gage died 11 years after the

incident and was buried but his skull

was later exhumed and in a study

published in 2012 and plos one

researchers were able to create a 3d

model of that skull to fully examine

what happened to it based on the

placement of the fractures and what's

known from modern imaging of brain

anatomy the researchers suggested that

the damage was largely to his left

frontal lobe a part of the brain which

is associated with decision-making and

emotional processing that might explain

some of the more subtle deficits he

suffered they also found that it was

likely most of the damage occurred to

white brain matter instead of gray

matter brain tissue that appears white

is made of the myelinated axons that

connect neurons while gray matter is

made mostly of neuron cell bodies the

research proposed that gage lost around

11 of his white matter specifically

white matter connecting the orbital

frontal cortex of the frontal lobe to

the limbic system while perhaps only

losing four percent of his gray matter

and that could help explain his recovery

because while gray matter doesn't grow

back well after injury it is possible

for white matter to regenerate this also

makes gage's case look a lot like modern

degenerative diseases like

frontotemporal dementia similar brain

regions are affected by the disease and

some of the symptoms associated with

personality change can also occur and

that modern comparison is a good

reminder of why it's important to debunk

the myths about phineas gage the wild

stories about him becoming an

unemployable vagrant can end up

dehumanizing him and we don't want to do

that to people who experience accidents

or brain damage today so keeping in mind

the full life he lived after his

accident can help remind us that

everyone deserves to have their story

told right and the human brain is

incredibly resilient thanks for watching

this episode of scishow psych if you

like learning about the human brain you

are in the right place check out some of

our other episodes to learn more about

how our minds work i really like the one

that we did on how surprisingly smart

babies are for example because my baby

is definitely surprisingly smart and

don't forget to click on that subscribe

button to make sure you never miss an

episode

[Music]