O RIDÍCULO RESULTADO DO CONCURSO DOS CORREIOS

Summary

In this video, Lucas shares his experience with the IBFC's postal service exam, highlighting the confusion and issues with the results. Despite achieving 57 points and being classified 13th, Lucas reveals the lack of transparency regarding the actual cutoff and tie-breaking rules. He criticizes the IBFC for publishing ambiguous results that led to misinterpretations, leaving many hopeful candidates, like Brenda, disappointed. Lucas also discusses the overly easy nature of the exam, arguing that it failed to differentiate between well-prepared and less-prepared candidates. He calls for a more challenging and transparent approach in future exams.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker, Lucas, passed the Correios public service exam but believes this is a negative outcome, as the exam lacked clarity and fairness.
• 😀 Lucas has been working as an INSS technician for over 8 years and shares free resources on his channel to help others prepare for public service exams.
• 😀 Lucas initially calculated that he would score at least 54 points on the Correios exam, and in the end, he scored 57 points, which was good but not perfect.
• 😀 The IBFC, the organization behind the exam, failed to explain that some candidates were tied for the same score, leading to confusion regarding who was actually eligible for the available positions.
• 😀 Lucas explains the term 'habilitado' (enabled) was used in a way that caused misunderstandings, as it does not necessarily mean the candidate is within the available spots.
• 😀 The IBFC’s exam results created confusion, with multiple candidates sharing the same rank (e.g., 13th position), but not clarifying if they were truly within the number of available positions.
• 😀 Lucas criticizes the IBFC for not properly applying tie-breaker rules stated in the official guidelines, leading to an inaccurate and unclear result publication.
• 😀 Lucas highlights how the exam was generally too easy, especially for a public service exam of such scale, suggesting the IBFC did not challenge the more prepared candidates adequately.
• 😀 The speaker claims that the easier questions did not help differentiate well-prepared candidates from less prepared ones, which ultimately led to odd situations, such as people scoring highly but not securing a position.
• 😀 Lucas points out a bizarre case where candidates who scored 95% of the exam (57 points) did not get a position, further illustrating the flaws in the exam’s structure and its inability to properly assess qualifications.

Q & A

Why does the speaker consider passing the Correios exam as a bad thing?

The speaker views passing the Correios exam negatively because, despite passing, the process was flawed, leading to confusion and the perception that many candidates were misinformed about their positions due to a lack of transparency and clarity in the results.

What issue did the speaker find with the IBFC's handling of the results?

The speaker criticized the IBFC for publishing unclear results, especially by listing candidates with the same score in the same ranking without considering tie-breaking rules, causing confusion among applicants about their actual status in the competition.

What is the significance of being listed as 'habilitado' in the result, according to the speaker?

The term 'habilitado' typically means that a candidate has not been eliminated from the exam and has passed the minimum score, but it does not necessarily mean they are within the available positions, which was misleading in the results.

How does the speaker feel about the IBFC's experience with large-scale exams?

The speaker believes that IBFC was unprepared for handling such a large-scale exam, as it lacked experience with high-profile, high-volume competitions, as shown by their mismanagement of the Correios exam.

What was the issue with the classification system used by the IBFC?

The classification system was flawed because it listed many candidates in the same position without explaining the tie-breaking rules. This created confusion, with candidates believing they were within the available positions when they were actually not.

What did the speaker think about the level of difficulty of the IBFC exam?

The speaker found the IBFC exam to be surprisingly easy, with many questions considered too basic, failing to properly distinguish between well-prepared candidates and those who were less prepared.

How does the speaker describe the impact of an easy exam on the competition?

The speaker argues that an easy exam with little difficulty does not adequately filter out less-prepared candidates, resulting in situations where highly qualified candidates are not necessarily given priority.

What problem arose due to the lack of difficulty in the exam questions?

Because the exam questions were too easy, candidates with minimal preparation were able to perform well, while more prepared candidates were not distinguished, leading to an unfair and ineffective selection process.

What was the result for candidates like Brenda who were initially excited about their results?

Brenda, who scored well in the exam, initially thought she had passed due to being listed as 'habilitado,' but later discovered she was not within the available positions after tie-breaking rules were applied.

What is the speaker's overall opinion of the IBFC's performance in the Correios exam?

The speaker believes that the IBFC's handling of the Correios exam was unprofessional and poorly executed, leading to confusion, frustration, and a failure to properly assess candidates based on their qualifications.