GEGER‼️DR LITA GADING UNGKAP LESTI BILLAR SEWA BUZZER BAYARAN?pansos,gosip,artiw,setingan,leslar

Summary

In this passionate and critical statement, the speaker addresses the ongoing issues surrounding public figures Lesti and Billar, specifically focusing on accusations of domestic violence. The speaker calls out the involvement of paid supporters (buzzers) and highlights the contradictions in their actions. The speaker emphasizes the importance of honesty, responsibility, and the impact of their actions on the public. There is a strong condemnation of Billar's behavior and a call for transparency, urging them to face the consequences of their actions instead of creating distractions or deflecting blame.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker warns about the involvement of paid online influencers (buzzers) in defending Lesti and Billar, suggesting that their actions are driven by financial compensation.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes people who support Lesti and Billar, accusing them of being misled or paid to do so, while emphasizing the wrongness of domestic violence.
• 😀 The speaker expresses frustration with Lesti and Billar's handling of the domestic violence issue, claiming that Lesti's actions undermine the seriousness of the case.
• 😀 The speaker highlights the public attention the case has attracted, noting the broader consequences of the domestic violence issue being overshadowed by public drama.
• 😀 The speaker claims that Lesti's decision to retract her police report and dismiss the domestic violence case could lead to a lack of accountability for Billar.
• 😀 The speaker accuses Lesti of not caring about the public’s concerns and using emotional reasons, including her child, to justify retracting the report.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes Lesti for using her child as an excuse, suggesting that it is a shield to avoid facing the consequences of her actions.
• 😀 The speaker stresses the importance of public figures maintaining moral integrity and not exposing personal family issues in a way that damages their own and others' reputations.
• 😀 The speaker demands that Lesti and Billar, as public figures, be held accountable for their actions and stop playing with public perception for personal gain.
• 😀 The speaker expresses concern that misstatements or distortions of the truth by Lesti's family or Billar’s camp may negatively impact their reputations and lead to further conflicts.

Q & A

What is the main topic of the transcript?

The transcript primarily discusses a domestic violence case involving public figures Lesti and Billar, with the speaker criticizing the way the case is being handled, especially the involvement of 'buzzers' and media manipulation.

What does the speaker think about the use of buzzers in the case?

The speaker believes that buzzers are being paid to defend Lesti and Billar, and they criticize the followers who blindly support them, emphasizing that domestic violence should not be trivialized or defended.

What is the speaker’s view on Lesti's handling of the situation?

The speaker feels that Lesti has mishandled the situation by retracting her report of domestic violence and giving in to emotional pressures. They argue that she should have maintained her stance for the sake of justice and her role as a public figure.

What role does the speaker believe public figures like Lesti should play in such cases?

The speaker believes that public figures like Lesti should act as role models and take responsibility for their actions. They argue that Lesti's public withdrawal of the report undermines the seriousness of domestic violence cases and sends a negative message.

How does the speaker describe the impact of Lesti and Billar's case on the public?

The speaker states that the case has caused a significant public disturbance, overshadowing other important issues, and believes that Lesti’s actions have led to a loss of trust and sympathy from the public.

What is the speaker's opinion on Lesti’s justification for withdrawing her report to the police?

The speaker criticizes Lesti for using her child as an excuse to retract the report, arguing that it is not a valid reason and that she is avoiding the consequences of her actions due to fear or embarrassment.

What does the speaker think about Billar's public statements and his behavior during the situation?

The speaker is critical of Billar's public statements, suggesting that he has made contradictory claims about the events and has attempted to avoid responsibility by blaming stress and pressure. They urge him to face the consequences rather than make excuses.

How does the speaker view the media’s role in this case?

The speaker accuses the media of sensationalizing the case and being complicit in spreading misinformation. They argue that the media should not be manipulated by public figures or their supporters to distract from the truth.

What is the speaker’s stance on the involvement of Lesti’s family in the situation?

The speaker is cautious about the involvement of Lesti’s family, particularly regarding conflicting statements. They warn against spreading false information or using family members to manipulate public opinion.

What does the speaker mean by 'acting with integrity' in the context of public figures?

The speaker emphasizes that public figures should act with honesty and integrity, particularly when handling serious matters like domestic violence. They criticize Lesti and Billar for not taking full responsibility for their actions and misleading the public.