Begini Modus Kecurangan UTBK SNBT 2025, Pakai Joki hingga Remote PC
Summary
TLDRIn a recent revelation by Prof. Edward Wolock, the head of the National Selection Team for New Students (SNPMB), multiple cheating methods were uncovered during university entrance exams. These included the use of hidden devices to photograph exam questions, remote control of computers to answer questions from outside the hall, and impersonators (jokers) taking exams for students. Communication tools were also used to relay answers. 50 students were caught cheating across 13 exam centers, and 10 jokers were identified. Strict penalties were imposed, including disqualification and dismissal for involved staff members.
Takeaways
- 😀 Advanced cheating detection technology has been introduced, including tools that are undetectable by metal detectors.
- 😀 One type of cheating involved participants attempting to smuggle devices to capture and share exam questions with external networks.
- 😀 Participants used hidden devices to photograph their computer screens during the exam, bypassing metal detector scans.
- 😀 The exam process is tightly monitored to spot suspicious behavior, leading to the identification of cheating attempts.
- 😀 Cheating methods included concealing mobile phones on participants' bodies to communicate exam answers.
- 😀 Another form of cheating involved using 'proxy' test-takers, or 'joki,' who would replace the actual candidate during the exam.
- 😀 Fraudulent actions also included falsifying identification documents, such as KTP (ID cards), diplomas, and class certificates to create fake accounts.
- 😀 Some candidates used communication tools to receive and share answers during the exam.
- 😀 Involvement of insiders, with their identities already known, was also detected in the cheating operations.
- 😀 A total of 50 participants were caught cheating in 13 UTBK centers, and 10 'jokis' were also caught.
- 😀 The consequences for using a proxy or cheating include disqualification from all university entrance channels, including independent admission routes.
Q & A
What kind of advanced tools were used in the SNPMB selection process to detect cheating?
-Advanced tools were used that could bypass metal detectors, such as hidden devices that participants used to take photos of their screens or communicate during the exam.
What was one of the main cheating methods detected during the SNPMB exam?
-One of the main methods was participants using hidden devices to take photos of the exam questions or manipulating the provided computers to transmit answers.
How do the participants avoid being detected by metal detectors?
-Some participants tried to conceal devices such as mobile phones in their clothing to avoid detection by metal detectors, which were used to scan individuals before entering the exam room.
What role did the examiners play in detecting suspicious activities?
-The examiners played a critical role in monitoring and identifying suspicious behavior, allowing them to detect cheating methods that were not visible through initial scans.
What is the penalty for students who were caught using proxies (jokers)?
-Students caught using proxies will be disqualified and banned from participating in all PTN entrance routes, including independent routes.
What kind of documents were falsified by those involved in cheating?
-Documents such as ID cards, diplomas, and class 12 certificates were falsified by individuals involved in cheating to create fake accounts or assist in cheating.
How many participants were caught cheating in the 13 UTBK centers?
-A total of 50 participants were caught cheating, while 10 individuals were caught acting as proxies (jokers).
What actions did the authorities take against those caught in the cheating scandal?
-The authorities ensured that students caught using proxies were disqualified, and individuals involved from within the system were fired.
How were remote cheating activities carried out during the exam?
-Remote cheating was conducted by controlling the PC from outside the exam room and answering the exam questions remotely.
What kind of technology did participants use to cheat that bypassed traditional detection methods?
-Participants used advanced technology, such as remote access tools, hidden communication devices, and manipulated settings on the exam PCs, which helped them cheat without being caught by traditional detection methods.
Outlines

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.
Upgrade durchführenMindmap

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.
Upgrade durchführenKeywords

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.
Upgrade durchführenHighlights

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.
Upgrade durchführenTranscripts

Dieser Bereich ist nur für Premium-Benutzer verfügbar. Bitte führen Sie ein Upgrade durch, um auf diesen Abschnitt zuzugreifen.
Upgrade durchführenWeitere ähnliche Videos ansehen

Error or Fraud - A New Bombshell in the Data

DIBACAIN: Rumus Golden Circle Untuk Hidup Selaras & Bahagia

Ecuaciones cuadráticas de la forma ax2 + c=0

Cara Membuat Literature Review Tiga Tips Mudah | Tirta Mursitama

Memahami Conversion, Cara Menghitungnya dan 3 Cara Meningkatkan Conversion Rate Digital Marketing

KAJIAN UTUH MENGENAI WAHYU BAGIAN 1 | Ust. M Fatikhun, S.Ag., M.H.
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)