Bisexual v Pansexual: MOGAI and Transphobic Sexuality

Summary

The video script explores the nuances of sexual orientation labels, particularly the distinction between 'bisexual' and 'pansexual' within the LGBT and MOGAI frameworks. It delves into the historical evolution of these terms, the importance of personal identity, and the impact of societal perceptions on attraction. The script challenges viewers to consider whether these labels represent genuine differences or are simply variations in terminology, using the metaphor of 'chips' to illustrate the potential for confusion and debate within the community.

Takeaways

• 📏 The script discusses two common systems of measurement: metric and imperial, drawing a parallel to the LGBT and MOGAI systems of understanding sexual and gender identities.
• 🏳️‍🌈 It highlights that the LGBT community has evolved over time, starting from the gay movement and eventually including lesbian, bisexual, and transgender individuals, as well as others like intersex and queer people.
• 🌈 The term 'queer' is presented as intentionally vague, often associated with more radical political perspectives compared to the mainstream LGBT movement.
• 🔍 MOGAI (Marginalized Orientations, Genders, and Intersex) is described as a newer system focusing on individualism and the smallest differences between people, as opposed to LGBT's focus on commonalities and broad social groups.
• 🚫 The script points out the controversy within the MOGAI system, where certain identities like 'bisexual' can have different definitions and implications, potentially leading to misunderstandings and offense.
• 💭 The speaker identifies as bisexual in the LGBT sense but acknowledges the complexities of identity within the MOGAI system, where they might be considered pansexual or omnisexual due to nuances in attraction and personal history.
• 🤔 The debate over the terms 'bisexual' and 'pansexual' is explored, with the script suggesting that these terms might be similar to regional synonyms, like 'soda' and 'pop', with different meanings based on cultural context.
• 👥 The script questions the necessity of distinguishing between omnisexual and pansexual individuals, suggesting that such distinctions may not have practical implications for community needs or resources.
• 🏋️‍♂️ It challenges the notion that bisexuality is inherently limited, arguing that the term has historically been intended to be inclusive and encompassing of all forms of attraction regardless of gender.
• 🚫 The issue of transphobia within the bisexual community is addressed, with the script suggesting that choosing a label like 'pansexual' to clarify attraction to trans people might inadvertently overlook internalized transphobia.
• 🌹 The script concludes by urging a reevaluation of identity politics, questioning whether the differences in labels and flags are more important than the shared experiences and challenges faced by the community.

Q & A

What are the two common systems of measurement mentioned in the script?

The two common systems of measurement mentioned are the metric and imperial systems.

How does the script compare the concept of LGBT to a system of measurement?

The script compares LGBT to a system of measurement by stating that it is a specific way of categorizing and understanding sexual orientation and gender identity, similar to how metric and imperial systems categorize and understand physical measurements.

What is the difference between the LGBT and MOGAI systems as described in the script?

LGBT focuses on broad social groups and similarities, while MOGAI emphasizes individualism and the smallest differences between individuals in terms of sexual orientation and gender identity.

What does the script suggest about the evolution of the term LGBT?

The script suggests that the term LGBT evolved from the gay movement to the gay and lesbian movement, and eventually included bisexuals and trans people in the 1990s due to pressure for inclusivity and respectability.

How does the script describe the term 'queer' within the context of the LGBT community?

The script describes 'queer' as an intentionally vague term that can refer to any of the other letters in the LGBT initialism, often associated with more radical political perspectives than the mainstream LGBT movement.

What is the significance of the term 'Novosexual' in the script?

Novosexual refers to an individual whose sexuality fluctuates along with their gender identity, highlighting the nuanced differences in the MOGAI system compared to the LGBT system.

What is the script's stance on the relationship between bisexuality and pansexuality within the MOGAI system?

In the MOGAI system, a pansexual is never considered bisexual, and it is offensive to equate the two. MOGAI distinguishes between various identities under the multi-attraction spectrum, with each having its own specific definition.

How does the script define 'multi-attraction spectrum' (MAS)?

The script defines MAS as a system that includes various sexual orientations such as polysexual, omnisexual, pansexual, and others, each with a unique definition of attraction based on the number of genders one is attracted to.

What is the script's view on the debate between bisexuality and pansexuality in terms of attraction to trans people?

The script suggests that pansexuality, by its specificity, leaves less room for uncertainty regarding attraction to trans people, whereas bisexuality, particularly under the MOGAI system, may not automatically include attraction to trans individuals.

How does the script conclude the discussion on the terms 'bisexual' and 'pansexual'?

The script concludes by questioning whether the debate between bisexuality and pansexuality is a result of identity politics and suggests that the two terms might be serving the same group of people with different labels and flags.