Trump trial ends with 'f-bombs': Cohen pressed in tirades against 'mob boss Trump'
Summary
TLDRThe video script discusses Michael Cohen's testimony against Donald Trump, highlighting the defense's efforts to undermine his credibility. Cohen, a former loyalist to Trump, is portrayed as a key witness whose testimony could significantly impact the case. The defense lawyers, led by Todd Blanche, attempt to cast doubt on Cohen's reliability by questioning his motives, past lies, and his public actions during the trial, such as selling merchandise that criticizes Trump. The script also touches on the jury's perception, emphasizing that they may be hearing about Cohen's actions for the first time and how this could influence their view of his testimony. The defense's strategy is to create reasonable doubt about Cohen's trustworthiness, suggesting that his testimony may be driven by personal interests rather than objective truth. The summary concludes by noting that while the defense's cross-examination was not a disaster for Cohen or the prosecution, it was not entirely favorable either, leaving the outcome of the trial uncertain.
Takeaways
- 📰 Michael Cohen has been a strong witness against defendant Trump, with his testimony marking a significant point in the case.
- 💼 The defense lawyers are attempting to undermine Cohen's credibility, highlighting his past lies and current actions.
- 🤝 Cohen's relationship with Trump is questioned, with suggestions of it being a 'psychodramatic' one that might have affected his testimony.
- 💰 The defense points out Cohen's financial interests, including his merchandising and potential earnings from the case, as reasons to doubt his testimony.
- 📈 Cohen's shift from loyalist to star witness is portrayed as suspicious by the defense, aiming to raise doubts about his motives and reliability.
- 🚫 The defense questions Cohen's compliance with the trial's rules, pointing out his public attacks on Trump during the trial via social media.
- 🗣️ Cohen's past lies and his admission to them are emphasized by the defense to create reasonable doubt about his current claims.
- 👕 Evidence of Cohen's merchandising, including a 'Jail Trump' shirt, is presented to the jury to suggest a personal vendetta against Trump.
- 📉 The defense's cross-examination aims to create reasonable doubt in the jury's mind, potentially affecting the outcome of the trial.
- 🤔 The jury is considered to be hearing many details about Cohen for the first time, which could significantly influence their perception and decision.
- 📚 The defense suggests that some of Cohen's crimes were unrelated to Trump, casting doubt on the narrative that all his actions were at Trump's behest.
Q & A
Who is Michael Cohen and what role has he played in the case against Defendant Trump?
-Michael Cohen is a former attorney for Donald Trump and has been a key witness against him in a legal case. His testimony has been significant, marking the official finale of the case, and he has provided evidence such as check stubs, fake receipts, and inside knowledge that has potentially hurt Defendant Trump's case.
What was the defense's strategy during Michael Cohen's cross-examination?
-The defense aimed to undermine Cohen's credibility. They suggested doubts about his truthfulness, his relationship with Trump, and his motivations. They highlighted Cohen's prior dishonesty, his public statements during the trial, and his commercial activities related to the case, such as selling merchandise, to cast doubt on his testimony.
What was the significance of the check stubs and fake receipts in the case?
-The check stubs and fake receipts were used as evidence of financial wrongdoings. They are indicative of potential fraudulent activities and are part of the case against Defendant Trump, showing a pattern of deception and dishonesty.
How did Michael Cohen's public statements and media appearances impact his credibility as a witness?
-Cohen's public statements and media appearances, including his podcast and the sale of merchandise related to the case, were used by the defense to suggest that he was monetizing the case and had a personal vendetta against Trump. This was intended to create reasonable doubt about his objectivity and truthfulness as a witness.
What was the defense's argument regarding Cohen's potential for bias or personal interest in the outcome of the case?
-The defense suggested that Cohen might say anything to anybody depending on his personal interests at the time. They questioned whether he could be trusted, especially since he admitted to wanting Trump to be convicted and was making money off the Trump relationship and the trial.
What was the impact of the defense's questioning on the jury's perception of Michael Cohen?
-The defense's questioning aimed to create reasonable doubt in the jury's mind about Cohen's credibility. By highlighting his past lies, his commercial activities related to the case, and his public attacks on Trump, the defense tried to paint Cohen as a witness who might be motivated by personal interests rather than truth.
What was the reaction of the judge to Cohen's public statements during the trial?
-The judge rebuked Cohen through his lawyers for his public statements, indicating that such behavior was not in line with the expectations of a witness in a trial.
How did the defense attempt to diminish Cohen's transformation from a loyalist to a star witness?
-The defense questioned Cohen's transformation as if it were suspicious, suggesting that he was a person who would say anything to anybody depending on his personal interests, and that the government couldn't possibly build a case beyond a reasonable doubt based on his testimony.
What was the significance of the merchandise that Cohen was selling in relation to the case?
-The merchandise, such as the 'Jail Trump' t-shirts, were used by the defense to argue that Cohen had a financial incentive to see Trump convicted. This was part of their strategy to cast doubt on his motives and credibility as a witness.
What was the general consensus among observers regarding the effectiveness of the defense's cross-examination?
-While some observers felt that the defense's cross-examination was effective in raising doubts about Cohen's credibility, others noted that Cohen remained composed and that the defense's lines of attack were scattered. It was not considered a disaster for Cohen or the prosecution, but it also wasn't seen as particularly beneficial for them.
What are the potential implications for the case if the jury is left with reasonable doubt after hearing Cohen's testimony?
-If the jury is left with reasonable doubt, it could lead to an acquittal or a hung jury. The defense's strategy to highlight inconsistencies in Cohen's testimony and his financial interests in the outcome of the case could make it difficult for the prosecution to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt.
Outlines
📛 Defense Lawyers Challenge Cohen's Credibility
The first paragraph of the video script focuses on Michael Cohen's role as a key witness against Donald Trump and the efforts by defense lawyers to undermine his testimony. Cohen is portrayed as a strong witness with inside knowledge that could hurt Trump. However, the defense lawyers aim to introduce reasonable doubt by highlighting Cohen's imperfections as a witness, including his combative demeanor, past lies, and potential for vindictiveness. The paragraph also mentions Cohen's public statements and merchandise sales, which the defense argues could compromise his testimony's reliability. The jury's perception of Cohen's motives and trustworthiness is central to this part of the trial.
🎥 Cohen's Merchandise and its Impact on the Case
The second paragraph delves into the strategy of the defense team, emphasizing how they use Cohen's actions outside the courtroom, such as selling merchandise that mocks Trump, to cast doubt on his character and intentions. The defense suggests that Cohen's commercial activities and public statements during the trial could indicate a biased vendetta against Trump rather than a genuine pursuit of justice. The paragraph also discusses the potential impact of these tactics on the jury's perception, considering that they are hearing much of this information for the first time. It concludes by suggesting that while the defense's efforts did not completely discredit Cohen, they succeeded in introducing elements that could lead to reasonable doubt.
💼 The Jury's Perception of Cohen's Testimony
The third paragraph discusses the challenges the prosecution faces in presenting Cohen as a credible witness, given his history of lying and the jury's potential skepticism. It highlights the complexity of the situation, with the defense painting Cohen as a 'Hall of Fame Liar' whose testimony is suspect due to his personal gain from the case's outcome. The paragraph also touches on the jury's common sense and life experience, which could lead them to question the authenticity of Cohen's claims, especially when coupled with his post-conviction activities like selling Trump-related merchandise. The defense's goal is to make the jury doubt the truthfulness of Cohen's testimony, which could significantly influence the outcome of the trial.
Mindmap
Keywords
💡Michael Cohen
💡Defendant Trump
💡Cross-examination
💡Credibility
💡Star Witness
💡Prosecutors
💡Reasonable Doubt
💡Social Media
💡Jury
💡Trump Merchandise
💡Intent
Highlights
Michael Cohen has been a strong witness against defendant Trump, driving headlines about his testimony that has marked the official finale of this case.
Cohen is the last witness, with check stubs, fake receipts, and inside knowledge now hurting defendant Trump.
Defense lawyers began an effort to blunt Cohen's testimony and undercut his credibility.
Attorney Todd Blanche's first question set a combative tone, and Cohen kept his composure despite months of preparation.
If prosecutors fail to convict Trump, it will likely turn on the cross-examination of Cohen.
The defense suggested doubts about whether Cohen's story is the whole truth and questioned his relationship with Trump.
The lawyers questioned whether Cohen is so bitter that his claims have become unreliable.
Cohen admitted his goal is to see Trump convicted in this case.
The defense questioned why the jury should trust Cohen's fidelity to the trial if he wouldn't honor requests to stop attacking Trump on social media.
The defense tried to diminish and liquidate the credibility that Cohen has.
The defense suggested Cohen may say anything to anybody depending on his personal interests that day.
Cohen's shift from loyalist to star witness is being questioned by the defense.
The jury is hearing new details about Cohen that may jog their memory.
Cohen's podcast and merchandise were shown to the jury as evidence.
The defense is trying to paint Cohen as vindictive and bent on revenge against Trump.
Some questions floated theories that don't undercut Cohen, such as how he wanted out of prison early.
Cohen's monumental flip on Trump occurred before he went to federal prison.
Today was not a disaster for Cohen or the prosecution, but it wasn't good for them either.
The defense is building reasonable doubt in the jury's mind about this star witness.
The jury will hear about Cohen's lies and redemption, and how some of his crimes have nothing to do with Trump.
The defense questioned whether the jury can believe Cohen's testimony when he has skin in the game and is making money off the defendant.
Transcripts
>>> TURNING TO OUR SPECIAL
>>> TURNING TO OUR SPECIAL
REPORT.
THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT MICHAEL
COHEN HAS BEEN A STRONG WITNESS
AGAINST DEFENDANT TRUMP.
DRIVING HEADLINES ABOUT HIS
TESTIMONY THAT HAS BASICALLY
MARKED THE OFFICIAL FINALE OF
THIS CASE.
HE'S THE LAST WITNESS.
YOU CAN SEE THE CHECK STUBS, THE
FAKE RECEIPTS, THE LOYALTY, THE
INSIDE KNOWLEDGE THAT IS NOW
HURTING DEFENDANT TRUMP.
TODAY THE DEFENSE LAWYERS GOT
THEIR TURN.
THEY BEGAN AN EFFORT TO BLUNT
COHEN'S TESTIMONY, UNDERCUT HIS
CREDIBILITY.
ATTORNEY TODD BLANCHE'S FIRST
QUESTION QUOTED COHEN CALLING
BLANCHE AN EXPLETIVE.
IT SET THE COMBATIVE TONE AND
COHEN KEPT HIS COMPOSURE.
HE'S BEEN PREPARING FOR MONTHS.
IF PROSECUTORS FAIL TO CONVICT
TRUMP, IT WILL LIKELY TURN ON
THIS CROSS-EXAMINATION OF COHEN
TODAY AND THURSDAY BECAUSE HE'S
NOT A PERFECT WITNESS.
THIS IS THE DEFENSE'S CHANCE TO
NOT JUST TALK ABOUT REASONABLE
DOUBT, BUT TO REALLY RAISE THE
DOUBTS IN THE JURY'S MIND ABOUT
THIS STAR WITNESS AND
CO-CONSPIRATOR.
THE DEFENSE SUGGESTED MANY
DIFFERENT DOUBTS.
IS COHEN'S STORY THE WHOLE
TRUTH?
DID HE HAVE AN UNHINGED
PSYCHODRAMA
PSYCHODRAMA
PSYCHODRAMATIC RELATIONSHIP WITH
DONALD TRUMP?
AT ONE POINT THE LAWYER ASKED
AND COHEN ACKNOWLEDGED HIMSELF
AS A CULT FOLLOWER.
IS MICHAEL COHEN SO BITTER, EVEN
UNDERSTANDABLY BITTER, THAT HIS
CLAIMS HAVE BECOME UNRELIABLE?
CAN HE BE TRUSTED, THE LAWYERS
ASKED, IF COHEN ADMITS PUBLICLY
THAT HIS GOAL IS TO SEE TRUMP
CONVICTED IN THIS CASE?
WHEN HE WAS ASKED ABOUT THIS
WITHIN THE LAST FEW HOURS, HE
SAID, SURE, YEAH, I WANT THE
CONVICTION.
HERE'S ANOTHER QUESTION.
DOES COHEN STILL LIE TO
INVESTIGATORS BECAUSE HE'S DONE
THAT BEFORE?
SINCE HE'S MAKING MONEY OFF THE
TRUMP RELATIONSHIP AND THIS VERY
TRIAL, CAN HIS TESTIMONY BE
TRUSTED?
THEN ONE OF THE MORE DAMAGING
LINES OF QUESTIONING TODAY, WHY
SHOULD THE JURY TRUST MICHAEL
COHEN'S FIDELITY TO THIS TRIAL
AND ITS RULES AND THE FAIR
PROCESS IF HE WOULDN'T EVEN
HONOR BASIC REQUESTS FROM
PROSECUTORS TO STOP DOING THE TV
AND THE TIKTOKS AND THE SOCIAL
MEDIA WHERE HE WOULD ATTACK
TRUMP UP THROUGH THIS VERY
TRIAL?
AS JOURNALISTS WE WELCOME THESE
PEOPLE.
WE INTERVIEW THEM.
LEGALLY, I HAVE TO TELL YOU
THAT'S A FAIR QUESTION.
THE JUDGE HAS EVEN REBUKED COHEN
THROUGH HIS LAWYERS FOR ALL OF
THE PUBLIC STATEMENTS.
NOW KNOWN OF THESENONE OF THESE
DEAL BREAKER, BUT THE DEFENSE
LAWYERS ARE TRYING TO DIMINISH
AND LIQUIDATE THE CREDITBILITY
THAT COHEN HAS AND THE
PROSECUTORS MORE LINEAR
QUESTIONS ABOUT HOW HE WENT FROM
LOYALIST TO THIS STAR WITNESS.
REMEMBER, THE JURY'S NOT MADE OF
HIGHLY INFORMED NEWS AND POLITIC
JUNKIES.
THEY'RE HEARING DETAILS ABOUT
COHEN THAT ARE NEW TO THEM.
THE DEFENSE HARPED ON COHEN'S
SHIFT AS IF IT WERE SUSPICIOUS.
THEY SUGGESTED THROUGH THE
QUESTIONING TODAY THAT HE'S A
PERSON WHO WILL MAYBE SAY
ANYTHING TO ANYBODY DEPENDING ON
HIS PERSONAL INTERESTS THAT DAY
AND THAT THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T
POSSIBLY HANG A CASE BEYOND A
REASONABLE DOUBT ON A WITNESS
LIKE THIS TO PROVE A DEFENDANT'S
INTENT ABOUT SCHEMES THAT COHEN
HELPED PULL OFF.
>> I KNOW MR. TRUMP.
I'VE STOOD BY HIM SHOULDER TO
SHOULDER FOR THE PAST DECADE.
DONALD CARES FOR NO ONE OR
ANYTHING OTHER THAN HIMSELF.
I'M OBVIOUSLY VERY LOYAL AND
DEDICATED TO MR. TRUMP.
I'M GOING TO JAIL.
I THINK HE'S GOING TO BE A GREAT
PRESIDENT.
BECAUSE OF MY DECISION TO HELP
MR. TRUMP HIDE THAT PAYMENT.
>> THAT'S A BACK AND FORTH THAT
WE'VE ALL FOLLOWED.
FOR THIS JURY, A LOT OF THE
DETAILS ARE PRETTY NEW AND MIGHT
JOG A MEMORY HERE AND THERE.
A LOT OF IT IS LIKE, WHOA.
THEY'RE HEARING TWO COMPETING
VERSIONS OF THE SAME STORY.
ONE IS OF COURSE THIS GUY
SHIFTED.
WHO WOULDN'T?
LOOK WHAT HE WENT THROUGH AND
THEN WENT TO PRISON.
NOW HE HAS EVERY REASON TO TELL
THE TRUTH.
THE OTHER STORY IS THIS GUY
MIGHT HAVE GONE TO PRISON FOR
HIS OWN REASONS, MIGHT HAVE
ENDED UP IN PRISON ANYWAY.
LOOK HOW HE'S ACTING NOT THEN
AND NOT AFTER THE BREAK, LOOK
HOW HE'S ACTING IN THE NEXT FEW
WEEKS.
SOME OF THIS EVIDENCE LEGALLY IS
NOT AS IMPORTANT AS THE SECRET
TAPES OR FINANCIAL RECEIPTS THAT
DEFENDANT TRUMP IS FACING.
IT WAS NOTABLE.
INSIDE THE COURTROOM TODAY I SAW
JURORS WATCHING CLOSELY AS MANY
OF THEM SAW, POSSIBLY FOR THE
FIRST TIME, HOW COHEN'S PODCAST
ARM -- HE HAD THIS PODCAST AND
SELLS THIS T-SHIRT.
THIS WAS SHOWN TODAY AND
ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE TO THE
JURY.
THIS WASN'T JUST A PERSON WHO
HAS AN ANGER WITH TRUMP, BUT
HE'S LOOKING AT THE PRESUMED
INNOCENT FORMER PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES STUCK BEHIND BARS
AND IMAGINED INCARCERATION ALL
YOURS FOR THE PRICE OF $27.99 OR
WHATEVER IT WAS.
OTHER ITEMS THAT COHEN SELLS ARE
ADMITTED INTO EVIDENCE.
THE LAWYER ASKED COHEN ABOUT
WHAT YOU'RE SEEING HERE.
I WANT TO BE CLEAR, THIS WAS
REFERENCED.
THEY DIDN'T PLAY THIS VIDEO IN
COURT.
WE PULLED IT FOR YOU.
MICHAEL COHEN WEARING THAT SAME
JAIL TRUMP SHIRT AND HE DID IT
DURING THE TRIAL ON ONE OF HIS
INTERNET LIVE STREAMS.
AS WITH STORMY DANIELS THE
LAWYERS ARE TRYING TO PAINT THIS
WITNESS AS SO VINDICTIVE, BENT
ON REVENGE AGAINST SOMEONE HE
USED TO LIKE THAT MAYBE YOU
CAN'T TAKE HIM AT HIS WORD.
ALSO, WE SHOULD NOTE SOME OF
THESE QUESTIONS FLOAT THEORIES
THAT DON'T UNDERCUT COHEN.
THEY ASKED HOW HE WANTED OUT OF
PRISON EARLY.
MOST PEOPLE IN PRISON WANT OUT.
COHEN'S MONUMENTAL FLIP ON TRUMP
OCCURRED BEFORE HE WENT TO
FEDERAL PRISON.
THAT LINE OF QUESTIONING DOESN'T
GET YOU ANYWHERE.
THERE ARE OTHER OBSERVERS WHO,
EVEN WITH EVERYTHING I TOLD YOU,
FOUND THIS LACKING, THAT THE
LINES OF ATTACK WERE ALL OVER
THE PLACE AND NOTING HOW COHEN
KEPT HIS COOL.
TODAY WAS NOT A DISASTER FOR
MICHAEL COHEN OR THE
PROSECUTION.
BUT I WOULD TELL YOU, AT LEAST
FROM OBSERVING IT INSIDE THE
ROOM AND FOLLOWING ALONG, IT
WASN'T GOOD EITHER FOR THEM.
IF THIS IS ALL FAIRLY NEW,
HEARING QUESTIONS ABOUT COHEN
LINING AND ADMITTING LIES AND
VARYING LEVELS OF MEMORY AND IF
YOU'RE A JUROR HEARING ALL THAT
FOR THE FIRST TIME AND HEARING
HOW HE'S HAWKING THE TRUMP
JUMPSUIT MERCH, THAT WOULDN'T BE
GOOD FOR ANY WITNESS, LET ALONE
A STAR WITNESS WHO IS PROVING
INTENT.
WE'RE FOLLOWING THIS TRIAL
TOGETHER.
IF LATER THEY FAIL TO CONVICT,
ACQUITTAL OR HUNG JURY, YOU
WON'T BE THAT SURPRISED ABOUT
THE POSSIBLE REASONS WHY.
I'M NOT SAYING THEY EXPLODED THE
CASE.
TODAY WAS ONE OF THOSE DAYS
WHERE YOU COULD SEE REASONABLE
DOUBT BEING BUILT.
NONE OF THIS WAS A KNOCK-OUT.
IT CAN GIVE THE JURORS THE
EXAMPLES, THINGS YOU CAN
REMEMBER, THE T-SHIRT TO SUPPORT
REASONABLE DOUBT, ESPECIALLY IF
SOME JURORS ALREADY HAD SOME.
MY POINT IS NOT WHETHER THAT'S
GOOD OR BAD NEWS.
IT WOULD DEPEND ON WHAT YOU
THINK IS FAIR.
HOW YOU FEEL ABOUT IT.
IT'S PART OF WHAT IS HAPPENING
IN THIS TRIAL.
HOW WILL TRUMP ATTORNEYS
CONTINUE THEIR CROSS-EXAMINATION
OF THIS CALM VERSION OF MICHAEL
COHEN?
WE HAVE A SEASONED DEFENSE
ATTORNEY WHO REPRESENTED TRUMP
IN THE SECOND IMPEACHMENT.
HE ALSO REPRESENTED THE TRUMP
ORGANIZATION IN A FRAUD CASE.
WILLIAM J. BRENNAN.
BILL, RACHEL WAS WATCHING THE
REMARKS HERE LAST NIGHT AND
MENTIONED THEM.
TAKE A LOOK.
>> I WAS INTERESTED IN YOUR
SPECIAL COVERAGE TODAY.
YOU HAD A GUEST ON WHO WAS VERY
BULLISH ON THE DEFENSE AND SAID
THAT, YOU KNOW, MICHAEL COHEN IS
GOING TO GET DESTROYED ON
CROSS-EXAMINATION.
>> I WALKED THROUGH SOME OF WHAT
THEY TRIED TO DO TODAY.
YOUR THOUGHTS?
>> GOOD EVENING.
THANKS FOR HAVING ME.
YOU KNOW, IT'S REALLY
COMPLICATED.
WHEN I LISTENED TO YOUR LAST
PANEL, LANNY DAVIS IS A WELL
RESPECTED SEASONED MEMBER OF THE
BAR THAT I HAVE RESPECT FOR.
REPRESENTATIVE CUMMINGS WAS A
GIANT, RESPECTED BY BOTH SIDES
OF THE AISLE.
REVEREND SHARPTON SAID WONDERFUL
THINGS ABOUT MR. COHEN.
THE PROBLEM IS THE JURY WON'T
HEAR THAT.
THE JURY WILL JUST HEAR THERE'S
LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE, THEN A
REDEMPTION, THEN MORE LIES AND
THE NARRATIVE THE PROSECUTION IS
TRYING TO SELL THAT IT'S ALL
DONE AT THE BEHEST OF TRUMP
FALLS FLAT BECAUSE SOME OF THE
CRIMES HE PLED GUILTY TO, LYING
TO THE IRS, THE BANKRUPTCY
COURT, THE THINGS RELATED TO THE
TAXES, HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
TRUMP OR THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION.
WHAT IF THE JURY THINKS THIS GUY
WOULD HAVE WOUND UP IN PRISON
ANYWAY?
I DON'T SEE ANY OTHER LOGICAL
DEDUCTION THAT'S POSSIBLE AND,
YOU KNOW, THIS GUY REALLY --
IT'S ONE THING TO HAVE A WITNESS
THAT LIES AND YOU WORK AROUND
IT, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE THE
PROSECUTOR AND GET IT OUT THERE.
THIS GUY'S LIKE AN OLYMPIC GOLD
MEDAL WINNER.
HE'S A HALL OF FAME LIAR.
IT'S A LOT TO WORK AROUND.
WHEN THE JURY SEES THAT AND
JUDGE MERCHAN INSTRUCTS THEM ON
THIS CHARGE WHICH SAYS, IF YOU
THINK HE LIED ON ONE THING, YOU
CAN FIND THAT HE LIED ON
EVERYTHING.
WHEN YOU PACKAGE THAT LIKE THE
DAILY DOUBLE WITH THE MERCH, THE
T-SHIRTS, THE BOOKS, HE'S
SHOPPING A REALITY SHOW AS WE
SPEAK CALLED "THE FIXER," JURIES
ARE SMART.
THEY GET IT.
IT'S A LOT OF COMMON SENSE AND
LIFE EXPERIENCE.
WHEN THEY SEE A WITNESS, A
POLLUTED SOURCE LIKE THIS THAT
NOT ONLY IS A LIAR AND HAS SKIN
IN THE GAME, HE'S MAKING MONEY
OFF THE DEFENDANT, IF THE
DEFENDANT'S CONVICTED, HE'S
LIKELY TO MAKE MORE MONEY, I
DON'T SEE HOW THEY CAN GIVE HIS
TESTIMONY THE -- SAY IT HAS THE
RING OF TRUTH.
>> FROM A DEFENSE PERSPECTIVE,
WHAT DID YOU THINK THEY WERE
TRYING TO SHOW WITH THE T-SHIRTS
AND MONETIZING?
>> JUST THAT.
YOU KNOW, YOU WANT A WITNESS TO
SAY -- SAY IT'S A BANK ROBBERY.
THESE ARE THE GUYS THAT DROVE
THE BANK.
THEY DROVE A GRAY SEDAN.
THE WEATHER WAS CLOUDY.
THAT'S IT.
YOU DON'T WANT SOMEONE TO SAY I
Weitere verwandte Videos ansehen
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/-wfwHlhjx6g/hq720.jpg)
Donald Trump’s hush money trial nears its end
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/aKVU0opDXQA/hq720.jpg)
‘Beyond thin skinned, rude’: Andrew Weissmann tears into Trump’s defense team’s performance
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/6GXKkjSSETQ/hq720.jpg)
Catch and Kill no more: Hush Money trial set to expose jury to lies Trump wanted to hide from voters
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/e7ucp8wP2xw/hqdefault.jpg?sqp=-oaymwEXCJADEOABSFryq4qpAwkIARUAAIhCGAE=&rs=AOn4CLDqDDo2FfN4M7MTMu1Yv0N-NxcSQQ)
Trump gets bad news amid effort to appeal $83 million verdict
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/H7CFLdG8PbY/hq720.jpg)
Trump throws tantrum on Day 1 after judge denies him from attending SCOTUS arguments next week
![](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yzytLBon-HY/hq720.jpg)
There Will Never Be Another Movie Like Borat
5.0 / 5 (0 votes)