Drama Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Arbitrase | Fakta yang disembunyikan | Kelompok 10

Summary

This video script follows an arbitration process between PT Terangin Makmur and CV Mitra Telematika Buana over a contract violation regarding unauthorized internet device installation. Despite initial mediation efforts, the dispute continues in arbitration, where both parties present evidence and testimonies. PT Terangin Makmur violated the agreement by using unapproved towers, prompting CV Mitra Telematika Buana to seek compensation. The arbitration panel orders a 500 million Rupiah compensation to CV Mitra Telematika Buana and allows PT Terangin Makmur to retain transmitter usage, with payment due in two months.

Takeaways

• 😀 PT Terang Dian Makmur and CV Mitra Telematika Buana entered into a contract regarding the installation of internet infrastructure.
• 😀 The contract specified that PT Terang Dian Makmur was required to obtain consent from CV Mitra Telematika Buana before installing internet devices.
• 😀 PT Terang Dian Makmur violated the contract by installing devices using a tower built by CV Mitra Telematika Buana without notifying them.
• 😀 Arbitration was chosen as the method to resolve the dispute after failed mediation attempts.
• 😀 The arbitration process involved submitting evidence, witness testimony, and discussions between both parties.
• 😀 The hearing included multiple sessions, with one focused on mediation, and others on presenting evidence and testimony from witnesses.
• 😀 CV Mitra Telematika Buana filed the arbitration case, claiming a breach of contract by PT Terang Dian Makmur.
• 😀 The witnesses provided crucial testimonies, confirming the breach and explaining the context of the agreement and installation process.
• 😀 The arbitration panel decided that PT Terang Dian Makmur should compensate CV Mitra Telematika Buana with 500 million Rupiah for the unauthorized use of the tower.
• 😀 Both parties retained certain rights regarding the equipment involved, and the payment for damages was set to be completed within two months.
• 😀 The final decision was made after a thorough review of the case, and both parties agreed to abide by the ruling based on existing legal procedures.

Q & A

What is the main issue discussed in the arbitration case?

The main issue is a dispute between PT Terangin Makmur and CV Mitra Telematika Buana regarding a breach of contract over the unauthorized installation of internet equipment using a tower built by CV Mitra Telematika Buana.

What breach of contract occurred in this case?

PT Terangin Makmur violated the agreement by installing internet devices without notifying CV Mitra Telematika Buana, using a tower that was not authorized for such use.

What was the role of arbitration in resolving the dispute?

Arbitration was used to mediate the conflict between the two companies. Despite a failed initial mediation, the case proceeded to arbitration, where both sides presented evidence and testimonies to reach a decision.

What was the outcome of the arbitration process?

The arbitration panel decided that CV Mitra Telematika Buana would receive 500 million Rupiah in compensation for the unauthorized use of its tower, while PT Terangin Makmur was allowed to retain the right to use the transmitter.

What legal process did the arbitration case follow?

The case followed a legal process involving mediation, arbitration, and the presentation of evidence. After unsuccessful mediation, the case proceeded with arbitration to resolve the breach of contract.

How did the arbitration panel determine the compensation amount?

The arbitration panel determined that CV Mitra Telematika Buana should receive 500 million Rupiah as compensation for the unauthorized use of its tower based on the breach of contract by PT Terangin Makmur.

How long did PT Terangin Makmur have to pay the compensation?

PT Terangin Makmur was required to pay the 500 million Rupiah compensation within two months.

What was the nature of the agreement between PT Terangin Makmur and CV Mitra Telematika Buana?

The agreement between the two companies involved the installation of internet devices, with specific terms regarding the use of equipment and towers, particularly ensuring that PT Terangin Makmur did not install devices without permission from CV Mitra Telematika Buana.

What was the outcome of the mediation attempts in this case?

The mediation attempts were unsuccessful, as no resolution was reached between the two parties, leading them to proceed with arbitration to resolve the dispute.

What is the role of a witness in an arbitration case?

In this case, witnesses provided testimony regarding the agreement and the breach of contract, offering key insights into the actions of both parties, including knowledge of the installation process and the terms of the agreement.