Sara Duterte cries ‘political harassment’ over removal of PNP security | INQToday

INQUIRER.net

28 Jul 202401:33

Summary

TLDRVice President Sarah Duterte accuses the Philippine National Police Chief, RL Marbill, of political harassment and lying about the withdrawal of her 75 police security personnel. In a Facebook open letter, she refutes Marbill's claims, asserting no official request was made for the security withdrawal and that there was indeed a threat, evidenced by publicized footage of her family leaving the country. Duterte also challenges Marbill on the removal of 45 PNP personnel she selected, demanding their return to the force. The PNP has yet to respond to the letter.

Takeaways

📜 Vice President Sarah Duterte has publicly criticized the Philippine National Police Chief, RL Marbill, in an open letter on Facebook.
👮‍♀️ She accuses Marbill of political harassment following the removal of her 75 police security personnel.
💬 Duterte claims that her security detail was withdrawn immediately after she resigned from President Bong Bong Marcos's cabinet.
🎥 A video allegedly showing Marcos using illegal drugs surfaced online, which Duterte commented on during the State of the Nation address.
🚫 The Vice President refutes several of Marbill's claims, stating that no official request was made regarding the withdrawal of her security.
🏠 She mentions that footage of her family leaving the country was made public, which contradicts Marbill's assertion that there was no threat against her.
🔍 Duterte questions the rationale behind Marbill's decision to leave 45 PNP personnel that she personally selected if there was no threat.
👩‍✈️ The Vice President is demanding the return of the 45 police officers to the PNP, as indicated in her letter to Marbill.
🤔 She challenges Marbill to provide a valid reason for the withdrawal of her security, implying that it was unjustified.
📢 Inquirer.net is seeking a response from the PNP and Marbill regarding the open letter, but no reply has been received yet.
📝 The situation highlights a conflict between the Vice President and the Philippine National Police, suggesting potential political tensions.

Q & A

Who is calling for the removal of her police security?
-Vice President Sarah Duterte is calling for the removal of her police security.
What does Sarah Duterte consider the removal of her police security as?
-Sarah Duterte considers the removal of her police security as a clear case of political harassment.
How did Sarah Duterte express her views on the removal of her police security?
-Sarah Duterte expressed her views through a four-page open letter on Facebook.
Who is the Philippine National Police Chief mentioned in the script?
-The Philippine National Police Chief mentioned in the script is RL Marbill.
What is Sarah Duterte's response to the allegations made by RL Marbill?
-Sarah Duterte slams RL Marbill for his alleged lies concerning the withdrawal of her police protection detail.
What event led to the immediate withdrawal of Sarah Duterte's P&P security?
-Her P&P security was pulled out immediately after she resigned from President Bong Bong Marcos's cabinet.
What was the context of Sarah Duterte's comment on the State of the Nation address?
-Her comment on the State of the Nation address came after a video showing Marcos allegedly using illegal drugs surfaced online.
What does Sarah Duterte refute regarding the withdrawal of her police security?
-Sarah Duterte refutes several of Marbill's claims, including that no official request was made to the office of the vice president regarding the withdrawal of her security.
What does Sarah Duterte claim about the threat against her?
-Contrary to what Marbill said, Sarah Duterte notes that there was a threat against her, evidenced by the publicized footage of her and her family leaving the country.
Why does Sarah Duterte question the actions of the police officers?
-Sarah Duterte questions why police officers attempted to case her residence where her kids also lived if there was no threat against her.
What is the status of the 45 PNP personnel that Marbill left for Sarah Duterte?
-Sarah Duterte questions the reason for leaving 45 PNP personnel that Marbill personally selected for her if there was indeed no threat against her and tells Marbill to expect a letter about the return of these officers to the PNP.

Outlines

00:00

🏛️ VP Duterte's Security Withdrawal Controversy

Vice President Sarah Duterte publicly accuses the Philippine National Police Chief, RL Marbill, of political harassment and lying regarding the withdrawal of her police security detail. In a four-page open letter on Facebook, she claims that her security was withdrawn immediately after resigning from President Bong Bong Marcos's cabinet. Duterte refutes Marbill's claims, stating that no official request was made to her office about the security withdrawal. She also points out that there was no evidence of a threat against her, as Marbill had suggested, and questions the motives behind leaving 45 PNP personnel selected for her protection. Duterte demands the return of the 45 police officers to the PNP and has yet to receive a response from Marbill or the PNP.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Vice President Sarah Duterte

Vice President Sarah Duterte refers to the person holding the second-highest office in the Philippines, who is also the daughter of the former president. In the script, she is central to the narrative as she is calling the removal of her police security a case of political harassment, indicating her significant role in the political landscape and the main theme of the video.

💡Political harassment

Political harassment is the act of targeting an individual or group politically for personal or partisan gain, often through intimidation or unfair treatment. In the context of the video, Sarah Duterte accuses the Philippine National Police of politically harassing her by removing her police security, which she believes is a response to her political actions and statements.

💡Philippine National Police Chief

The Philippine National Police Chief is the highest-ranking officer in the Philippine National Police. In the script, the Chief, identified as RL Marbill, is accused by the Vice President of lying about the reasons for withdrawing her police protection detail, highlighting the conflict between the two figures and the tension within the country's law enforcement and political leadership.

💡Withdrawal of police protection detail

The withdrawal of police protection detail refers to the removal of police officers assigned to protect a person, usually a high-ranking official or public figure. In the video, this action is the main point of contention, as the Vice President claims it was done without proper procedure and as a form of political retaliation.

💡State of the Nation Address

The State of the Nation Address is a formal address delivered by a country's leader, typically the president, to the legislative body, outlining the government's agenda and priorities. In the script, the Vice President's comment on President Marcos's address is mentioned, suggesting a political context in which her actions and the subsequent events are taking place.

💡Illegal drugs

Illegal drugs refer to substances that are regulated or banned by law due to their potential for abuse and health risks. The script mentions a video showing President Marcos allegedly using illegal drugs, which adds a layer of controversy and scandal to the political narrative.

💡Public letter

A public letter is a written communication intended for a broad audience, often used to express grievances or to make a public statement. In the video, the Vice President uses a public letter on Facebook to air her complaints against the Philippine National Police Chief, making it a key element in the unfolding political drama.

💡Personal Protection Detail

Personal Protection Detail refers to a team of security personnel assigned to safeguard an individual from potential threats. In the script, the withdrawal of the Vice President's personal protection detail is a central issue, indicating the perceived threat to her safety and the political implications of such a move.

💡PNP Personnel

PNP Personnel refers to the members of the Philippine National Police. The script mentions 45 PNP personnel selected by Marbill for the Vice President's security, which she questions the necessity of, given the alleged lack of threat against her, further emphasizing the dispute over the withdrawal of her security.

💡Inquirer.net

Inquirer.net is an online news platform, likely representing the media in the script. The mention of Inquirer.net seeking a response from the PNP for Marbill's reaction to the Vice President's letter shows the role of journalism in covering and amplifying the political conflict.

💡Threat

A threat, in this context, refers to a potential danger or risk to someone's safety. The Vice President notes that contrary to Marbill's claims, there was a publicized footage of her family leaving the country, suggesting that there could be a perceived threat, which is a critical point in her argument against the withdrawal of her security.

Highlights

Vice President Sarah Duterte claims the removal of her 75 police security as political harassment.

She posted a four-page open letter on Facebook addressing the issue.

Duterte accuses Philippine National Police Chief, RL Marbill, of lying about the withdrawal of her police protection detail.

The Vice President's security was withdrawn immediately after resigning from President Bong Bong Marcos's cabinet.

A video showing Marcos allegedly using illegal drugs surfaced online, prompting Duterte's comment on his state of the nation address.

Duterte refutes several of Marbill's claims regarding the withdrawal of her police security.

No official request was made to the Office of the Vice President about the withdrawal of her security detail, contrary to Marbill's statements.

Duterte points out the publicized footage of her and her family leaving the country.

She mentions police officers attempting to case her residence where her children also lived.

Duterte questions why Marbill left 45 PNP personnel selected for her if there was no threat.

The Vice President demands the return of the 45 police officers to the PNP in her letter.

Inquirer.net has sought Marbill's response to Duterte's letter, but there is no reply yet.

Duterte's open letter is a public challenge to the Philippine National Police's actions.

The letter details the alleged lack of communication and transparency in the withdrawal of her security detail.

Duterte's resignation from the cabinet is linked to the timing of her security detail's withdrawal.

The Vice President emphasizes the absence of any official threat against her to justify the security withdrawal.

Duterte's letter raises questions about the integrity and motives of the Philippine National Police leadership.

The incident reflects potential political tensions within the Philippine government.

Duterte's case may set a precedent for political figures' security arrangements in the Philippines.