Por Qué la Democracia es Matemáticamente Imposible

Veritasium en español
14 Sept 202421:56

Summary

TLDRThis video delves into the mathematical impossibility of perfect democracy through voting systems. It critiques the 'first-past-the-post' system, highlighting its historical use and flaws such as not reflecting the majority's choice and causing 'spoiler effects.' The video introduces alternative voting methods like instant runoff voting and points-based systems, which aim to mitigate these issues. It also discusses the paradoxes in voting theory, such as Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and the Condorcet Paradox, and concludes by emphasizing the importance of civic engagement despite the imperfections in democratic processes.

Takeaways

  • 🗳️ The script discusses the mathematical improbability of democracy, focusing on the irrationality of methods used to elect leaders.
  • 🏛️ It explains the 'First Past the Post' voting system, which is used in 44 countries and originated in 14th-century England.
  • 📊 The script highlights issues with 'First Past the Post', such as the possibility of a party winning a majority of seats without the majority of votes.
  • 🔄 The concept of 'vote splitting' is introduced, where similar parties take votes from each other, leading to the spoiler effect.
  • 📉 The spoiler effect is illustrated by the 2000 US Presidential Election, where Ralph Nader's candidacy impacted the outcome.
  • 🔄 The script introduces alternative voting methods like 'instant runoff voting' or 'ranked-choice voting' to address some of these issues.
  • 🤝 The use of ranked-choice voting is shown to encourage politeness and cooperation among candidates, as seen in the 2013 Minneapolis mayoral election.
  • 🔄 The paradox of voting, where no clear winner emerges despite multiple iterations, is discussed through the lens of Condorcet's method.
  • 🏆 The script touches on the work of mathematicians like Jean-Charles de Borda and Marquis de Condorcet, who contributed to social choice theory.
  • 🏁 Kenneth Arrow's Impossibility Theorem is explained, demonstrating the inherent difficulties in creating a perfectly rational voting system.
  • 🔄 Duncan Black's positive theorem offers a more optimistic view, suggesting that the median voter's preference can reflect the majority's decision in certain conditions.
  • 📊 The script concludes by discussing 'approval voting' as a potentially better system that can increase voter participation and reduce negative campaigning.

Q & A

  • What does the transcript suggest about the possibility of mathematically perfect democracy?

    -The transcript suggests that achieving a mathematically perfect democracy is impossible when using preferential voting methods with three or more candidates, as demonstrated by Arrow's Impossibility Theorem.

  • What is the First Past the Post system and why does it have issues?

    -The First Past the Post system is a voting method where the candidate with the most votes wins. It has issues because it can lead to situations where the majority of a country does not vote for the party that ends up in power, and similar parties can split the vote.

  • What is the spoiler effect in elections?

    -The spoiler effect occurs when a candidate with similar policies to another takes votes away, potentially causing a less preferred candidate to win. This is illustrated by the 2000 US Presidential election where Ralph Nader's candidacy may have influenced the outcome between Al Gore and George W. Bush.

  • What is the Instant Runoff Voting (IRV) and how does it work?

    -Instant Runoff Voting, also known as Ranked-Choice Voting, is a system where voters rank candidates in order of preference. If no candidate has a majority after the first count, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed based on the voters' next preferences, continuing until a candidate has a majority.

  • How does the behavior of candidates change with the use of Ranked-Choice Voting?

    -With Ranked-Choice Voting, candidates are incentivized to be more civil and respectful towards each other to gain second or third preference votes, potentially leading to a more collaborative and less adversarial campaign environment.

  • What is the paradox of voting and how does it relate to the Condorcet method?

    -The paradox of voting, or Condorcet's Paradox, occurs when there is no clear winner in a head-to-head comparison between all candidates, leading to a cycle of preferences where each candidate is preferred by some voters over another in a circular pattern.

  • Who is Condorcet and what contribution did he make to voting theory?

    -Condorcet was a French mathematician and philosopher who applied logic and mathematics to the study of electoral systems. He proposed a voting system where a candidate must win against all others in one-on-one elections, which is now known as the Condorcet method.

  • What is Arrow's Impossibility Theorem and what does it imply for voting systems?

    -Arrow's Impossibility Theorem states that it is impossible to create a preferential voting system that satisfies certain desirable conditions—such as unanimity, independence of irrelevant alternatives, and non-dictatorship—when there are three or more candidates.

  • What is the significance of Black's Median Voter Theorem in the context of voting systems?

    -Black's Median Voter Theorem suggests that in a one-dimensional voting scenario, the preference of the median voter will determine the election outcome, aligning with the majority's preference and avoiding paradoxes like those highlighted by Arrow's Theorem.

  • What is Approval Voting and how does it differ from preferential voting?

    -Approval Voting is a system where voters can vote for as many candidates as they approve of, rather than ranking them. This method can increase voter participation, reduce negative campaigning, and mitigate the spoiler effect, as voters are not limited to expressing a single preference.

  • How does the transcript conclude about the state of democracy and voting systems?

    -The transcript concludes that while democracy and voting systems are not perfect and may be inherently flawed, it is still the best system available. It encourages engagement and political commitment as a means to make a difference in the world.

Outlines

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Mindmap

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Keywords

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Highlights

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora

Transcripts

plate

Esta sección está disponible solo para usuarios con suscripción. Por favor, mejora tu plan para acceder a esta parte.

Mejorar ahora
Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Etiquetas Relacionadas
DemocracyVoting SystemsMathematicsElection MethodsPolitical TheorySocial ChoiceArrow's Impossibility TheoremVoter BehaviorElectoral ReformPolitical Science
¿Necesitas un resumen en inglés?