NEW: Judicial Watch Threatens Oregon with Lawsuit to Clean Up Dirty Voter Rolls!

Summary

Judicial Watch is taking significant steps to enhance election integrity, having facilitated the removal of 4 million names from voter registration lists in the U.S. within the last two years. Their lawsuits in states like Illinois and California target inaccurate and inactive voter registrations, highlighting a lack of compliance with the National Voter Registration Act in Oregon, where many counties reported zero removals of ineligible voters. Emphasizing transparency and accountability, Judicial Watch is committed to ensuring clean voter rolls and is prepared to pursue legal action to uphold these standards, urging citizens to engage in the conversation on election integrity.

Takeaways

• 😀 Judicial Watch has successfully removed 4 million names from U.S. voting rolls over the past two years.
• 🗳️ The organization is currently engaged in major lawsuits in Illinois and California to enforce clean voter registration processes.
• ⚖️ Judicial Watch warns that Oregon is violating the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) by not properly maintaining its voter rolls.
• 📬 Voter registrations should be canceled if individuals fail to respond to address confirmation notices and do not vote in two consecutive federal elections.
• 📊 Many counties in Oregon reported zero removals of ineligible voter registrations between November 2020 and November 2022.
• 🔍 The letter sent to Oregon's Secretary of State highlights the need for transparency and public access to voter roll maintenance records.
• ❌ Inactive voter registrations can still participate in elections, posing a risk for potential voter fraud.
• 📋 Judicial Watch encourages citizens to request public records related to voter registration maintenance in their jurisdictions.
• 🔗 High voter registration numbers in some Oregon counties compared to eligible voters suggest a lack of compliance with legal maintenance requirements.
• ⚔️ Judicial Watch is committed to litigating for election integrity and will continue its efforts to address failures in voter roll maintenance.

Q & A

What role does Judicial Watch play in maintaining election integrity?

Judicial Watch is actively involved in legal efforts to ensure the accuracy of voter registration lists and to promote clean and fair elections in the United States. They have successfully facilitated the removal of millions of names from voter rolls and are currently pursuing lawsuits against states that are not compliant with federal election laws.

How many names has Judicial Watch helped to remove from voting rolls recently?

Judicial Watch has contributed to the removal of approximately 4 million names from voting rolls in the last year or two.

What specific legal requirements does the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) impose on states?

The NVRA requires states to conduct regular maintenance of their voter registration lists to remove ineligible voters, specifically those who have died or changed their residence. This includes sending confirmation notices to registrants who have not voted in recent elections.

What concerns does the speaker express regarding the voter registration rates in Oregon?

The speaker highlights that many counties in Oregon reported zero removals of voter registrations despite federal requirements. This raises concerns about the accuracy of the voter rolls and the potential for ineligible voters to participate in elections.

What is the process for removing a voter from the rolls under the NVRA?

A voter's registration can be canceled if they confirm a change of address in writing or if they do not respond to a confirmation notice and fail to vote in the next two consecutive federal elections.

What legal actions is Judicial Watch currently undertaking?

Judicial Watch is involved in major lawsuits against Illinois and California to enforce compliance with the NVRA and is prepared to take action against Oregon if it does not clean up its voter registration lists.

What does the speaker indicate about inactive voter registrations?

The speaker notes that inactive registrations may still vote on Election Day, which poses a risk for electoral fraud. They emphasize the importance of having clean voter rolls to prevent such situations.

How does the speaker justify the need for accurate voter rolls?

The speaker argues that inaccurate voter rolls can lead to opportunities for voter fraud and undermine public confidence in election outcomes. They emphasize that maintaining clean lists is not just a legal requirement but a matter of electoral integrity.

What are some examples of states that have recently cleaned up their voter rolls?

Judicial Watch mentions that states like California, New York, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and Kentucky have taken actions to clean up their voter rolls, often in response to lawsuits or legal pressure.

What implications does the speaker see in states counting ballots after Election Day?

The speaker believes that counting ballots that arrive after Election Day undermines election integrity and provides opportunities for fraud, arguing that federal law should clearly define Election Day as the cutoff for counting votes.