حاشية الأمير على الجوهرة / تابع حال ايمان المقلد /أ. د. جمال فاروق عميد كلية الدعوة

Summary

This script delves into the concept of blind imitation in faith, particularly focusing on the implications of following the beliefs of others without personal conviction or evidence. It examines the importance of having genuine belief and the consequences of mere imitation, both in this life and in the afterlife. The discourse touches on the opinions of scholars, such as al-Subki, and explores the distinction between following with knowledge and following without proof. It also discusses the rulings on such practices in terms of both worldly and spiritual matters, emphasizing the need for sincere faith and understanding in Islamic teachings.

Takeaways

• 😀 The concept of blind imitation (taqlid) is discussed, emphasizing the difference between imitation without understanding and knowledge-based belief.
• 😀 Faith based on blind imitation is considered valid for worldly matters, but may lead to uncertainty in the afterlife.
• 😀 If a person follows others' beliefs without knowledge and risks falling into doubt or confusion, it is recommended they adhere to imitation (taqlid).
• 😀 Imitation (taqlid) is valid when someone cannot engage in independent reasoning due to a lack of capacity or fear of falling into error.
• 😀 The script explains that faith derived from imitation without understanding may still be accepted for practical, worldly purposes like marriage and inheritance.
• 😀 However, for the afterlife, a deeper, more certain belief is required to avoid the potential consequences of blind faith.
• 😀 The role of religious leaders and scholars in guiding the believer through reasoning and faith is acknowledged, especially in complex religious matters.
• 😀 A person’s belief, based solely on the words of another, is considered valid only if the one they follow is not infallible. Otherwise, imitation becomes invalid.
• 😀 The concept of certainty in faith (jazzm) is highlighted as crucial for a believer's stability in the face of religious trials and questions in the afterlife.
• 😀 The script stresses the importance of understanding the basis of one’s faith rather than simply repeating the words of others without knowledge, especially when facing questions in the grave or after death.

Q & A

What is the concept of 'taqlid' in the context of the script?

'Taqlid' refers to following the beliefs or opinions of others without personal evidence or deep reasoning. In the script, it is discussed in relation to the act of adopting beliefs based on others' convictions rather than independent understanding.

Who is al-Taj al-Subki and what role does his interpretation play in the script?

Al-Taj al-Subki is a renowned Islamic scholar mentioned in the script for his interpretation of 'kashf,' or the revealing of the truth about the state of faith in the believer. His views help clarify the nature of belief and whether it is genuine or merely based on tradition and following others.

What is meant by the term 'kashf' in the script?

'Kashf' refers to the unveiling or revelation of the true state of a person's faith. The script discusses how some scholars, like al-Taj al-Subki, emphasized the importance of 'kashf' in understanding the authenticity of the belief of a follower.

What does the script imply about the consequences of blindly following beliefs (taqlid)?

The script suggests that blindly following beliefs without genuine understanding (taqlid) may lead to a superficial form of faith. This is reflected in the discussion that the follower (mukallid) may not have a complete grasp of their faith, which can affect the authenticity of their belief, especially regarding the afterlife.

What does the script say about the role of reason ('aql) in belief?

The script implies that for a belief to be genuine, it should be based on reason ('aql) and personal understanding. The follower who is capable of reasoning should ideally not engage in taqlid, as they should arrive at their belief independently and avoid following others out of habit or tradition.

How does the script differentiate between faith and Islam in terms of worldly and afterlife consequences?

The script distinguishes between 'faith' (iman) and 'Islam' in terms of the consequences they have in this world and the next. It emphasizes that faith, which is internal and reflects genuine belief, affects one's afterlife, while Islam, represented by outward acts like the declaration of faith, has consequences in the worldly realm, such as legal matters and social status.

What are the implications of not being certain in one's faith during the trial in the grave (fitna al-qabr)?

The script explains that those who are not certain in their faith, as indicated by their inability to give a confident answer about their belief during the trial in the grave (fitna al-qabr), might not pass the test smoothly. This reflects the importance of having a firm and clear belief in Islam to avoid confusion and doubts when questioned.

What is the significance of the distinction between 'genuine faith' and 'mere verbal declaration' of Islam in the script?

The script stresses that a mere verbal declaration of faith without genuine belief behind it is insufficient for salvation in the afterlife. It points out that while outwardly declaring the shahada (testimony of faith) is necessary for worldly matters, true belief must be accompanied by firm conviction for it to have lasting effects in the afterlife.

Why does the script argue that simply believing the word of others ('taqlid') may not suffice in matters of the afterlife?

The script argues that blindly accepting the words of others without understanding or conviction does not lead to genuine faith. True faith requires personal certainty and understanding, which influences the afterlife, while mere imitation can lead to a lack of depth in belief, especially when tested in situations like the grave trial.

What role does the concept of 'imitation' (taqlid) play in the context of Islamic jurisprudence and faith?

In the context of Islamic jurisprudence, 'imitation' (taqlid) plays a role when a person follows the established beliefs or practices of others, especially in matters where they may lack the expertise to independently verify or understand the issues. However, the script highlights that true faith requires personal certainty and not just adherence to others' opinions without understanding.