WWC Recommendation: Screen for reading problems at the beginning and middle of the year
Summary
TLDRThe video script emphasizes the importance of Universal Screening for early detection and prevention of reading difficulties in students. It highlights the Response to Intervention (RTI) as a multi-tier instructional program that screens all students and monitors their progress. The script underscores the need for biannual screenings, the involvement of diverse school staff in an RTI team, and the selection of efficient, reliable, and valid screening measures. It also discusses the significance of predictive validity, the use of multiple measures to avoid false positives, and the necessity of progress monitoring to ensure appropriate interventions.
Takeaways
- 📚 Universal screening is essential for early detection and prevention of reading difficulties in students.
- 🔍 Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier instructional program that helps in early identification of struggling readers.
- 👀 Schools often overlook students at risk for reading difficulties if they only assess those already showing problems.
- 📉 Students who are not identified early may fall behind their peers and struggle with learning disabilities by grade 2 or 3.
- 📈 Universal screening provides an objective measure of student skills, complementing teacher observation and judgment.
- 📆 Screenings should occur twice a year, at the beginning and middle of the school year, for accurate assessment of student progress.
- 👥 A building-level RTI team with diverse expertise is crucial for coordinating a universal screening program.
- 📝 The team is responsible for selecting screening measures, establishing benchmarks, and managing logistics.
- 📊 Screening measures should be efficient, reliable, and have proven validity for predicting future reading ability.
- 🔎 Using at least two screening measures can reduce false positives and enhance the accuracy of identifying at-risk students.
- 💰 Consideration of costs, including staff time and resources, is important when selecting screening measures.
- 📉 Establishing grade-level benchmarks and cut points is necessary for identifying students at different risk levels for reading difficulties.
- 🔄 Progress monitoring is vital to ensure that interventions are matched to students' developing needs.
Q & A
What is the primary purpose of Universal Screening for students?
-Universal Screening aims to provide early detection and prevention of reading difficulties for all students, ensuring that those who are struggling receive help promptly.
Why is it important to implement Response to Intervention (RTI) in schools?
-RTI is a multi-tier instructional program that offers a strategy for early detection and prevention of reading difficulties, helping to identify and support students who may not be diagnosed with a learning disability until later grades.
What are the key components of RTI?
-The key components of RTI include universal screening of all students and ongoing monitoring of their progress in core reading skills.
Why is it crucial to screen all students instead of only those demonstrating reading problems?
-Screening all students helps to identify those at risk for future reading difficulties who might otherwise be overlooked if only students with existing problems are assessed.
How often should schools conduct universal screening for reading difficulties?
-Schools should conduct universal screening twice a year, at the beginning and middle of the school year, to provide an accurate picture of student skills.
What role does the building level RTI team play in a school's universal screening program?
-The building level RTI team, comprised of diverse members with various expertise, is responsible for tasks such as managing logistics, selecting screening measures, establishing benchmarks, and identifying at-risk students.
What factors should the RTI team consider when selecting screening measures?
-The team should consider factors such as efficiency, reliability, and proven validity of the measures, ensuring they accurately predict risk, measure appropriate reading skills for each grade level, and are cost-effective.
What is predictive validity in the context of screening measures?
-Predictive validity refers to the accuracy of a screening measure in predicting future reading ability, including its sensitivity in identifying at-risk students and its specificity in identifying students at low risk.
Why is it recommended to use more than one screening measure?
-Using multiple screening measures can enhance the accuracy of the screening process, reduce false positives, and ensure that interventions are not provided to an inflated percentage of the student population.
What are the considerations when interpreting screening results?
-Interpreting screening results requires grade level benchmarks or growth rates to determine which children are at low, moderate, or high risk for developing reading difficulties. It's also important to establish cut points to identify students who may need additional assistance.
How can schools ensure that screening measures are reliable and not overly taxing on resources?
-Schools need to ensure they have the capacity to meet the demands of the screening process, consider the costs involved, and may need to train paraprofessionals to conduct screening to avoid taking teachers away from classroom instruction.
What is the significance of progress monitoring in the context of RTI?
-Progress monitoring ensures that students continue to receive interventions at a level of intensity that matches their developing needs, allowing for adjustments to be made based on ongoing assessment of their progress.
Outlines
📚 Universal Screening for Early Reading Difficulties Detection
This paragraph introduces the concept of Universal Screening as a critical strategy within the Response to Intervention (RTI) framework. It emphasizes the importance of early detection and prevention of reading difficulties, rather than waiting for formal diagnosis in later grades. The paragraph explains that RTI involves a multi-tier instructional program with universal screening of all students and ongoing monitoring of their core reading skills. It highlights the risk of overlooking students who may not yet show reading problems but are at risk. The paragraph also discusses the need for schoolwide coordination, the formation of an RTI team with diverse expertise, and the selection of efficient, reliable, and valid screening measures. It stresses the significance of using multiple measures to enhance accuracy and avoid overburdening resources with unnecessary interventions.
📈 Establishing Benchmarks and Monitoring Progress for Reading Proficiency
The second paragraph delves into the specifics of establishing benchmarks and monitoring student progress to identify those who may not require additional assistance. It notes the imperfect reliability of any single measure and suggests additional assessments or monitoring for students whose scores are near the cutoff. The paragraph discusses the importance of setting appropriate initial benchmark cut points to balance false positives and missed opportunities for at-risk students. It also touches on the necessity of progress monitoring to ensure that interventions are matched to students' needs. The federal office of special education programs is mentioned as a resource for benchmark information, and the paragraph concludes by emphasizing that screening is just the beginning, with ongoing monitoring being essential for student success.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Universal Screening
💡Response to Intervention (RTI)
💡Learning Disability
💡Core Reading Skills
💡Screening Measures
💡Predictive Validity
💡Benchmarks
💡Progress Monitoring
💡False Positives
💡Intervention
💡Grade Level Benchmarks
Highlights
Universal screening is critical for early detection and prevention of reading difficulties in students.
Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier instructional program for early detection of reading issues.
Students often don't receive help until they are officially diagnosed with a learning disability or have fallen behind.
Universal screening provides an objective reading on student skills, complementing teacher observation and judgment.
Screenings should occur twice a year to accurately assess student progress in core reading skills.
Midyear screenings are especially important for younger students to provide a more accurate picture of their skills.
A universal screening program requires schoolwide coordination of staff and resources.
The RTI team should include diverse members such as teachers, special educators, school psychologists, reading coaches, and the principal.
Screening measures should be efficient, reliable, and have proven validity for the appropriate grade level.
Screening measures should focus on appropriate reading skills for each grade level, from letter knowledge to passage reading.
Using more than one screening measure can reduce false positives and enhance the accuracy of the screening process.
The predictive validity of a screening measure is its ability to accurately identify students at risk for reading difficulties.
Costs associated with additional screening measures include staff time for administration and interpretation of results.
Interpretation of screening results requires grade level benchmarks or growth rates to identify students at risk.
Establishing cut points or cutoff scores is necessary to identify students who may need additional assistance.
Screening is just the start; progress monitoring ensures students receive interventions matched to their needs.
Setting lenient or stringent cut points can impact the accuracy of identifying at-risk students and resource allocation.
Regular progress monitoring is essential to determine which students are most at risk and require additional support.
Transcripts
welcome to the overview on universal
screening for all
students beginning readers who are
struggling need help right away but they
often don't receive it until grade 2 or
three after they have been officially
diagnosed with a learning disability or
have fallen far behind their
peers response to intervention or RTI is
a multi-tier instructional program that
offers a strategy for early detection
and prevention of reading
difficulties key components of RTI are
the screening of all students and
ongoing monitoring of their progress in
core reading
skills when a school only assesses those
students who are already demonstrating
problems with reading other students who
are at risk for future reading
difficulties can be overlooked this is
why Universal screening is such a
critical first step in determining the
scope of reading support a school needs
to offer Universal screening provides an
objective reading on student skills
this does not mean that teacher
observation and judgment is unimportant
by monitoring student performance over
time teachers will make an important
contribution engaging a student's
progress in both core and intervention
programs screenings for reading
difficulty should take place twice a
year at the beginning of the school year
and again in the middle of the Year
these midyear screenings are especially
important for younger students as the
results are likely to give a more
accurate picture of student skills than
those obtained at the beginning of the
year a universal screening program
requires schoolwide coordination of
staff and resources a building level RTI
team should be comprised of diverse
members with a range of expertise such
as teachers special Educators School
psychologists reading coaches and the
principal the team will be responsible
for a number of tasks for managing basic
Logistics such as determining who will
administer the assessments and handle
scheduling to more substantive
responsibilities such as selecting
screening measures and establishing
benchmarks to identify atrisk
students when considering which measures
to adopt the building level team should
give special attention to each measure's
efficiency reliability and proven
validity specific factors to consider
include ensuring that the appropriate
reading skills are being measured how
accurately the measure predicts risk and
cost screening measures should focus on
appropriate reading skills for each
grade level in kindergarten screening
should assess letter knowledge pheic
awareness and expressive and receptive
vocabulary in grade one focus should
shift to address pheic awareness
decoding word identification and text
reading in grade two screening should
focus on word reading and passage
reading it may be necessary to use more
than one screening measure in order to
assess all of these
skills the accuracy of Any Given
screening measure in predicting future
reading ability is referred to as its
predictive validity predictive validity
has two aspects its sensitivity the
degree of accuracy with which it
correctly identify students at risk for
reading difficulties and its specificity
its accuracy in identifying students at
low risk for such
difficulties use of at least two
screening measures is highly recommended
as use of a single measure can often
result in false positives such as
identifying students as needing
additional assistance but who are likely
to do fine without it using two
screening measures can both enhance the
accuracy of the screening process and
ensure that schools are not taxing their
resources by providing intervention to
an inflated percentage of the student
population When selecting which
screening mechanisms to implement it's
important to factor in the various costs
involved each additional measure
requires more staff time to ad Minister
and made his place instruction moreover
interpreting multiple indices or
measurement results can be a complex and
timec consuming task these factors
should be carefully considered When
selecting the number and type of
screening measures to adopt the team
needs to be sure that their school has
the capacity to meet the demands of the
screening process and to consider
alternatives such as training par
professionals to conduct screening
rather than taking teachers away from
classroom
instruction interpretation of screening
results requires grade level benchmarks
or growth rates to determine which
children are at low moderate or high
risk for developing reading difficulties
grade level benchmarks indicate when a
particular reading skill should be
achieved the federal office of special
education programs offers a good
starting point for information on
Benchmark screening and progress
monitoring through its National Center
on response to intervention
website once benchmarks have been
established the district will need to
EST establish cut points or cuto off
scores to identify those students who
are likely to reach proficiency without
additional
assistance it is critical to keep in
mind that no measure is perfectly
reliable when students scores fall
slightly below or above a cuto off score
in a benchmark test schools may wish to
conduct an additional assessment of
those students or monitor their progress
for a period of 6 to 8 weeks to
determine whether the student does in
fact require additional
assistance schools may need to Define
initial Benchmark cut points to obtain
the right level of accuracy for
identifying atrisk students a lenient
cut Point can result in false positives
that end up being more costly to the
school while a more stringent cut Point
may miss students at risk for potential
reading problems in general it's best to
set screening cut points that will
identify a pool of children and then
follow up with regular progress
monitoring to further determine those
most at
risk remember screening is just the
start
progress monitoring ensures that
students continue to receive
interventions at a level of intensity
match to their developing needs
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)