Nestle Strategic Marketing Failure | Crisis | Business Ethics | MBA case study example with solution

5 Minutes Learning
3 Dec 202210:29

Summary

TLDRThis video script addresses the historical and ongoing controversy surrounding infant formula marketing in developing countries. It highlights how incorrect use of formula can increase infant mortality and the role of multinational corporations in promoting formula over breastfeeding. The script discusses the creation of the World Health Organization's marketing guidelines, the challenges of enforcing these guidelines, and Nestle's controversial marketing practices. It concludes with the importance of effective regulation and the need for multinational corporations to prioritize infant safety over profits.

Takeaways

  • 🌐 The script discusses the global impact of infant formula marketing and its consequences, particularly in developing countries.
  • 🍼 Historically, breastfeeding has been the norm, but the introduction of infant formula has changed feeding practices, especially with aggressive marketing by multinational corporations.
  • 📉 Incorrect use of infant formula has been linked to increased infant mortality and morbidity rates in developing countries due to factors like poverty, unsanitary conditions, and illiteracy.
  • 🏥 Hospitals have played a role in promoting formula feeding by separating mothers and infants at birth and providing free formula samples, which can lead to a preference for bottle feeding over breastfeeding.
  • 💼 Multinational corporations (MNCs) have been criticized for their marketing strategies that encourage the use of breast milk substitutes, often at the expense of breastfeeding.
  • 📜 The World Health Organization (WHO) developed marketing guidelines for breast milk substitutes to address the issue, but their effectiveness has been limited due to controversy and lack of enforcement.
  • 🚫 Nestlé, a major player in the infant formula industry, faced an international boycott due to its marketing practices, which were seen as irresponsible and harmful.
  • 🔄 In response to criticism, Nestlé made changes such as stopping mass media advertising of infant formula and working with UNICEF to develop educational materials and labels.
  • 🏛️ The WHO code is not legally enforceable, relying on individual countries to adopt and implement it, which has been a challenge in ensuring its effectiveness.
  • 🌱 The script highlights the need for third-world governments to take a strong stance against MNCs to protect the health of infants and promote breastfeeding as the optimal feeding method.

Q & A

  • What is the main issue discussed in the video script?

    -The main issue discussed is the controversy surrounding the marketing and use of infant formula in developing countries, which has led to increased infant mortality and morbidity rates due to improper use.

  • Why did formula feeding begin to spread in third-world countries?

    -Formula feeding spread in third-world countries due to promotional campaigns by multinational corporations, which made it more difficult to control the use of potentially dangerous infant formula.

  • What role did the World Health Organization play in addressing the infant formula issue?

    -The World Health Organization created the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes to regulate the marketing of infant formula and protect breastfeeding practices.

  • What are the key problems with the WHO code mentioned in the script?

    -The key problems with the WHO code are its lack of legal enforceability and ambiguity in its provisions, which has led to disagreements and controversies over its implementation.

  • How did Nestle's marketing practices contribute to the controversy?

    -Nestle's marketing practices, including mass advertising and free samples, were seen as promoting infant formula over breastfeeding, leading to health risks for babies in developing countries.

  • What was the international response to Nestle's marketing practices?

    -An international boycott of Nestle was initiated in 1977 by consumer groups, urging people to boycott Nestle products until the company stopped promoting infant formula.

  • What steps did Nestle take to address the controversy?

    -Nestle agreed to work with UNICEF, limit gifts for health workers, and make supplies free or low cost for mothers who needed to bottle feed. They also promised to include statements declaring the superiority of breastfeeding with their products.

  • What was the outcome of the Nestle boycott?

    -The seven-year boycott against Nestle officially ended in 1984 with Nestle and NGOs declaring a truce after clarification conferences, leading to Nestle committing to not engage in certain marketing practices and to support educational materials for breastfeeding.

  • Why is it important for third-world governments to enforce an effective code regarding infant formula?

    -Enforcing an effective code is crucial for third-world governments to ensure the safety of infants and to promote breastfeeding, which is vital for the health and development of babies.

  • What is the underlying message of the video script regarding product safety and multinational corporations?

    -The underlying message is that product safety is context-dependent and that multinational corporations must be held accountable for their marketing practices, especially in developing countries where the consequences can be severe.

Outlines

00:00

👶 The Controversy of Infant Formula Marketing

This paragraph discusses the historical shift from breastfeeding to formula feeding, which began with the advent of modern technology. It highlights the dangers of incorrect formula feeding in developing countries, leading to increased infant mortality and morbidity. The paragraph emphasizes the role of multinational corporations (MNCs) in promoting infant formula through aggressive marketing campaigns, which have been criticized for making it difficult for mothers to breastfeed. The World Health Organization's code of marketing guidelines for breast milk substitutes was introduced to address these issues, but its effectiveness is limited due to controversies and ambiguous provisions. The paragraph also details the marketing strategies of MNCs, such as donating free formula to hospitals and promoting it through healthcare staff, which have contributed to a preference for formula over breast milk.

05:01

🌐 Nestle's Response to Infant Formula Controversy

The second paragraph delves into Nestle's specific role in the infant formula controversy, focusing on the company's initial denial of marketing malpractice and the subsequent international boycott that led to significant financial losses. It outlines the steps taken by Nestle to address the concerns, including participating in the development of the World Health Organization's regulatory code, redesigning formula labels, and forming the Nestle Infant Formula Commission. The paragraph also discusses the company's efforts to work with UNICEF on educational materials and labels, and its agreement to limit gifts for health workers. Despite these steps, the controversy persisted, leading to Nestle's promise in 1984 to provide supplies free or at low cost only to mothers who needed to bottle feed. The paragraph concludes with the end of the boycott against Nestle in 1984, following a series of clarification conferences and agreements with NGOs.

10:02

📢 Call to Action for Safe Infant Feeding Practices

The final paragraph serves as a call to action, urging viewers to subscribe to the YouTube channel for updates on case study videos. It emphasizes the importance of breastfeeding for the health of third-world babies and the need for effective enforcement of marketing codes to combat the dangers of improper infant formula use. The paragraph concludes with a reminder of the responsibility of third-world governments to take a stand against MNCs that do not follow the rules, ensuring that product safety is upheld and that the social and economic development of their nations is not hindered by preventable health issues related to infant feeding.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Breastfeeding

Breastfeeding is the natural method of feeding infants with milk produced by the mother's body. It is a traditional practice that has been carried out for centuries. In the context of the video, breastfeeding is contrasted with formula feeding, emphasizing its importance and the risks associated with the latter, especially in developing countries where improper use of infant formula can lead to increased infant mortality and morbidity.

💡Infant Formula

Infant formula is a manufactured product designed to substitute for breast milk when breastfeeding is not possible. The video discusses how the use of infant formula has been promoted by multinational corporations, leading to its widespread adoption even in situations where it may not be safe or appropriate. The script highlights the dangers of formula feeding when not used correctly, particularly in developing countries with poor sanitation and lack of education on proper use.

💡Multinational Corporations (MNCs)

Multinational corporations are large companies that operate in multiple countries. In the video, MNCs are criticized for their aggressive marketing of infant formula in developing nations, which has contributed to a decline in breastfeeding rates and an increase in health risks for infants. The script specifically mentions Nestlé, a major player in the infant formula industry, and its controversial marketing practices.

💡World Health Organization (WHO)

The World Health Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations responsible for international public health. The video discusses the WHO's role in addressing the issue of inappropriate marketing of infant formula. It mentions the creation of the WHO code of breast milk substitute marketing guidelines, which aimed to regulate the promotion and sale of infant formula to protect the health of infants in developing countries.

💡Marketing Strategies

Marketing strategies refer to the methods used by companies to promote their products. The video describes how MNCs have employed various marketing strategies to encourage the use of infant formula over breastfeeding. These include advertising, providing free samples, and influencing healthcare professionals to recommend formula. The script criticizes these strategies for potentially misleading mothers and healthcare providers about the safety and necessity of formula feeding.

💡Infant Mortality

Infant mortality refers to the death of infants before their first birthday. The video connects the improper use of infant formula to increased infant mortality rates in developing countries. It emphasizes the importance of proper education and regulation to ensure that infant formula is used safely and does not contribute to unnecessary infant deaths.

💡Code of Breast Milk Substitute Marketing

The Code of Breast Milk Substitute Marketing is a set of guidelines established by the WHO to regulate the promotion and sale of breast milk substitutes, such as infant formula. The video discusses the creation of this code in response to concerns about the marketing practices of MNCs and the negative health impacts on infants in developing countries. However, the script also points out the limitations of the code due to its non-binding nature and ambiguities within it.

💡Nestlé Infant Formula Commission (NIFAC)

NIFAC was a commission formed by Nestlé in response to the controversy surrounding its marketing practices. The video mentions that Nestlé used NIFAC to redesign infant formula labels, eliminate old marketing materials, and release reports to reassure the public about its compliance with the WHO code. However, critics viewed NIFAC as a public relations tool rather than an objective body, questioning its independence due to its funding by Nestlé.

💡Boycott

A boycott is an act of protest in which individuals or groups refuse to buy or use a product to express disapproval or to achieve a specific goal. The video recounts how an international boycott against Nestlé was initiated in 1977 due to its marketing practices. The boycott pressured Nestlé to change its approach and eventually led to a truce and agreement with NGOs in 1984.

💡Third World

The term 'Third World' historically referred to countries that were neither aligned with NATO nor the Warsaw Pact during the Cold War, often characterized by their economic and political challenges. In the video, 'Third World' is used to describe countries where the marketing of infant formula has had particularly detrimental effects due to factors like poverty, unsanitary conditions, and illiteracy, leading to high rates of infant mortality related to improper formula use.

Highlights

Learning organizational strategies through case studies

Breastfeeding has been the norm throughout history

Introduction of infant formula in the 20th century

Formula feeding increases infant mortality if used incorrectly

Multinational corporations' promotional campaigns complicate control of infant formula

Infant formula industry resists control over its promotion

World Health Organization code created to regulate breast milk substitute marketing

Controversy over ambiguous provisions in the WHO code

Infant formula MNCs use marketing to tempt mothers away from breastfeeding

Hospitals encourage bottle feeding over breastfeeding

Free samples can cause babies to become dependent on formula

Marketing techniques influence healthcare systems to support formula feeding

Nestle's controversial promotional practices in developing nations

UN awareness of infant formula advertising problems

WHO urged member nations to introduce restrictive advertising codes

International boycott of Nestle initiated in 1977

Nestle's announcement to stop mass media advertising of infant formula

Adoption of the WHO code by the 34th World Health Assembly in 1981

The WHO code is only a recommendation and not legally enforceable

Nestle's compliance with the code and redesign of infant formula labels

Criticism of Nestle's infant formula commission as a PR tool

Nestle's agreement with UNICEF to develop educational materials

End of the Nestle boycott in 1984 after clarification conferences

Misuse of infant formula has led to the death of millions of babies

The importance of third-world governments taking a stand against MNCs

Encouraging breastfeeding for the best chance of infant health

Transcripts

play00:00

have you ever thought there's got to be

play00:02

a better and simple way to learn

play00:03

organizational strategies five minutes

play00:06

learning has a global and diverse

play00:09

collection of case studies to help

play00:11

management students

play00:12

click the Subscribe button and hit the

play00:15

Bell icon to stay updated with our

play00:17

upcoming and interesting case studies

play00:24

throughout history women have

play00:26

successfully breastfed their children it

play00:29

has only been a century since modern

play00:31

technology enabled women to feed

play00:33

manufactured infant formula to their

play00:36

babies

play00:37

formula feeding began in developed

play00:39

countries and quickly spread to the

play00:41

third world

play00:42

when formula feeding is used incorrectly

play00:45

it directly increases infant mortality

play00:48

and morbidity rates in developing

play00:50

countries

play00:51

through promotional campaigns

play00:53

multinational corporations have made it

play00:56

more difficult to control the use of

play00:58

this potentially dangerous product

play01:00

the infant formula industry which makes

play01:03

healthy profits in the third world has

play01:06

resisted outside attempts to control the

play01:08

promotion of its product

play01:10

the problem of infant formula was

play01:12

brought to light by concerned citizens

play01:14

in the third world

play01:16

as a result the World Health

play01:18

Organization code of breast milk

play01:20

substitute marketing guidelines was

play01:22

created

play01:23

the effectiveness of this code is

play01:26

severely limited by controversy over

play01:28

ambiguous provisions

play01:30

this disagreement has not been settled

play01:33

as long as such legislation does not

play01:35

exist the consequences of product misuse

play01:38

will continue to plague developing

play01:40

countries

play01:47

infant formula mncs spend their money on

play01:51

marketing and advertising strategies

play01:53

that tempt mothers away from

play01:54

breastfeeding and toward breast milk

play01:56

substitutes

play01:57

these strategies encourage lactating

play02:00

mothers to use formula instead of breast

play02:02

milk during her Hospital stay the

play02:05

medical staff recommends formula feeding

play02:08

for the mother

play02:09

in addition manufacturers sell infant

play02:12

formula by donating free supplies to

play02:15

hospitals which encourages mothers to

play02:17

choose bottle feeding over breastfeeding

play02:20

many hospitals routinely separate mother

play02:22

and child at Birth and administer

play02:24

newborn formula which manufactures

play02:27

supply to the institution at no or low

play02:30

cost

play02:31

from the initial feeding the infant and

play02:33

mother are introduced to the bottle

play02:36

as a result the hospital creates the

play02:38

illusion that doctors prefer formula and

play02:41

that milk substitutes are necessary to

play02:43

maintain healthy infants

play02:45

offering free samples as not only

play02:48

psychologically effective for the mother

play02:50

but it can also cause the baby to become

play02:52

physiologically dependent on formula

play02:55

furthermore marketing techniques aimed

play02:58

at gaining the confidence and support of

play03:00

Health Care Systems have led doctors in

play03:03

the third world to support this shift

play03:05

away from breastfeeding

play03:06

formula must be carefully marketed in

play03:09

developing countries due to the many

play03:11

dangers involved

play03:13

it'll make sure moms are aware of the

play03:15

dangers of using it and can make

play03:17

informed decisions

play03:23

in the past years Nestle's promotional

play03:26

practices have been problematic Nestle's

play03:29

Mass advertising campaigns to Market

play03:31

formulas in developing nations sparked

play03:34

controversy in 1968.

play03:37

through billboard ads and pictorials

play03:39

Nestle made people think infant formula

play03:42

was safe and easy to use in the third

play03:44

world

play03:45

the United Nations became aware of the

play03:48

problem with infant formula advertising

play03:50

in 1970.

play03:52

the UN protein calorie Advisory Group

play03:55

warned that poverty unsanitary

play03:58

conditions and illiteracy could lead to

play04:00

the misuse of infant formula

play04:02

the pag recommended careful regulation

play04:05

and supervision of the marketing and use

play04:07

of breast milk substitutes

play04:10

until 1974 infant formula marketing

play04:13

remained and regulated despite a clear

play04:16

link between misleading formula

play04:18

promotions and infant mortality

play04:21

Additionally the who

play04:23

urged member nations to review infant

play04:25

formula marketing and introduce

play04:27

restrictive advertising codes

play04:30

while Nestle denied any marketing

play04:32

malpractice the industry was worried an

play04:35

international boycott of nestle was

play04:37

initiated in 1977 after Nestle's

play04:41

marketing practices were repeatedly

play04:43

ignored by Active consumer groups

play04:45

they urged people everywhere to boycott

play04:48

Nestle products until the company

play04:50

stopped promoting infant formula it

play04:53

includes all direct advertising to

play04:55

Consumers free samples milk nurses and

play04:58

health workers promoting the product

play05:01

Nestle announced in 1978 that it was

play05:04

planning to stop advertising infant

play05:06

formula in the mass media

play05:09

as a means of resolving the conflict

play05:11

industry Representatives requested a

play05:14

World Health Organization meeting

play05:21

in collaboration with the United Nations

play05:23

Children's Fund and who the UN organized

play05:27

and sponsored an international Forum on

play05:30

infant health and breast milk

play05:31

substitutes

play05:33

to control the inappropriate marketing

play05:35

practices of infant formula suppliers a

play05:38

regulatory code was needed

play05:40

after rejecting four drafts the World

play05:43

Health assembly considered the final

play05:45

version

play05:46

it was adapted as a recommendation by

play05:49

the 34th World Health assembly on May 21

play05:52

1981.

play05:54

there's one big problem with the who

play05:56

code it's only a recommendation

play05:59

it's not legally enforceable or binding

play06:02

due to the fact that wha recommendations

play06:05

don't have any legal Force without

play06:07

ratification by individual countries

play06:10

affected governments have been urged to

play06:12

implement legislation adopting the

play06:15

international code

play06:16

another problem with the code as its

play06:19

inherent ambiguity in addition the code

play06:22

allowed free supplies to be given to

play06:24

institutions and whether hospitals were

play06:27

considered institutions became a

play06:29

controversy

play06:30

as a result of these discrepancies the

play06:33

wha launched an international effort to

play06:36

clarify these terms

play06:42

according to Nestle since the code was a

play06:45

recommendation for governments the

play06:48

industry wasn't obligated to enforce it

play06:51

in spite of that Nestle promised to

play06:53

support the objectives of the code while

play06:56

doing its part to interpret its

play06:58

ambiguous terms

play06:59

Nestle says the code shouldn't restrict

play07:02

specific industry behavior in response

play07:05

to alleged marketing violations in the

play07:07

third world Nestle formed the Nestle

play07:10

infant formula Commission

play07:12

in compliance with the code Nestle

play07:14

redesigned infant formula labels and got

play07:17

rid of old marketing materials

play07:19

Nestle released reports reassuring the

play07:22

public that its code specs were followed

play07:25

since nifac relies completely on Nestle

play07:29

for funding critics questioned the

play07:31

commission's objectivity despite the

play07:33

chair's assurances

play07:35

rather than reveal the company's flaws

play07:37

the public saw the commission as a

play07:39

public relations tool

play07:46

the boycott cost Nestle a lot of money

play07:49

and forced the company to take firmer

play07:51

steps towards resolving the issues

play07:54

the company agreed to work with UNICEF

play07:56

to develop and test upcoming educational

play07:58

materials and labels that incorporate

play08:01

the code

play08:02

in addition it agreed to limit gifts for

play08:05

health workers to inexpensive utility

play08:07

items

play08:08

Nestle couldn't resolve the controversy

play08:11

over article despite their best efforts

play08:14

Nestle finally promised in 1984 that it

play08:18

would make supplies free or low cost

play08:20

only for those mothers who needed to

play08:22

bottle feed their babies

play08:24

Nestle would use its own definition of

play08:26

need until who or UNICEF clarified it

play08:31

the seven-year boycott against Nestle

play08:33

officially ended in 1984 with Nestle and

play08:37

the ngos declaring a truce after the

play08:39

Nestle and UNICEF clarification

play08:41

conferences

play08:43

Nestle specifically said the company

play08:45

would not engage in advertising or give

play08:48

free samples to mothers

play08:50

Nestle assured the ngos that it would

play08:53

include statements with its products

play08:55

declaring the superiority of

play08:56

breastfeeding

play08:58

finally Nestle promised to make

play09:00

educational materials for doctors to use

play09:03

with patients

play09:04

although all parties hailed this

play09:06

agreement as a success ngos and who

play09:10

Representatives continued to disagree

play09:12

with Nestle

play09:18

the misuse of infant formula in

play09:20

developing countries has led to the

play09:22

death of millions of babies and slowed

play09:25

down their social and economic

play09:26

development

play09:27

using infant formula improperly as a

play09:30

human-made problem because modern infant

play09:33

feeding Innovations have been pushed too

play09:35

quickly onto Nations that aren't ready

play09:38

despite more than 20 years of

play09:40

controversy the infant formula problem

play09:42

reminds industrialized nations that

play09:45

product safety depends directly on where

play09:47

the product is used

play09:49

to combat the dangers inherent in this

play09:52

product third world governments need to

play09:54

take an effective stand against mncs

play09:57

if multinationals don't follow the rules

play10:00

they'll be threatened with serious

play10:02

penalties

play10:03

by enforcing an effective code third

play10:06

world babies will have the best chance

play10:08

of being breastfed

play10:10

thank you so much for listening to this

play10:12

video do not forget to subscribe this

play10:14

YouTube channel for receiving updates

play10:16

about my upcoming case study videos

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
Infant FormulaBreastfeedingMarketing EthicsHealth ImpactDeveloping NationsNestle ControversyWHO GuidelinesPublic HealthMother and ChildCase Study
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?