Adidas EVO SL vs ASICS Novablast 5 | The choice is EASY!

Summary

In this video, the reviewer compares two popular running shoes: the ASICS NovaBlast 5 and the Adidas Adizero Evo SL. The NovaBlast 5 is praised for its versatility, durability, and stability, making it a great choice for all types of runs. The Evo SL, with its racing foam, excels in fast-paced runs but is noted for its instability and subpar traction. The review highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each shoe, ultimately declaring the NovaBlast 5 as the superior all-around option, especially for long-distance and easy runs. The comparison includes discussions on cushioning, fit, outsole durability, and more.

Takeaways

• 😀 The ASICS Nova Blast 5 is a reliable, popular daily trainer, known for its comfortable cushioning and versatile performance.
• 😀 The Adidas Adizero Evo SL, a recent release, is marketed as a fast shoe but is being compared to the Nova Blast 5 due to its similar non-plated construction.
• 😀 Despite being a tempo shoe, the Evo SL has some similarities to the Nova Blast 5, especially in terms of lack of plating and a midfoot shank in the Evo SL.
• 😀 The outsole of the ASICS Nova Blast 5 has decent traction, though it could benefit from more varied patterning for better friction on diverse surfaces.
• 😀 In terms of durability, the Nova Blast 5's outsole is average, showing signs of wear after 60-70 miles, which may be more pronounced for heavier runners.
• 😀 The Evo SL's Continental rubber outsole, while thin, has performed better in terms of durability than expected but struggles with traction on less-than-ideal surfaces.
• 😀 The Nova Blast 5 performs better in terms of traction, especially on various surfaces like light trails and wet roads.
• 😀 Cushioning is a key factor, with the Nova Blast 5 featuring FF Blast Max foam, providing a softer and more consistent ride for various types of runs.
• 😀 The Evo SL features Adidas's premium Lightstrike Pro foam, which performs better in faster runs due to its responsive nature but is less stable for long runs.
• 😀 When it comes to the uppers, the Nova Blast 5 has a more padded heel collar and a basic engineered mesh, while the Evo SL has a thinner, lighter upper but lacks padding in the heel area.
• 😀 The fit of the Nova Blast 5 is superior, with a true-to-size fit and better heel lockdown, while the Evo SL feels a bit sloppy, especially for those with narrower feet.

Q & A

What is the main reason for comparing the ASICS NovaBlast 5 and Adidas Adizero Evo SL?

The comparison is made because both shoes are popular in the running market, and although they serve different purposes (daily trainer vs tempo shoe), they are non-plated and share some similarities in design and performance, making them an interesting contrast.

How does the outsole of the ASICS NovaBlast 5 perform in various conditions?

The outsole of the ASICS NovaBlast 5 performs decently across various conditions, including dry roads, light trails, and some wet conditions. However, its traction could be improved as it doesn't offer exceptional grip, especially on surfaces requiring more friction.

What is the durability of the ASICS NovaBlast 5 outsole like?

The durability of the ASICS NovaBlast 5 outsole is considered average. After around 60-70 miles, the rubber starts to show signs of wear, particularly for heavier runners, though it is not unusual for running shoes to wear out quicker for such individuals.

What issues were found with the traction of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL?

The traction of the Adidas Adizero Evo SL is underwhelming, especially when running on surfaces like trails or roads with sand and debris. The Continental rubber outsole does not provide the same level of grip that the reviewer expected, making it less reliable in varied conditions.

Which shoe has better durability in terms of outsole performance?

The Adidas Adizero Evo SL has better durability in terms of its outsole, as the Continental rubber has shown minimal degradation after 40-50 miles of use. The ASICS NovaBlast 5’s outsole, while functional, shows more wear in a similar distance.

How does the cushioning of the ASICS NovaBlast 5 differ from the Adidas Adizero Evo SL?

The ASICS NovaBlast 5 uses FF Blast Max foam, offering a more consistent, stable, and comfortable cushioning setup that works well across various types of runs. The Adidas Adizero Evo SL uses Lightstrike Pro foam, which is responsive and suitable for faster paces but feels less stable during long runs.

Which shoe is better for fast-paced runs?

The Adidas Adizero Evo SL is better for fast-paced runs, thanks to its Lightstrike Pro foam, which provides a firmer and more responsive feel. The ASICS NovaBlast 5 is more versatile but doesn’t offer the same level of responsiveness for high-speed running.

How do the uppers of the two shoes compare?

Both shoes feature engineered mesh uppers, but the Adidas Adizero Evo SL has a thinner, lighter mesh that feels more premium and less bulky. The ASICS NovaBlast 5 has a thicker, more padded upper with a gusseted tongue and cushioned heel collar, providing a slightly more secure fit.

Which shoe offers a better fit for the reviewer?

The ASICS NovaBlast 5 offers a better fit for the reviewer. The shoe provides a more secure and locked-down feel around the heel and midfoot, while the Adidas Adizero Evo SL feels a bit loose and less stable, especially around the heel.

What is the overall conclusion about the ASICS NovaBlast 5 vs Adidas Adizero Evo SL?

Overall, the ASICS NovaBlast 5 is the winner, offering better cushioning, fit, and stability for a wide range of runs. The Adidas Adizero Evo SL is suited for faster runs but lacks the versatility and stability needed for everyday training, making the NovaBlast 5 the more reliable and well-rounded option.