Interpreting Output for Multiple Regression in SPSS
Summary
TLDRIn this informative video, Dr. Grande teaches viewers how to interpret multiple regression output using SPSS. With a fictitious dataset involving career limitations and work experience as predictors, and days until employment as the outcome, the video guides through the process of conducting a regression analysis. It explains the significance of R-square, ANOVA, and p-values, and how to understand the impact of each predictor on the outcome. The video concludes with a clear explanation of the confidence intervals for the coefficients, offering a helpful guide for those new to regression analysis.
Takeaways
- 👨⚕️ Dr. Grande introduces a video tutorial on interpreting multiple regression output in SPSS.
- 📊 The video uses fictitious data with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables, and one outcome variable.
- 🔑 The predictor variables are 'career limitations', an index reflecting potential barriers to employment, and 'experience', measured in years of work.
- 📈 The outcome variable is 'days until employed', tracking the time it takes for participants to find work post-training.
- ❓ Hypotheses suggest that higher career limitations may increase unemployment duration, while more experience may decrease it.
- 📚 The video emphasizes checking assumptions before running multiple regression to ensure data suitability for the analysis.
- 📝 The SPSS process involves selecting 'Analyze', 'Regression', and 'Linear', with 'days until employed' as the dependent variable.
- 📋 The model includes career limitations and experience as independent variables, with options for statistics like R-squared change and confidence intervals.
- 📊 The model summary reveals an adjusted R-square of 0.237, indicating that 23.7% of variance in employment time is explained by the predictors.
- 🔍 The ANOVA table shows a statistically significant result (p < .05), validating the model's predictive power.
- 📈 The coefficients table provides unstandardized and standardized coefficients, with p-values indicating the statistical significance of each predictor.
- 📉 Career limitations have a positive impact on unemployment duration, with each unit increase associated with 2.658 more days until employed.
- 📈 Experience has a negative impact, with each additional year reducing the days until employed by approximately 4 days.
- 📊 Standardized coefficients indicate the effect size in terms of standard deviations, with career limitations increasing days until employed by 0.233 and experience decreasing it by 0.436.
- 📐 Confidence intervals provide a range within which the true effect of each predictor is likely to fall, offering a measure of precision for the estimates.
- 🤔 The video concludes by encouraging viewers to reach out with questions, emphasizing support for further understanding.
Q & A
What is the purpose of the video by Dr. Grande?
-The purpose of the video is to explain how to interpret the output from a multiple regression analysis using SPSS.
What are the four variables mentioned in the SPSS data editor in the video?
-The four variables mentioned are an ID variable, two predictor variables (career limitations and experience), and one outcome variable (days until employed).
What does the career limitations variable represent in the study?
-The career limitations variable represents an index of potential barriers to employment, such as criminal history, low educational level, active substance use disorder, etc., with higher values indicating more severe limitations.
How is the experience variable measured in the study?
-The experience variable is measured in years, representing the number of years a participant had either a full-time or part-time job.
What is the maximum number of days considered for the 'days until employed' variable?
-The maximum number of days considered for the 'days until employed' variable is 365 days.
What are the hypotheses regarding the relationship between the predictor variables and the outcome variable?
-The hypotheses are that a higher number on the career limitations variable would be associated with a longer time to become employed, and more experience would be associated with fewer days until employment.
What does the adjusted R-square value of 0.237 indicate about the model in the video?
-An adjusted R-square of 0.237 indicates that 23.7% of the variance in the outcome variable (days until employed) is explained by the independent variables (career limitations and experience).
What does a statistically significant p-value in the ANOVA table suggest?
-A statistically significant p-value (less than 0.05) in the ANOVA table suggests that the overall model is significant and that at least one predictor variable has a statistically significant effect on the outcome variable.
What is the interpretation of the unstandardized coefficient for career limitations being 2.658?
-The unstandardized coefficient of 2.658 for career limitations means that for every one-unit increase in the career limitations index, there is an expected increase of 2.658 days until employed.
How does the experience variable affect the outcome variable according to the unstandardized coefficients?
-The unstandardized coefficient for experience is -4.044, indicating that for every additional year of experience, the number of days until employed decreases by approximately 4 days.
What do the standardized coefficients tell us about the effect of each variable in terms of standard deviations?
-The standardized coefficients indicate that for every one standard deviation increase in career limitations, the dependent variable increases by 0.233 standard deviations, and for every one standard deviation increase in experience, the dependent variable decreases by 0.436 standard deviations.
What is the purpose of the confidence intervals provided for the unstandardized coefficients?
-The confidence intervals provide a range within which we can be 95% confident that the actual value of the unstandardized coefficient lies, indicating the precision of the estimates.
Outlines
📊 Introduction to Multiple Regression Analysis in SPSS
Dr. Grande introduces a tutorial on interpreting multiple regression output using SPSS. The video focuses on a hypothetical study with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables (career limitations and experience), and one outcome variable (days until employed). The career limitations variable represents potential barriers to workforce re-entry, while experience is measured in years of previous employment. The study aims to understand the relationship between these variables and the time to find employment post-training. The video will guide viewers through the SPSS interface for setting up a linear regression analysis, including selecting variables and choosing statistical options such as R-squared change, model fit, and confidence intervals.
📈 Analyzing Regression Results and Hypothesis Testing
This paragraph delves into the results of the multiple regression analysis. The p-values for both predictor variables, career limitations and experience, are statistically significant, indicating their impact on the outcome variable. The unstandardized coefficients reveal that an increase in career limitations is associated with a longer time to employment, while more experience is linked to a shorter period of unemployment. The standardized coefficients provide insight into the effect size in terms of standard deviations, showing that both variables have a substantial influence on the dependent variable. Confidence intervals for the unstandardized coefficients are also discussed, providing a range within which the true effect is likely to fall with 95% certainty. The summary concludes with an invitation for questions and further assistance, emphasizing the educational value of the video.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Multiple Regression
💡SPSS
💡Dependent Variable
💡Independent Variables
💡Predictor Variables
💡R-squared
💡ANOVA
💡Coefficients
💡Standardized Coefficients
💡Confidence Intervals
💡Statistical Significance
Highlights
Dr. Grande introduces a video on interpreting multiple regression output from SPSS.
The video uses fictitious data with four variables: an ID variable, two predictor variables, and one outcome variable.
The first predictor variable, 'career limitations', represents potential barriers to workforce re-entry.
The 'experience' variable measures years of full-time or part-time job experience.
The outcome variable, 'days until employed', measures the time to find employment after a Career Training Program.
Hypotheses suggest that higher career limitations may increase the time to employment, while more experience may decrease it.
The video explains the process of conducting a multiple regression in SPSS, including setting up the model and selecting statistics.
The output includes descriptive statistics, correlations, model summary, and ANOVA results.
Adjusted R-square is used to interpret the proportion of variance explained by the model, which is 23.7% in this case.
ANOVA results show the model is statistically significant with a p-value less than 0.05.
Coefficients table reveals the unstandardized and standardized coefficients for 'career limitations' and 'experience'.
P-values indicate that both 'career limitations' and 'experience' have statistically significant impacts on employment time.
The unstandardized coefficient for 'career limitations' is 2.658, suggesting an increase in limitations leads to longer unemployment.
The negative unstandardized coefficient for 'experience' (-4.044) implies more experience results in shorter unemployment duration.
Standardized coefficients show the effect size in terms of standard deviations for each predictor variable.
Confidence intervals provide a range where the true coefficient values are likely to fall with 95% certainty.
The video concludes with an invitation for questions or concerns, offering further assistance.
Transcripts
hello this is dr. Grande welcome to my
video on interpreting the output from a
multiple regression using SPSS as always
if you find this video useful please
like it and subscribe to my channel
I certainly appreciate it I have in the
SPSS data editor four variables these
are fictitious data I have an ID
variable I have a hundred participants
in this design and I have two predictor
variables and one outcome variable so
for the first predictor variable this
one is named career limitations so let's
assume that we have participants that
are in a career training program and we
develop this series of questions to
determine how many limitations they're
facing in terms of getting back into the
workforce and these questions go through
a scoring process and end up in this
variable and this is an index so certain
characteristics or occurrences may be
weighted more heavily than others
potential limitations could include a
criminal history low educational level
an active substance use disorder and
other factors so a higher value in this
variable would represent more
limitations or more severe limitations
then we have experienced an experience
we've measured in years this be the
number of years a participant had either
a full-time or part-time job then we
have days until employed so after the
completion of the Career Training
Program the number of days until the
participant finds employment is measured
and for this example the maximum would
be 365 days so we could have a couple
hypotheses here
before we conduct a multiple regression
career limitations we believe the higher
the number on the career limitations
variable the longer it would take to
become employed and for the experience
variable the more experience associated
with fewer days with a smaller number of
days until the participant becomes
employed now there are assumptions from
multiple regression but here I'm gonna
be focused on the output so I'm not
going to check those assumptions but
just know there are assumptions before
running a multiple regression that would
need to be checked to make sure these
data would be appropriate for that
statistic so here under analyze
regression and linear I have the dialog
for linear regression and you can see
there's one space for a dependent
variable or an outcome variable and
that's going to be days until employed
and you can have multiple independent
variables or predictor variables in this
case I have two career limitations and
experience under statistics by default
we have estimates and model fit I'm just
going to add r-squared change and
descriptives here as well as the
confidence intervals at the 95% level
continue and I'm not going to make any
other changes here under the buttons on
the right so ready to conduct the
multiple regression click OK
and let's take a look at the tables we
have the descriptive statistics here up
top then correlations variables entered
and removed both of the variables I put
into the model used here model summary
we have R square and adjusted r-square
we're going to be interpreting adjusted
r-square so with this model we have the
two predictor variables the one
dependent variable and we have an
adjusted r-square of 0.23 seven
this tells us that 23.7% of the variance
in the dependent variable is explained
by the independent variables moving down
to ANOVA we have a statistically
significant finding here less than point
zero five for the p-value then we have
the coefficients table so we have your
career limitations experience and the
unstandardized coefficients for career
limitations it's two point six five
eight and for experience it's negative
four point zero four four we also have
the standardized coefficients and
p-values so let's start with the
p-values here for career limitations we
have point zero zero nine that's
statistically significant so this
variable has a statistically significant
impact on the outcome variable on the
days until employed taking a look here
at the p-value associated with
experience you can see this is also less
than point zero five so we have
statistically significant contribution
from the experience predictor variable
looking at the unstandardized
coefficients for career limitations we
have a value here of two point six five
eight and what this tells us is as the
career limitations index increases by a
value of one for every one unit of
change for career limitations we're
going to see a two points six five eight
change in the days until employed
variable so one point on the Kermit
Asians
one additional point is associated with
two point six five eight days increase
on the dependent variable so the more
career limitations we have as measured
by that scale by that index
the longer it takes the participant to
find employment experience however works
differently with the experienced
independent variable we have a negative
value for the unstandardized coefficient
negative four point zero four four so if
this tells us is as experience increases
by one year because experience is
measured in years that's the unit of
analysis for that variable the number of
days into employed decreases by about
four so more experience associated with
a smaller number of days of unemployment
now when thinking about this in terms of
standard deviations we would look at the
standardized coefficients so for every
full standard deviation of movement we
see in career limitations very one
standard deviation of movement we see
what this variable the dependent
variable days until employed increases
by 0.23 three standard deviations for
every one standard deviation of movement
we see an experience as an experience
increases by one standard deviation we
have a decrease on the dependent
variable base until employed of negative
0.4 three six standard deviations and
then moving over to the confidence
interval and this is for the
unstandardized coefficient we interpret
before we can see there's a 95% chance
that the actual value of the
unstandardized coefficient is between
0.67 one and 4.6 or four
and the actual value for experience we
can be 95% confident that is between
negative five point six six three and
negative two point four two six I hope
you found this video on interpreting the
output from multiple regression in SPSS
to be helpful as always if you have any
questions or concerns feel free to
contact me I'll be happy to assist you
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)