Viral Eksperimen Sosial Banyak Siswa Tak Tahu Pengetahuan Umum, Sistem Pendidikan Indonesia Gagal?

Summary

In this conversation, educational expert Pak Martadi discusses the shortcomings of Indonesia's current education system. He highlights how many students lack basic knowledge, such as abbreviations and facts about their own country, which raises concerns about the effectiveness of the curriculum. The conversation touches on the controversial Merdeka Curriculum and the removal of national exams (UN), with a focus on adapting educational strategies to Indonesia's unique context. Pak Martadi stresses the importance of fostering a strong national identity in students while preparing them for global challenges. The discussion also addresses how to properly assess student progress in the absence of national exams.

Takeaways

• 😀 The lack of basic general knowledge among students is highlighted, such as not knowing simple abbreviations like MPR or the capital of East Java.
• 😀 Education system criticism is discussed, particularly about the ineffectiveness of transferring knowledge despite the curriculum being present.
• 😀 Some students may rely on Google rather than memorizing basic facts, questioning the importance of memorization in today's education system.
• 😀 Former Vice President Yusuf Kalla criticized Indonesia's education system for being weak in providing essential knowledge to students about the country.
• 😀 The curriculum in Indonesia is being debated, with concerns about its effectiveness in addressing the country's unique challenges compared to other nations like Finland.
• 😀 The importance of adapting global educational models to suit the specific needs and challenges of Indonesia is emphasized.
• 😀 The current Merdeka Curriculum is discussed, with criticism that it doesn't fully align with Indonesia's educational realities, such as teacher disparity and regional educational differences.
• 😀 The issue of educational outcomes, where schools focus more on students advancing to the next grade rather than actual learning, is pointed out.
• 😀 The role of UN exams in the education system is questioned, suggesting that the absence of standardized testing could harm motivation and result in inflated student scores.
• 😀 The need for a curriculum that reflects Indonesia’s cultural values and prepares students for the global stage without losing their national identity is emphasized.
• 😀 The upcoming changes in government, particularly with a new education minister, raise concerns about the future of standardized testing and the effectiveness of current educational indicators.

Q & A

What does the acronym MPR stand for, and why was it mentioned in the video?

MPR stands for 'Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat' (People's Consultative Assembly). It was mentioned in the video to highlight a common misunderstanding among students who could not recall the meaning of this simple acronym.

What was the significance of the question regarding the capital city of East Java?

The question about the capital city of East Java was used to illustrate the lack of basic general knowledge among students. Many students were unable to correctly identify the capital, which reflects poorly on the education system’s effectiveness.

What criticism did former Vice President Jusuf Kalla make regarding the Indonesian education system?

Jusuf Kalla criticized the Indonesian education system for being weak in providing students with a proper understanding of Indonesia's basic facts, suggesting that the system lacked sufficient depth and was disconnected from real-world knowledge.

How did Pak Martadi describe the issue with Indonesia’s curriculum?

Pak Martadi explained that while the 'Merdeka' curriculum concept was inspired by successful models like Finland's, it was not fully adaptable to Indonesia’s unique conditions. He emphasized the importance of contextualizing education to suit Indonesia’s diverse needs.

What does Pak Martadi suggest about the 'Merdeka' curriculum in relation to Indonesia’s educational challenges?

Pak Martadi argued that although the 'Merdeka' curriculum concept is good, it needs to be adapted to the Indonesian context. He pointed out disparities in education access, differences in teacher quality, and regional educational gaps that need to be considered.

What is Pak Martadi’s opinion about the national exam (UN) and its role in evaluating students?

Pak Martadi believed that the national exam (UN) is not the only measure of student success. While the removal of the UN may reduce pressure on students, it also risks diminishing the standards and clear benchmarks needed to assess education quality.

What alternative does Pak Martadi propose for evaluating students in place of the UN?

Pak Martadi suggested that the government should evaluate alternative methods to assess education quality, possibly by introducing new forms of assessment that can better reflect the actual learning outcomes of students without relying solely on exams.

What is the main point about ‘knowing the world’ and ‘knowing Indonesia’ in the context of the education system?

Pak Martadi emphasized that for students to understand the world, they first need to understand their own country, Indonesia. He argued that neglecting national identity in favor of global knowledge could lead to a generation of students who are disconnected from their own cultural heritage.

Why does Pak Martadi stress the importance of maintaining Indonesian values in education?

Pak Martadi stressed that to succeed in the globalized world, students must have a strong understanding of Indonesia’s values and identity. He coined the term 'Inq Indonesia Qu' to highlight the importance of instilling Indonesian culture and history in students’ education.

What does Pak Martadi think about the potential for Indonesia to become a developed country based on its education system?

Pak Martadi agreed with Jusuf Kalla's view that while Indonesia aims to become a developed country, it needs to tailor its education system to the country’s specific needs, rather than simply adopting foreign models. He believes that without proper adaptation, the system will not effectively address Indonesia’s complex challenges.