This Will Kill PvP Participation In The War Within If Not Fixed

Venruki

20 Sept 202408:17

Summary

TLDRIn the video, the speaker expresses concern over the MMR (Matchmaking Rating) system in Solo Shuffle mode of a game, noting that despite high player activity, the highest rated player is only 2200. They contrast this with Blitz mode, where over 200 players are rated 2400 Plus, and the highest is 2900. The speaker suggests that the MMR system may be stifling progress in Solo Shuffle, making it difficult for players to gain rewards and reach higher ratings, even for top players. They also mention that while Solo Shuffle is still popular, there seems to be a cap on MMR gains, which could be discouraging players and potentially pushing them towards Blitz mode for easier rewards.

Takeaways

😕 The speaker expresses concern over the MMR system in Solo Shuffle mode, feeling it's not rewarding players adequately.
📉 The highest-rated player in Solo Shuffle globally is at 2200 MMR, which is significantly lower compared to Blitz mode where the highest is 2900.
🔍 A comparison is made between the number of players in high MMR brackets in Blitz versus Solo Shuffle, with Blitz having almost 200 players over 2400 MMR.
🎮 Despite having fewer players per game, Solo Shuffle is still popular with 37,000 rounds played in the last 24 hours compared to 1,600 Blitz games.
🤔 The speaker questions whether the activity level is affecting MMR gains, but data suggests Solo Shuffle is still being played frequently.
🏆 The rewards system is criticized for not providing enough incentive to play Solo Shuffle, as the highest player isn't even Elite.
📊 Data is presented to show a potential MMR cap in Solo Shuffle, with a large number of players stuck in the mid-range MMR brackets.
😟 The speaker feels frustrated that the path of least resistance for gaining rewards is to play Blitz, which they don't have a problem with but believe shouldn't be the only viable mode.
👥 There's a mention of top players like Mir and Avid Dan playing together in Blitz and achieving high MMRs, indicating the mode's competitiveness.
🤝 The community, including the speaker, is calling for changes to the MMR system to make Solo Shuffle more rewarding and balanced.

Q & A

What is the speaker's main concern regarding Solo Shuffle MMR?
-The speaker is concerned that the Solo Shuffle MMR is being stifled, with the highest rated player in the world only at 2200, indicating a potential issue with the rating system not allowing players to gain higher ratings.
How does the speaker compare Solo Shuffle to Battleground Blitz in terms of player ratings?
-The speaker compares Solo Shuffle unfavorably to Battleground Blitz, noting that while there are almost 200 players rated 2400 Plus in Blitz, the highest rated player in Solo Shuffle is only 2200.
What evidence does the speaker provide to show that Solo Shuffle is still popular?
-The speaker provides evidence of Solo Shuffle's popularity by showing that in the last 24 hours, there were 37,000 Shuffle rounds played and about 6,200 lobbies, which is significantly more than the 1,600 Blitz games played in the same period.
Why does the speaker believe that the MMR system for Solo Shuffle might be flawed?
-The speaker believes the MMR system for Solo Shuffle might be flawed because even the best player in the game is not Elite, and there seems to be a cap on MMR gains, as evidenced by the similar number of players in the mid-range ratings but a sharp drop in players as ratings get higher.
What is the speaker's opinion on the rewards system in relation to MMR?
-The speaker suggests that the rewards system is tied to MMR, and if players can't gain rating, they can't get rewards, which might be a disincentive for playing Solo Shuffle.
What does the speaker think about the activity levels in Solo Shuffle compared to Battleground Blitz?
-The speaker thinks that Solo Shuffle is still extremely popular despite having fewer players per game, and the activity levels in the last 24 hours show that there are more Solo Shuffle lobbies than Blitz games.
What is the highest MMR recorded in Battleground Blitz according to the speaker?
-The highest MMR recorded in Battleground Blitz is 2900, as seen with the player Mir.
What does the speaker suggest might be the reason for the disparity in MMR between Solo Shuffle and Battleground Blitz?
-The speaker suggests that there might be an MMR cap in Solo Shuffle that is not present in Battleground Blitz, making it harder to gain ratings in Solo Shuffle.
What is the speaker's suggestion for improving the Solo Shuffle MMR situation?
-The speaker suggests that the rating system should allow players to gain similar ratings in both game modes and that there should be an incentive for players to play Solo Shuffle, such as the ability to push for higher ratings and rewards.
What does the speaker think about the current state of the gearing and rating systems in the game?
-The speaker thinks that the gearing system is good, but the rating system is still bad, and it creates a problem where players might prefer to play Blitz because it's easier to gain rewards.

Outlines

00:00

🎮 Concerns Over Solo Shuffle MMR Stifling

The speaker expresses their reluctance to discuss a topic they find unenjoyable, which is the perceived stifling of the Solo Shuffle MMR in a game. They mention that the highest-rated player is only 2200, indicating a lack of high MMR players, and compare this to the 200+ players rated 2400 or above in Blitz mode. The speaker highlights that rewards are tied to ratings and if players can't gain ratings, they can't earn rewards. They refute the idea that the issue is due to a lack of activity, showing that Solo Shuffle is still popular with 37,000 rounds played in the last 24 hours compared to 1,600 Blitz games. The speaker emphasizes that even the best players in Solo Shuffle are not reaching Elite status, suggesting that there might be an MMR cap or some form of sabotage affecting the rating system.

05:01

📊 Analysis of MMR and Player Incentives

Continuing the discussion on MMR, the speaker provides a detailed analysis of player ratings in Europe, noting that there are 95 players over 2400 in Blitz but a significant drop in higher ratings for Solo Shuffle. They point out that there are 678 players who have achieved a rating of 1950 in Blitz, which grants a weapon enchant, while in Solo Shuffle, the number of players in the mid-range of 1900 is similar, but there's a noticeable cap for ratings above 2200. The speaker suggests that this indicates a possible MMR cap in Solo Shuffle. They argue that the rating system should allow players to gain similar ratings in both game modes and that the current system creates an incentive to only play Blitz, which is perceived as easier for gaining rewards. The speaker concludes by expressing their enjoyment of the game and the gearing system but criticizes the rating system, hoping for improvements.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡MMR

MMR, or Matchmaking Rating, is a numerical value used in competitive gaming to rank players based on their skill level. In the context of the video, the speaker is concerned about the MMR system for 'Solo Shuffle' being stifled, meaning it's not allowing players to progress or gain rating as they should. The speaker points out that the highest-rated player in Solo Shuffle is only 2200, which is significantly lower compared to other game modes like Blitz, where players can reach much higher ratings.

💡Solo Shuffle

Solo Shuffle is a game mode where players compete individually in a randomized team composition. The speaker mentions that despite being a popular mode, as evidenced by the number of games played, it seems to have a cap on MMR gains, which is a point of contention. The video discusses how this mode is being overshadowed by other modes like Blitz in terms of rewards and player progression.

💡Blitz

Battleground Blitz is another game mode discussed in the video. The speaker contrasts it with Solo Shuffle, noting that Blitz has a higher MMR and more players achieving higher ratings. This mode is seen as having an easier path to rewards, which might be discouraging players from playing Solo Shuffle.

💡Rating Cap

A rating cap refers to an artificial limit on how high a player's MMR can go in a particular game mode. The speaker suspects that Solo Shuffle has a rating cap, as evidenced by the lack of players in the higher rating brackets compared to Blitz. This cap is seen as a barrier to progression and rewards for players who enjoy Solo Shuffle.

💡Rewards

In the context of the video, rewards refer to the in-game items or achievements that players can earn by increasing their MMR. The speaker argues that the MMR system in Solo Shuffle is not providing adequate rewards, which could be demotivating players. The video suggests that the reward system is skewed towards Blitz, making it more attractive to players.

💡Activity

Activity in this context refers to the number of games played within a certain time frame. The speaker uses activity data to argue that Solo Shuffle is still popular, with a significant number of games played in the last 24 hours. This counters the idea that the lower MMR in Solo Shuffle is due to a lack of players.

💡Gladiator

Gladiator is a high-ranking title in competitive gaming, often given to top players. The speaker mentions that even at lower MMR levels in Solo Shuffle, players are facing opponents who are Gladiators, suggesting that the competition is intense and the MMR gains are difficult.

💡Elite

Elite is a status in the game that signifies a high level of achievement. The speaker points out that even the best player in Solo Shuffle is not Elite, which is a stark contrast to other modes where many players have reached Elite status. This highlights the disparity in the MMR system between different game modes.

💡Path of Least Resistance

This phrase refers to the tendency to choose the easiest or most convenient option. The speaker uses it to suggest that players might be gravitating towards Blitz because it's easier to gain MMR and rewards, rather than because they prefer the mode itself.

💡Capping Brackets

Capping brackets means to limit the number of players who can achieve a certain rank or rating. The speaker speculates that this might be happening in Solo Shuffle, where players are unable to push past a certain MMR, even if they are highly skilled.

Highlights

The speaker expresses concern over solo Shuffle MMR being stifled, with the highest rated player at 2200.

Contrasts the solo Shuffle MMR with Blitz, where almost 200 players are 2400 Plus and the highest is 2900.

Emphasizes that rating equals rewards, and if players can't gain rating, they can't get rewards.

Dispels the notion that the issue is due to activity levels, showing 37,000 Shuffle rounds played in the last 24 hours.

Points out that Solo Shuffle is still extremely popular, with about 6,200 lobbies in the last 24 hours.

Compares the activity in Battleground Blitz with 1,600 games in the last 24 hours, less than a third of Solo Shuffle.

Argues that the MMR gains should not be affected by the number of players per game mode.

Mentions that the highest rated Battleground Blitz player in North America is 2700 MMR.

Notes the highest rated player in Europe for Battleground Blitz is 2900 MMR.

Observes that top players are playing in lower rated Solo Shuffle lobbies, suggesting a lack of incentive.

Raises the question of whether rewards are an incentive for players to push their rating.

States that even the best player in Solo Shuffle is not Elite, highlighting a potential MMR cap.

Suggests that there might be an MMR cap in Solo Shuffle, as evidenced by the leaderboard distribution.

Expresses a desire for players to be able to play the game mode they prefer and gain similar ratings.

Shares personal enjoyment of the game in various modes but criticizes the rating system.

Endorses the idea that the path of least resistance is to play Blitz due to easier rewards acquisition.

Calls for addressing the issue to ensure a fair rating system across all game modes.

Concludes by expressing frustration with having to discuss the issue but acknowledging its importance.