Impossibility of the Contrary Explained
Summary
TLDRThis video explores the concept of 'the impossibility of the contrary' within the framework of presuppositional apologetics. It explains that the Christian worldview is deemed true because a non-Christian perspective cannot sustain rationality, knowledge, or meaningful human experience. The speaker uses the transcendental argument to assert the logical impossibility of any position contradicting Christianity. Biblical passages are cited to support the idea that the Christian God's omniscience and the presence of all wisdom and knowledge in Christ make any contrary position irrational. The video also discusses the method of internal worldview critiques to demonstrate the inconsistency of non-Christian views and the necessity of the Christian worldview for grounding logic and knowledge.
Takeaways
- 📖 The video discusses the concept of 'the impossibility of the contrary' in the context of presuppositional apologetics, where the Christian worldview is considered true because the contrary would be impossible.
- 🧠 The centerpiece of the presuppositional apologetic method is the transcendental argument, which argues that the Christian worldview is necessary for human experience to be meaningful and intelligible.
- 🔍 The term 'impossibility of the contrary' refers to the logical impossibility of a position that is not Christian, suggesting that rationality is not possible on a non-Christian presupposition.
- 🤔 The contrary is the contradictory of the Christian worldview; if a position contradicts Christianity, it is deemed impossible or irrational.
- 📜 The speaker believes that the Bible implicitly and explicitly supports the method of arguing by the impossibility of the contrary, providing a foundation for transcendental arguments.
- 📝 The script cites Isaiah 44:6-8 and Colossians 2:2-3 to illustrate the Christian belief in an omniscient God and the impossibility of any other god existing or any wisdom existing outside of Christ.
- 💡 The use of internal worldview critiques is a common method in presuppositional apologetics, where the opponent's position is hypothetically granted to be true and then shown to be self-defeating.
- 🤝 The goal of internal critique is to reduce the opponent's position to absurdity, showing it to be inconsistent or incapable of grounding rationality, knowledge, or the intelligibility of human experience.
- 🛠 The speaker acknowledges that while Christians claim their worldview provides necessary preconditions for rationality and knowledge, these claims must be demonstrated through rational argumentation and practice.
- 📈 The video is part of a series aiming to explain the presuppositional approach in apologetics, with the intention of helping viewers understand and engage in these discussions more effectively.
- 👍 The speaker encourages viewers to like, share, and support the content by donating or signing up for courses and conferences offered at revealedapologetics.com.
Q & A
What is the main concept discussed in the video?
-The main concept discussed in the video is the 'impossibility of the contrary,' which is a central idea in presuppositional apologetics, arguing for the truth of the Christian worldview by demonstrating the logical impossibility of any non-Christian position.
What is the transcendental argument in the context of presuppositional apologetics?
-The transcendental argument in presuppositional apologetics is an argument that the Christian worldview must be true because it is the necessary precondition for human experience to be meaningful, intelligible, and for there to be rationality and knowledge.
What does it mean to say that Christianity is true by the 'impossibility of the contrary'?
-Saying that Christianity is true by the 'impossibility of the contrary' means that any non-Christian presupposition makes rationality impossible, suggesting that the logical impossibility of any position that contradicts the Christian worldview is the basis for its truth.
What is an 'internal worldview critique' in apologetics?
-An 'internal worldview critique' is a method used in apologetics where the truth of an opponent's position is hypothetically granted, and it is then demonstrated that their own presuppositions undermine the very foundations of rationality, knowledge, logic, or the intelligibility of science.
How does the concept of the 'impossibility of the contrary' relate to the idea of an omniscient God?
-The concept of the 'impossibility of the contrary' relates to the idea of an omniscient God in that if God knows everything, then there cannot logically be another god, as God would know of its existence. This demonstrates the logical impossibility of a contradictory position.
What is the purpose of using internal worldview critiques within an apologetic argumentation?
-The purpose of using internal worldview critiques within an apologetic argumentation is to show that a non-Christian position, based on its own presuppositions, cannot provide a foundation for rationality, knowledge, logic, or the intelligibility of human experience, thus reducing the opponent's position to absurdity or inconsistency.
How does the video script use scripture to support the idea of the 'impossibility of the contrary'?
-The video script uses scripture, such as Isaiah 44:6-8 and Colossians 2:2-3, to argue that the principles of the 'impossibility of the contrary' are present in the Bible, providing a basis for the transcendental arguments used by presuppositionalists.
What is the goal of the internal critique when engaging with a non-Christian worldview?
-The goal of the internal critique when engaging with a non-Christian worldview is to expose the opponent's position as arbitrary, inconsistent, or incapable of rendering human experience intelligible, by demonstrating the failure of their presuppositions to ground concepts like rationality and knowledge.
How does the video script suggest that Christians should practice apologetics?
-The video script suggests that Christians should practice apologetics by engaging in rational argumentation and discourse, asking questions, and interacting with the unbeliever's worldview and presuppositions, while also being able to explain how the Christian worldview provides the necessary preconditions for logic, knowledge, and intelligible experience.
What is the role of the presuppositionalist in demonstrating the truth of the Christian worldview?
-The role of the presuppositionalist in demonstrating the truth of the Christian worldview is to show that it provides the necessary preconditions for meaningful human experience and rationality, while also showing that the hypothetical truth of a non-Christian position leads to the destruction of these very foundations.
Outlines
📖 The Impossibility of the Contrary in Presuppositional Apologetics
The video discusses the concept of 'the impossibility of the contrary' within the framework of presuppositional apologetics. It explains that the Christian worldview is considered true because the state of affairs where it is true is necessary for human experience to be meaningful and intelligible. The argument is transcendental, positing that rationality, knowledge, and other cognitive faculties are only possible within a Christian framework. The speaker breaks down the idea by explaining that the truth of Christianity is established by the logical impossibility of any non-Christian position. The video also touches on the concept of 'the contrary,' which refers to anything that contradicts the Christian worldview, arguing that such contradictions are inherently impossible. The speaker suggests that the Bible implicitly and explicitly supports this method of argumentation, citing Isaiah 44:6-8 to illustrate the deductive reasoning behind the impossibility of another god existing alongside the Christian God.
📚 Internal Worldview Critiques in Presuppositional Apologetics
This paragraph delves into how the concept of the impossibility of the contrary is applied in apologetic argumentation, specifically through internal worldview critiques. An internal critique involves granting the truth of an opponent's position and then demonstrating that their view, based on its own presuppositions, undermines the very foundation of rationality, knowledge, logic, or the intelligibility of science. The speaker uses Colossians 2:2-3 to argue that all wisdom and knowledge are hidden in Christ, implying that outside of Christ, there can be no wisdom or knowledge. This serves to show that any position contradictory to the Christian worldview is impossible from a Christian perspective. The goal is to expose the opponent's position as arbitrary, inconsistent, or incapable of grounding human experience in a meaningful way. The speaker acknowledges that while Christians can claim this, it must be demonstrated through rational argumentation and discourse, which requires practice and interaction with non-Christian worldviews.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Presuppositional Apologetics
💡Transcendental Argument
💡Impossibility of the Contrary
💡Rationality
💡Internal Worldview Critique
💡Omniscience of God
💡Contradiction
💡Isaiah 44:6-8
💡Colossians 2:2-3
💡Revealed Apologetics
Highlights
The concept of 'the impossibility of the contrary' is central to presuppositional apologetics, suggesting that the Christian worldview must be true as the alternative state of affairs makes human experience meaningless.
Transcendental arguments are used to argue that the Christian worldview is necessary for rationality, knowledge, and intelligibility.
The phrase 'impossibility of the contrary' refers to the logical impossibility of a non-Christian position maintaining rationality.
Contradictory statements cannot both be false; if one position is false, its contradictory is true, implying Christianity's truth and other worldviews' falsehood.
Scripture is believed to implicitly and explicitly support the method of arguing by the impossibility of the contrary.
Isaiah 44:6-8 is used to illustrate the concept that an omniscient God invalidates the possibility of another god.
Colossians 2:2-3 supports the idea that all wisdom and knowledge are in Christ, making any contradictory position outside of Christ irrational.
The goal of internal worldview critiques in apologetics is to show the inconsistency or absurdity of non-Christian positions based on their own presuppositions.
Presuppositionalists aim to demonstrate that the Christian worldview provides necessary preconditions for logic, knowledge, and the intelligibility of human experience.
The success of presuppositional apologetics relies on both showing the inadequacy of non-Christian positions and the sufficiency of the Christian worldview.
Practice and discourse are essential in apologetics to refine the argumentation and interaction with non-Christian worldviews.
The video aims to clarify the presuppositional approach and its application in apologetics for better understanding.
Support for the channel can be provided through donations or participation in courses and conferences offered at revealedapologetics.com.
The video concludes with an invitation for viewers to engage with the content and support the mission of revealed apologetics.
Transcripts
all right
um in this video I want to talk about
the concept or the phrase the
impossibility of the contrary what do
presuppositionalists mean when they say
that the Christian worldview is true by
the impossibility of the contrary now if
you know anything about presuppositional
apologetic methodology the centerpiece
of the apologetic method is
um the transcendental argument okay and
when we argue transcendentally we are
arguing by the impossibility of the
contrary so we are in essence arguing
that the Christian worldview must be
true the the the State of Affairs in
which the Christian worldview is true is
necessary for Human Experience to be
meaningful intelligible for there to be
rationality and knowledge these sorts of
things now that's the claim of course
right
um but the transcendental argument seeks
to do that but what do we mean let's
kind of break apart this idea of the
impossibility of the contrary
when we say that something is true by
the impossibility of the contrary this
refers to the impossibility of say truth
the truth of some position that's not
the Christian position when we say that
Christianity is true by the
impossibility of the Contrary we're
saying that
um on some other non-Christian
presupposition rationality is not
possible basically we're speaking of The
Logical impossibility of some other
position that is not the Christian
position so that's basically what we are
saying uh in essence now what do we mean
by the contrary what uh when we speak of
the impossibility of the contrary now
the when we speak of the contrary we are
basically um using informal language to
refer to uh the contradictory the
contradictory of the Christian worldview
position okay so anything that
contradicts the Christian worldview is
impossible that's basically what we're
trying to say so contradictory
statements cannot both be false at the
same time and in the same way if a
position is false then it's
contradictory is true and vice versa
okay so within when we speak of the
impossibility of the country within the
context of like the Christian worldview
we're basically saying that uh
Christianity is true and every other
position that's not the Christian
worldview is false or Christianity is
rational and every other position that's
not Christianity is irrational okay and
that's that's basically to say that only
the Christian worldview is rational and
that would have to be true if we're
arguing that Christianity is the
necessary precondition for human Intel
uh intelligibility or rationality or
whatever the case maybe that's just the
nature of the claim all right now why do
Christians or presuppositionalists more
specifically uh argue why should we
argue along these lines of um in
impossibility of the contrary well I
actually think that scripture both
prescribes and describes this method I
think scripture both implicitly and
explicitly argues in this way and I want
to show you kind of through a scripture
or two of my line of reasoning here is
uh so so I don't think that the Bible is
is
teaching us transcendental arguments and
like that philosophical sense but the
principles of this idea of something
being true by the impossibility of the
country is right there in scripture and
so scripture provides the soil out of
which transcendental principle arises
okay so let's take a look for example at
Isaiah chapter 44 uh verses 6 through 8
which reads
I am the first and the last besides me
there is no God who is like me let him
Proclaim it let him declare and set it
before me since I appointed an ancient
people let them declare what is to come
and what will happen fear not nor be
afraid have I not told you from of old
and declared it and are you my Witnesses
is there a god besides me there is no
Rock I know not any now notice from
within the Christian worldview we have
an omniscient God a God who knows all
things
um we're not including open theism here
I do not believe that open theism is a
Biblical position but that's that's the
topic for another video okay so we're
assuming that Christian theism teaches
that there is an omniscient God he knows
all things of the past all things of the
present all things in the future all
contingencies all these sorts of things
so um let's illustrate this idea of the
impossibility of the contrary or the
contradictory
um from this concept here so I'm going
to lay it out in a deductive form so you
can kind of see the reasoning behind
this okay so
um premise one God knows everything
premise two if there is another God then
God would know that there is another God
premise three God does not know that
there is another God four which is the
conclusion
therefore there is not another God and
so if you think about that
any position that posits another God
namely the contradictory to what we're
just asserting is false it would be
impossible for the um contradictory to
be true okay let's take a look for
example at Colossians chapter 2 verses
two through three which says Christ in
whom are hidden all the treasures of
wisdom and knowledge so let's break this
down in kind of a deductive form so you
can see the reasoning behind here uh
premise one if all of the treasures of
wisdom and knowledge are hidden in
Christ then outside of Christ there are
no Treasures of wisdom and knowledge
premise two all the treasures of wisdom
and knowledge are hidden in Christ and
this is believed by Christians on the
basis of scripture so if you're a
Christian you affirm the Bible this is
something we need to affirm from within
the Christian worldview three therefore
outside of Christ there are no Treasures
of wisdom and knowledge and therefore
wisdom and knowledge on the contrary or
contradictory position is impossible
from within the Christian Perspective
and that's why we as
presuppositionalists be trying to be
consistent will argue along these lines
okay so how is the impossibility of the
country are used within an apologetic
argumentation this is typically
um Illustrated through the use of what
we call internal worldview critiques
okay what's an internal critique an
internal critique is when you
hypothetically Grant the truth of your
opponent's position and show that on
their own presupposition their own view
they lose the foundation for whatever
we're arguing about whether it's
rationality knowledge logic or you know
the intelligibility of science the
inductive principle these sorts of
things and so we engage in an internal
critique to show that the non-Christian
position on his own presuppositions
can't ground those very things and so
the goal of the internal critique is to
reduce the opponent's position to
absurdity to expose the opponent's
position as arbitrary or to expose it as
inconsistent or incapable of rendering
Human Experience intelligible anything
along those lines now can the Christians
successfully do that yes does the
Christian always success fully do that
no right this is going to be this takes
practice as we're interacting with the
unbeliever and asking questions and
letting them lay out their world view
and kind of
um interacting with their worldview and
their presuppositions and these sorts of
things
um and the Christian of course is going
to have to also be able to explain how
the Christian worldview does in fact
provide what we call those necessary
preconditions for say something like
logic knowledge uniformity the inductive
principle
um and intelligible experience in
general okay so that's kind of the two
sides of the presuppositional coin we
show that the Christian worldview given
our presuppositions provides a
foundation for for these things and then
given the hypothetical truth of the
unbeliever's position
you know they can't ground those things
and in fact they destroy all of those
things and the meaningfulness of all
those things now again we can claim this
but that needs to be demonstrated
through rational argumentation and
discourse um and of course that takes
work and practice but that's you know
when we're doing apologetics it requires
us to you know practice you're going to
mess up a bunch of times and hopefully
you get better at it the more that you
do it I know that I don't do it
perfectly all the time either so
um so there we go that's what we mean by
the impossibility of the contrary that
kind of short little phrase which
encapsulates the transcendental
principle
um that the presuppositionalist is
trying to uh employ within the context
of apologetic interactions well I hope
this is helpful and I'm going to try to
do other videos in the future where I
lay out some aspect of the
presuppositional approach and try my
best to explain it so that folks can
understand uh what we're talking about
all right well that's it for this video
um if you enjoy this video please please
click that like or share uh share this
video and if you're looking to support
revealed apologetics you can do so by
going to revealedapologetics.com there's
a donate button you could also
contribute
um
by signing up for uh any of the courses
or conferences that I've put on uh that
can be found right there on the website
revealedapologetics.com you click down
the precept you menu and you can sign up
for those things that's a great way to
support what I'm doing uh but
nevertheless thank you so much for
listening and uh until next time bye
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)