[FULL] Panas! Bahas Anggaran Kemendikbud, Anggota DPR Fraksi Demokrat Marahi Menteri Nadiem

Summary

In this impassioned speech, the speaker highlights critical issues regarding the mismanagement of the national education budget, particularly the delay in implementing various programs and the lack of support for teachers, such as those in remote areas. The speaker expresses frustration over the inefficiency of the Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemendikbud), calling for accountability and improvements in budget usage. The speech emphasizes the need for proper oversight and verification of data, with a focus on fairness for disadvantaged regions. The speaker urges for a deeper investigation into the misuse of public funds, urging authorities to prioritize the welfare of the people over bureaucratic hurdles.

Takeaways

• 😀 The speaker highlights a budget deficit of 15 trillion, suggesting the need for self-reflection on the use of allocated funds.
• 😀 The speaker questions whether the large budget for 2024 has been properly utilized, criticizing inefficient usage of funds.
• 😀 The issue of budget absorption remains problematic, especially in regions where local governments are facing challenges.
• 😀 There are unresolved issues with teacher appointments, such as the delay in providing SK for teachers who passed the P3K program.
• 😀 Teachers in remote areas are still not receiving their allowances, causing ongoing frustration in these regions.
• 😀 In Kupang, 17 school buildings funded since 2021 remain incomplete, showing a lack of progress despite budget allocations.
• 😀 The speaker stresses the importance of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) intervening to investigate education fund mismanagement.
• 😀 There is frustration with the Ministry of Education's handling of verifications and budget management, with the speaker urging higher-level oversight.
• 😀 The speaker criticizes the idea of local school operators and heads of districts verifying data, suggesting it is inappropriate and counterproductive.
• 😀 There is a call for accountability, with the speaker requesting a KPK investigation into the Ministry of Education's actions and the handling of public funds.
• 😀 The speaker expresses disappointment over the lack of fairness and attention to remote regions, especially concerning access to internet services and support for marginalized schools.

Q & A

What is the main concern raised in the transcript?

The main concern is the poor utilization of the 2024 budget, despite a significant allocation. The speaker highlights issues with budget absorption, unfulfilled promises, and ongoing problems in various sectors, particularly in education.

What specific problems in the education sector does the speaker highlight?

The speaker points out multiple issues, including delays in issuing SK (appointments) for P3K teachers, unfulfilled allowances for teachers in remote areas, and ongoing construction issues in schools that have been pending since 2021.

How does the speaker describe the government's handling of the education budget?

The speaker criticizes the Ministry of Education and Culture for not properly overseeing or utilizing the education budget, resulting in issues such as incomplete school buildings and delays in teacher payments. They also express frustration with the lack of accountability and oversight.

What is the speaker's stance on KPK's recommendation to the Ministry of Education?

The speaker supports the KPK's recommendation to the Ministry of Education and Culture (Kemendikbud), suggesting that the Ministry should take the recommendation seriously and not ignore the issues. They feel that Kemendikbud is not addressing the root causes of problems in the education system.

Why does the speaker express frustration with the verification process proposed by Kemendikbud?

The speaker is frustrated because they believe the verification process is being handled improperly. They argue that the Ministry should verify the data itself, rather than relying on local education authorities (such as school operators and heads of schools), who may not be fully informed or equipped for the task.

What is the speaker's opinion on the transparency of local government officials regarding education funds?

The speaker is skeptical about the integrity of local government officials, specifically district heads (Kepala Dinas), in managing educational funds. They suggest that corruption may be present at the local level and that the true state of affairs can only be understood by speaking directly with recipients of the funds, not just local officials.

How does the speaker view the distribution of resources in Indonesia, particularly in remote areas?

The speaker expresses disappointment in how resources are distributed, particularly in 3T (Tertinggal, Terdepan, Terluar) areas. They emphasize that remote areas are neglected, with issues such as a lack of internet access and insufficient government support for education and other vital services.

What does the speaker believe the government should prioritize moving forward?

The speaker believes the government should focus on ensuring that the allocated budget is used effectively, particularly in education and remote areas. They stress the importance of addressing existing issues before seeking additional funding.

What is the speaker’s overall message regarding accountability in government spending?

The speaker urges greater accountability in the management of public funds, particularly in education. They demand that the government and relevant authorities take responsibility for their actions and ensure that funds reach the people who need them the most, especially in underserved areas.

How does the speaker conclude their speech?

The speaker concludes by expressing hope that the new president will take notice of the issues raised and take action to improve the situation. They reiterate their commitment to advocating for justice and progress for the people of Indonesia.