'Absolutely outrageous': Weissmann blasts Trump docs case judge’s ‘dead wrong’ ruling
Summary
TLDRこのスクリプトは、ドナルド・トランプ前大統領が任命したフロリダの連邦裁判官キャンディス・キャンノンが、トランプの弁護団が提出した反対意見を擁護し、特別検察官ジャック・スミスが提出した捜査令状に関する発言を禁止する動議を却下した事件に関するものです。スミスはトランプがFBIの捜査に関する虚偽の情報を広めることで、捜査官たちに危険をもたらすと主張しましたが、裁判官は手続き上の理由からその動議を却下し、代わりにスミスに対してより詳細な手続きを求めています。トランプの弁護団は緊急性がないと主張しており、裁判官もその見解を受け入れています。この決定はトランプが裁判を遅延させる戦略に合致しており、裁判官の判断は批判的視点から評価されています。
Takeaways
- 📅 5月20日に予定されていたトランプ氏の裁判は延期され、再開の日程は未定です。
- 👩⚖️ フロリダの連邦裁判所の裁判官キャンノンは、トランプ氏の側に再度有利な判断をしました。
- 🚫 特別捜査官ジャック・スミスはトランプ氏が警察を非難する発言を禁止する動議を提出しましたが、裁判官キャンノンは手続き上の理由でそれを拒否しました。
- 🗣️ トランプ氏はFBIの捜査手続を過激に誤解し、危険な嘘をついていましたが、裁判官キャンノンはそれについて何も言及しませんでした。
- 📚 裁判官キャンノンはジャック・スミスに対して、今後はより適切な手続きを踏まずに緊急動議を提出しないよう指示しました。
- 🤔 ワシントン・ポストは裁判官キャンノンを経験不足で自信がないと評価しており、その慎重な態度が事件の解決を遅らせています。
- 👨💼 国家安全保障弁護士のブラッドリー・モスと元検察官のアンドリュー・ワイスマンがトランプ氏の裁判に関する見解を述べています。
- 🔍 ジャック・スミスはトランプ氏の弁護士と連絡を取り、緊急ではないと判断したと脚注に記載していますが、裁判官キャンノンはその意見を無視しています。
- 📉 トランプ氏の弁護士は裁判官キャンノンに対して、裁判を遅延させる戦略を展開しています。
- 🚨 トランプ氏の発言は警察官の安全に大きな脅威をもたらしており、裁判所はそのリスクを認識する必要があります。
- 📚 ジャック・スミスは裁判官キャンノンに対して、トランプ氏の発言が法執行機関に与える危険についてより具体的に説明する必要があります。
Q & A
ドナルド・トランプ氏が裁判所に対してどのような主張を行ったとされていますか?
-ドナルド・トランプ氏は、FBIの手引きに含まれる文書が暗殺計画だったと主張しましたが、実際にはそのような計画は存在していませんでした。
ジャック・スミス特別検察官はなぜトランプ氏からの激しい発言を禁止する動議を提出しましたか?
-スミス特別検察官は、トランプ氏からの激しい発言が法律執行機関の危険に晒される可能性があると懸念し、その発言を禁止する動議を提出しました。
裁判官キャンノンはなぜスミス特別検察官の動議を却下しましたか?
-裁判官キャンノンは手続き上の理由と、スミス特別検察官がディフェンスと事前協議を行っていないことから動議を却下しました。
裁判官キャンノンはトランプ氏の側に立っているとされていますが、その根拠は何ですか?
-裁判官キャンノンはトランプ氏の弁護士が主張した議論を採用し、ディフェンスと事前協議がないことからスミス特別検察官の動議を却下したため、トランプ氏の側に立っているとされています。
裁判官キャンノンはトランプ氏の裁判に関してどのような批判を受けていますか?
-裁判官キャンノンはニューヨーク・タイムズのプロフィールでは経験不足で不十分とされており、重要な刑事事件を遅延させていると批判されています。
トランプ氏の裁判はいつ予定されていましたか?
-トランプ氏の裁判は5月20日に予定されていましたが、再設定される予定はなく、裁判は延期されているとされています。
トランプ氏の裁判に関して、裁判官キャンノンはどの程度の影響力を持っていますか?
-裁判官キャンノンはトランプ氏の裁判に関して重要な影響力を持ち、多数の前審手続について判断を下しています。
トランプ氏の裁判に関する11回目の巡回裁判所はどのような立場を取っていますか?
-11回目の巡回裁判所は裁判官キャンノンに対して厳しい立場を取っており、彼女の判断を2度も覆しています。
トランプ氏の裁判に関して、政府はどのように対応する予定ですか?
-政府は裁判官キャンノンに対して反論し、裁判に関する重要な問題を再度検討する予定です。
トランプ氏の裁判において、裁判官キャンノンの判断が11回目の巡回裁判所によってどう評価されると予想されますか?
-裁判官キャンノンの判断は11回目の巡回裁判所によって厳しく評価される可能性があり、彼女は裁判から除外されるかもしれないと予想されています。
Outlines
🏛️ 裁判官キャンノンの判断とトランプの弁護団
連邦裁判所は、非合法な機密文書の保管に関するトランプの裁判が予定されていたが、延期され、再設定の兆しも見受けられません。裁判官キャンノンはトランプ任命された裁判官であり、特別捜査官ジャック・スミスがトランプに対して警察に関する過激な発言を禁止する動議を却下しました。トランプはFBIの捜査手続について危険で誤った主張を行い、裁判官キャンノンは手続き上の理由から動議を却下し、スミスに対しては辻詰まりの理由を指摘しました。しかし、裁判官キャンノンはトランプの繰り返しの虚偽主張が警察官に及ぼす危険について何も言及しませんでした。これは裁判官キャンノンによる判断の遅延と事前動議の多数に関連して、重要な刑事事件が未解決の問題の羅列に埋もれています。
📚 裁判官キャンノンの判断批判と法廷での手続き
トランプ前大統領による警察官に対する危険な虚偽主張に関する議論が続きます。裁判官キャンノンはジャック・スミスの動議を却下し、その手続きについて非難していますが、その判断は過剰な自由裁量と批判されています。スミスは裁判官キャンノンに対して、トランプの発言が警察官に危険をもたらすと主張していますが、裁判官キャンノンはその緊急性を認めておらず、トランプの弁護団もその危険性について懸念を示していません。これにより、裁判官キャンノンは裁判の遅延につながり、重要な刑事事件が未解決の問題の羅列に埋もれています。11サーキット裁判所は裁判官キャンノンの判断を2度も覆しましたが、今回の判断が新たな問題をもたらす可能性もあります。
📖 裁判官キャンノンの動議対応と政府の再検討
裁判官キャンノンはジャック・スミスの動議に対処する際に、より詳細な情報を求めています。政府は裁判官キャンノンの要求に応えるために、より詳細な情報を提供し、動議を再検討する必要があります。裁判官キャンノンはトランプの弁護団が緊急性を主張しないことから、その動議を暫定的に却下していますが、政府は裁判官キャンノンに対して、トランプの発言が警察官に及ぼす具体的な危険について詳細に説明する必要があります。裁判官キャンノンはこの問題を慎重に検討し、政府が提供する情報を元に判断を下すでしょう。
Mindmap
Keywords
💡連邦訴訟
💡証拠保全
💡特別検察官
💡裁判所の判断
💡捜索令状
💡脅迫
💡法執行
💡裁判官の経験
💡審判の遅延
💡訴訟手続き
Highlights
Trial date for federal charges related to illegal retention of classified documents has passed without rescheduling.
Florida federal judge appointed by Donald Trump rules in his favor, denying a motion by Special Counsel Jack Smith.
Judge rejects motion on procedural grounds and criticizes lack of professional courtesy in the motion.
Judge Cannon's reluctance to rule decisively on minor matters has led to a backlog of unresolved issues in the case.
Judge Cannon described as industrious but inexperienced, often insecure, and slow in decision-making.
Concerns raised about the risk and danger to law enforcement officials due to Donald Trump's repeated lies.
Discussion on whether the motion to modify bond conditions was handled correctly by Judge Cannon.
Concern that there may be a First Amendment issue raised by Trump's defense regarding his ability to speak.
Andrew Weissmann argues that Judge Cannon is wrong in her decision and that it disregards law enforcement safety.
Bradley Moss suggests that the government should provide more substantial evidence to support their motion.
Judge Cannon has been reversed twice by the 11th Circuit for disregarding national security.
Debate on whether this case could be a tipping point for Judge Cannon's role in the case.
Andrew Weissmann emphasizes the importance of addressing the merits of the case for law enforcement safety.
Bradley Moss calls for a reset and a re-filing of the motion with more substantial evidence.
Concerns about the impact of Judge Cannon's decisions on the pace and direction of the trial.
Transcripts
GO TO TRIAL ON FEDERAL CHARGES RELATED TO ILLEGAL RETENTION OF
CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS LAST MONDAY MAY 20TH THAT TRIAL DATE
HAS COME AND GONE AND IT DOESN'T SEEM LIKE TRIAL WILL BE
RESCHEDULED ANYTIME SOON. AND NOW THE FLORIDA FEDERAL
JUDGE WHO DONALD TRUMP APPOINTED IS ONCE AGAIN RULING
IN HIS FAVOR. IN THE CASE, JUDGE AILING CAN AND DENIED A
MOTION BY SPECIAL COUNSEL JACK SMITH SEEKING TO PROHIBIT
DONALD TRUMP FOR MAKING INFLAMMATORY STATEMENTS ABOUT
LAW ENFORCEMENT AFTER HE PUSHED THE WILD AND DANGEROUS LIE THAT
A STANDARD FBI PROCEDURE DOCUMENT INCLUDED IN THE
MAR-A-LAGO SEARCH WARRANT WAS AN ASSASSINATION PLOT, EVEN
THOUGH THE SEARCH HAD BEEN PLANNED FOR A DAY WHEN TRUMP
WAS 1000 MILES AWAY IN NEW JERSEY,
JUDGE CANNON REJECTED JAX. THAT'S MOTION ON PROCEDURAL
GROUNDS AND REVIEW TO SMITH FOR NOT CONFERRING WITH THE
DEFENSE. FOR THIRDLY WRITING, QUOTE, THE COURT FINDS THE
SPECIAL COUNSEL'S PRO FORMA CAN FOR ALL TO BE WHOLLY LACKING IN
SUBSTANCE AND PROFESSIONAL COURTESY ANY FUTURE. NOT
EMERGENCY MOTION BROUGHT IN THIS CASE SHALL NOT BE FILED.
ABSENT MEANINGFUL, TIMELY AND PROFESSIONAL CAN FOR ALL
THAT'S JUDGE CAN AND TAKING THE SIDE OF DONALD TRUMP'S LAWYERS
WHO MADE THAT ARGUMENT IN THEIR RESPONSE. BUT AS THE WASHINGTON
POST NOTES, SMITH WROTE IN A FOOTNOTE TO THE MOTION THAT
PROSECUTORS CONTACTED TRUMP'S LAWYERS, BUT HIS LAWYERS,
QUOTE, DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE IS ANY IMMINENT DANGER
AND ASKED TO MEET AND CONFER. NEXT MONDAY, JUDGE CANNON SAID
NOTHING ABOUT THE RISK OF THREAT AND DANGER TO LAW
ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS BY DONALD TRUMP'S REPEATED LIES. SO THIS
IS YET ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF JUDGE CANNON SLOW WALKING DECISIONS
ON A GROWING NUMBER OF PRETRIAL MOTIONS IN A NEW PROFILE OF
JUDGE CAN OF THE NEW YORK TIMES DESCRIBES HER AS INDUSTRIOUS
BUT INEXPERIENCED AND OFTEN INSECURE. JUDGE. THIS
RELUCTANCE TO RULED DECISIVELY EVEN ON MINOR MATTERS HAS
PERMITTED ONE OF THE COUNTRY'S MOST IMPORTANT CRIMINAL CASES
TO BECOME BOGGED DOWN IN A LOG JAM OF UNRESOLVED ISSUES.
SHE HAS LARGELY ACCOMPLISHED THIS BY GRANTING A SERIOUS
HEARING TO ALMOST EVERY ISSUE NO MATTER HOW FAR FETCHED THAT
MISTER TRUMP'S LAWYERS HAVE RAISED PLAYING DIRECTLY INTO
THE FORMER PRESIDENT'S STRATEGY OF DELAYING THE CASE FROM
REACHING TRIAL. JOINING US NOW IS BRADLEY MOSS, NATIONAL
SECURITY ATTORNEY WHO REPRESENTS PEOPLE IN THE
INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY. AND ANDREW WEISSMANN IS BACK WITH
US. BRADLEY, I WANT TO START WITH YOU WHEN I LAST SPOKE WITH
YOU. I THINK IT WAS MONDAY, PERHAPS WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY ANY
MOVEMENT FROM JUDGE CANNON AT ALL IN RESPONSE TO JACK SMITH'S
MOTION TO MODIFY DONALD TRUMP'S BOND CONDITIONS. AND THEN WE
GET THIS ORDER, WHICH WAS REMARKABLY INSULTING TO JACK
SMITH. BUT THAT'S PAR FOR THE COURSE. LET ME BE FRANK,
BECAUSE I'VE SEEN JUDGE CANNON WITH THE GOVERNMENT IN COURT.
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT SHE DOES. BUT I TWEETED BRADLEY THAT THIS
IS A FORM OVER SUBSTANCE ISSUE. SHE COULD HAVE SET A HEARING
AFTER DOING A VERY QUICK BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON THIS AND
ADDRESS THE LACK OF COME FOR ALL. BUT JACK'S ACTUALLY CONFER
WITH DONALD TRUMP'S LAWYERS AND THEY SAID WE DON'T THINK IT'S
AN EMERGENCY.
>> IT COMES BACK TO THAT PHRASE THAT WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT
SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THIS PARTICULAR CASE, JUDICIAL
DISCRETION. BUT SURELY WE'RE DEALING WITH PROCEDURAL
MATTERS. SO, YES, THERE WERE CERTAINLY ALTERNATE OPTIONS.
THE JUDGE CANNON COULD HAVE TAKEN ISSUE, CERTAINLY COULD
HAVE SENT A REALLY QUICK BRIEFING SCHEDULE. SHOULD HAVE
ALSO ASKED JACEK SMITH'S TEAM TO SUMMIT DECLARATIONS OR
MULTIPLE DECLARATIONS FROM RELEVANT AGENCY OFFICIALS ABOUT
THE NATURE OF WHAT THEY VIEWED AS THE THREAT FROM THE
STATEMENTS FROM DONALD TRUMP. THAT WAS A HALF. SHE COULDN'T
TAKE IT. SHE CHOSE NOT TO. SHE DIDN'T DO WHAT DONALD TRUMP
Y, WHICH WAS IMMEDIATELY YOU'D OR SOME KIND OF SANCTIONS OF AN
INCH REHEARING. BUT SHE BASICALLY TELL JACK SMITH GO
BACK TO AT LEAST SOMETHING TO SHOW ME A QUOTE, UNQUOTE,
CONFER WITH DONALD TRUMP'S TEAM AND COME FIND ME WITH SOMETHING
MORE. SOME PUT MORE MEAT ON THE BONE BEFORE YOU BRING THIS TO
ME IN A NON-EMERGENCY FOR. IS THAT WITHIN HER DISCRETION?
SURE. OF COURSE, IT WAS A BIT OF AN UNFORCED ERROR BY JACK
SMITH A LITTLE BIT. THEY KIND OF DONE IT A DIFFERENT WAY.
WHAT OTHER JUDGES HAVE DONE WHAT SHE DID? PROBABLY NOT.
>> AND WE HAVE TO SPEAK, FRANKLY, THOUGH, ABOUT WHAT I
THINK IS NOT EVEN A DOUBLE STANDARD HERE. I MEAN, TO
BRADLEY'S POINT, I'M VERY RESPECTFUL OF PROCESS, RIGHT?
THERE'S A PROCEDURE THAT HAS TO BE FOLLOWED. BUT IN THIS
INSTANCE, THIS MOTION TO MODIFY THE BOND CONDITIONS WASN'T
FOLLOWED AND EMERGENT BASIS, BUT IT DOES ALLEGE SOMETHING
THAT IS OF SERIOUS SECURITY AND SAFETY FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT
OFFICERS WHO EXECUTED A DULY AUTHORIZED A SEARCH WARRANT
THAT WAS APPROVED BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE. IT WAS DONE
IN COORDINATION WITH THE UNITED STATES SECRET SERVICE. SO IN
ORDER TO BE ABLE TO CURB WHAT IS HAPPENING WITH TRUMP,
IS THERE FEAR THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE A FIRST AMENDMENT
ISSUE THAT'S GOING TO BE RAISED BY TRUMP'S DEFENSE?
>> WELL, I I CAN'T BELIEVE I'M ABOUT TO SAY THIS, BUT I
DISAGREE WITH BRAD BRADLEY. I I THINK THIS IS
IT'S SOMETHING THAT IS
ABSOLUTELY OUTRAGEOUS. I THINK THIS IS THE KIND OF THING THAT
IS GOING TO BE WHEN SHE ULTIMATELY DENIES A JUDGE.
WHEN JUDGE CANNON DENIES JACKSON, SAP LUCK HAITIAN WHEN
IT'S GETS REFILED, I THINK THIS WILL BE TAKEN UP TO THE 11TH
CIRCUIT. THE THIS IS SOMETHING THAT THE GOVERNMENT OBVIOUSLY
CARES DEEPLY ABOUT. INDEED, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE UNITED
STATES TALKED ABOUT HOW THIS IS A DANGEROUS AND FALSE
MISREPRESENTATION BY THE FORMER PRESIDENT ENDANGERING LAW
ENFORCEMENT IS A KIND OF THING. THAT IS THE REASON THAT YOU GO
INTO GOVERNMENT TO TRY AND PREVENTION TO MAKE SURE THAT
YOU ARE. I'M HOLDING US THAT PEOPLE SAFETY, INCLUDING
THERE'S IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO PUT THEIR LIVES ON THE LINE FOR
HER TO HAVE PUT THIS OFF WHEN IT WAS A MATTER OF SAFETY ON ON
THE GROUND. THAT IS IT'S NOT EVEN A TECHNICAL GROUND THERE
WAS CAN FOR ALL AND FOR THE DEFENSE TO SAY I THE DEFENSE
DON'T THINK THAT'S AN EMERGENCY. THAT'S NOT THE
ISSUE. IT'S AN ISSUE IS THAT AS THE JUDGE THINKS IT'S AN
EMERGENCY. SO I REALLY THINK THIS WAS ONE AWARE THE JUDGE IS
DEAD WRONG. I THINK SHE IS MAKING UP THEIR PROCEDURAL
ISSUE. I THINK IT IS THE KIND OF THING THAT IS GOING TO BE
USED BY JACK'S PAST, RIGHTLY ON APPEAL. AND IT SHOWS THE SAME
KIND OF CAVALIER DISREGARD FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT CAUSE
JUDGE CANNON TO BE REVERSED, NOT ONCE, BUT TWICE BY THE 11TH
CIRCUIT WHEN THIS INVESTIGATION AND CASE WAS JUST BEGINNING.
AND, YOU KNOW, I THINK SHE IS REALLY PLAYING WITH FIRE HERE
AND SHE'S PLAYING, I THINK, WITH PEOPLES LIVES. SO I I
REALLY THINK THIS IS SORT OF OUTRAGEOUS CONDUCT BY SOMEBODY
WHO TOOK AN OATH, THE OFFICE AS WE JUST SAW OFFICER.
>> PROBABLY I'M GOING TO GET A CHANCE TO RESPOND, BUT I I'M
GOING TO OUTNUMBER YOU, I THINK RIGHT NOW BECAUSE I AGREE WITH
ANDREW IT THIS THIS IS A FOREGONE CONCLUSION. WE KNOW
SHE'S GOING TO SAY THAT THIS MOTION CANNOT BE WELL TAKEN BY
JACK SMITH, BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, I THINK SHE'S GOING TO
SAY THAT THERE'S A FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUE HERE IN TERMS
OF THE ABILITY TO SPEAK. BUT THIS DEFINITELY IS A
SERIOUS RISK. SO THE LIVES OF THESE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS
WHO BECAUSE REMEMBER, JACKSON HAS BEEN FIGHTING THE
DISCLOSURE THROUGH THE DISCOVERY PROCESS OF THE
IDENTITIES OF MANY PEOPLE THAT PARTICIPATED IN THIS
INVESTIGATION AS WELL AS HIS PROSECUTION.
>> YEAH. WELL, I HOPE TO SEE WHEN WHEN THE JUST JUST
APARTMENT DOES REFILE THIS ONE, JACK SMITH'S TEAM COMES BACK
WITH A NEW MOTION. I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A LOT MORE SUBSTANCE,
NOT NECESSARILY JUST A BRIEF. I CERTAINLY THINK THEY SHOULD A
PRETTY SOME OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUES THAT PLENTY OF
RULINGS AND ANALYSIS ON THAT IN THE OTHER CASES IN MANHATTAN
AND IN DC THEY CAN USE AS A FOUNDATION BUT PUT SOME MEAT ON
THE BONE AND CALL JUDGE CANNON'S BLOCK. SHE AND THE
TRUMP TEAM HAVE KIND OF, YOU KNOW, WISH YOU'D BEEN
WISHY-WASHY ON THE IDEA THAT THERE'S A THREAT TO PUBLIC
SAFETY IS A THREAT TO LAW ENFORCEMENT GET AGENCY
DECORATIONS IF NEEDS BE SHOW HER, YOU KNOW, SPELL IT OUT TO
ALEXIS. THE 5 YEAR-OLD NEED TO BE. HERE'S THE THREAT. HERE'S
EVERY TIME HE'S MADE THESE REMARKS THAT GOT APPLE FIDE,
VARIOUS MEDIA OUTLETS. HERE'S HOW THE THREAT MATRIX WAS
INCREASED FEARS THAT THEIR VARIOUS THREATS THAT THE AGENCY
HAS RECEIVED, ECCENTRIC CETERA, CALL HER BLUFF ON. THAT GIVES
YOU A MUCH BETTER GROUNDS FOR APPEAL IF SHE WERE TO DENY IT
ON THE MERITS.
>> ANDREW, THERE'S A TIPPING POINT, THOUGH, TO YOUR POINT
THAT THE 11TH CIRCUIT HAS BEEN SLAPPED HER REPEATEDLY. IS THIS
THE ONE THAT IS THE TIPPING POINT TO BE ABLE TO EITHER GET
HER OFF THE CASE OR GET REASSIGNED IN SOME WAY?
>> IT IT MAY BE BETTER. YOU KNOW, THIS IS ONE WHERE I WOULD
SAY AS SOMEBODY WHO USED TO BE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, IT'S MORE
IMPORTANT THAT THE MERITS OF THIS BE DEALT WITH PROPERLY
BECAUSE WE ARE DEALING WITH SAFETY. AND IF IT LEADS TO THE
SECONDARY CALL OF THE 11 CIRCUIT, A SIGHTING, YOU KNOW
WHAT, IT'S THE 3RD STRIKE AND YOU'RE OUT SO BE IT. I WOULD
NOTE THAT IT REALLY IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER THAT WHAT
SHE DID HERE AND HER NOT REALLY GIVING WEIGHT TO BE THE
ALLEGATIONS OF OF HARM TO LAW ENFORCEMENT IS EXACTLY IS
EXACTLY WHAT THE 11TH CIRCUIT DENIGRATED HER DECISIONS ABOUT
WHEN THEY REVERSED HER TWICE, WHICH WAS HER CAVALIER
DISREGARD OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY OF THIS COUNTRY.
THAT IS THAT IS A CORE. WHILE SHE WAS REVERSED TWICE BY THE
CONSERVATIVE PANELS OF THE 11 CIRCUIT SAY THIS IS I THINK
VERY MUCH OF A PEACE. IT WILL HAVE TO WAIT AND SEE INTO THE
SEE WHAT SHE DOES ON HER SOUTH ON THE MOTION AND WHAT THE 11TH
CIRCUIT DOES. BUT I ALSO, BY THE WAY ON THIS, I DO AGREE
THAT BRADLEY, THIS DOES GIVE THE GOVERNMENT A CHANCE TO SEND
A RESET AND FILE THINGS THAT ARE THAT HAVE MORE MEAT ON THE
BAGS. AS BRADLEY SAID,
Weitere ähnliche Videos ansehen
Georgia appeals court indefinitely pauses Trump election subversion case
Can't Read Too Much Into Note: Zeldin on Trump Jury
Jessica Roth on Trump Trial Closing Statements
Trump asks judge to terminate gag order in hush money case
立花孝志裁判終了後、鬼詰め追っかけっこ。ヘイヘイヘイ❕ #立花孝志
Day One of Trump Jury Deliberations Ends | Balance of Power
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)