Relative Risk & Odds Ratios

Christine Rabinak
6 Feb 201708:55

Summary

TLDRThis video introduces the concepts of relative risk and odds ratio, explaining how they are calculated and interpreted in epidemiological studies. It covers the differences between the two measures, their applications in cohort and case-control studies, and the importance of statistical significance. The video also discusses how to construct and use a 2x2 contingency table for these calculations and emphasizes the distinctions between odds and probability. Finally, it highlights the conditions under which each measure should be used and potential pitfalls in their interpretation.

Takeaways

  • 📊 The video introduces the concepts of relative risk and odds ratio, explaining how they are used to compare the occurrence of events between two groups in studies.
  • 🔍 An association is identified when the risk among the exposed is higher than among those not exposed, highlighting the relationship between exposure and outcome.
  • 📈 The interpretation of relative risk or odds ratio involves two components: the point estimate (the actual number) and the statistical significance (p-value and/or confidence interval).
  • 🚬 Relative risk is used for comparing the probability of an event occurring to all possible events, such as the risk of developing lung cancer in those exposed to secondhand smoke.
  • 📝 A 2x2 contingency table is essential for calculating incidence rates and relative risk in cohort studies, providing frequency counts of events for both exposed and unexposed groups.
  • 🔢 The formula for relative risk is the proportion of individuals with the event in the exposed group divided by the proportion in the unexposed group.
  • 📉 A relative risk of one indicates no difference between groups, greater than one suggests a positive association, and less than one indicates a negative association or protective effect.
  • ⚠️ The significance of relative risk is determined by the p-value and confidence interval; if the p-value is ≥ 0.05 or the interval includes 1, the risk is not statistically significant.
  • 🚫 Case-control studies cannot calculate relative risk because they compare cases with the event to controls without the event, making them retrospective and not suitable for incidence or risk calculation.
  • 🎰 Odds ratio is used when relative risk cannot be calculated, such as in case-control studies, and is based on the odds of an event occurring rather than the probability.
  • 🔄 The formula for odds ratio is the cross product of a 2x2 table, dividing the odds of the exposed group by the odds of the unexposed group.
  • 📚 Odds ratios can be calculated for both cohort and case-control studies and are comparable in magnitude to relative risk only when the outcome is rare.
  • 📉 Odds ratios may overestimate risk when the outcome is common, so relative risk should be used if possible, and caution is advised when interpreting odds ratios.
  • 📘 The video concludes by noting that odds ratios are common in medical literature for both study types and are often the result of logistic regression analysis.

Q & A

  • What are the two main statistics used to compare the occurrence of events between two groups in studies?

    -The two main statistics used are relative risk and odds ratio.

  • What is the purpose of calculating relative risk or odds ratio in a study?

    -The purpose is to determine whether an association exists between exposure and outcome and to assess how strong that association is.

  • What is the difference between the point estimate and statistical significance in the context of relative risk or odds ratio?

    -The point estimate is the actual number representing the relative risk or odds ratio, while statistical significance is indicated by the p-value and/or confidence interval, showing the reliability of the point estimate.

  • When is the relative risk used in a study?

    -Relative risk is used when comparing the probability of an event occurring to all possible events considered in a study, typically in cohort studies.

  • How is the relative risk calculated using a 2x2 contingency table?

    -Relative risk is calculated by dividing the proportion of individuals who suffered the event in the exposed group by the proportion of individuals who suffered the event in the unexposed group.

  • What does a relative risk of 5.41 imply in the context of the secondhand smoke example?

    -A relative risk of 5.41 implies that the risk of developing lung cancer in the exposed group is 5.41 times higher than in the unexposed group.

  • What are the three interpretations of relative risk values?

    -A relative risk of one indicates no difference between groups, a value greater than one suggests a positive association or risk factor, and a value less than one indicates a negative association or protective effect.

  • Why can't relative risk be calculated from a case-control study?

    -Relative risk cannot be calculated from a case-control study because it compares cases that have experienced the event with controls who have not, and it does not provide the necessary data to calculate incidence or risk.

  • What is the difference between odds and probability, and how do they relate to odds ratio?

    -Odds are calculated as the probability of an event divided by the probability of the event not happening, while probability is the chance of an event occurring. The odds ratio compares the odds of an event in the exposed group to the odds in the unexposed group.

  • Why are odds ratios preferred over relative risk in case-control studies?

    -Odds ratios are preferred in case-control studies because they can be calculated without needing incidence rates, which are not available in this study design.

  • How do you interpret an odds ratio of 1.48 in a case-control study?

    -An odds ratio of 1.48 suggests that the odds of the exposed group experiencing the event (e.g., children with leukemia) are 1.48 times higher than the odds of the unexposed group.

  • When are relative risk and odds ratios comparable in magnitude?

    -Relative risk and odds ratios are comparable in magnitude when the outcome under study is rare, as their formulas yield more similar results in such cases.

  • Why should caution be exercised when interpreting odds ratios?

    -Caution is needed because odds ratios can overestimate risk when the outcome is more common, and they should not be assumed to represent the true risk ratio.

  • Why are odds ratios common in both case-control and cohort studies?

    -Odds ratios are common because they are the result of logistic regression, a widely used statistical method in medical research for both types of study designs.

Outlines

00:00

📊 Introduction to Relative Risk and Odds Ratio

This paragraph introduces the concepts of relative risk and odds ratio, explaining their importance in comparing event occurrences between two groups. It discusses how these statistical measures help determine the strength of an association between exposure and outcome. The paragraph outlines the process of interpreting these numbers, emphasizing the point estimate and statistical significance indicated by the p-value and confidence interval. It also explains the calculation of relative risk using a 2x2 contingency table, providing an example with secondhand smoke exposure and lung cancer risk, resulting in a relative risk of 5.41. The interpretation of relative risk values is detailed, noting that values greater than, less than, or equal to one indicate positive association, negative association, or no difference, respectively. The paragraph concludes with a discussion on the statistical significance of relative risk, highlighting the importance of the p-value and confidence interval in determining the strength of the association.

05:00

🎲 Understanding Odds Ratio and Its Calculation

The second paragraph delves into the concept of the odds ratio, contrasting it with relative risk by explaining the difference between odds and probability. It clarifies that odds ratios are used when the study design is retrospective, such as in case-control studies, where relative risk cannot be calculated due to the nature of the data. The paragraph provides the formula for calculating the odds ratio using the cross product method from a 2x2 table and illustrates this with a real-life example of a case-control study on leukemia and parental smoking. It discusses the interpretation of odds ratios, which mirrors that of relative risk, and the conditions under which they are statistically significant. The paragraph also addresses the limitations of odds ratios, noting that they overestimate risk when the outcome is common, and emphasizes the importance of using relative risk when possible. It concludes by mentioning that odds ratios are common in medical literature and can result from logistic regression, a favored method in biomedical research.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡Relative Risk

Relative Risk is a statistical measure that quantifies the strength of the association between an exposure and an outcome, specifically the likelihood of an event occurring in an exposed group compared to an unexposed group. In the video, it is used to compare the probability of developing lung cancer in individuals exposed to secondhand smoke versus those unexposed, with a relative risk of 5.41 indicating a significantly higher risk in the exposed group.

💡Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio is another measure of association that compares the odds of an event occurring in one group to the odds of it occurring in another group. Unlike relative risk, odds ratios can be calculated from case-control studies and are used when the outcome is not rare. The video script provides an example of an odds ratio of 1.48 in a study examining the association between parental smoking and leukemia in children.

💡Association

In the context of the video, association refers to the relationship between exposure to a particular stimulus and the occurrence of an outcome, such as disease. The script discusses how an association exists when the risk among the exposed is higher than among those not exposed, which is a key concept in understanding both relative risk and odds ratio.

💡Point Estimate

A point estimate is a single value that serves as the best guess for the parameter of interest. In the video, the point estimate is the actual number given by the relative risk or odds ratio, which provides an immediate sense of the strength of the association without considering statistical significance.

💡Statistical Significance

Statistical significance is a measure that determines whether an observed effect is likely to be real or due to chance. The video explains that a relative risk or odds ratio is not considered significant if the p-value is greater than 0.05 or if the 95% confidence interval includes 1, indicating that the observed association could be due to random variation.

💡Two-by-Two Contingency Table

A two-by-two contingency table is a type of frequency table used in statistical analysis to display the frequency of outcomes in two groups based on their exposure status. The video uses this table to calculate both relative risk and odds ratio, providing the necessary data to assess the association between exposure and outcome.

💡Cohort Study

A cohort study is a type of observational study where a group of individuals is followed over time to determine the incidence of an event in relation to exposure to a particular factor. The video explains that relative risk can be calculated from cohort studies, as they provide the data needed to assess the probability of an event occurring.

💡Case-Control Study

A case-control study is a retrospective observational study that compares individuals with a specific condition (cases) to those without it (controls) to identify potential risk factors. The video clarifies that relative risk cannot be calculated from case-control studies due to their design but odds ratios can be used as an alternative.

💡Odds

Odds are a way of expressing the likelihood of an event occurring, calculated as the probability of the event divided by the probability of the event not happening. The script explains that odds are used in the calculation of odds ratios, contrasting with the use of probabilities in relative risk calculations.

💡Confidence Interval

A confidence interval is a range of values within which the true population parameter is likely to fall with a certain level of confidence. The video mentions that a 95% confidence interval is used alongside the p-value to assess the statistical significance of a relative risk or odds ratio.

💡Logistic Regression

Logistic regression is a statistical method used to model the relationship between a binary outcome and one or more predictors. The video script mentions that odds ratios are commonly the result of logistic regression, which is a favored method in biomedical research for both case-control and cohort studies.

Highlights

Introduction to relative risk and odds ratio and their calculation.

Relative risk compares the probability of an event occurring between two groups.

An association exists when the risk among the exposed is higher than the risk among the unexposed.

Relative risk is calculated by dividing the incidence in the exposed group by the incidence in the unexposed group.

Example: Calculating relative risk for lung cancer in those exposed to secondhand smoke.

Interpretation of relative risk: a value of 1 indicates no difference, greater than 1 indicates a positive association, and less than 1 indicates a negative association.

Statistical significance of relative risk is shown by the p-value and/or confidence interval.

Relative risk cannot be calculated from case-control studies because they do not provide incidence data.

Odds ratio is used in case-control studies and compares the odds of exposure among cases and controls.

Calculation of odds ratio using a 2x2 table: a times d divided by b times c.

Example: Calculating odds ratio for leukemia in children with parental smoking history.

Interpretation of odds ratio: similar to relative risk, values indicate positive or negative association.

Odds ratios can be calculated for both cohort and case-control studies.

Relative risk and odds ratios are comparable only when the outcome is rare.

Caution is needed when interpreting odds ratios as they can overestimate risk in common outcomes.

Logistic regression commonly yields odds ratios in medical research.

Transcripts

play00:00

hello this video will introduce relative

play00:03

risk and odds ratio and how they are

play00:05

calculated throughout the class we have

play00:08

discussed comparing the occurrence of

play00:09

events between two groups studies can

play00:12

characterize these associations by using

play00:14

one of two statistics relative risk or

play00:17

odds ratio when evaluating the relative

play00:21

risk or nadh's ratio we are really

play00:23

trying to determine whether an

play00:24

association exists and how strong it is

play00:26

when we talk about an association think

play00:29

of it as a relationship between exposure

play00:31

and outcome as we discussed earlier this

play00:34

semester there is an association when

play00:36

the risk among the exposed is higher

play00:38

than the risk among those who are not

play00:40

exposed there are two components to your

play00:43

interpretation of a number first is the

play00:45

actual number which we refer to as the

play00:47

point estimate and the second is the

play00:49

statistical significance which is shown

play00:51

by the p-value and/or the confidence

play00:54

interval relative risk is used when

play00:58

comparing the probability of an event

play00:59

occurring to all possible events

play01:01

considered in a study for example

play01:03

consider the risk of developing lung

play01:05

cancer in those who are exposed and

play01:07

unexposed to secondhand smoke over

play01:09

ten-year study period con study

play01:12

conclusion the two-by-two contingency

play01:13

table shown here is created containing

play01:16

frequency counts of events for two

play01:18

groups exposed and unexposed to the

play01:20

secondhand smoke stimulus this table

play01:23

provides all necessary data to calculate

play01:26

the incidence of the event for both

play01:28

exposed and unexposed individuals in a

play01:30

cohort study relative risk is calculated

play01:34

by dividing the proportion of

play01:36

individuals who suffered the event in

play01:38

the exposed group here it is a divided

play01:41

by a plus B by the proportion of

play01:44

individuals who suffered the event in

play01:46

the unexposed group here it is C divided

play01:49

by C plus D using our secondhand smoke

play01:52

example let's input some numbers into

play01:55

our 2x2 table and calculate relative

play01:57

risk in our examples the risk of lung

play02:00

cancer in the exposed group is 0.92 this

play02:06

risk is divided by the risk in the

play02:07

unexposed group 0.17 for a relative risk

play02:11

of 5.41

play02:14

relative risk provides a single number

play02:16

ranging from zero to infinity

play02:18

and there are three resulting

play02:20

interpretations provided below when

play02:22

interpreting the relative risk we

play02:24

consider one to be null a relative risk

play02:27

of one means there is no difference

play02:29

between the two groups and the incidence

play02:31

and risk in the exposed is the same as

play02:33

the risk and the incidence in the non

play02:34

exposed there is no increased risk and

play02:37

no association if the relative risk is

play02:41

greater than one the incidence of needs

play02:43

posed is greater than the incidence in

play02:45

the non exposed there is a positive

play02:47

association or detrimental effect also

play02:50

known as the risk factor of being

play02:51

exposed to the stimulus if the relative

play02:54

risk is less than 1 the incidence in the

play02:56

exposed is less than the incidence in

play02:58

the non expose there is a negative

play03:00

association or protective effect of

play03:03

being exposed to the stimulus remember

play03:06

the further the relative risk is from 1

play03:08

the stronger the Association when you

play03:12

interpret a relative risk remember to

play03:14

take into account whether the

play03:15

Association is significant this applies

play03:18

the odds ratio as well the relative risk

play03:21

will be reported alongside a p-value

play03:22

and/or a 95% confidence interval if the

play03:26

p-value is not less than 0.05 or if the

play03:29

confidence interval includes 1 the

play03:31

relative risk is not statistically

play03:33

significant this is true no matter how

play03:36

large or small the relative risk is you

play03:38

may have noticed that I said you have

play03:41

all the information you need to

play03:42

calculate a relative risk when we do a

play03:44

cohort study this is not true for case

play03:47

control studies you cannot calculate

play03:49

incidence or risk in a case control

play03:52

study thus you cannot calculate relative

play03:54

risk from a case control study why not a

play03:58

case control study compares cases that

play04:00

have experienced the event and controls

play04:02

who have not and then assesses whether

play04:04

each individual was exposed to a

play04:06

stimulus or not in the example here the

play04:10

researcher compared 300 people of cancer

play04:13

to 300 people without cancer the disease

play04:16

rate is 50% just because of the way the

play04:18

study was designed not because 50% of

play04:21

people under 15 years of age of cancer

play04:24

thus the case control study is

play04:26

retrospective when relative risk cannot

play04:28

be calculated like in case control

play04:30

studies researchers will often present

play04:32

an odds ratio before I show you the

play04:36

formula for calculating an odds ratio

play04:37

here's a reminder about the difference

play04:40

between odds and probability relative

play04:42

risk uses probability of getting disease

play04:45

AHS ratio uses odds which is calculated

play04:48

as probability divided by one minus

play04:50

probability so if there's a 60%

play04:53

probability that I will win this race

play04:55

the odds are 1.5 that I will win so

play05:00

thinking in terms of odds and

play05:01

probability the relative risk is the

play05:03

probability that an exposed person gets

play05:05

disease divided by a probability that an

play05:07

unexposed person gets the disease the

play05:10

odds ratio is odds that a case or person

play05:13

with disease was exposed divided by the

play05:15

odds a control or person without disease

play05:18

was exposed

play05:19

remember that even though you can

play05:21

mathematically convert between odds and

play05:23

probability it is never okay to

play05:24

calculate a relative risk from case

play05:27

control study data odds are calculated

play05:31

by dividing the proportion of people

play05:32

experiencing events by the proportion of

play05:34

people not experiencing event thus an

play05:37

odds ratio is a ratio of two odds one

play05:40

for individuals exposed to the stimulus

play05:42

and the other for those not exposed to

play05:44

the stimulus here is the calculation for

play05:46

the odds ratio it is the same as the

play05:50

cross product using the 2x2 table that

play05:52

we designed earlier the calculation is a

play05:54

times B divided by B times C let's look

play05:59

at a real-life example this is a case

play06:01

control study of children with leukemia

play06:03

compared to children without leukemia

play06:05

which look to see whether history of

play06:07

parental smoking was associated with

play06:10

cancer here is a 2x2 table created just

play06:13

as was done in the earlier example to

play06:16

get the odds ratio we divide the number

play06:18

of kids with parental smoking by the

play06:20

number of kids without parental smoking

play06:23

in the cancer group for an odds of 0.43

play06:26

this is divided by the odds of parental

play06:29

smoking in the non cancer group 0.294 an

play06:33

odds ratio of one point four eight

play06:37

this is different from the relative risk

play06:39

equation because we don't use total

play06:41

exposed or total unexposed anywhere in

play06:43

the equation odds ratios can range from

play06:48

zero to infinity

play06:49

they have three interpretations

play06:50

identical to those presented above for

play06:53

relative risk the rule for determining

play06:56

whether an odds ratio statistically

play07:00

significant is also the same as with

play07:02

relative risk odds ratios can be

play07:05

calculated for both cohort and

play07:07

case-control designs odds ratios are

play07:10

used when comparing events to non-event

play07:12

with this calculation depending on the

play07:14

study design for example consider

play07:16

comparing a group of individuals who

play07:18

develops measles to those who did not

play07:20

and then determining whether they

play07:22

received all the recommended

play07:23

vaccinations in a cohort study the odds

play07:27

ratio is calculated by dividing the odds

play07:29

of experiencing the event in the exposed

play07:31

group a divided by B by the odds the

play07:34

unexposed group experiences the effect C

play07:38

divided by B in a case control study the

play07:41

odds ratio is calculated by dividing the

play07:43

odds that cases works both to the risk a

play07:45

divided by C by the odds that the

play07:48

controls were exposed B divided by D

play07:51

relative risk can only appear in cohort

play07:55

studies or possibly at times and

play07:57

randomized control studies relative risk

play07:59

and odds ratios are comparable in

play08:01

magnitude only when the outcome under

play08:03

study is rare for instance some cancers

play08:06

this is because the results of the

play08:08

relative risk formula and odds ratio

play08:10

formula become more similar as the

play08:12

denominator gets larger and as the

play08:14

number of disease cases gets smaller it

play08:17

is important to consider that odds

play08:19

ratios consistently overestimate risk

play08:21

when the outcome is more common for

play08:24

instance in hyperlipidemia as a result

play08:27

eliten risk should be used if possible

play08:29

and caution should be exhibited when

play08:31

interpreting odds ratios additionally

play08:34

don't assume that a case is a case

play08:36

control study just because you see an

play08:38

odds ratio and the results ratios are

play08:42

very common in the medical literature

play08:43

for both case control and cohort studies

play08:45

they are the result of logistic

play08:47

regression which is every bi

play08:49

medical researchers favorite mystical

play08:51

method this concludes the video

Rate This

5.0 / 5 (0 votes)

Ähnliche Tags
EpidemiologyRelative RiskOdds RatioStatistical AnalysisHealth StudiesCohort StudyCase-Control StudyData InterpretationMedical ResearchRisk FactorsHealth Outcomes
Benötigen Sie eine Zusammenfassung auf Englisch?