Why the “born this way” argument doesn't advance LGBT equality | Dr. Lisa Diamond | TEDxSaltLakeCity

Summary

In this talk, the speaker challenges the popular 'Born That Way' argument for LGBT equality, arguing that sexual orientation is not fixed at birth and can be fluid over time. The speaker highlights that this argument is scientifically inaccurate, legally unnecessary, and unjust. While genetic factors may influence sexual orientation, they don't determine it completely. The speaker also critiques how the argument can marginalize bisexual individuals and perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Ultimately, the call for LGBT equality should be based on dignity, autonomy, and equality, rather than on the misconception of being 'born' a certain way.

Takeaways

• 😀 Sexual orientation is not strictly 'born that way'; it can change and show fluidity over time.
• 😀 Many studies have shown that sexual attraction can evolve, with individuals sometimes shifting from exclusive same-sex attraction to attraction to both genders, and vice versa.
• 😀 The argument that sexual orientation is fixed from birth is not scientifically accurate, as genetics only play a role in shaping, not determining, sexual attraction.
• 😀 Twin studies have shown that identical twins can have differing sexual orientations, providing evidence that genetics influence but do not entirely determine sexual attraction.
• 😀 The 'Born That Way' argument, though well-meaning, is not legally necessary for protecting LGBT rights, as courts focus more on whether discrimination is based on rational reasons or prejudice.
• 😀 Legal victories for LGBT equality have been won by focusing on the irrationality of discrimination, not on proving sexual orientation is immutable.
• 😀 The 'Born That Way' argument is unjust because it implies LGBT individuals are somehow flawed or deserving of pity, instead of acknowledging their dignity and autonomy.
• 😀 Over the years, the focus of LGBT advocacy has shifted from proving sexual orientation is biologically determined to demanding equality, dignity, and self-determination.
• 😀 The 'Born That Way' argument unintentionally harms bisexual individuals, who may be dismissed or stigmatized because their sexual attractions are not fixed or are more fluid.
• 😀 It's crucial to support LGBT equality not based on how or why someone is LGBT, but because it's simply the right thing to do, regardless of an individual’s sexual identity or journey.

Q & A

What is the 'Born That Way' argument in relation to LGBT rights?

The 'Born That Way' argument suggests that sexual orientation is innate, like eye color, and that LGBT individuals should not be discriminated against because they are born with their orientation. It has been widely used to promote LGBT equality.

What is the main scientific issue with the 'Born That Way' argument?

The main scientific issue is that sexual orientation is not entirely fixed at birth. While sexual attraction may express itself early, it can also change over time, which contradicts the idea that sexual orientation is completely innate.

How do studies of identical twins challenge the 'Born That Way' argument?

Studies of identical twins show that if one twin is gay, the other twin is gay only 30-40% of the time. This suggests that while genetic factors may influence sexual orientation, they do not fully determine it, highlighting that other factors play a role.

What does sexual fluidity mean in the context of sexual orientation?

Sexual fluidity refers to the changes in sexual attraction that can occur over time. Some individuals may experience shifts in attraction from one gender to another, or may be attracted to both genders at different points in their lives.

What is the legal issue with the 'Born That Way' argument?

The 'Born That Way' argument is not legally necessary for LGBT rights protection. Courts are more focused on whether discrimination against LGBT individuals is based on irrational prejudice, rather than the immutability of sexual orientation.

Why do courts no longer prioritize the immutability of sexual orientation in LGBT legal cases?

Courts have increasingly focused on whether discrimination against LGBT individuals has a rational basis or if it's based on unconstitutional hatred, rather than focusing on whether sexual orientation is fixed at birth.

How does the 'Born That Way' argument create an unjust narrative about LGBT people?

The 'Born That Way' argument implies that being LGBT is a fault or something to be pitied, reinforcing the idea that LGBT individuals are inherently flawed. It also sets up a hierarchy, suggesting those with fixed sexual orientations are more deserving of equality than those with fluid orientations.

What challenges do bisexual individuals face in the context of LGBT acceptance?

Bisexual individuals often face rejection or invalidation from both the straight and LGBT communities. The 'Born That Way' argument can further marginalize them, as it suggests they are less legitimate or deserving of acceptance if their orientation is not fixed.

What is the main ethical stance regarding conversion therapy in relation to sexual fluidity?

Conversion therapy, which seeks to change an individual's sexual orientation, has been discredited and shown to cause harm, including depression and suicide. While sexual attraction may fluctuate naturally, trying to forcefully change it through therapy is ineffective and unethical.

How does the speaker suggest we should approach LGBT equality in society?

The speaker advocates for LGBT equality based on dignity, autonomy, and self-determination. The focus should be on the right to live freely and authentically, regardless of when someone comes out or how their sexual attractions develop.