STOs and Security Tokens Explained (simply)

Outlines

00:00

🤔 Was ist eine STO? ICOs und ihre Unterschiede

Der erste Absatz stellt die grundlegenden Begriffe und die Fragestellungen ein, die im Video behandelt werden. Es wird erklärt, dass eine STO (Security Token Offering) eine Art von ICO (Initial Coin Offering) ist, bei der es um Sicherheitstoken geht, die als Investitionen dienen und Dividenden oder Gewinne bringen. Der Absatz stellt auch die Unterschiede zwischen Sicherheits- und Nutzwert-Tokens dar und erklärt, warum diese Unterscheidung wichtig ist. Der Sprecher, Nate Martin, begrüßt das Publikum und lädt zum Abonnieren des Kanals ein, bevor er in die Erörterung von ICOs einsteigt, die Unternehmen nutzen, um durch den Verkauf von Kryptowerten, sogenannten Tokens, Kapital zu generieren.

05:02

📈 ICOs im Vergleich zu STOs und IPOs

Der zweite Absatz vergleicht ICOs mit STOs und IPOs (Initial Public Offerings). ICOs werden als schnelle und unregulierte Methode zur Kapitalbeschaffung beschrieben, die jedoch auch für Betrug und Fehler anfällig ist. Im Gegensatz dazu sind IPOs ein langwieriger und teurer Prozess, der von seriösen Unternehmen durchgeführt wird. STOs bieten einen Mittelweg dar, indem sie Sicherheitstoken an die Öffentlichkeit verkaufen, ohne den langen und anstrengenden Prozess eines IPOs zu durchlaufen. Der Absatz erklärt auch, wie STOs durch bestimmte Ausnahmen von der SEC-Registrierung befreit sind, wie zum Beispiel die Regulierung D, die Crowdfunding-Regulierung und die Regulierung A. Jeder dieser Regulierungen hat unterschiedliche Anforderungen und Grenzen für die Beteiligung von Investoren und das Kapital, das angehoben werden kann.

10:02

🔐 Vorteile und Nachteile von STOs

Der dritte Absatz diskutiert die Vor- und Nachteile von STOs. Er hebt hervor, dass STOs durch die Implementierung von Regulierungen und Überwachung das Risiko von Betrug reduzieren. Im Gegensatz zu ICOs, die auf unregulierten Börsen gehandelt werden, werden STOs auf verifizierten Börsen gehandelt. Darüber hinaus ermöglichen STOs es Investoren, auf eine größere Bandbreite von Anlageklassen zuzugreifen, da fast jede Art von Vermögenswert tokenisiert werden kann. Von der Perspektive des Fundraisings aus können Unternehmen eine breitere Zielgruppe von Investoren erreichen, da digitale Wertpapiere leicht über Grenzen hinweg beworben und übertragen werden können. Allerdings kritisieren einige, dass STOs in bestimmten Fällen nur für akkreditierte Investoren zugänglich sind, was die breitere Öffentlichkeit ausschließt. Der Lock-up-Zeitraum und die Kosten der Compliance können auch Investoren und Unternehmen davon abhalten, an STOs teilzunehmen. Der Sprecher schließt mit der Aussage, dass STOs für frühe Adopter geeigneter sind, die in etwas Neues und Aufregenderes investieren möchten, während sie gleichzeitig eine gewisse Maßnahme an Investorenschutz bieten.

Transcripts

What is an STO?

Is it “the new” ICO?

What’s the difference between a security token and a utility token?

Why is it even important?

Well stick around,

in this episode of Crypto Chiteboard Tuesday we’ll answer these questions and more.

Hi, I’m Nate Martin from 99Bitcoins.com and welcome to Crypto Whiteboard Tuesday

where we take complex cryptocurrency topics, break them down

and translate them into plain English.

Before we begin don’t forget to subscribe to the channel

and click the bell so you’ll immediately get notified

when a new video comes out.

Today’s topic are Security Tokens and Security Token Offerings

or STOs for short.

But before we dive in, we first need to understand what ICOs are.

An Initial Coin Offering, or ICO for short,

takes place when a company sells cryptographic assets known as tokens

in order to raise funds for its operations.

The tokens being sold play a role in the project

and those who buy in early are getting them at a discount,

assuming the project succeeds.

The company usually opens the sale of tokens for a limited time frame

until the money they need to raise is reached.

A good analogy for an ICO would be selling $1 casino chips at 80 cents a chip

in order to build the new casino.

If the casino comes to life the investors made a wise investment.

A good example of an actual ICO would be Ethereum,

where Ether - the token used to power the Ethereum network -

was sold to investors before the network launched,

in order to fund the project.

Tokens in general are divided into two categories -

utility tokens and security tokens.

Utility tokens are tokens that promise the future use of a product or service.

They aren’t meant to be an investment, they have a utility.

One example that might be considered a utility token of sorts

would be a starbucks gift card.

If you buy it at a discount,

you’re not really expecting to make a profit by selling the gift card.

Effectively, you’ve prepaid for, and expect at a later date,

a cup of coffee.

Security tokens on the other hand,

are tokens that represent tradable financial assets,

for example a share or a bond from a company.

Security tokens are meant as a form of investment,

they pay dividends, share profits

or pay interest in a way that promises future profit.

Put simply, utility tokens promise a product or a service

while security tokens promise profit.

While ICOs started out with good intentions,

people quickly started seeing the opportunity for easy money

and used this mechanism to fuel their greed.

In 2017 the ICO frenzy reached its peak.

Billions of dollars were invested in so called utility tokens

that had as little as a piece of paper describing some obscure future venture.

Of course the overwhelming majority of these projects

never saw the light of day and a lot of investors lost their money.

Back then the ICO field was completely unregulated

and quite the number of scams and manipulations emerged.

Investors pumped up the price of specific tokens just to dump all of their holdings

once everyone else bought in.

Other cases included companies that just completely vanished, along with the money,

once the ICO ended and the money was raised.

Instead of a creative way to raise capital,

ICOs quickly became a workaround to avoid regulation.

Companies that wanted to avoid the long, expensive regulatory path

toward the traditional Initial Public Offering or IPO

just conducted an ICO instead.

Nobody asks for permission to run an ICO,

you just set up a website, some tokens and start selling them to the general public.

Also, unlike an IPO,

you’re not giving away any control over your company or profits

since you’re supposedly selling tokens

that only promise future use of your currently non existing product.

As things got out of hand, public complaints increased,

companies like Google and Facebook

banned all ICO projects from advertising on their platforms

and regulators stepped in.

The regulators wanted to investigate whether these so called tokens

shouldn’t be in fact considered as securities.

And if so, are the companies behind them

meeting the requirements to allow them to sell securities.

You see, in the US there’s a simple test called the “Howey Test” that is used to decide

if what someone is selling should be considered a security.

It states that a transaction is considered a security sale,

if a person invests his money in a common enterprise

and is led to expect profits solely from the efforts of the promoter or a third party.

We can break this long and confusing sentence down to four main questions:

One - Was there an investment of money?

In the case of ICOs the obvious answer is yes.

Two - Was this investment done in a common entreprise?

Since ICOs raise money for a company which is considered a common enterprise

the answer is also yes.

Three - Was there an expectation of profit?

Well, this is a very interesting question,

since a company can always claim that its tokens were meant for utility only.

However, when you look at the token market

you can clearly see that people are buying tokens in the morning

and then selling them in the afternoon.

Meaning tokens are bought in order to sell them for a profit.

So depending on the specific case this could be a yes or a no.

And four - are the profits connected directly to efforts of a person or entity

who are not the investor?

This question is a bit confusing, so here are some other ways to look at it:

“Is there a person, that isn’t the investor,

who is in charge of making this venture succeed?”

You could also ask “Is this a passive process for the investor?”

In most cases the answer to these would be a solid “Yes”

as the investor’s involvement in the project ends

usually once he or she invested funds and got tokens in return.

Bitcoin, for example, doesn’t fall under this category

since there’s no one person making the decisions.

Many open source projects can have the benefit of the doubt

since you can’t say that there is one person calling the shots,

it’s more of a group effort

and that disqualifies them from the fourth question.

So while most companies classified their token as utility tokens

in order to avoid security regulations,

when they were reviewed by the authorities,

almost all of them were said to be selling securities.

As a result many ICO companies were subject to legal actions

including hefty fines and even jail time.

Today, most ICOs aren’t open to the public because of the fear of regulators

and are privately funded by small groups of investors.

So there you have it,

on the one hand we have ICOs -

A completely unregulated form of raising money from all around the world,

that’s fast and easy to execute and is filled with scams, frauds

and just plain negligence.

And on the other hand IPOs -

A long, expensive, exhausting road of raising money from investors

by vetted, legit companies.

But today,

there’s a new type of offering called a Security Token Offering or STO.

A kind of middle ground between an ICO and an IPO.

Let me explain.

An STO is the process of selling security tokens to the public

while avoiding the long exhausting process of an IPO.

There are no utility tokens in STOs

and everyone participating is considered an investor.

STOs are intended to be compliant with Anti Money Laundering requirements

and securities laws.

You might be wondering how are STOs possible?

How can you sell securities without regulatory oversight?

The answer is through exemption.

In the US for example,

you’re exempt from registering with the SEC if you fall into one of three regulations.

Regulation D, Regulation Crowdfunding or regulation A.

Regulation D means that STOs are exempt from registering with the SEC

if they raise money only from accredited investors,

meaning anyone with a net worth of $1 million or more

or with an annual income of $200,000 or more in the last two years.

The company can raise an unlimited amount of money

in this manner.

Regulation Crowdfunding states both accredited and non-accredited investors

can participate in the offering,

but there is an annual limit to how much an STO can raise -

and that's $1,070,000

Both regulation D and regulation CrowdFunding have a one year lockup limit.

This means that investors need to wait for one whole year

before selling their security.

This is done to prevent pump and dump schemes and protect other investors.

Regulation A+ means the offering must be qualified by the SEC,

sort of a mini IPO.

Once it is approved,

everyone can participate in the STO, which is limited to $50,000,000.

There is no lock up period for a Regulation A+ exemption.

You could buy and sell your tokens in the same day

just like you currently can with cryptocurrencies.

So, once a company falls into any one of these regulations,

it can sell security tokens as part of an STO,

with no threat from the SEC coming down on it to shut it down

and throw the proprietors into jail.

So are STOs a good thing?

STOs have a lot of advantages.

For starters,

they remove the threat of scams

through the implementation of regulation and oversight.

While ICOs were traded on shady and unregulated exchanges,

STOs are traded on verified exchanges.

Also, STOs open up bigger markets for investors

since almost every asset class type can be tokenized.

From the fundraiser’s perspective,

a wider audience of investors can be reached,

as digital securities are easily marketed and transferred across borders.

Of course many people think STOs are a bad thing since in some cases,

regulation D for example,

they offer the investment to accredited investors only.

This seemingly excludes the Main Street investor

while allowing only the rich to benefit.

On top of that,

the lockup period and cost of compliance

may deter many investors and companies from participating in STOs.

In the end, STOs have various pros and cons.

I believe that at this point in time,

they are more suited for early adopters,

who are looking to invest in something new and exciting

while still subject to some oversight,

which offers a certain degree of investor protection.

These are just the early days of STOs

and as we move forward,

more and more companies, not just crypto related,

are thinking about how they can “tokenize” their assets

in order to raise funds.

Well, that’s it for today’s episode of Crypto Whiteboard Tuesday.

Hopefully by now you understand what Security Tokens and STOs are -

A way to tokenize tradable financial assets and offer them to the public

in a responsible regulated process.

You may still have some questions.

If so, just leave them in the comment section below.

And if you’re watching this video on YouTube, and enjoy what you’ve seen,

don’t forget to hit the like button.

Then make sure to subscribe to the channel

and click that bell so that you’ll be notified as soon as we post new episodes.

Thanks for joining me here at the Whiteboard.

For 99bitcoins.com,

I’m Nate Martin, and I’ll see you… in a bit.